Deferasirox Monotherapy Research Articles

Comparison of Yearly Cost Related to Complications Between Deferasirox and Deferiprone Monotherapy in Thalassemia.

Hemoglobin disorders such as thalassemia major have created an economic burden on the health care system. Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is the most expensive cost component in patients with thalassemia. ICT was administered to reduce the toxic effects of iron overload. This study aims to compare the costs of iron chelators as monotherapy in patients with thalassemia major in Indonesia, specifically in Cipto Faculty of Medicine, Universit. This is a retrospective analytical observational study. Data were collected from the thalassemia registry from 2016 to 2019. Patients' age, gender, type of thalassemia, and type of iron chelation were recorded. Complications and total annual costs were evaluated. All thalassemia patients aged ≥2 years who were only receiving monotherapy ICT and had no history of therapy switching were eligible. We excluded subjects who moved out to other facilities or lost to follow-up. From a total of 256 subjects, 249 subjects were included. The median age is 28 years old. Both sexes were represented equally. As many as 96.8% of subjects have thalassemia beta. Deferiprone was the most common iron chelator used (86.7%). Complications were observed in the subjects based on 4-year data collection; most of them were cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, delayed puberty, and malnutrition ( P =0.422; P =0.867; P =0.004; and P =0.125, respectively). Deferiprone had a lower mean annual cost of USD 3581 than deferasirox, which had a cost of USD 6004. Cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, delayed puberty, and malnutrition were the most common complications found in the study. This study showed that deferiprone should be taken as consideration as a drug of choice to treat iron overload in thalassemia provided by Indonesian national health insurance which is less costly despite the probability of complications found after the treatment was given. Further investigations are required to evaluate contributing factors of complications in thalassemia.

Efficacy and Safety of a Dispersible Tablet of GPO-Deferasirox Monotherapy among Children with Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia and Iron Overload

The study aimed to determine efficacy and safety of generic deferasirox monotherapy. Deferasirox was administered in transfusion-induced iron overloaded thalassemia. Efficacy was defined as responders and nonresponders by ≤ 15 reduced serum ferritin from baseline. Adverse events were also monitored. Fifty-two patients with mainly Hb E/β-thalassemia at the mean (SD) age of 8.7 (4.1) years, were enrolled. The mean (SD) daily transfusion iron load was 0.47 (0.1) mg/kg and maximum daily deferasirox was 35.0 (6.2) mg/kg. Altogether, 52, 40 and 18 patients completed the first, second and third years of study, respectively. The median baseline serum ferritin 2,383 ng/mL decreased to 1,478, 1,038 and 1,268 ng/mL at the end of first, second and third years, respectively, with overall response rate at 73.1% (38/52). Patients with baseline serum ferritin >2,500 ng/mL showed a change in serum ferritin higher than those ≤2,500 ng/mL starting from the 9th month of chelation. Adverse events were found in 5 of 52 patients (9.6%) including transaminitis (n = 2), one each of proteinuria, rash and proximal tubular dysfunction which resolved after transient stopping or decreasing the chelation dose. Generic deferasirox was effective and safe among pediatric patients with transfusion-induced iron overloaded thalassemia.

Longitudinal prospective comparison of pancreatic iron by magnetic resonance in thalassemia patients transfusion-dependent since early childhood treated with combination deferiprone-desferrioxamine vs deferiprone or deferasirox monotherapy.

In transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients who started regular transfusions in early childhood, we prospectively and longitudinally evaluated the efficacy on pancreatic iron of a combined deferiprone (DFP) + desferrioxamine (DFO) regimen versus either oral iron chelator as monotherapy over a follow-up of 18 months. We selected patients consecutively enrolled in the Extension-Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassemia network who received a combined regimen of DFO+DFP (No.=28) or DFP (No.=61) or deferasirox (DFX) (No.=159) monotherapy between the two magnetic resonance imaging scans. Pancreatic iron overload was quantified by the T2* technique. At baseline no patient in the combined treatment group had a normal global pancreas T2* (≥26 ms). At follow-up the percentage of patients who maintained a normal pancreas T2* was comparable between the DFP and DFX groups (57.1 vs 70%; p=0.517).Among the patients with pancreatic iron overload at baseline, global pancreatic T2* values were significantly lower in the combined DFO+DFP group than in the DFP or DFX groups. Since changes in global pancreas T2* values were negatively correlated with baseline pancreas T2* values, the percent changes in global pancreas T2* values, normalized for the baseline values, were considered. The percent changes in global pancreas T2* values were significantly higher in the combined DFO+DFP group than in either the DFP (p=0.036) or DFX (p=0.030) groups. In transfusion-dependent patients who started regular transfusions in early childhood, combined DFP+DFO was significantly more effective in reducing pancreatic iron than was either DFP or DFX.

PD02 A Literature Review Of Treatment Schemes And Effects For Beta Thalassemia In China

IntroductionThe incidence of beta thalassemia varies greatly in different regions of China. Blood transfusion combined with iron chelation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the main treatment for beta thalassemia in China. This study aimed to reveal the specific treatment schemes used for patients with beta thalassemia and to evaluate their effects.MethodsA search strategy was developed to identify articles published between 1 January 2010 and 30 August 2021 in the following literature databases: PubMed, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database.ResultsThe most used iron chelation schemes in China for patients with beta thalassemia included deferoxamine (DFO) monotherapy, deferiprone (DFP) monotherapy, deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy, and combinations of DFP and DFO. Most studies reported that combinations of DFP, DFO, and DFX monotherapy performed better than DFO or DFP monotherapy alone in reducing the blood, heart, and liver iron load. However, the adverse effects of iron chelation affected patient compliance with treatment to a certain extent. Stem cells for patients receiving HSCT in China were mainly donated by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings or unrelated individuals. The five-year overall survival rate after HSCT ranged from 83 to 90 percent, while the five-year beta thalassemia-free survival rate ranged from 65 to 87 percent. Graft-versus-host disease and infection were the most common serious complications experienced by transplant recipients.ConclusionsFor patients in China with beta thalassemia, the most effective iron chelation treatment schemes were combinations of DFP, DFO, and DFX monotherapy. HSCT from HLA-matched siblings or unrelated donors resulted in a significant improvement in the cure rate for beta thalassemia. However, patients still need safer and more effective innovative treatments, and further evidence on existing treatments needs to be generated from larger scale studies in the Chinese population.

Deferasirox and vitamin D3 co-therapy mitigates iron-induced renal injury by enhanced modulation of cellular anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and iron regulatory pathways in rat

BackgroundChronic iron overload could induce nephropathy via oxidative stress and inflammation, and chelating therapy has limited efficacy in removing excess intracellular iron. Although vitamin D (VD) has shown potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, as well contribute to iron homeostasis, none of the previous studies measured its potential remedial effects against chronic iron toxicity. AimsTo measure the alleviating effects of deferasirox (DFX) and/or vitamin D (VD) single and combined therapies against nephrotoxicity induced by chronic iron overload. MethodsForty male rats were divided into negative (NC) and positive (PC) controls, DFX, VD, and DFX/VD groups. The designated groups received iron for six weeks followed by DFX and/or VD for another six weeks. Then, the expression pattern of renal genes and proteins including hepcidin, ferroportin (FPN), megalin, transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), ferritin heavy and light chains, VD receptor (VDR), VD synthesizing (Cyp27b1) and catabolizing (Cyp24a1) enzymes were measured alongside serum markers of renal function and iron biochemical parameters. Additionally, several markers of oxidative stress (MDA/H2O2/GSH/SOD1/CAT/GPx4) and inflammation (IL-1β/IL-6/TNF-α/IL-10) together with renal cell apoptosis and expression of caspase-3 (Casp-3) were measured. ResultsThe PC rats showed pathological iron and renal biochemical markers, hypovitaminosis D, increased renal tissue iron contents with increased Cyp24a1/Megalin/ferritin-chains/hepcidin, and decreased Cyp27b1/VDR/TfR1/FPN expression than the NC group. The PC renal tissues also showed abnormal histology, increased inflammatory (IL-1β/IL-6/TNF-α), oxidative stress (MDA/H2O2), and apoptosis markers with decreased IL-10/GSH/SOD1/CAT/GPx4. Although DFX monotherapy reduced serum iron levels, it was comparable to the PC group in renal iron concentrations, VD and iron-homeostatic molecules, alongside markers of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. On the other hand, VD monotherapy markedly modulated renal iron and VD-related molecules, reduced renal tissue iron concentrations, and preserved renal tissue relative to the PC and DFX groups. However, serum iron levels were equal in the VD and PC groups. In contrast, the best significant improvements in serum and renal iron levels, expression of renal iron-homeostatic molecules, oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis were seen in the co-therapy group. Conclusionsiron-induced nephrotoxicity was associated with dysregulations in renal VD-system together with renal oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. While DFX reduced systemic iron, VD monotherapy showed better attenuation of renal iron concentrations and tissue damage. Nonetheless, the co-therapy approach exhibited the maximal remedial effects, possibly by enhanced modulation of renal iron-homeostatic molecules alongside reducing systemic iron levels. Availability of data and materialsAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Supplementary information files].

P1511: EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COMBINATION IRON CHELATION THERAPY WITH DEFERIPRONE AND DEFERASIROX IN PATIENTS WITH Β-THALASSEMIA MAJOR: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Background: Iron overload can occur in patients with thalassemia syndromes because of hyperabsorption and/or frequent blood transfusions. Currently, 3 iron chelators are approved for clinical use: deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), and deferasirox (DFX). Combination iron chelation therapy may be prescribed for patients who do not adequately respond to monotherapy, have increased heart and/or liver iron overload, or have dose-dependent toxicity. It is important to optimize chelation to reduce iron-associated morbidity and early mortality and to improve quality of life. Oral DFP is typically administered as a monotherapy or in combination with DFO or DFX. Combination therapy was approved for clinical use by the European Medicines Agency in 2016; additionally, a recent British Society for Haematology guideline states that DFP+DFX is a highly effective combination therapy, although the safety and efficacy of DFX in combination with other iron chelators is not well established. Aims: A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of combination chelation therapy with DFP+DFX in patients with transfusion dependent β-thalassemia major (TDT). Methods: A systematic search was performed of the Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify trials related to the use of combination iron chelation therapy (DFP+DFX) in patients with TDT. The literature search was conducted in May 2021 and was not restricted to a specific start date. The search strings were established by logical association of appropriate words and MESH terms. The publications were screened based on a priori exclusion and inclusion criteria (eg, case-report exclusion). Results: Eight clinical study publications (7 prospective, 1 retrospective) of 1725 screened articles assessed the DFP+DFX combination for a total of 181 patients (Table). One publication was a pharmacokinetic (PK) study. Of the 7 studies, 6 reported a consistent reduction in at least 1 of the 3 studied endpoints (serum ferritin, liver, and cardiac iron). The PK study reported an additive effect in the total iron excretion in comparison with monotherapy. The adverse events reported with DFP+DFX were consistent with what has previously been reported for DFP or DFX monotherapy; no new adverse events were observed. The most common adverse events across the 7 studies included gastrointestinal symptoms, elevation in alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase, arthralgia or joint symptoms, an increase in creatinine levels, proteinuria, and red-colored urine. The numbers of patients reported with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were low (neutropenia, n=7 patients; thrombocytopenia, n=8 patients); agranulocytosis was not observed. Two studies reported serious adverse events, of which 1 (acute cholecystitis) was related to treatment. Image:Summary/Conclusion: This systematic literature review suggests that DFP+DFX combination iron chelation therapy can be a highly effective therapeutic option for improving iron overload, with an acceptable tolerability profile. This review supports the safety and efficacy of the combination, as approved by the EMA. Limitations of this analysis include small sample size and nonrandomization in most studies.

Cost-Utility Analysis of four Chelation Regimens for β-thalassemia Major: a Chinese Perspective.

ObjectiveThe Iron chelation is essential to prevent iron overload damage of vital organs, like heart, liver, and endocrine glands, in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. The most common chelation regimens for β-thalassemia major (β-TM) patients used in China are a combination therapy of deferoxamine and deferiprone (DFO+DFP), deferoxamine (DFO) monotherapy, deferiprone (DFP) monotherapy and deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy. Such patients use iron chelators their whole lives, resulting in enormous treatment costs. This study analyses the cost-utility of these four regimens from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.MethodsA Markov decision model was used over a 5-year time horizon and was populated using clinical data from a systematic literature review. We obtained utility data from local and previous research. Costs were estimated using Chinese national sources.ResultsFrom the base-case analysis results, DFP was the most cost-effective chelation regimen, followed by DFO, DFX, and DFO+DFP. DFP had 97.32%, 99.43%, and 58.04% likelihood of being cost-effective versus DFX, DFO+DFP, and DFO, respectively, at a payment threshold of 193,932.00 CNY/QALY (QALY, quality-adjusted life-year).ConclusionsDFP was the most cost-effective chelation regimen for β-TM patients, followed by DFO, DFX, and DFO+DFP. Using DFP as the primary treatment regimen may potentially result in cost-savings and QALY gains for the Chinese healthcare system. To increase these benefits, the Chinese government should take measures to lower DFX and DFO drug costs, and Chinese clinicians should choose the cheaper DFX and DFO, increase the utility of DFO+DFP and reduce mortality and morbidity of DFP. Changes in influential parameters easily affect the results of DFX versus DFO+DFP and of DFP versus DFO; clinicians should focus on such parameters and adjust the regimens accordingly.

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CHELATION REGIMENS FOR β--THALASSEMIA MAJOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

BackgroundDeferoxamine (DFO) or Deferiprone (DFP) or Deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy and DFO and DFP combination therapy (DFO+DFP) were four commonly implemented now chelation regimens for the iron overloaded of β-thalassemia major. This systematic review aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of four chelation regimens and provide evidence for the rational use of chelation regimens for β-thalassemia major therapy in the clinic.MethodsA systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Data, and WanFang Data was conducted in April 2018. In addition, a manual search was performed. Two researchers, working independently, selected the papers, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included documents. Each included paper was evaluated using a checklist developed by Drummond et al.ResultsThe number of records was initially 968, and eight papers met the final eligibility criteria. All the included eight papers were cost-utility analyses, and their methodological quality was fair. In these eight papers, nineteen studies were present. Nine studies of DFX versus DFO had contradictory results. Out of the nineteen studies, three studies of DFX versus DFP established that using DFP was cost-effective. Three studies of DFP versus DFO proved that using DFP was cost-effective. One survey of DFO+DFP versus DFO found that using DFO was cost-effective. One study of DFO+DFP versus DFP found that using DFP was cost-effective. Moreover, there were two studies of DFO+DFP versus DFX, but we cannot be sure which one of two chelation regimens was cost-effective.ConclusionIn brief, DFP is cost-effective, followed by DFO or DFX, when an iron chelator is to be used alone for β-thalassemia iron overload treatment. All studies that compared DFO+DFP with DFO (or DFP) monotherapy established that the DFO+DFP was not cost-effective. Existing studies about DFO+DFP versus DFX could not prove which one of two chelation regimens was cost-effective. However, due to the low number of DFO+DFP versus DFO (or DFP or DFX) monotherapy studies, more extensive, high-quality research is required for further analysis and confirmation of our findings. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness is not an absolute issue when in different countries (regions) the results are opposite for other countries (regions). As a result, the local/national context had a substantial influence on the results of the pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Therapeutic mechanism of combined oral chelation therapy to maximize efficacy of iron removal in transfusion-dependent thalassemia major – a pilot study

ABSTRACTObjectives: Three iron chelators are used to treat transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia: desferrioxamine (DFO), deferasirox (DFX), and deferiprone (DFP). Compliance is low for DFO as it cannot be administered orally. Combined administration of DFP and DFX is orally available, however, the therapeutic mechanism is unknown. This pilot study investigated the iron removal mechanisms of DFX and DFP treatment in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia major.Methods: Each patient received three treatments sequentially: (1) DFX monotherapy, (2) DFP monotherapy, and (3) DFX/DFP combination therapy with a four-day washout period between each treatment. Urine and stool specimens were collected to determine the primary outcome of iron excretion volumes.Results: The mean iron excretion was seven times higher after combination therapy with DFX and DFP. Monotherapies also increased excretions volumes, though to a significantly lesser degree.Combined administration of DFX and DFP achieves maximum iron removal in transfusion-dependent thalassemia major compared to monotherapy with either drug.Conclusions: We suggest combination therapy in chronic severe iron overload cases, especially for patients in poor compliance with DFO/DFP combination therapy or those exhibiting poor iron removal from DFX or DFP monotherapy.

Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox.

BackgroundIron overload, resulting from blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemias, has historically been controlled with regular deferoxamine, but its parenteral requirement encouraged studies of orally-active agents, including deferasirox and deferiprone. Deferasirox, licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 based upon the results of randomized controlled trials, is now first-line therapy worldwide. In contrast, early investigator-initiated trials of deferiprone were prematurely terminated after investigators raised safety concerns. The FDA declined market approval of deferiprone; years later, it licensed the drug as “last resort” therapy, to be prescribed only if first-line drugs had failed. We undertook to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicities of deferiprone and deferasirox in one transfusion clinic.Methods and findingsUnder an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively inspected the electronic medical records of consented iron-loaded patients managed between 2009 and 2015 at The University Health Network (UHN), Toronto. We compared changes in liver and heart iron, adverse effects and other outcomes, in patients treated with deferiprone or deferasirox.ResultsAlthough deferiprone was unlicensed in Canada, one-third (n = 41) of locally-transfused patients had been switched from first-line, licensed therapies (deferoxamine or deferasirox) to regimens of unlicensed deferiprone. The primary endpoint of monitoring in iron overload, hepatic iron concentration (HIC), increased (worsened) during deferiprone monotherapy (mean 10±2–18±2 mg/g; p < 0.0003), exceeding the threshold for life-threatening complications (15 mg iron/g liver) in 50% patients. During deferasirox monotherapy, mean HIC decreased (improved) (11±1–6±1 mg/g; p < 0.0001). Follow-up HICs were significantly different following deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies (p < 0.0000002). Addition of low-dose deferoxamine (<40 mg/kg/day) to deferiprone did not result in reductions of HIC to <15 mg/g (baseline 20±4 mg/g; follow-up, 18±4 mg/g; p < 0.2) or in reduction in the proportion of patients with HIC exceeding 15 mg/g (p < 0.2). During deferiprone exposure, new diabetes mellitus, a recognized consequence of inadequate iron control, was diagnosed in 17% patients, most of whom had sustained HICs exceeding 15 mg/g for years; one woman died after 13 months of a regimen of deferiprone and low-dose deferasirox. During deferiprone exposure, serum ALT increased over baseline in 65% patients. Mean serum ALT increased 6.6-fold (p < 0.001) often persisting for years. During deferasirox exposure, mean ALT was unchanged (p < 0.84). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed in the proportions of patients estimated to have elevated cardiac iron.ConclusionsDeferiprone showed ineffectiveness and significant toxicity in most patients. Combination with low doses of first-line therapies did not improve the effectiveness of deferiprone. Exposure to deferiprone, over six years while the drug was unlicensed, in the face of ineffectiveness and serious toxicities, demands review of the standards of local medical practice. The limited scope of regulatory approval of deferiprone, worldwide, should restrict its exposure to the few patients genuinely unable to tolerate the two effective, first-line therapies.

Deferasirox for managing iron overload in people with thalassaemia.

Deferasirox for managing iron overload in people with thalassaemia.

Comparison of iron chelation effects of deferoxamine, deferasirox, and combination of deferoxamine and deferiprone on liver and cardiac T2* MRI in thalassemia maior.

Background: Cardiac complications due to iron overload are the most common cause of death in patients with thalassemia major. The aim of this study was to compare iron chelation effects of deferoxamine, deferasirox, and combination of deferoxamine and deferiprone on cardiac and liver iron load measured by T2* MRI.Methods:In this study, 108 patients with thalassemia major aged over 10 years who had iron overload in cardiac T2* MRI were studied in terms of iron chelators efficacy on the reduction of myocardial siderosis. The first group received deferoxamine, the second group only deferasirox, and the third group, a combination of deferoxamine and deferiprone. Myocardial iron was measured at baseline and 12 months later through T2* MRI technique.Results:The three groups were similar in terms of age, gender, ferritin level, and mean myocardial T2* at baseline. In the deferoxamine group, myocardial T2* was increased from 12.0±4.1 ms at baseline to 13.5±8.4 ms at 12 months (p=0.10). Significant improvement was observed in myocardial T2* of the deferasirox group (p<0.001). In the combined treatment group, myocardial T2* was significantly increased (p<0.001). These differences among the three groups were not significant at the 12 months. A significant improvement was observed in liver T2* at 12 months compared to baseline in the deferasirox and the combination group.Conclusion: In comparison to deferoxamine monotherapy, combination therapy and deferasirox monotherapy have a significant impact on reducing iron overload and improvement of myocardial and liver T2* MRI.

Efficacy of Deferasirox as an Oral Iron Chelator in Paediatric Thalassaemia Patients.

Thalassaemia Major patients require frequent blood transfusion leading to iron overload. Excessive iron gets deposited in vital organs and leads to dysfunction of the heart, liver, anterior pituitary, pancreas, and joints. Our body has limited mechanism to excrete iron, so patients with iron overload and its complications need safe and effective iron chelation therapy. To assess the efficacy of Deferasirox (DFX) as an iron chelator, with specific reference to reduction in serum ferritin level. This is a prospective; observational study done in 45 multitransfused Thalassaemia Major Children receiving DFX therapy at registered Thalassaemia society Raipur Chhattisgarh. DFX was given in an initial dose of 20 mg/kg/day and according to response increased to a maximum of 40 mg/kg/day. Serum ferritin level was estimated at time of registration and at every three monthly intervals (four times during study period). The primary end point of the study was change in serum ferritin level after 12 months of DFX therapy. The mean serum ferritin before DFX therapy of all cases was 3727.02 ng/mL. After 12 months of mean dose of 38 mg/kg/day of DFX, the mean decline in serum ferritin was 1207.11 ng/mL (drop by 32.38%, p-value <0.001). DFX monotherapy has a good safety profile and effectively chelates total body iron in Thalassaemia major patients.

Safety of deferasirox as an oral iron chelator in thalassemic children

Background: Thalassemia major patients require frequent blood transfusion leading to iron overload. Iron overload is characterized by excessive iron deposition and consequent injury and dysfunction of the heart, liver, anterior pituitary, pancreas, and joints. Because physiologic mechanisms to excrete iron are very limited, patients with iron overload and its complications need safe, effective therapy that is compatible with their coexisting medical conditions. Current prospective, observational study is done to assess the safety of deferasirox as an oral iron chelator, with specific reference to rise in serum creatinine level, alanine aminotransferase level (SGPT), urine albumin level in 50 multi-transfused thalassemia major children receiving deferasirox (DFX) therapy at registered thalassemia society Raipur, India. Methods: DFX was administered in an initial dose of 20 mg/kg/day and increased to a maximum of 40 mg/kg/day. Serum creatinine, alanine aminotransferase level (SGPT), urine albumin level were estimated in pretransfusion samples at time of registration and at 3 monthly intervals (4 times). The primary end point of the study was completion of 12 months of therapy (January 2013 to December 2013). Results: Prior to DFX therapy the mean serum creatinine, SGPT, urine albumin of all cases were 0.4617 mg/dl, 20.78 U/L and nil respectively. After 12 months of DFX therapy of mean dose 38 mg/kg/day, the mean serum creatinine was. 0.4624 mg/dL. SGPT was 20.81 U/L, and urine albumin was nil. Conclusions: Deferasirox monotherapy has a good safety profile and effectively chelates total body iron.

Effect of deferasirox on iron overload in patients with transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies

BackgroundPatients with haematopoietic disorders requiring long-term blood transfusions are at risk of iron overload. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of long-term deferasirox monotherapy in patients with transfusion-dependent anaemia in the routine clinical practice setting. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of patients who commenced deferasirox therapy at the Hospital Bianchi Melacrino Morelli in Reggio Calabria, Italy. Data collected included cardiac and hepatic iron load (assessed by magnetic resonance imaging); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients were divided into two groups for analysis: group A (baseline information collected prior to deferasirox initiation) and group B (baseline information collected after deferasirox initiation). ResultsForty-six patients were included (group A: n=25; group B: n=21). The overall population was 63% male, with a mean age of 33years. The majority of patients (65%) had thalassaemia major. In the overall population, cardiac iron levels between the baseline and first follow-up visits improved in both groups A and B (29.2 vs. 32.5ms; p=0.04 and 28.4 vs. 31.4ms; p=0.038). Liver iron levels improved significantly from baseline to visit 1 in group A (7.2 vs. 12.1ms; p<0.004) and from baseline to visit 3 (6.9 vs. 10.7; p=0.049) in group B. Generally, there was no correlation between cardiac and liver iron levels. LVEF remained stable throughout the study period. Deferasirox was well tolerated and was not associated with significant adverse events. ConclusionLong-term treatment with deferasirox is effective and safe in patients with transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies monitored in the clinical practice setting.

Deferasirox–Deferoxamine Combination Therapy Reduces Cardiac Iron With Rapid Liver Iron Removal In Patients With Severe Transfusional Iron Overload (HYPERION)

Background Transfusion-dependent patients with severe cardiac siderosis often require intensive iron chelation therapy for a limited time to facilitate rapid removal of iron from the heart, allowing patients to move from a high-risk (cardiac T2*<10 ms) to lower risk (≥10 ms) status for heart failure. Oral deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy has been shown to improve cardiac T2*, but data on the combined use of DFX and deferoxamine (DFO) are limited. Aim To evaluate efficacy and safety of investigational DFX–DFO in combination followed by DFX monotherapy in patients with severe transfusional cardiac siderosis. Methods The prospective, Phase II, open-label, multinational HYPERION study evaluated DFX–DFO in combination followed by DFX monotherapy in transfusion-dependent patients with severe cardiac siderosis ([NCT01254227][1]). Patients enrolled were ≥10 years with CMR-measured cardiac T2* 5–<10 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥56%, R2-MRI liver iron concentration (LIC) ≥7 mg Fe/g dw. Starting dose was DFX 20 mg/kg/d, 7 d/wk, plus DFO 40 mg/kg/d, 5 d/wk for ≥8 hrs/d. DFX dose could be increased to 30 and 40 mg/kg/d after Month 1 and 6, respectively. Patients achieving cardiac T2* ≥10 ms and a relative T2* increase of ≥10% from baseline (BL) any time after 6 months were switched to DFX monotherapy. Combination therapy was resumed if cardiac T2* fell to <10 ms with a relative decrease of ≥10% from previous T2* value. Dose adjustments were based on efficacy and safety parameters. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in geometric mean cardiac T2* at Month 12 divided by that at BL. A key secondary objective was the proportion of patients achieving T2* ≥10 ms and a ≥10% relative increase from BL after 6 and 12 months. Efficacy was analyzed for all evaluable patients in the full analysis set (FAS) who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had a BL and post-BL assessment; cardiac T2* is also reported for patients with T2* at BL and Month 12 (12-month completers). Results 60 patients were enrolled (59 β-thalassemia major, 1 Diamond–Blackfan anemia; mean age 22.8 years; 46.7% male) with severe iron overload (geometric mean [Gmean] cardiac T2* 7.03 ms, mean LIC 33.4 ± 14.5 mg Fe/g dw, median serum ferritin 5551 ng/mL [range 1163, 11,317]). Overall, 20 patients discontinued; 5 consent withdrawals, 4 adverse events (AEs: pruritus, arthritis, abdominal pain, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms), 4 abnormal test procedure results (all T2* 33% increase from BL and >upper limit of normal at 2 consecutive visits. ![Figure][3] Discussion Cardiac T2* improved during 12 months of treatment with DFX–DFO in patients with severe transfusional body iron burden. High BL LIC levels decreased considerably with DFX–DFO. Overall, as LIC decreased cardiac T2* increased, most notably after 6 months. The higher DFX dose permitted after Month 6 possibly influenced this trend. Cardiac T2* improvements were observed irrespective of BL LIC value, but were most marked in those with BL LIC <30 mg Fe/g dw, consistent with previous data showing that cardiac iron removal follows liver iron removal (Noetzli Blood 2008). Safety of DFX–DFO was consistent with established monotherapy profiles, with no unexpected findings. 2-year follow-up for HYPERION will evaluate the impact of longer-term DFX–DFO in combination on liver and cardiac iron removal. Disclosures: Aydinok: Shire: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Deferasirox and deferoxamine are both indicated as a monotherapy for the treatment of chronic iron overload due to frequent blood transfusions. Patients with severe cardiac iron overload are at increased risk of heart failure and are often treated by off-label combination therapy for a limited time to facilitate rapid removal of iron from the heart, allowing patients to move to a lower-risk status. This abstract describes off-label use of the combination of deferasirox and deferoxamine to treat patients with severe transfusional cardiac iron overload. Kattamis: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ApoPharma: Speakers Bureau. Cappellini: Genzyme: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Perrotta: Novartis: Research Funding. Karakas: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Viprakasit: GPO, Thailand: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Habr: Novartis: Employment. Wegener: Novartis: Employment. Shen: Novartis: Employment. Porter, MD on behalf of the HYPERION investigators: Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01254227&atom=%2Fbloodjournal%2F122%2F21%2F2257.atom [2]: #F1 [3]: pending:yes

Long Term Efficacy Of Iron Chelation Therapy With Deferasirox On Endocrine Function In Thalassemia Major

Although the heart and liver have traditionally been the organs of interest for iron-related complications in Thalassemia Major (TM), endocrine disorders are common and carry significant morbidity. This is thought to result from iron accumulation in multiple organs functioning as part of endocrine systems. Deferasirox chelation therapy is well tolerated in TM and reduces iron burden effectively in the heart and liver. The impact of deferasirox on endocrine parameters remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term efficacy of deferasirox for both the prevention of endocrine dysfunction in patients free of endocrine complications, and in improving endocrine parameters in those with pre-existing endocrine disorders.This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of TM patients over 2 years of age receiving chelation treatment with once daily oral deferasirox monotherapy. Data on relevant clinical and laboratory parameters, including glycaemia, bone mineral density (BMD) z-scores, and testing of the pituitary, gonadal, thyroid and adrenal axes were collected at baseline and follow-up. Dosing regimens were titrated according to standard practice and only patients treated for at least 3 years were included in the present analysis. Data are presented as mean with standard deviation unless otherwise stated. Statistical comparisons were made using paired t-tests for continuous data, and chi-square test or Fisher's exact test to compare categorical data distributions.A total of 72 patients (69% female) with a mean age 26 ± 15 years were included. Mean duration of exposure to deferasirox was 6.9 ± 2.7 years with a mean daily dose of 25 ± 5 mg/kg. Myocardial T2* significantly increased from baseline to follow up (29.30 ± 10.29ms vs. 33.5 ± 13.06ms, P=0.01), signifying effective removal of iron from the heart. Among patients free of thyroid dysfunction at baseline, we observed no significant difference in mean TSH (2.10 ± 1.00 mi/u/ml vs. 2.28 ± 1.06 mi/u/ml, P=0.23 ), FT4 (6.89 ± 4.50 ng/ml vs. 7.10 ± 4.71 ng/ml, P=0.34) or FT3 (2.87 ± 1.16 pg/ml vs. 3.00 ± 0.58 pg/ml, P=0.35) during the study period. Of 9 patients with biochemical hypothyroidism at baseline, including 4 receiving thyroxine, we observed no significant change in thyroid function tests or thyroxine requirements. Two new incidences of subclinical hypothyroidism were noted. Among patients free of diabetes mellitus at baseline, we observed no significant variation in blood glucose measurements (pooled over 3 consecutive readings) at the end of treatment (88.62 ± 10.53 mg/dl vs. 88.36 ± 9.35 mg/dl, P=0.83). There was 1 incidence of type 2 diabetes during the study period. No significant difference was seen in blood sugar control or insulin requirements between baseline and end of treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes. Excluding normal pre-pubertal paediatric patients, there was no significant increase in the prevalence of hypogonadism between baseline and the end of study, 21 patients (38%) vs. 24 (44%) were diagnosed with hypogonadism respectively (P=0.56). Biochemical indices of bone metabolism showed no significant difference in calcium levels or vitamin D from baseline to follow up. BMD was improved from baseline to follow-up, with normal Z scores in 7 (20%) patients, 20 (57%) osteopenic, and 8 (23%) osteoporotic, compared with 7 (20%), 24 (69%), and 4 (11%) at end of treatment, respectively. Adverse effects were infrequent and of low grade, effecting 7 (9.7%) patients.Endocrine disorders are common sequelae of iron overload in patients with TM, and follow an insidious course of progressive dysfunction. We report infrequent development and progression of endocrine abnormalities, and significant improvement in bone density in TM patients treated with deferasirox over a 7-year follow-up period. In comparison with the incidence of complications from other studies of TM, deferasirox appears effective in reducing risk of developing endocrine disorders. Increasing myocardial T2* values confirmed effective removal of iron from the heart. Although multiple biological pathways are likely responsible, reduction in global iron alleviating siderosis of endocrine organs may be responsible for preserved function and bone mineral metabolism. Our study suggests that chelation therapy with deferasirox may prevent endocrine complications in patients with TM and prevent progression in those with established abnormalities Disclosures:Silverio:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Cost–Utility Analysis of Deferiprone for the Treatment of β-Thalassaemia Patients with Chronic Iron Overload: A UK Perspective

BackgroundPatients with β-thalassaemia major experience chronic iron overload due to regular blood transfusions. Chronic iron overload can be treated using iron-chelating therapies such as desferrioxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy, or DFO–DFP combination therapy.ObjectivesThis study evaluated the relative cost effectiveness of these regimens over a 5-year timeframe from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective, including personal and social services.MethodsA Markov model was constructed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the treatment regimens over 5 years. Based on published randomized controlled trial evidence, it was assumed that all four treatment regimens had a comparable effect on serum ferritin concentration (SFC) and liver iron concentration (LIC), and that DFP was more effective for reducing cardiac morbidity and mortality. Published utility scores for route of administration were used, with subcutaneously administered DFO assumed to incur a greater quality of life (QoL) burden than the oral chelators DFP and DFX. Healthcare resource use, drug costs (2010/2011 costs), and utilities associated with adverse events were also considered, with the effect of varying all parameters assessed in sensitivity analysis. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated for each treatment, with cost effectiveness expressed as incremental cost per QALY. Assumptions that DFP conferred no cardiac morbidity, mortality, or morbidity and mortality benefit were also explored in scenario analysis.ResultsDFP was the dominant strategy in all scenarios modelled, providing greater QALY gains at a lower cost. Sensitivity analysis showed that DFP dominated all other treatments unless the QoL burden associated with the route of administration was greater for DFP than for DFO, which is unlikely to be the case. DFP had >99 % likelihood of being cost effective against all comparators at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY.ConclusionsIn this analysis, DFP appeared to be the most cost-effective treatment available for managing chronic iron overload in β-thalassaemia patients. Use of DFP in these patients could therefore result in substantial cost savings.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0076-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combination therapy of deferasirox and deferoxamine shows significant improvements in markers of iron overload in a patient with β‐thalassemia major and severe iron burden

Iron overload is a common complication of patients with β-thalassemia major (TM). Despite the availability of three iron chelators, deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), and deferasirox (DFX), some patients fail to respond adequately to monotherapy with any of them. We report a case of TM who had refractory severe iron overload and was successfully and safely chelated with the combination of DFX with DFO. A 40-year-old male with β-TM, who had been regularly transfused from the age of 2, had been administered in the past iron chelation with DFO, DFP, and DFX monotherapy, without major improvement on his iron overload status. Liver and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed severe iron overload, while serum ferritin was persistently greater than 2500 μg/L. After the patient gave informed consent, he was administered combination therapy of DFX at 30 mg/kg/day for 7 days per week and DFO at 2500 mg/day for 4 days every week and routinely followed up for compliance. Eighteen months later, serum ferritin was reduced to 680 μg/L, while both liver and cardiac MRI T2* values improved, reflecting lower iron overload. The combination regimen was well tolerated and no adverse events were documented. This is the first official report of simultaneous daily administration of the two iron chelators DFX and DFO that demonstrates the beneficial effect of the combination on heart and liver hemosiderosis. If our observation is confirmed in more patients, this combination could constitute a useful option in tailoring individual chelation therapy for β-TM patients with iron overload.

Effect of Deferasirox Chelation on Liver Iron and Total Body Iron Concentration

To determine efficacy of Deferasirox (DFX) on total body iron and liver iron concentration (LIC) as estimated by serum ferritin (SF) and liver MRI T2. Thirty patients had baseline MRI T2 of the liver performed to determine LIC before starting DFX therapy and classified as normal >6.3 milliseconds (ms), mild 6.3-2.7 ms, moderate 2.7-1.4 ms and severe iron overload <1.4 ms. DFX was given 25-35 mg/kg/d. The serum ferritin (SF) level was estimated every 3 monthly. Liver iron is expressed as liver R2 = 1,000/T2. The primary end point of the study was to determine change in SF and liver MRI R2 values after 18 mo of therapy. All 30 patients had some degree of liver iron overload; 11 (36.6 %) had severe, 15 (50 %) had moderate while 4 (13.3 %) had mild overload. The pre-DFX therapy median SF of all was 3604.5 ng/mL (IQR 2357.0-5056.0) and median liver R2 was 574.71 Hz (IQR 411.3-770.8). After 18 mo, SF dropped significantly to a median of 2036.5 ng/mL (IQR 1700.0-3162.0) (p = 0.0011), while median liver R2 decreased from 574.71 to 568.18 Hz (IQR 393.4-803.2) which was not significant (p = 0.986). DFX monotherapy at the doses used decreases total body iron, but does not significantly decrease liver iron. It is well tolerated by Indian thalassemia patients, with observed side effects including rash, diarrhea, and transient albuminuria. MRI T2 (and derived R2) can serve as useful method in non invasive monitoring of LIC in thalassemia patient management.