Deferral Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Abstract 4471: Long-Term Follow-Up After Deferral of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in Patients With Moderate Coronary Lesions and Borderline Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements

Background: Many studies have demonstrated that deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the basis of a myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.75 is associated with a very low coronary event rate. However, some groups have empirically chosen the cut-off value of 0.80 rather than 0.75 for decision to defer PCI and the FFR measurement between 0.75 and 0.80 has been established as a grey zone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with moderate coronary lesions and FFR measurements between 0.75 and 0.80. Methods: The study included 125 anigiographically moderate coronary lesions (>50% diameter stenosis by visual assessment) in 125 patients but in whom the PCI was deferred on the basis of an FFR ≥ 0.75. The FFR was calculated as the ratio of mean distal pressure divided by the proximal pressure during hyperemia. Patients were divided into two groups according to the result of FFR: ≥ 0.80 (n=99, group 1) and between 0.75 and 0.79 (n=26, group 2). We evaluated the long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) related and unrelated to the FFR-evaluated lesion. Results: During a follow-up period of 82 ± 29 months (mean ± SD), The Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves showed that group 2 was poorer than group 1 in prognosis (p=0.0148). The incidence of MACE unrelated FFR-evaluated lesion in group 1 was equivalent to that in group 2 (p=0.96). Conclusions: In patients with moderate coronary lesions and borderline FFR measurements, deferral of PCI was associated with a higher rate of MACE related to the FFR-evaluated lesion. FFR cut-off point of 0.80 instead of 0.75 may be more appropriate for deferring PCI.

The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention

We evaluated deferral of PCI of intermediate coronary lesions (IL) using fractional (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) hyperemic stenosis resistance index (HSR) in patients with a negative or nondiagnostic and noninvasive stress tests. Outcome after deferral of PCI of IL with discordant results between FFR and CFR is unknown. PCI was deferred in 186 IL (mean diameter stenosis: 52%). Patients were divided according to the results of FFR and CFR in group A; FFR >or= 0.75 and CFR >or= 2.0 (n = 129), group B; FFR >or= 0.75 and CFR 2.0 (n = 28), group C; FFR 0.75 and CFR >or= 2.0 (n = 23) and group D; FFR 0.75 and CFR 2.0 (n = 6). Patients were followed for one year to document major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Nineteen MACEs (0 deaths, 4 myocardial infarctions, 1 CABG, and 14 PCIs) occurred during a follow up of 323 +/- 88 days. MACE rate was lowest (4.7%) when FFR, CFR, and HSR were normal. A higher MACE rate was observed when concordant abnormal (group D) or discordant results between FFR and CFR (group B and C) were compared to concordant normal values (group A, 33.3% vs. 19.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.008). Multivariate regression analysis showed a higher predictive power for HSR than for FFR and CFR. Abnormal FFR or abnormal CFR was documented in 31% of intermediate coronary lesions. Deferral of PCI in this group was associated with a high MACE rate, which underscores the rationale of combined pressure and flow measurements providing a stenosis resistance index that is better suited for clinical decision making in these lesions.

Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement

Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement