Deep Surgical Site Infection Research Articles

Do Hypoalbuminaemia Increase the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Neck of Femur Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Serum albumin plays an important role in physiological and inflammatory haemostasis, and low serum levels are linked with an increased incidence of surgical site infections (SSI). Although this has been demonstrated in the spine and elective arthroplasty settings, there is a paucity of evidence with regard to the effect of low serum albumin on rates of SSI following surgery for adult patients suffering from traumatic and acute hip fractures. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Four databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-controlled studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Score (NOS). Data was collected and pooled using RevMan Web software. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and statistical significance of p <0.05. An inverse variance model was used in the meta-analysis. Six retrospective studies (five cohorts and one case-control) with a total of 43,059 patients were included. 45.3% (n=19 496) had low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dL). Hypoalbuminemia was associated with a significantly higher risk of any form of SSI (OR 1.25, p=0.008) and deep SSI (OR 1.76, p=0.05). There was no statistical significance between hypoalbuminemia and the incidence of superficial SSI (OR 1.06, p=0.77). Organ-space SSI was associated with hypoalbuminemia, although one study reported this with poor statistical significance (OR 8.74, p<0.054). Hypoalbuminemia increases the risk of most forms of surgical site infections, both superficial and deep. There is a weak conclusion to draw between the incidence of deep-space organ infections and low serum albumin.

Frequency of Readmission Among American Society of Anesthesia Classification after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background: With the aging population and the increasing prevalence of degenerative joint diseases, the need for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has surged. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System plays a pivotal role in preoperative evaluation, predicting the risk of postoperative complications and mortality. Understanding the impact of ASA classification on surgical outcomes can guide improvements in patient care and surgical planning. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ASA classification and the risk of postoperative readmission in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Methods: Conducted at a single urban medical center, this descriptive, non-randomized study involved 352 patients who underwent primary TJA due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or avascular necrosis. Participants were assigned an ASA classification preoperatively. The primary outcome measured was readmission within three months post-surgery, with secondary outcomes including the incidence of complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and surgical site infections. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21, with significance set at p&lt;0.05. Results: Of the 352 participants, 165 (46.9%) were from rural areas, and 187 (53.1%) were from urban locations. The readmission rate was 6.8%, with ASA III and IV classifications showing significantly higher readmission rates (9.7% and 28.6%, respectively) compared to ASA I and II (1.8% and 4.4%). The most common reasons for readmission were chest infections (37.5%), followed by cardiac complications, pulmonary embolism, and neurological complications (20.8% each). The study found a significant correlation between higher ASA classification and increased readmission risk (p=0.021). Conclusion: Higher ASA classifications are associated with a greater risk of postoperative readmission in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive preoperative assessments and tailored postoperative care strategies to mitigate the risk of readmission, particularly in patients with higher ASA scores.

Clinical outcomes of triclosan-coated barbed suture in open hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeWe assessed clinical outcomes of patients undergoing open hernia repair using STRATAFIX™ Symmetric, a barbed triclosan-coated suture (TCS; Ethicon), versus conventional polydioxanone suture (PDS) for abdominal wall closure.MethodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study identified patients undergoing hernia repair. The site used PDS from 2013 to 2016 and switched exclusively to barbed TCS in 2017. Outcomes were assessed at 30, 60, and 90 days. Multivariate regression analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used.ResultsOf 821 hernia repairs, 446 used barbed TCS and 375 used conventional PDS. Surgical site infections (SSIs) were significantly less frequent with barbed TCS (60 days, 5.9% vs. 11.4%; P = 0.0083; 90 days, 5.9% vs. 11.7%; P = 0.006) and this remained consistent after multivariate adjustment (60 days, OR [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.3–0.9]; 90 days, 0.5 [0.3–0.9]). Among patients with SSI, deep SSIs were less frequent with barbed TCS (60 days, 9.1% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.022; 90 days, 9.1% vs. 34.9%; P = 0.0252). Barbed TCS significantly reduced the risk of perioperative complications (HR [95% CI]: 0.5[0.3–0.8]; P = 0.0058). Hospital length of stay was 2.5 days shorter with barbed TCS (mean [95% CI]: 5.7[4.9–6.6] vs. 8.2[7.3–9.1] days; P < 0.0001). No differences in reoperation rate over time were observed by type of suture (HR[95% CI]:1.3 [0.5–3.4]; P = 0.4793).ConclusionsThis study showed that patients who underwent open hernia repair appeared to recover equally well regardless of the suture type. In addition, the use of barbed TCS was associated with significantly reduced risk of perioperative complications and hospital length of stay.

Parastomal hernia repair according to Modified Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (mSMART): which are the results ?

Parastomal hernia repair is a real surgical challenge because of the high rate of recurrence. The Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (SMART) is a keyhole-like technique in which the mesh is stapled to the fascia using a circular mechanical stapler. A prospective study from January 2021 to February 2023 was conducted including all patients operated with the SMART technique. Primary endpoint was the recurrence rate during the follow-up. Secondary endpoints were reoperation, Surgical site Occurrence (SSO) and deep (mesh) surgical site infection (SSI) within 30days postoperatively. Sixteen patients operated on SMART procedures were included. The mean follow-up was 11.3 ± 9.2months. The SSO rate was 18.7% (n = 3). A seroma was drained radiologically (IIIa), one haematoma was evacuated surgically (IIIb) and one patient presented a postoperative lesion of a ureter after a parastomal Bricker's hernia repair. In addition, there was one death due to multiple organ failure (V). There was no SSI. The recurrence rate was 57.1% during the follow-up. This study shows disappointing results for this SMART technique, with a high recurrence rate.

Evaluating the association between time to skin grafting for truncal burn patients and complications: a comparative cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank.

The split-thickness skin graft (STSG) procedure is frequently used in the reconstruction of burn-injured patients. This study assessed the impact of graft timing on associated skin complications in patients with torso burns using a comprehensive national database. Truncal burn (2nd-degree and 3rd-degree burns covering 20-89% TBSA) patients who underwent STSG in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011 to 2015 were studied. The outcomes examined were graft-related complications (superficial surgical site infections, deep surgical site infections, and graft failure), overall mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients were compared based on the presence or absence of grafting complications. A linear regression model was used to assess the relationship between hospital LOS and graft timing, considering other variables. Among the 853 studied patients, the cohort with graft complications exhibited a significantly prolonged time to STSG (413.0h compared to 264.6h, P<0.001) and a higher percentage of patients with pre-existing diabetes (18.5 vs. 8.0%, P=0.008). The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that both the extended time to STSG (odds=1.001, P=0.003) and pre-existing diabetes (odds=2.790, P=0.010) significantly elevated the likelihood of complications associated with STSG. Notably, this delay did not elevate mortality risks. A positive relationship was found between grafting delay and LOS. The findings underscore that a prolonged duration to skin grafting contributes to extended hospital stays and increased graft-related complications. However, the role of grafting delay in influencing the mortality of truncal burn patients appeared inconsequential, indicating that mortality may be influenced by various factors.

The Effect of Vancomycin and Tobramycin Local Antibiotic Powder on Surgical Site Infections After Open Treatment of Fracture: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of vancomycin/tobramycin local antibiotic powder (LAP) on surgical site infections (SSIs) after open treatment of fractures. This was a retrospective comparative study with propensity matching. The study was set in an urban level 1 trauma center. Patients undergoing open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon before and after cessation of routine LAP use were included. Deep and superficial SSIs were the measured outcomes. There were 652 open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon: LAP was used in 36.7% (114/310) of procedures before stopping its use, after which 342 procedures were performed without LAP. Comparison of all procedures performed with and without routine LAP use demonstrated no difference in infection rates, although there was a trend for the group without LAP to have fewer superficial SSIs (proportional difference [PD] -2.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.1% to 0.1%; P = 0.05) and more deep SSIs (PD 3.9%, 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.9%; P = 0.06). Prematch analysis demonstrated that LAP use was associated with external fixation (PD 8.5%, 95% CI, 1.6%-16.2%; P = 0.005), longer operative times (median difference 56.0 minutes, 95% CI, 39.0-74.0; P < 0.0001), greater estimated blood loss (median difference 70.0, 95% CI, 50.0-100.0; P < 0.0001), and no difference in superficial (PD 2.4%; 95% CI, -0.8% to 6.8%; P = 0.07) or deep SSIs (PD -1.6%, 95% CI, -6.2% to 4.1%; P = 0.54). After propensity matching (108 vs. 108) to control for the above differences, the LAP group, compared with the no LAP group, had no difference in superficial SSIs and was less likely to have deep SSIs (PD -8.3%, 95% CI, -16.2% to -0.2%; P = 0.04). The use of vancomycin and tobramycin LAP lowered the rate of deep SSIs after open treatment of fractures on propensity-matched analysis. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pancreas preserving duodenectomy (PPrD)

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy has been the standard of care for managing duodenal neoplasms, but recent studies show similar overall and disease-specific survival after pancreas-preserving duodenectomy (PPrD) with potentially less morbidity. MethodsRetrospective cohort of all adult (age >18) patients who underwent PPrD with curative intent of a neoplasm in or invading into the duodenum at our institution from 2011 to 2022 (n ​= ​29), excluding tumors involving the Ampulla of Vater or the pancreas. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA. ResultsR0 resection was achieved in 93 ​% patients. Ten (34.4 ​%) experienced postoperative complications (13.7 ​% within Clavien-Dindo III-V). PPrD patients had lower rates of pancreatic leak, delayed gastric emptying, and deep surgical site infection. ConclusionsIn this case series, we demonstrate PPrD is safe and effective, with a high rate of complete resection and lower complication rate than that seen in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The Impact of an Evidence-Based Bundle on Cesarean Section-Related Surgical Site Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness of an evidence-based bundle in minimizing cesarean section (CS)-related surgical site infections (SSIs) with that of standard routine care. Methods This was a single-center, parallel, and randomized clinical trial conducted at KAHER’s Dr. Prabhakar Kore Charitable Hospital, Belagavi, India, from January 2021 to December 31, 2021. Three hundred twenty women undergoing CS delivery were selected and allocated into two groups (1:1) using simple randomization with fixed allocation. An evidence-based surgical bundle (a combination of more than three perioperative interventions) was used for the intervention group, whereas the control group received routine standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI (superficial, deep, and organ or space SSIs) within 6 weeks postpartum in both groups. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests with a significance threshold set at P &lt; 0.05. Results In this study, 16 and 17 participants each from the control and intervention groups, respectively, were lost to follow-up, resulting in a total of 144 and 143 study participants included in the respective groups. Twenty-eight (19.4%) and 14 (9.8%) women developed SSI in the control and intervention groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of SSI in both groups (63.6% (7/11) and 100% (3/3) in the control and intervention groups, respectively). Conclusion The use of the evidence-based bundle for CS-related SSI prevention effectively decreased the incidence of SSI by half compared to standard routine practice. Implementing the use of this bundle in routine perioperative care will reduce the cost of CS and improve health outcomes in CS. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry-India (www.ctri.nic.in). Registration number: CTRI/2020/11/029246.

Effects of Preoperative Glucocorticoid Use on Patients Undergoing Single-Level Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Registry Study.

Objective Spinal fusions are gaining popularity as a means of treating spinal deformity and instability from a range of pathologies. The prevalence of glucocorticoid use has also increased in recent decades, and their systemic effects are well-documented. Although commonly used in the preoperative period, the effects of steroids on outcomes amongpatients undergoing spinal fusions are inadequately described. This study compares the oddsof developing complications amongpatients who underwent single-level lumbar fusions with and without preoperative glucocorticoid use in hopes of establishing more evidence-based parameters for guiding preoperative steroid use. Methods The TriNetX multi-institutional electronic health record database was used to perform a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of clinical outcomes of two cohorts of patients who underwent posterior or posterolateral single-level lumbar fusions with and without interbody fusion, those who used glucocorticoids for at least one week within a year of fusion and those who did not. The outcomes of interest were examined within 30 days of the operation and included death, reoperation, deep or superficial surgical site infection (SSI), pneumonia, reintubation, ventilator dependence, tracheostomy, acute kidney injury (AKI), renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), urinary tract infection (UTI), emergency department (ED) visit, sepsis, and myocardial infarction (MI). Results The odds of developing pneumonia within 30 days of spinal fusion in the cohort that used glucocorticoids within one year of operation compared to the cohort without glucocorticoid use was 0.67 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 0.59-0.69). The odds of requiring a tracheostomy within 30 days of spinal fusion in the cohort that used glucocorticoids within one year of operation compared to the cohort without glucocorticoid use was 0.39 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 0.26-0.60).The odds of reoperation, deep and superficial SSI, and ED visits within 30 days of operation were significantly higher for the same glucocorticoid-receiving cohort, with odds ratios of 1.4 (p=0.003, 95% CI: 1.11-1.65), 1.86 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.31-2.63), 2.28 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.57-3.31), and 1.25 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.17-1.33), respectively. After propensity score-matching, there was no significant difference between the odds of death, DVT, PE, MI, UTI, AKI, sepsis, reintubation, and ventilator dependence between the two cohorts. Conclusion In support of much of the current literature regarding preoperative glucocorticoid use and rates of complications, patients who underwent a single-level lumbar fusion and have used glucocorticoids for at least a week within a year of operation experienced significantly higher odds of reoperation, deep and superficial SSI, and ED visits. However, these patients using glucocorticoids were also found to have lower odds of developing pneumonia, renal insufficiency, and tracheostomy requirement than those who did not use steroids within a year of surgery.

Getting the drop on Staphylococcus aureus: Semiquantitative Staphylococcus aureus nasal colony reduction in orthopedic surgery reduces surgical site infection

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent health care-associated infection. We aimed to reduce SSI risk after joint arthroplasty and spine surgery by reducing Staphylococcus aureus colonization burden with presurgery intranasal povidone-iodine (PVP-I) application in conjunction with skin antisepsis ("the intervention"). Retrospective case-control study; postintervention cohort versus a historical cohort. Adults who underwent joint arthroplasty or spine surgery during February 2018 through October 2021 ("post-intervention cohort") included. In the analysis cases any patient who underwent surgery and developed SSI within 90 days postsurgery, controls had no SSI. Postintervention cohort data were compared with a similar retrospective 2016 to 2017 patient cohort that did not use intranasal PVP-I. The postintervention cohort comprised 688 consecutive patients aged 65y/o, 48.8% male, 28 cases, and 660 controls. Relatively more cases than controls had diabetes mellitus (P=.019). There was a 39.6% eradication rate of S aureus nasal colonization post intranasal PVP-I (P<.0001). SSI rate was higher in patients positive versus those negative for S aureus on a 24-hour postsurgery nasal culture (P<.0001). The deep SSI rate per 100 operations postintervention versus the historical cohort decreased for all surgical procedures. Semiquantitative S aureus nasal colony reduction using intranasal PVP-I is effective for decreasing SSI rate in joint arthroplasty and spine surgery. In patients with presurgery S aureus nasal colonization additional intranasal PVP-I postsurgery application should be considered.

Incidence and associated factors of surgical site infection in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery: a 7-year cohort study

Surgical site infections (SSI) constitute 31% of all hospital-acquired conditions, with ankle and foot surgical procedures showing an incidence of SSI ranging from 0.5% to 6.5%. This study aimed to assess the incidence of both superficial and deep surgical site infections in foot and ankle surgery, along with associated factors. Conducted as a retrospective cohort study, it included 2180 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in a private hospital between 2014 and 2020, encompassing elective and trauma cases. Outcome variables comprised SSI, while predictor variables encompassed sex, age, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index. Logistic regression models were employed to identify associations between study variables. The incidence of surgical site infections stood at 4% (83/2180), comprising a rate of 2.8% (57/2180) for superficial infections and 1.2% (26/2180) for deep infections. Smoking (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.4–5.3) and ASA score >2 (OR 3.4, 95%CI 1.2–8.4) emerged as independent factors associated with surgical site infections. The group with deep infections exhibited higher proportions of smokers (p = 0.002), systemic arterial hypertension (p = 0.018), trauma surgery (p = 0.049), and an ASA score >2 (p = 0.011). Overall infection incidence in this cohort reached 4%, with trauma cases, smoking, hypertension, and an ASA score >2 independently linked to deep infections. Surgeons should be cognizant of these risk factors when managing prophylactic antibiotic regimens for patients.

Long-term outcomes of PGA-TMC absorbable synthetic scaffold in both clean and contaminated ventral hernia repairs.

Biosynthetic meshes afford the cost advantages of being made from fully synthetic material, but are also biodegradable, making them a versatile option that can be used in both clean and contaminated cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and long-term outcomes of using GORE BIO-A (BIO-A) as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction in all wound classes. A retrospective review identified patients undergoing abdominal hernia repair using BIO-A from October 2008 to June 2018. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence rate. Only patients with at least 6-month follow-up were included when looking at recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included 30-day morbidity categorized according to CDC Surgical Site Infection Criteria, return to operating/procedure room (RTOR), 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. A total of 207 patients were identified, CDC Wound Classification breakdown was 127 (61.4%), 41 (19.8%), 14 (6.8%), and 25 (12.1%) for wound classes I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Median follow-up was 55.4months (range 0.2-162.4). Overall recurrence rate was 17.4%. Contaminated cases experienced higher recurrence rates (28.8% versus 10.4%, p = 0.002) at a mean follow up of 46.9 and 60.8months for contaminated and clean patients, respectively. Recurrent patients had higher BMI (32.4 versus 28.4kg/m2, p = 0.0011), larger hernias (162.2 versus 106.7 cm2, p = 0.10), higher LOS (11.1 versus 5.6days, p = 0.0051), and higher RTOR rates (16.7% versus 5.6%, p = 0.053). 51 (24.5%) patients experienced some morbidity, including 19 (9.2%) surgical site occurences, 7 (3.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 16 (7.7%) deep surgical site infections, and 1 (0.5%) organ space infection. This study affirms the use of biosynthetic mesh as a cost-effective alternative in all wound classifications, yielding good outcomes, limited long-term complications, and low recurrence. rates.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for prevention of deep surgical site infections following primary total joint replacement

BackgroundThe use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) as a mean for preventing deep surgical site infections (SSI) after total joint replacement is controversial. Therefore, we have conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prophylactic effect of ALBC for SSI prevention in patients undergoing arthroplasty. This study was conducted to revise treatment guidelines for MRSA infections in Japan. MethodsPubMed (Medline), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched for relevant articles comparing preventive effect of ALBC for patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty by August 2022. Primary outcome was the incidence of deep SSI. Subgroup analyses by type of surgery (total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty) and by causative pathogen (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)) were performed. ResultsOf the 3379 studies identified for screening, six studies involving 5745 patients were included. The use of ALBC significantly reduced the incidence of deep SSI in overall patients (risk ratio [RR] 0.60, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.39–0.92), but the evidence level was very low. There was no significant preventive effect for ALBC compared with non-ALBC in both THA and TKA (THA, RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.23–1.16; TKA, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.38–1.06), and for preventing MRSA-SSI (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03–2.41). ConclusionsAlthough the overall preventive effect of ALBC was significant, the evidence level was very low. Thus, the routine use of ALBC as a mean to prevent SSI in arthroplasty may not be suggested.

Spectrum of Surgical Site Infection Pathogens in Chronic Infectious Spondylitis Requiring Revision Surgery: A 5-Year Cohort Study.

Background: Spectrum monitoring of the pathogen in spondylitis patients plays a key role in preventing infectious complications of spinal reconstructions in chronic spondylitis (CS) and in the treatment of surgical site infection (SSI). The aim of this study is to characterize the spectrum of SSI pathogens in CS requiring revision surgery. Methods: The primary cohort encompassed 569 surgical patients with infectious CS. In 99 patients (61 men and 38 women) requiring revision surgical interventions due to SSI, continuous microbiological monitoring of the pathogens was conducted. The average age of the patients was 63 ± 14 years. The vast majority of the patients underwent surgery on a set of multilevel (two or more spinal-motor segments) lesions. Lesions of the lumbar spine were more often noted, and lesions of the thoracic, thoracolumbar, and cervical spine sections were less often noted. This study included all patients operated on within the scope of revision spinal reconstructions in connection with the development of infection of the surgical area over the period from January 2018 to December 2022. Inclusion criteria were etiologically verified spondylitis, age of 18 years or older, and follow-up of 6 months or more. Results: The average rate of revision surgery due to SSI was 17.4%. Germ detection from the material of vertebral localization was noted in 48.3% and pathogen strains were isolated in urine in 60.8%, in decubital ulcers in 23.9%, and in hemoculture in 15.2% of all study patients. Aseptic, deep SSI was detected in 10.1%. Gram-positive, multidrug-resistant, and Gram-negative bacteria with extreme resistance prevailed in the microbiological landscape of late SSI, early, and delayed Gram-positive strains without drug resistance. Conclusions: Infectious etiology of spondylitis is associated with a significantly higher frequency of SSI. In the absence of a positive result from bacteriological examination of the vertebral localization material, it is advisable to conduct blood, decubital ulcer discharge, and urine sampling.

The role of environmental and seasonal factors in spine deep surgical site infection: the air pollution, a factor that may be underestimated.

Different strategies have been described in order to reduce spine deep surgical site infection (SSI); however, non-intervenable items such as environmental factors remain as one of the main concerns for spine surgeons. A retrospective cohort study was designed in order to evaluate the effect of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and particularly the air pollution index (PM 2.5) on spine surgical site infection. The files of 3609 patients who underwent spinal surgery from April 2019 to March 2022 were reviewed, and 121 patients with spine SSI were detected. There was no significant relationship between mean temperature and humidity of each month with infection and type of bacteria. However, there was a significant relation between warmer season periods and infection. The rate of infection among patients was 3.25% ranged from 2.5% to 4% in colder and warmer seasons accordingly. It was determined that air pollution had a significant relationship with the infection and the type of bacteria. (p value < 0.05, R-Squared = 0.249). Our study revealed a 60% increase in spine SSI during warmer seasons. There was a significant correlation between air pollution and the rate of infection. These may suggest the necessity to reduce the number of elective spine surgeries during warmer seasons and when the level of air pollutant is high.

Intrawound Vancomycin Powder Reduces Delayed Deep Surgical Site Infections Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Retrospective. Evaluate whether the use of vancomycin powder (VP) placed in the surgical site prior to wound closure prevents delayed deep surgical site infections (DDI). DDI after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients remains a significant major complication. The use of VP to prevent acute surgical site infection has been reported but the impact on DDI is unknown. AIS patients treated over the past 20 years with PSF/instrumentation from a large muti-center registry were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: intraoperative vancomycin powder placed in the wound (VP) or no antibiotics placed in the wound (NVP). DDI was defined as an infection that occurred >90 days after surgery and required surgical intervention in the operating room. Patients who developed a DDI had secondary verification of VP use or not. Chi square and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survivorship analyses were used to compare demographics and incident rate of DDI between groups. 4145 cases met inclusion for this study. A total of 43 DDI cases were identified (1.0%). The incidence of DDI for the VP group was 0.2% (4/2111), and 1.9% (39/2034) in the NVP group (P<0.001). Given the difference in follow-up for the 2 groups a Cumulative Survival and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the VP group had significantly better "survival" (no DDI) than the NVP group (P<0.001). DDIs are significant, adverse events that can greatly complicate patient recovery after PSF for AIS, including rehospitalization. This study found that patients who received VP intraoperatively were 10 times less likely to develop a DDI than those who did not receive VP. Although other advances/changes in surgical techniques may contribute to the significant decrease in infections found in the more recent VP cohort, VP should be considered as a prophylactic measure.

Salvage Algorithm for Deep Surgical Site Infections after HTO with Unstable Bone Situation Using a Hexapod System - Primary Results.

The incidence of deep surgical site infections following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) ranges between 0.4 to 4.7%. It is a severe complication with a high risk for poor clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to proof that a salvage algorithm for infected HTO with unstable bone situation leads to an infection-free status and bone union of the osteotomy and that correct limb alignment can be restored with good knee function.The study included seven patients with peri-implant infections following HTO. Infections occurred 83±58.9 days (range: 24-191) after HTO. All patients underwent the "RESTORE" algorithm: patients received (1) REmoval of the HTO hardware and extensive debridement; (2) the osteotomy was STabilized with a hexapod external fixator (Taylor Spatial Frame, TSF); (3) the osteotomy gap was Opened; and (4) the alignment was REconstructed using the TSF, aiming for the intended limb alignment of the initial HTO. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed 22-36 months after removal of the TSF.After 24 weeks (range: 11-35), an infection-free status and bone healing were achieved. In all cases, the limb was saved, and the previously targeted mechanical axis of the lower limb was restored. All patients reached full extension of the knee joint and at least 110° of flexion. For KOOS: Symptoms 67.86±18.1, Pain 73.41±16.58, ADL 78.99±21.32, Sports 52.14±25.96, and QoL 41.96±24.66. OKS 35.71±8.8, SF-12 Physical Health 38.89±10.3, and SF-12 Mental Health 46.86±13.76.The "RESTORE" algorithm is a safe and effective salvage procedure. The concept allows for saving the limb and obtaining the previously planned limb alignment. Patient-reported outcome measures showed slightly lowered values than healthy samples, but substantially better values than patients awaiting HTO. Due to the possibility of initial full weight-bearing, the risk of higher morbidity caused by immobilization is minimized.

(239) Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Receiving Partial vs Total Penectomy for Penile Malignancy

Abstract Introduction Partial penectomies (PP) and total penectomies (TP) are both performed for penile cancer in the United States. Compared to TP, PP is performed more frequently to preserve functional urinary outcomes. To date TP and PP outcomes have not been compared, in this study we compared clinical characteristics and post-operative outcomes between TP and PP conducted between 2006–2016. Objective We conducted a retrospective review of penile cancer patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the years 2010–2016 using international classification of diseases clinical modification (ICD-CM) ninth revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of penile cancer patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the years 2010–2016 using international classification of diseases clinical modification (ICD-CM) ninth revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. Results Partial penectomy patients were less likely to be transferred patients (7.3% vs 20.9%, p=0.002), less likely to be suffering from diabetes (25.9% vs 40.3%, p=0.026), and were more likely to have preoperative laboratory values within normal limits. TP was associated with increased preoperative white blood cell count x109, preoperative white blood cell count &amp;gt; 7.5x109 (p&amp;lt;0.001), preoperative hematocrit (p&amp;lt;0.001). PP patients were, in contrast, shown to have higher pre-operative creatinine levels (p=.037) and lower platelet levels than TP patients (p=.045). PP patients had shorter operation times (78.8 vs 145.5 min, p&amp;lt;0.001). PP patients also had decreased levels of inpatient stay length (1.67 vs 4.31, p&amp;lt;0.001), any 30-day post-surgery complication (7% vs 31%, p&amp;lt;0.001), deep incisional surgical site infection (0.5% vs 6% p=0.017), wound disruption (0.5% vs 6.0%p=0.017), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (1.6% vs 7.5%, p=0.029), and sepsis (0.5% vs 7.5%, p=0.005), when compared to patients who underwent TP. TP patients displayed a significantly greater number of concurrent surgical procedures (p&amp;lt;0.001), when compared to PP patients. There was no information on urinary, sexual, and erectile outcomes in the database. Conclusions PP is associated with fewer post-operative complications, shorter surgeries, shorter hospital stays, and fewer concurrent surgical procedures. Total penectomy is associated with a greater proportion of patients suffering from comorbid conditions, suggesting that TP patients are at higher risk for post-surgical complications and longer hospital stays. There is a gap in reported data pertaining to post-operative sexual function and erectile outcomes for PP at a national level. Disclosure No.

Cardiac interventions on total knee arthroplasty: a national inpatient sample-based analysis.

Comorbid cardiovascular diseases have been associated with poor outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, our understanding of TKA with prior cardiac treatment procedures has largely been undocumented. In this study, we examined TKA patients who had undergone different cardiac interventions that addressed their condition. The purpose was to characterize and compare outcomes for a growing patient population not yet analyzed. The 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for 558,256 patients who had TKA (ICD-10CM). Backgrounds significant for pacemaker [PM] (n = 8025), coronary artery bypass [CABG] (n = 12,683), heart valve surgery [HV] (n = 4125), or coronary stent [CS] (n = 19,483) were compared against those without, across demographics, admission information, and various complications. Cardiac interventions were associated with increased age, male gender, length of stay, and cost of care. CABG, and Stent groups had more diabetics, but HV had significantly fewer (p = 0.008). PM and HV had significantly less tobacco use and, in addition to CABG, less obesity. Postoperatively, mortality was elevated in the PM [Odds ratio (OR) 2.89, p = 0.008], CABG (OR 2.53, p = 0.006) and CS group (OR 1.94, p = 0.018), but not HV. Myocardial infarctions were elevated in the CABG (OR 3.874) and CS group (OR 5.11) (p < 0.001). PM, HV, and CS had increased odds of periprosthetic fracture by 2.15-fold (p < 0.001), 2.09-fold (p < 0.001), 1.29-fold (p = 0.011) respectively. HV saw increased periprosthetic mechanical complications (OR 1.48, p = 0.006). CABG increased the odds of deep surgical site infection 14.23-fold and CS 9.22-fold (p < 0.001). Postoperative pneumonia was increased in PM, CABG, and CS groups (OR 2.15,), (OR 2.21,), (OR 1.64,) (p < 0.001). Patients who have undergone cardiac intervention are generally at risk for adverse stays. Furthermore, risk factors and complications vary between the groups. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of individualized medical care and as a basis for electing and informing patients for TKA.

Optimizing antibiotic management for patients with acute appendicitis: A quality improvement study

BackgroundTo decrease surgical site infections after appendectomy for acute appendicitis, preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics are often used in clinical practice. However, this treatment strategy has come under scrutiny because of increasing rates of antibiotic-resistant infections. MethodsThe aim of this multisite quality improvement project was to decrease the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis with piperacillin-tazobactam without increasing the rate of surgical site infections. Our quality improvement intervention had 2 distinct components: (1) updating electronic health record orders to encourage preoperative administration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics and (2) educating surgeons and emergency department clinicians about selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared 6 months before and after implementation of the quality improvement intervention. ResultsA total of 352 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed during the 6-month preintervention period, and 369 were performed during the 6-month postintervention period. The preintervention period and postintervention period groups had similar baseline demographics, vital signs, and laboratory test values. The rate of preoperative piperacillin-tazobactam administration significantly decreased after the intervention (51.4% preintervention period vs 20.1% postintervention period, P < .001). The rate of surgical site infections was similar in both groups (superficial surgical site infections = 1.4% preintervention period vs 0.8% postintervention period, P = .50; deep surgical site infections = 1.1% preintervention period vs 0.0% postintervention period, P = .06; and organ space surgical site infections = 3.1% preintervention period vs 3.0% postintervention period, P > .99). Rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and Clostridioides difficile infection also did not differ between groups. ConclusionOur quality improvement intervention successfully decreased piperacillin-tazobactam administration without increasing the rate of surgical site infections in patients with acute appendicitis.