Definite Familial Hypercholesterolemia Research Articles

Clinical Diagnostic Criteria of Familial Hypercholesterolemia - A Comparison of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society and Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria.

This study is aimed to compare the efficacy of the 2017 Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) criteria, which focuses on only 3 essential clinical manifestations, with that of Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) FH criteria, which adopts a scoring system of multiple elements.Methods and Results:A total of 680 Japanese dyslipidemic participants (51% men) were enrolled between 2006 and 2018, all of whom had full evaluations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, Achilles tendon X-rays, family history records, and genetic analysis of FH-associated genes (LDLR,APOB, andPCSK9). Predictive values for the existence of FH mutations by both clinical criteria were evaluated. Overall, 173 FH patients were clinically diagnosed by using the 2017 JAS criteria and 100, 57, 156, and 367 subjects were also diagnosed as having definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH by the DLCN FH criteria, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio predicting the presence of FH mutations by using the 2017 JAS FH criteria were 19.8 and 0.143, respectively; whereas, using the DLCN criteria of definite, probable, and possible FH, the ratios were 29.2 and 0.489, 9.70 and 0.332, and 3.43 and 0.040, respectively. Among Japanese patients, the JAS 2017 FH criteria is considered superior to diagnose FH mutation-positive patients and simultaneously rule out FH mutation-negative patients compared with the DLCN FH criteria.

Genetic Analysis in a Taiwanese Cohort of 750 Index Patients with Clinically Diagnosed Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Aim: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is underdiagnosed in most countries. The genetic heterogeneity of FH requires an algorithm to efficiently integrate genetic testing into clinical practice. We aimed to report the spectrum of genetic mutations from patients with clinically diagnosed FH in Taiwan. Methods: Patients with LDL-C＞190 mg/dL or those with probable or definite FH according to the Taiwan Lipid Guidelines underwent genetic testing. Samples from 750 index patients from the Taiwan FH registry were screened using custom-made mass spectrometry, followed by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) and/or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) if found negative. Results: The mean age of the patients was 52.4±15.1 years and 40.9% were male. Mutations were detected in 445 patients (59.3%). The distribution of mutations was as follows:LDLR (n=395),APOB (n=58),PCSK9 (n=0), andABCG5 (n=3). The most common mutations wereAPOB c.10579 C＞T (p.R3527W) (12.6%),LDLR c.986 G＞A (p.C329Y) (11.5%), andLDLR c.1747 C＞T (p.H583Y) (10.8%).LDLR c.1187-10 G＞A (IVS 8-10) andAPOB c.10580 G＞A (p.R3527Q) were detected using targeted NGS in Taiwan for the first time. Four novel mutations were identified, includingLDLR c.1060＋2 T＞C (IVS 7＋2),LDLR c.1139 A＞C (p.E380A),LDLR c.1322 T＞C (p.A431T)＋c.1867 A＞G (p.I623V), and ABCG5 c.1337 G＞A (p.R447Q). Conclusion: LDLR andAPOB, but notPCSK9, mutations were the major genetic causes of FH. Four novel mutations inLDLR orABCG5 were identified. This genetic screening method using mass spectrometry, targeted NGS, and MLPA analysis provided an efficient algorithm for genetic testing for clinically diagnosed FH in Taiwan.

Founder effects facilitate the use of a genotyping-based approach to molecular diagnosis in Swedish patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

To investigate whether genotyping could be used as a cost-effective screening step, preceding next-generation sequencing (NGS), in molecular diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) in Swedish patients. Three hundred patients of Swedish origin with clinical suspicion of heterozygous FH were analysed using a specific array genotyping panel embedding 112 FH-causing mutations in the LDLR, APOB and PCSK9 genes. The mutations had been selected from previous reports on FH patients in Scandinavia and Finland. Mutation-negative cases were further analysed by NGS. In 181 patients with probable or definite FH using the Dutch lipid clinics network (DLCN) criteria (score ≥ 6), a causative mutation was identified in 116 (64%). Of these, 94 (81%) were detected by genotyping. Ten mutations accounted for more than 50% of the positive cases, with APOB c.10580G>A being the most common. Mutations in LDLR predominated, with (c.2311+1_2312-1)(2514)del (FH Helsinki) and c.259T>G having the highest frequency. Two novel LDLR mutations were identified. In patients with DLCN score < 6, mutation detection rate was significantly higher at younger age. A limited number of mutations explain a major fraction of FH cases in Sweden. Combination of selective genotyping and NGS facilitates the clinical challenge of cost-effective genetic screening in suspected FH. The frequency of APOB c.10580G>A was higher than previously reported in Sweden. The lack of demonstrable mutations in the LDLR, APOB and PCSK9 genes in ~1/3 of patients with probable FH strongly suggests that additional genetic mechanisms are to be found in phenotypic FH.

Identification of familial hypercholesterolemia in acute coronary syndrome patients: are we missing the mark?

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Patients (P) with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have considerable elevation in levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and a higher risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, even in a hospital setting with a high volume of ACS P, the diagnosis of FH frequently goes undetected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) Criteria in P admitted for ACS and analyse ACS recurrence, hospitalization and mortality in a 30-day follow-up. Methods Retrospective evaluation of P with ACS admitted to a tertiary center from 2005 to 2019. Data from the digital files including family history and laboratory tests was analysed and P were followed up for 30 days for hospitalization, recurrent ACS, all cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) death. Evaluation of tendinous xanthomata, arcus cornealis and genetic analysis was not undertaken. Results 3811 P were evaluated, mean age 63 ± 13 years, 28% female gender, 1497 P (39%) with active or previous smoking habits, 847 P (22%) with diabetes mellitus, 419 P (11%) with family history of coronary disease, 1340 P (35%) with premature CAD, 53 P (1.4%) with premature cerebral or peripheral vascular disease and 522 (14%) with previous ACS. The mean LDL cholesterol level was 125 ± 43 mg/dL, the mean high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level was 40 ± 16 mg/dL and the mean triglyceride level was 132 ± 89 mg/dL. The diagnosis at hospital admission was unstable angina (UA) in 189 P (5%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in 1024 P (27%) and ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) in 2598 P (68%). The hospital mortality rate was 4.3% (163P). Applying the DLCN criteria, 3089 P (81%) had a score of &amp;lt;3 ("unlikely FH"), 675 P (17.7%) a score of 3 to 5 ("possible FH"), 41 P (1.1%) a score of 6 to 8 ("probable FH") and 1 P (0.03%) a score of &amp;gt;8 ("definite FH"). Stratifying according to ACS type: among UA, 31 P (16%) had "possible FH" and 4 P (2.1%) had "probable FH". Among NSTEMI, 145 P (14.2%) had "possible FH", 9 P (0.9%) "probable FH" and 1 P (0.03%) had "definite FH". Finally, among STEMI P, 497 P (19.1%) had "possible FH" and 28 P (1.1%) had "probable FH". In a 30-day follow-up, there was an all cause mortality of 2% (78 P) and a CV death of 1.3% (49P), while the all cause hospitalization rate was 3.5% (134P) and the admission rate for recurrent ACS was 1.7% (65P). The DLCN criteria score was significantly correlated with CV death (OR 1.25, CI 95% 1.04-1.50, p = 0.020) and admission for recurrent ACS (OR 1.19, CI 95% 1.04-1.36, p = 0.04). Conclusion Application of the DLCN criteria in P admitted for ACS revealed 675 P (17.7%) with "possible FH" and 41 P (1.1%) with "probable FH" as well as show significant correlation with CV death and recurrent ACS. Routine assessment of these criteria can be an accessible tool to stratify likelihood of FH and proceed accordingly to genetic testing.

Systematic Identification of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care-A Systematic Review.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited cause of premature cardiovascular disease, but the majority of patients remain undiagnosed. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions to systematically identify FH in primary care. No randomised, controlled studies were identified; however, three non-randomised intervention studies were eligible for inclusion. All three studies systematically identified FH using reminders (on-screen prompts) in electronic health records. There was insufficient evidence that providing comments on laboratory test results increased the identification of FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria. Similarly, using prompts combined with postal invitation demonstrated no significant increase in definite FH identification using Simon-Broome (SB) criteria; however, the identification of possible FH increased by 25.4% (CI 17.75 to 33.97%). Using on-screen prompts alone demonstrated a small increase of 0.05% (95% CI 0.03 to 0.07%) in identifying definite FH using SB criteria; however, when the intervention was combined with an outreach FH nurse assessment, the result was no significant increase in FH identification using a combination of SB and DLCN criteria. None of the included studies reported adverse effects associated with the interventions. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to determine which is the most effective method of systematically identifying FH in non-specialist settings.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in the Malaysian Community: Prevalence, Under-Detection and Under-Treatment.

Aim: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common autosomal dominant lipid disorder, leading to severe hypercholesterolaemia. Early detection and treatment with lipid-lowering medications may reduce the risk of premature coronary artery disease in FH patients. However, there is scarcity of data on FH prevalence, detection rate, treatment and control with lipid-lowering therapy in the Malaysian community. Methods: Community participants ( n =5130) were recruited from all states in Malaysia. Blood samples were collected for lipid profiles and glucose analyses. Personal and family medical histories were collected by means of assisted questionnaire. Physical examination for tendon xanthomata and premature corneal arcus were conducted on-site. FH were clinically screened using Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria. Results: Out of 5130 recruited community participants, 55 patients were clinically categorised as potential (Definite and Probable) FH, making the prevalence FH among the community as 1:100. Based on current total population of Malaysia (32 million), the estimated number of FH patients in Malaysia is 320,000, while the detection rates are estimated as 0.5%. Lipid-lowering medications were prescribed to 54.5% and 30.5% of potential and possible FH patients, respectively, but none of them achieved the therapeutic LDL-c target. Conclusion: Clinically diagnosed FH prevalence in Malaysian population is much higher than most of the populations in the world. At community level, FH patients are clinically under-detected, with majority of them not achieving target LDL-c level for high-risk patients. Therefore, public health measures are warranted for early detection and treatment, to enhance opportunities for premature CAD prevention.

Coronary artery calcium score assessment in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

In the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, coronary artery calcium (CAC) score assessment may be considered as a risk modifier. It seems that CAC score is often very low in patients younger than 45 with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). We assessed the relationship between CAC score and FH. Analysis was based on patients consecutively referred to a Department of Preventive Cardiology and having a CAC score assessed ( n = 1402). FH was diagnosed using the modified version of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN). LDL-C was corrected for patients under statin or ezetimibe using dose- and statin- or ezetimibe-specific correction factors. FH was considered as definite, probable, possible or unlikely for a total > 8, equal to 6–8, 3–5 or < 3 points, respectively. DLCN score was assessed in 1157 patients. CAC score was significantly associated with DLCN score: 21%, 29%, 18%, and 32% of the patients with FH (DLCN score for definite or probable FH; n = 38) versus 39%, 29%, 18% and 14% of the patients without FH (DLCN score for possible or unlikely FH; n = 1119) had a CAC score equal to 0, 1-100, 101-400 and > 400, respectively ( P = 0.009). Factors independently associated with a CAC > 400 were age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lipid-lowering treatment and definite or probable FH. Among patients with FH < 45 years, CAC was > 0 for 40% of patients. Among patients with FH, 11% had premature CVD and 68% were treated. Mean corrected LDL-C was 9.8 mmol/L (± 2.3) and 4.1 mmol/L (± 1.3) in patients with and without FH, respectively ( P < 0.0001). None of the patients with FH reached the LDL-C goal. In patients with FH that were not treated, 67% had a CAC > 0 (25%, 17% and 25% with a CAC equal to 1-100, 101-400 and > 400, respectively). In patients with definite or probable FH, CAC may refine CV risk assessment and may be helpful in discussions about treatment strategies.

Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Premature Atherosclerotic Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1/200 - 1/500 in the general population. Early identification of patient with familial hypercholesterolemia is important, because appropriate treatment may reduce the risk of premature atherosclerosis. Objective: Assessment of the prevalence of different modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and clinical diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Methods: One hundred patients were enrolled, included young patients (males less than 50 years and females less than 60 years old) presented with first attack of acute coronary syndrome either ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA). All patients were subjected to full history taking, general and local examination, Electrocardiogram, transthoracic Echocardiography, laboratory investigations, coronary angiography and Dutch score calculation for familial hyperlipidemias. Results: The mean level of serum cholesterol among studied group was 268.31 ± 59.33, HDL-C was 39.63 ± 7.52, LDL was 192.27 ± 60.61 and TG was 180.10 ± 39.64. With application of Dutch score, 20% of patients diagnosed definite familial hypercholesterolemia with Dutch score > 8. Twenty-six percent of patients diagnosed as probable familial hypercholesterolemia with Dutch score 6 - 8. Thirty-nine percent patients diagnosed as possible familial hypercholesterolemia with Dutch score 3 - 5 and 15% of patients were unlikely familial hypercholesterolemia with Dutch score 3 with significant correlation between Dutch score and age, total cholesterol, LDL-C, serum creatinine. Conclusion: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most common serious genetic disorders of cholesterol metabolism. The early identification of heterogynous FH patients is crucial to start an effective prevention strategy.

Identification of novel variants in the LDLR gene in Russian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia using targeted sequencing

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is caused by mutations in various genes, including the LDLR, APOB and PSCK9 genes; however, the spectrum of these mutations in Russian individuals has not been fully investigated. In the present study, mutation screening was performed on the LDLR gene and other FH-associated genes in patients with definite or possible FH, using next-generation sequencing. In total, 59 unrelated patients were recruited and sorted into two separate groups depending on their age: Adult (n=31; median age, 49; age range, 23-70) and children/adolescent (n=28; median age, 11; age range, 2-21). FH-associated variants were identified in 18 adults and 25 children, demonstrating mutation detection rates of 58 and 89% for the adult and children/adolescent groups, respectively. In the adult group, 13 patients had FH-associated mutations in the LDLR gene, including two novel variants [NM_000527.4: c.433_434dupG p.(Val145Glyfs*35) and c.1186G>C p.(Gly396Arg)], 3 patients had APOB mutations and two had ABCG5/G8 mutations. In the children/adolescent group, 21 patients had FH-causing mutations in the LDLR gene, including five novel variants [NM_000527.4: c.325T>G p.(Cys109Gly), c.401G>C p.(Cys134Ser), c.616A>C p.(Ser206Arg), c.1684_1691delTGGCCCAA p.(Pro563Hisfs*14) and c.940+1_c.940+4delGTGA], and 2 patients had APOB mutations, as well as ABCG8 and LIPA mutations, being found in different patients. The present study reported seven novel LDLR variants considered to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Among them, four missense variants were located in the coding regions, which corresponded to functional protein domains, and two frameshifts were identified that produced truncated proteins. These variants were observed only once in different patients, whereas a splicing variant in intron 6 (c.940+1_c.940+4delGTGA) was detected in four unrelated individuals. Previously reported variants in the LDLR, APOB, ABCG5/8 and LIPA genes were observed in 33 patients. The LDLR p.(Gly592Glu) variant was detected in 6 patients, representing 10% of the FH cases reported in the present study, thus it may be a major variant present in the Russian population. In conclusion, the present study identified seven novel variants of the LDLR gene and broadens the spectrum of mutations in FH-related genes in the Russian Federation.

Screening for potential familial hypercholesterolaemia in general practice: an observational study on prevalence and management.

BackgroundFamilial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder causing premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The estimated prevalence of probable or definite FH is 1:200–250 individuals, according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria for FH. In Denmark approximately 12% of cases are identified.AimTo provide knowledge of the prevalence and management of FH in general practice.Design & settingA collaboration between six general practice clinics and the department of cardiology at Bispebjerg hospital in Denmark.MethodA total of 9652 patient records were screened for hypercholesterolaemia. All patients with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥5.0 mmol/l were included in the study population and their records were investigated in order to perform a diagnostic score according to the DLCN criteria.ResultsIt was found that 2382 individuals had a lipid measurement available, and 236 of those had an LDL-C ≥5.0 mmol/l. In total, 34 individuals were found to have probable or definite FH (DLCN score ≥5). Only three individuals had been diagnosed and treated with lipid-lowering therapy. Of 236 individuals with high LDL-C, only 25 individuals met their treatment target. By excluding patients with signs of secondary hypercholesterolaemia, a subgroup of 115 individuals with potential primary hypercholesterolaemia was established. Among those, 21 individuals were found to have probable or definite FH (1:114 individuals).ConclusionThe study shows that there is a massive lack of recognition of FH in general practice. Despite a measured high LDL-C, the diagnosis is rarely made and only a few patients are treated accordingly. Of the patients undergoing treatment, only a few reached their treatment target.

A service evaluation: impact of nurse-led regional familial hypercholesterolaemia service on a hospital adult lipid clinic.

Patients with a lipid clinic diagnosis of definite and possible FH based on the SBR criteria were referred to a nurse-led regional service for FH genetic testing. 140 patients were referred for genetic testing. Six had SBR-definite FH due to the presence of tendon xanthomata and 134 had SBR-possible FH. A monogenic FH mutation was detected in all six patients (100%) with SBR-definite FH and in 34 (25%) of patients with possible FH. The appropriate use of molecular genetics in a lipid clinic will greatly facilitate the management of hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular risk since the management of FH patients (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline 71) is different from non-FH patients (NICE Clinical Guideline 181).

Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome. Insights from CholeSTEMI Registry.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an underdiagnosed genetic inherited condition that may lead to premature coronary artery disease (CAD). FH has an estimated prevalence in the general population of about 1:313. However, its prevalence in patients with premature STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) has not been widely studied. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of FH in patients with premature STEMI. Cardiovascular risk factors, LDLc (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) evolution, and differences between genders were also evaluated. Consecutive patients were referred for cardiac catheterization to our center due to STEMI suspicion in 2018. From the 80 patients with confirmed premature CAD (men < 55 and women < 60 years old with confirmed CAD), 56 (48 men and eight women) accepted to be NGS sequenced for the main FH genes. Clinical information and DLCN (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network) score were analyzed. Only one male patient had probable FH (6–7 points) and no one reached a clinically definite diagnosis. Genetic testing confirmed that the only patient with a DLCN score ≥6 has HF (1.8%). Smoking and high BMI the most frequent cardiovascular risk factors (>80%). Despite high doses of statins being expected to reduce LDLc levels at STEMI to current dyslipidemia guidelines LDL targets (<55 mg/dL), LDLc control levels were out of range. Although still 5.4 times higher than in general population, the prevalence of FH in premature CAD is still low (1.8%). To improve the genetic yield, genetic screening may be considered among patients with probable or definite FH according to clinical criteria. The classical cardiovascular risk factors prevalence far exceeds FH prevalence in patients with premature STEMI. LDLc control levels after STEMI were out range, despite intensive hypolipemiant treatment. These findings reinforce the need for more aggressive preventive strategies in the young and for intensive lipid-lowering therapy in secondary prevention.

Feasibility and cost of FH cascade screening in Belgium (BEL-CASCADE) including a novel rapid rule-out strategy

Background Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is underdiagnosed in most countries. We report our first experience from a national pilot project of cascade screening in relatives of FH patients. Methodology Participating specialists recruited consecutive index patients (IP) with Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score ≥6. After informed consent, the relatives were visited by the nurses to collect relevant clinical data and perform blood sampling for lipid profile measurement. FH diagnosis in the relatives was based on the DLCN and/or MEDPED FH (Make-Early-Diagnosis-to-Prevent-Early-Deaths-in-FH) criteria. Results In a period of 18 months, a total of 127 IP (90 with definite FH and 37 with probable FH) were enrolled in 15 centres. Out of the 270 relatives visited by the nurses, 105 were suspected of having FH: 31 with DCLN score >8, 33 with DLCN score 5-8 and 41 with MEDPED FH criteria. In a post-hoc analysis, another set of MEDPED FH criteria established in the Netherlands and adapted to Belgium allowed to detect FH in 51 additional relatives. Conclusion In a country with no national FH screening program, our pilot project demonstrated that implementing a simple phenotypical FH cascade screening strategy using the collaboration of motivated specialists and two nurses, allowed to diagnose FH in 127 index patients and an additional 105 of their relatives over the two-year period. Newly developed MEDPED FH cut-offs, easily applicable by a nurse with a single blood sample, might further improve the sensitivity of detecting FH within families.

Awareness, treatment rates, and compliance to treatment in patients with serum LDL cholesterol higher than 250 mg/dL, and possible, probable, or definite familial hypercholesterolemia

ABSTRACT Purpose Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease characterized by increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). It is underdiagnosed and undertreated despite relatively high prevalance and significant association with increased mortality. We aimed to determine treatment status and compliance in patients with LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL and FH. Design Patients older than 18 years old and have a serum LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL between January 2010 to December 2016 were identified from the hospital database. A phone survey was performed. Demographic features, smoking status, alcohol use, exercise, cardiovascular disease (CVD), use of medication for dyslipidemia, and CVD and high cholesterol levels in the family were questioned. Dutch Lipid Clinical Network Criteria was used to classify patients. The study was registered to Clinicaltrials.gov in July 2020 (NCT04494464). Results 1365 patients with a LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL were identified. Patients that could not be reached and who refused to interview were excluded and the data of 367 patients were analyzed. There were 248 (67.6%) female and 119 (32.4%) male patients and mean age was 50.52 ± 11.66. LDL-C was ≥330 mg/dL in 50 (13.6%) and 250–329 mg/dL in 317 (86.4%) patients. Forty (10.9%) patients were classified as definite, 181 (49.3%) as probable and 146 (39.8%) as possible FH. 213 (58.0%) patients were not receiving lipid-lowering treatment, and 162 (76.1%) stated that medication was never recommended previously, 30 (14.1%) had stopped medication him/herself and 21 (9.8%) had stopped medication with the advice of the physician. Among patients with definite/probable FH, 84 (38.0%) had CVD and the rate of lipid-lowering drug use in these patients was 58.3%. Conclusion A significant proportion of patients with LDL-C ≥ 250 mg/dL were not taking lipid-lowering drugs. Similar with many other studies, diagnosis, and treatment rates of FH patients were very low in our study. Further national studies are required to increase awareness of the disease in both physicians and patients.

Phenotype of definite familial hypercholesterolemia with negative genetic study in Argentina.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic disease, associated with variants in the LDLR, APOB and PCSK9 genes. The initial diagnosis is based on clinical criteria like the DLCN criteria. A score > 8 points qualifies the patient as "definite" for FH diagnosis. The detection of the presence of a variant in these genes allows carrying out familial cascade screening and better characterizes the patient in terms of prognosis and treatment. In the context of the FH detection program in Argentina (Da Vinci Study) 246 hypercholesterolemic patients were evaluated, 21 with DLCN score > 8 (definite diagnosis).These patients were studied with next generation sequencing to detect genetic variants, with an extended panel of 23 genes; also they were adding the large rearrangements analysis and a polygenic score of 10 SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) related to the increase in LDL-c. Of the 21 patients, 10 had variants in LDLR, 1 in APOB with APOE, 1 in LIPC plus elevated polygenic score, and 2 patients showed one deletion and one duplication in LDLR, the later with a variation in LIPA. It is highlighted that 6 of the 21 patients with a score > 8 did not show any genetic alteration. We can conclude that 28% of the patients with definite clinical diagnosis of FH did not show genetic alteration. The possible explanations for this result would be the presence of mutations in new genes, confusing effects of the environment over the genes, the gene-gene interactions, and finally the impossibility of detecting variants with the current available methods.

Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in South Africa: The Wits FIND-FH Program.

Due to gene founder effects, familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) has a prevalence of ≈1:80 in populations of Afrikaner ancestry and is a major contributor to premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in South Africans of Jewish and Indian descent. No systematic program exists to identify these families. Furthermore, information regarding FH prevalence in Black Africans is sparse. The Wits FIND-FH program was initiated in late 2016 to address these issues. Approach and Results: Based on index subjects with definite or probable FH, first-degree relatives were contacted, informed consent obtained, and targeted medical history, physical examination, and blood samples collected. In patients with likely FH using the Simon Broome criteria, DNA analysis for LDLR (low-density lipoprotein receptor), APOB (apolipoprotein B), PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), and LDLRAP1 (LDLR adaptor protein 1) variants was analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Of the initial 700 subjects screened of whom 295 (42%) were index cases, 479 (68.4%) were clinically diagnosed with probable or definite FH. Genetic analysis confirmed 285 of 479 (59.5%) as having variants consistent with FH. Three subjects met the clinical diagnosis for homozygous FH, but DNA analysis revealed a further 34 patients, including 4 Black African subjects, with ≥2 FH-causing variants. Using phenotype cascade screening, the Wits FIND-FH program has screened an average of 30 subjects monthly of whom 68% had a clinical diagnosis of FH with ≈60% genetically confirmed. The program is identifying a small but growing number of Black South Africans with FH. Interestingly, 37 subjects (7.7%) who underwent DNA testing were found to have ≥2 FH-causing variants.

Targeted Genetic Analysis in a Chinese Cohort of 208 Patients Related to Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Aim: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most commonly encountered genetic condition that predisposes individuals to severe autosomal dominant lipid metabolism dysfunction. Although more than 75% of the European population has been scrutinized for FH-causing mutations, the genetic diagnosis proportion among Chinese people remains very low (less than 0.5%). The aim of this study was to identify genetic mutations and help make a precise diagnosis in Chinese FH patients.Methods: We designed a gene panel containing 20 genes responsible for FH and tested 208 unrelated Chinese possible/probable or definite FH probands. In addition, we called LDLR copy number variation (CNVs) with the panel data by panelcn.MOPS, and multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used to search for CNVs in LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9.Results: A total of 79 probands (38.0%) tested positive for a (likely) pathogenic mutation, most of which were LDLR mutations, and three LDLR CNVs called from the panel data were all successfully confirmed by MLPA analysis. In total, 48 different mutations were identified, including 45 LDLR mutations, 1 APOB mutation, 1 ABCG5 mutation, and 1 APOE mutation. Among them, the five most frequent mutations (LDLR c.1879G>A, c.1747C>T, c.313+1G>A, c.400T>C, and APOB c.10579C>T) were detected. Moreover, we also found that patients with LDLR variants of CNVs and splicing and nonsense had increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels when compared with those who carried missense variants.Conclusions: The spectrum of FH-causing mutations in the Chinese population is refined and expanded. Analyses of FH causal genes have been a great help in clinical diagnosis and have deep implications in disease treatment. These data can serve as a considerable dataset for next-generation sequencing analysis of the Chinese population with FH and contribute to the genetic diagnosis and counseling of FH patients.

Prevalence Of familial hypercholeSTerolaemia (FH) in Italian Patients with coronary artERy disease: The POSTER study

Background and aimsFamilial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events. High levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) since birth are linked to the early onset of atherosclerotic disease. A genetic mutation determining FH is present in about one subject out of 250; FH should be more represented among subjects with a documented diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The POSTER Study evaluated the prevalence of FH in Italian patients with a recent CAD event. MethodsEighty-two cardiology centres enrolled patients with a documented CAD event; CV risk profile, drug therapy and biochemical parameters were collected. Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria were used to define patients with a potential FH diagnosis (score ≥6); these patients underwent molecular testing for genetic diagnosis of FH. ResultsOverall, 5415 patients were enrolled and the main index events were myocardial infarction with ST-elevation, non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or a recent coronary revascularization (34.8%, 37.2%, and 28% respectively). Mean age was 66 ± 11 years, men were 78%; about 40% were already treated with statins, proportion that increased after the acute event (96.5%). Based on the DLCN score, the prevalence of potential FH was 5.1%, 0.9% of them had a diagnosis of definite FH (score >8). These patients were younger than patients with a score <6 (56 ± 10 vs 66 ± 11, p < 0.001), and LDL-C levels were in most of them (~87%) >190 mg/dL. FH was genetically confirmed in 42 subjects (15.9%); genetic diagnosis was defined as not conclusive for FH in 63 patients (23.9%). Finally, in 159 subjects (60.2%) no pathogenic mutations in the tested genes were identified, defining them as negative for monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia. ConclusionsResults underscore a relatively high prevalence of potential FH in patients with a recent CAD event. Therefore, an early identification of these subjects may help improve the management of their high CV risk and, by cascade screening, identify possible FH relatives.

EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF EVOLOCUMAB THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA (IN KARELIA REPUBLIC)

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of evolocumab in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with a definite FH were treated with PCSK9 inhibitors, in 11 patients with a history of CAD. Eight patients (53.3%) received evolocumab (Repata) subcutaneously 140 mg once every 2 weeks, their average age was 51.4±2.3 years, 6 men. Lipid spectrum, ALT, AST, creatinine, glucose, Lp (a) were evaluated after 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, the ECG and the clinical picture were monitored. Evolocumab was prescribed in connection with the failure to achieve the target LDL. Before the start of therapy, 7 patients received statins, 5 statins with ezetemib, 1 patient did not receive lipid-lowering therapy due to intolerance. The target LDL levels were considered: for very high risk patients less than 1.4 mmol/L, high risk – less than 1.8 mmol/L. Statistical processing of the material was performed using STATISTICA10.0.Results: On the background of evolocumab therapy, the average level of LDL after 3 months of therapy decreased by 56.4% (from 3.9±0.3 to 1.71±0.2 mmol/L), the effect persisted after a year. All patients did not stop the therapy; there were no side effects, including local ones. Target LDL was achieved in 62.5% of patients, the average LDL level after 3 months of therapy decreased by 56.4% in patients from the initial, including the case of monotherapy with evolocumab. The Lp (a) level during therapy decreased by 30%.Conclusions: Evolocumab allows to increase the achievement of the target LDL level on 40% in FH patients; target LDL level was achieved in 62.5%. LDL decreased after 3 months by 56.4%, remaining stable with prolonged therapy. The decrease in Lp(a) reached 30%. Evolocumab therapy was characterized by high adherence and the absence of side effects.

The Prevalence and Diagnostic Ratio of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) and Proportion of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Japanese FH Patients in a Healthcare Record Database Study.

Background Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Because of underdiagnosis, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often the first clinical manifestation of FH. In Japan, there are few reports on the prevalence and diagnostic ratios of FH and the proportion of ACS among FH patients in clinical settings. Methods This retrospective, observational study used anonymized data from electronic healthcare databases between April 2001 and March 2015 of patients who had ≥2 LDL-C measurements recorded after April 2009. The index date was defined as the date of the first LDL-C measurement after April 2009. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of definite or suspected FH; secondary endpoints included the proportion of FH patients hospitalized for ACS, the proportion of patients using lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs), and LDL-C levels. Results Of the 187,781 patients screened, 1547 had definite or suspected FH (0.8%) based on data from the entire period; 832 patients with definite (n = 299, 0.16%) or suspected FH (n = 533, 0.28%) before the index date were identified in the main analysis cohort. LLDs were used in 214 definite FH patients (71.6%) and 137 suspected FH patients (25.7%). Among definite or suspected FH patients with ACS (n = 84) and without ACS (n = 748), 32.1% and 30.1% with definite FH and 3.2% and 2.4% with suspected FH had LDL-C levels < 2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL), respectively. Sixty patients (7.2%) were hospitalized due to ACS at the index date. Conclusions The prevalence of FH in this Japanese cohort of patients with ≥2 LDL-C measurements at hospitals was 0.8%, which is higher than that currently reported in epidemiological studies (0.2–0.5%). Patients with suspected FH, with or without ACS, had poorly controlled LDL-C levels and were undertreated. The proportion of FH patients who were hospitalized due to ACS was 7.2%.