Deep Inspiration Breath-hold Radiotherapy Research Articles

Eliciting the views of left breast cancer patients' receiving deep inspiration breath hold radiation therapy to inform the design of multimedia education and improve patient-centred care for prospective patients.

The currently accepted best practice radiation treatment for left breast cancer patients is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) where patients hold a deep breath to reduce late cardiac and pulmonary effects from treatment. DIBH can be challenging and induce or exacerbate anxiety in patients due to the perceived pressure to reduce radiation treatment side effects. This study explored the experiences of patients treated with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Radiation Therapy (DIBH-RT) to improve patient-centred care and inform the design of multimedia educational tools for future patients undergoing DIBH. This descriptive qualitative study was underpinned by a social constructivist approach to create new educational and patient care approaches based on previous patients' experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had completed DIBH-RT for breast cancer. Data was analysed with reflexive thematical analysis. Twenty-two patients were interviewed with five key themes identified: (1) informational needs, (2) care needs, (3) autonomy, (4) DIBH performance influencers and (5) other centredness. Recommendations were derived from these themes to improve future treatments of DIBH patients. These recommendations revolved around improvements to education, patient-centred care and strategies to improve self-efficacy with breath holding. Patients offer a wealth of knowledge regarding their lived experiences with treatment which can enhance future patients' experiences if incorporated into their education and care. Eliciting patients' views of their DIBH-RT treatment highlighted the need to improve patient self-efficacy with DIBH through familiarity with their planned treatment from new multimedia education, and foster patient care to enhance their experience.

Skin marker combined with surface-guided auto-positioning for breast DIBH radiotherapy daily initial patient setup: An optimal schedule for both accuracy and efficiency.

By employing three surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT)-assisted positioning methods, we conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing SGRT-based deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy using a Sentine/Catalys system. The aim of this study was to optimize the initial positioning workflow of SGRT-DIBH radiotherapy for breast cancer. A total of 124 patients were divided into three groups to conduct a prospective comparative study of the setup accuracy and efficiency for the daily initial setup of SGRT-DIBH breast radiotherapy. Group A was subjected to skin marker plus SGRT verification, Group B underwent SGRT optical feedback plus auto-positioning, and Group C was subjected to skin marker plus SGRT auto-positioning. We evaluated setup accuracy and efficiency using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) verification data and the total setup time. In groups A, B, and C, the mean and standard deviation of the translational setup-error vectors were small, with the highest values of the three directions observed in group A (2.4±1.6, 2.9±1.8, and 2.8±2.1mm). The rotational vectors in group B (1.8±0.7°, 2.1±0.8°, and 1.8±0.7°) were significantly larger than those in groups A and C, and the Group C setup required the shortest amount of time, at 1.5±0.3min, while that of Group B took the longest time, at 2.6±0.9min. SGRT one-key calibration was found to be more suitable when followed by skin marker/tattoo and in-room laser positioning, establishing it as an optimal daily initial set-up protocol for breast DIBH radiotherapy. This modality also proved to be suitable for free-breathing breast cancer radiotherapy, and its widespread clinical use is recommended.

Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer — a multicenter study on the setup accuracy

Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer — a multicenter study on the setup accuracy

Protocol of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep-inspiration breath-hold daily online adaptive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours (PUDDING study)

BackgroundCentrally located lung tumours present a challenge because of their tendency to exhibit symptoms such as airway obstruction, atelectasis, and bleeding. Surgical resection of these tumours often requires sacrificing the lungs, making definitive radiotherapy the preferred alternative to avoid pneumonectomy. However, the proximity of these tumours to mediastinal organs at risk increases the potential for severe adverse events. To mitigate this risk, we propose a dual-method approach: deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy combined with adaptive radiotherapy. The aim of this single-centre, single-arm phase II study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy.MethodsPatients diagnosed with centrally located lung tumours according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, are enrolled and subjected to DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the one-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse events, as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0).DiscussionDelivering definitive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours presents a dilemma between ensuring optimal dose coverage for the planning target volume and the associated increased risk of adverse events. DIBH provides measurable dosimetric benefits by increasing the normal lung volume and distancing the tumour from critical mediastinal organs at risk, leading to reduced toxicity. DIBH adaptive radiotherapy has been proposed as an adjunct treatment option for abdominal and pelvic cancers. If the application of DIBH adaptive radiotherapy to centrally located lung tumours proves successful, this approach could shape future phase III trials and offer novel perspectives in lung tumour radiotherapy.Trial registration. Registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/); registration number: jRCT1052230085 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1052230085).

Individual benefit in heart sparing during DIBH-supported left breast radiotherapy

IntroductionDeep-inspirational breath hold (DIBH) is an option for heart protection in breast radiotherapy; we intended to study its individual benefit. Materials and Methods3DCRT treatment planning was performed in a cohort of 103 patients receiving radiotherapy of the whole breast (WBI)/chest wall (CWI) ± nodal regions (NI) both under DIBH and free breathing (FB) in the supine position, and in the WBI only cases prone (n = 45) position, too. A series of patient-related and heart dosimetry parameters were analyzed. ResultsThe DIBH technique provided dramatic reduction of all heart dosimetry parameters the individual benefit, however, varied. In the whole population the best predictor of benefit was the ratio of ipsilateral lung volume (ILV)FB and ILVDIBH. In the WBI cohort 9–11 patients and 5–8 patients received less dose to selected heart structures with the DIBH and prone positioning, respectively; based on meeting various dose constraints DIBH was the only solution in 6–13 cases, and prone positioning in 5–6 cases. In addition to other excellent predictors, a small ILVFB or ILVDIBH with outstanding predicting performance (AUC ≥ 0.90) suggested prone positioning. Detailed analysis consistently indicated the outstanding performance of ILVFB and ILVDIBH in predicting the benefit of one over the other technique in lowering the mean heart dose (MHD), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) mean dose and left ventricle(LV)-V5Gy. The preference of prone positioning was further confirmed by anatomical parameters measured on a single CT scan at the middle of the heart. Performing spirometry in a cohort of 12 patients, vital capacity showed the strongest correlation with ILVFB and ILVDIBH hence this test could be evaluated as a clinical tool for patient selection. DiscussionIndividual lung volume measures estimated by spirometry and anatomical data examined prior to acquiring planning CT may support the preference of DIBH or prone radiotherapy for optimal heart protection.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure–Assisted Breathing With Supine Tangential Left Breast Radiation Therapy When Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Was Ineffective or Unsuitable: Clinical Implications for an Affordable Heart-Sparing Breast Radiation Therapy to Reduce the Health Care Disparities in Low-Resource Settings

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure–Assisted Breathing With Supine Tangential Left Breast Radiation Therapy When Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Was Ineffective or Unsuitable: Clinical Implications for an Affordable Heart-Sparing Breast Radiation Therapy to Reduce the Health Care Disparities in Low-Resource Settings

Deep inspiration breath hold real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy (DBRT) as a novel stereotactic body radiation therapy approach for lung tumors

Radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) reduces doses to the lungs and organs at risk. The stability of breath holding and reproducibility of tumor location are higher during expiration than during inspiration; therefore, we developed an irradiation method combining DIBH and real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy (RTRT) (DBRT). Nine patients were enrolled in this study. Fiducial markers were placed near tumors using bronchoscopy. Treatment planning computed tomography (CT) was performed thrice during DIBH, assisted by spirometer-based device. Each CT scan was fused using fiducial markers. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured for each dataset and summed to create GTVsum; adding a 5-mm margin around GTVsum generated the planning target volume. The prescribed dose was mainly 42 Gy in four fractions. The treatment plan was created using DIBH CT (DBRT-plan), with a similar treatment plan created for expiratory CT for cases for which DBRT could not be performed (conv-plan). Vx defined as the volume of the lung received x Gy, and the mean lung dose, V20, V10, and V5 were evaluated. DBRT was completed in all patients. Mean dose, V20, and V10 were significantly lower in the DBRT-plan than in the conv-plan (all p = 0.003). Mean rates of decrease for mean dose, V20, and V10 were 14.0%, 27.6%, and 19.1%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in V5. We developed DBRT, a stereotactic body radiation therapy performed with the DIBH technique; it combines a spirometer-based breath-hold support system with an RTRT system. All patients who underwent DBRT completed the procedure without any technical or mechanical complications. This is a promising methodology that may significantly reduce lung doses.

Chest Wall to Heart Distance Reproducibility in Postoperative Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer Using an Anzai Laser Sensor With Visual Feedback.

Background Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy may increase the risk of cardiovascular death due to possible heart irradiation. Thereproducibility of the chest wall to heart distance in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) was studied using a laser sensor with visual feedback. Methodology A total of 10 consecutive postoperative left-sided breast cancer cases receiving DIBH radiotherapy between December 2022 and September 2023 were retrospectively investigated. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. An Anzai respiratory gating system, AZ-733VI (Anzai, Tokyo, Japan), was employed that has a laser displacement sensor and a visual feedback device. An Elekta linac with a cone-beam CT unit, Axesse (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), was used in this study. The interfractional changes in the chest wall to heart distance among 25 fractions were analyzed for each of the 10 patients in each coordinate axis. In addition, the median with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and interquartile range (IQR) for all 250 fractions were calculated in each axis to assess the reproducibility of our DIBH technique. Results The medians of the interfractional changes in the chest wall to heart distance in each of the 10 patients ranged from -2 mm to 3 mm, -1 mm to 3 mm, and -2 mm to 1 mm in the lateral (X), superior-inferior (Y), and anterior-posterior (Z) directions, respectively. For all 10 cases, the medians were 1 mm (95% CI = 0.72 to 1.28 mm) in X, 1 mm (95% CI = 0.76 to 1.24 mm) in Y, and 0 mm (95% CI = -0.20 to 0.20 mm) in Z directions, whereas the IQRs were 4 mm in X, 2 mm in Y and 2 mm in Z directions. The measured IQRs were two to three times smaller than those shown in a previous report without visual feedback, suggesting a clinical advantage of the visual feedback in DIBH for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. The DIBH solution shown in this study required approximately 10 minutes from room-in to room-out, thereby not reducing the daily number of patients. Conclusions Our DIBH approach with visual feedback achieved better distance reproducibility between the chest wall and heart by a factor of two to three in terms of IQR compared to the previously reported data without visual feedback. Patient throughput was also favorable. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the chest wall to heart distance reproducibility in DIBH with visual feedback.

Failure mode and effects analysis in consensus-based GDM for surface-guided deep inspiration breath-hold breast radiotherapy for breast cancer under the framework of linguistic Z-number

Most of the cancer patients cannot get the usual treatment in the advanced stage of the disease. In particular, for breast cancer, it is to use a special kind of radiation that targets the tumor while the patient holds their breath. This is called surface-guided (SG) breast radiotherapy (RT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). This treatment is very complicated and different from the normal way of treating breast cancer. It can also have many errors and problems that are not well-studied or understood. To prevent these problems, we need to use a method called failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). This method helps us find and rank the possible risks and how to avoid them. In keeping with this aim, this paper studies consensus-reaching process-based group decision-making (GDM) with completely unknown risk factors' weights and the gained-lost dominance score (GLDS)-based ranking process. We cannot avoid the uncertainty related to relativity information in medical science. Therefore, in this study, we offer the experts to provide their opinions using the linguistic Z number (LZN) because LZN is designed to capture such types of information in medical science. For the consensus-reaching process (CRP), the relativity among experts is considered for consensus measurement, and the minimum adjustment sum with group consensus opinion-based feedback is offered. For unknown weight of risk factors, we don't know how much each risk factor weighs. So, we use a method that combines two ways of calculating weights. One way is a subjective weight computation process, and the other way is based on the data using entropy and division. Finally, we applied our proposed CRP-based GDM approach for ranking the identified FMs related to the SG DIBH RT process. We conduct sensitive, comparative, and statistical assessments to ensure our method is reasonable and practical.

AI segmentation as a quality improvement tool in radiotherapy planning for breast cancer

AI segmentation has been recently introduced in the local department for delineation of targets and organs-at-risk (OAR) for a wide range of tumour sites. For breast radiotherapy, AI segmentation can provide target delineation (breast and lymph nodes) and required OAR, and this has enabled a stepwise series of improvements to the local planning technique.Clinician feedback deemed 67 - 89 % of nodal target volumes required no edits or only minor edits, so AI breast and lymph nodes volumes were first used to guide tangent and supraclavicular field placement, instead of a bony-anatomy based technique.Next, evolution from anatomical field-placement to true inverse optimised planning was introduced using AI to create the required target volumes. For internal mammary node (IMN) treatments, the previous 3-field technique prohibited Deep Inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), due to the couch rotation used to match field edges. The roll-out of VMAT (volumetric-modulated arc therapy) with DIBH enabled by AI therefore resulted in a dose reduction to ipsi-lateral lung, and in mean heart dose compared to the old 3-field technique. Median time from CT scan to VMAT IMN plan approval reduced from 12 days (with manual contouring) to 7 days using reviewed and edited AI-generated volumes.Consistent, high-quality contours for 9 OAR and breast PTVs for all patients facilitates comparison with NHS-E scorecards as a benchmark for plan quality. Workflows have been simplified, with significant time-savings. DIBH radiotherapy is now available to more patients, further improving dose sparing for heart and lung.

EP08.02-32 Optimal Planning Target Volume Margins for Spirometer-Based DIBH Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

EP08.02-32 Optimal Planning Target Volume Margins for Spirometer-Based DIBH Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

The Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Technique on Right Coronary Artery, Heart, and Liver Doses in Right Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

The deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) approach has been thoroughly researched with the aim of reducing radiation exposures to normal tissues in breast cancer patients. Although heart and lung toxicity are widely addressed in many literature, radiation-associated liver toxicity and dose constraints for the right coronary artery (RCA) are not well studied in relation to breast radiotherapy. Additionally, very few studies have investigated the relationship between doses to cardiac substructures. This study aimed to determine the effect of the DIBH technique on the right coronary artery (RCA) region, cardiac substructures, and liver dose in right breast cancer irradiation. Between January 2022 and December 2022, thirty-five right breast cancer patients who previously received breast-surgery underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation with both free-breathing (FB) and DIBH techniques. Patients were contoured by a radiation oncologist on the scans using the Treatment Planning System. For cardiac substructures, reference atlas contours were used for accurate delineation and to reduce inter-observer variation. Each patient underwent two treatment plans for both the DIBH and FB datasets. The plan comprised the FB and DIBH techniques, and the doses to the cardiac substructures, ipsilateral lung, RCA region, and liver were compared using a two-tailed paired t-test. Radiotherapy was delivered with a Linac with the prescription dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. For both FB and DIBH irradiation groups, the mean radiation doses to the ipsilateral lung, heart, and RCA region in patients with FB and DIBH techniques were; 14.67 Gy, 2.33 Gy, 4.88 Gy and 12.05 Gy, 1.34 Gy and 3.29 Gy respectively. The mean radiation doses to the cardiac substructures; for the left ventricle, right ventricle, left atrium, and right atrium for the FB were 1.08 Gy, 1.79 Gy, 4.11 Gy, and for DIBH, 0.49 Gy, 1.49 Gy, 0.95 Gy, and 2.61 Gy, respectively. For the DIBH group, the liver maximum dose (p<0.01), right lung mean dose (p = 0.001), heart maximum dose (p = 0.009), RCA mean dose (p = 0.020), RCA maximum dose (p = 0.008), RCA V5 dose (p = 0.035), right atrium maximum dose (p = 0.009) and right ventricle mean dose (p = 0.040) were significantly lower than in patients treated in the non-gated group. DIBH resulted in considerable displacement of the liver away from the high-dose target region, such that the volume of liver in the high-dose region was reduced. Additionally, the use of the DIBH technique in right breast cancer irradiation effectively reduces the radiation doses to the cardiac substructures, such as the left ventricle, right ventricle, left atrium, right atrium, RCA region, and lungs. DIBH could lead to substantial sparing of these structures with the right breast cancer radiotherapy. Future prospective studies are required to determine whether improvements to dose-distribution will translate into improved toxicity outcomes.

Application of tangent-arc technology for deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer.

To explore the advantages of dosimetry and the treatment efficiency of tangent-arc technology in deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for breast cancer. Forty patients with left-sided breast cancer who were treated in our hospital from May 2020 to June 2021 were randomly selected and divided into two groups. The first group's plan was a continuous semi-arc that started at 145° ( ± 5°) and stopped at 325° ( ± 5°). The other group's plan, defined as the tangent-arc plan, had two arcs: the first arc started at 145° ( ± 5°) and stopped at 85° ( ± 5°), and the second arc started at 25° ( ± 5°) and stopped at 325° ( ± 5°). We compared the target dose, dose in organs at risk (OARs), and treatment time between the two groups. The target dose was similar between the continuous semiarc and tangent-arc groups. The V5 of the right lung was significantly different between the two groups (Dif 5.52, 95% confidence interval 1.92-9.13, t=3.10, P=0.004), with the patients in the continuous semi-arc and tangent-arc groups having lung V5 values of (9.16 ± 1.62)%, and (3.64 ± 0.73)%, respectively. The maximum dose to the spinal cord was (1835.88 ± 222.17) cGy in the continuous semi-arc group and (599.42 ± 153.91) cGy in the tangent-arc group, yielding a significant difference between the two groups (Dif 1236.46, 95% confidence interval 689.32-1783.6, t=4.57, P<0.001). The treatment times was (311.70 ± 60.45) s for patients in the continuous semi-arc group and (254.66 ± 40.73) s for patients in the tangent-arc group, and there was a significant difference in the mean number of treatment times between the two groups (Dif 57.04, 95% confidence interval 24.05-90.03, t=3.5, P=0.001). Both the continuous semi-arc and tangent-arc plans met the clinical prescription dose requirements. The OARs received less radiation with the tangent-arc plan than the continuous semi-arc plan, especially for the lung (measured as V5) and the spinal cord (measured as the maximum dose). Tangent-arc plan took significantly less time than the continuous semi-arc, which can greatly improve treatment efficiency. Therefore, tangent-arc plans are superior continuous semi-arc plans for all cases.

Comparison of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guided radiotherapy approaches in the reduction of setup uncertainties during deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy (DIBH-RT) for left breast cancer

Advances in radiotherapy has allowed higher cure rates for cancer such as breast and thus, it is important to reduce the possible radiation side effects from exposure to other organs such as the heart. Deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy technique (DIBH-RT) significantly reduces cardiac dose during left breast radiotherapy, but the patient setup requires careful adoption of image guidance radiotherapy technique (IGRT) approaches. This study investigates the effectiveness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based IGRT protocols for patients' inter-fraction set-up correction. Setup error data from two patients’ groups; A and B who had daily CBCT and first 3 fractions + weekly CBCT imaging respectively, were analysed. This constitutes a total of 13 left breast cancer patients treated using DIBH-RT at Advanced Medical Dental Institute (AMDI), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia. The analysis was performed using MATLAB (MathWorks Inc Natick MA) to calculate the mean setup errors. The population systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors were calculated for non-IGRT, online, and two offline IGRT protocols; no action level (NAL) and extended no action level (eNAL) for each patient group. The corresponding planning target volume (PTV) margin and its percentage reduction for each of the IGRT protocols were established using van Herk margin recipe. The least population systematic setup error and PTV margin were found when using the online protocol (∑X/Y/Z = 0.17/0.22/0.31 mm; PTVX/Y/Z = 0.71/0.92/1.28 mm) followed by eNAL (∑X/Y/Z = 1.32/1.94/1.85 mm; PTVX/Y/Z = 5.75/7.99/8.46 mm), NAL (∑X/Y/Z = 1.45/2.26/1.84 mm; PTVX/Y/Z = 6.27/8.93/8.46 mm) and non-IGRT (∑X/Y/Z = 2.28/3.35/3.10 mm; PTVX/Y/Z = 7.77/10.85/10.93 mm). Up to 90% in PTV margin reduction is achieved with the online protocol. In conclusion, the use of IGRT during DIBH-RT for left breast cancer patients reduces patient set-up error and allows the use of tighter PTV margins. The online IGRT protocol was shown to be more effective in the reduction of errors and the PTV margin followed by eNAL and NAL offline IGRT protocols.

Robustness analysis of surface-guided DIBH left breast radiotherapy: personalized dosimetric effect of real intrafractional motion within the beam gating thresholds.

The robustness of surface-guided (SG) deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy (RT) for left breast cancer was evaluated by investigating any potential dosimetric effects due to the residual intrafractional motion allowed by the selected beam gating thresholds. The potential reduction of DIBH benefits in terms of organs at risk (OARs) sparing and target coverage was evaluated for conformational (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. Atotal of 192 fractions of SGRT DIBH left breast 3DCRT treatment for 12patients were analyzed. For each fraction, the average of the real-time displacement between the isocenter on the daily reference surface and on the live surface ("SGRT shift") during beam-on was evaluated and applied to the original plan isocenter. The dose distribution for the treatment beams with the new isocenter point was then calculated and the total plan dose distribution was obtained by summing the estimated perturbed dose for each fraction. Then, for each patient, the original plan and the perturbed one were compared by means of Wilcoxon test for target coverage and OAR dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics. Aglobal plan quality score was calculated to assess the overall plan robustness against intrafractional motion of both 3DCRT and IMRT techniques. Target coverage and OAR DVH metrics did not show significant variations between the original and the perturbed plan for the IMRT techniques. 3DCRT plans showed significant variations for the left descending coronary artery (LAD) and the humerus only. However, none of the dose metrics exceeded the mandatory dose constraints for any of the analyzed plans. The global plan quality analysis indicated that both 3DCRT and IMRT techniques were affected by the isocenter shifts in the same way and, generally, the residual isocenter shifts more likely tend to worsen the plan in all cases. The DIBH technique proved to be robust against residual intrafractional isocenter shifts allowed by the selected SGRT beam-hold thresholds. Small-volume OARs located near high dose gradients showed significant marginal deteriorations in the perturbed plans with the 3DCRT technique only. Global plan quality was mainly influenced by patient anatomy and treatment beam geometry rather than the technique adopted.

Deep inspiration breath hold: dosimetric benefits to decrease cardiac dose during postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer patients.

Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment for almost all patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Even with modern RT techniques, parts of the heart may still receive higher doses than those recommended by clinically validated dose limit restrictions, especially when the left breast is irradiated. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) may reduce irradiated cardiac volume compared to free breathing (FB) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact on the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in FB and DIBH RT planning in patients with left breast cancer. A retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer submitted to breast surgery followed by postoperative RT from 2015 to 2019. All patients were planned with FB and DIBH and hypofractionated dose prescription (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions). 68 patients were included in the study. For the coverage of the planned target volume evaluation [planning target volume (PTV) eval] there was no significant difference between the DIBH versus FB planning. For the heart and LAD parameters, all constraints evaluated favored DIBH planning, with statistical significance. Regarding the heart, median V16.8 Gy was 2.56% in FB vs. 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001); median V8.8 Gy was 3.47% in FB vs. 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001) and the median of mean heart dose was 1.97 Gy in FB vs. 0.92 Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001). For the LAD constraints D2% < 42 Gy, the median dose was 34.87 Gy in FB versus 5.8 Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001); V16.8 Gy < 10%, the median was 15.87% in FB versus 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001) and the median of mean LAD dose was 8.13Gy in FB versus 2.92Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001). The DIBH technique has consistently demonstrated a significant dose reduction in the heart and LAD in all evaluated constraints, while keeping the same dose coverage in the PTV eval.

A Potential Pitfall and Clinical Solutions in Surface-Guided Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is an effective technique to spare the heart in treating left-sided breast cancer. Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) is increasingly applied in DIBH setup and motion monitoring. Patient-specific breathing behavior, either thoracically driven or abdominally driven (A-DIBH), should be unaltered, online identified, and monitored accordingly to ensure reproducible heart-sparing treatment. Sixty patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with SGRT were analyzed: 20 A-DIBH patients with vertical chest elevation (VCE ≤ 5 mm) were prospectively identified, and 40 control patients were retrospectively and randomly selected for comparison. At simulation, both free-breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) were acquired, guided by a motion surrogate placed around the xiphoid process. For SGRT treatment setups, the region of interest (ROI) was defined on the CT chest surface, and the surrogate-based setup was a backup. For all 60 patients, the VCE was measured as the average of the FB-to-DIBH elevations at the breast and xiphoid process, together with abdominal elevation. In the 40-patient control group, A-DIBH patients (VCE ≤ 5 mm) were identified. Of the 20 A-DIBH patients, 10 were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy plans, and 10 patients were treated with tangent plans. Clinical DIBH plans were recalculated on FB CT to compare maximum dose (DMax), 5% of the maximum dose (D5%), mean dose (DMean), and V30Gy, V20Gy, and V5Gy of the heart and lungs and their significance. In the 20 A-DIBH patients, VCE=3 ± 2 mm, surrogate motion (9 ± 6 mm), and abdomen motion of 14 ± 5 mm are found. Heart dose reduction from FB to DIBH is significant (P < .01): ∆DMax=-8.4 ± 9.8 Gy, ∆D5%=-2.4 ± 4.4 Gy, and ∆DMean=-0.6 ± 0.9 Gy. Six out of 40 control patients (15%) are found to have VCE ≤ 5 mm. A-DIBH (VCE ≤ 5 mm) patient population is significant (15%), and they should be identified in the SGRT workflow and monitored accordingly. A new abdominal ROI or an abdominal surrogate should be used instead of the conventional chest-only ROI. Patient-specific DIBH should be preserved for higher reproducibility to ensure heart sparing.

PO-1667 Long axial field-of-view PET/CT-scanner for deep inspiration breath hold radiation therapy planning

PO-1667 Long axial field-of-view PET/CT-scanner for deep inspiration breath hold radiation therapy planning

OC-0935 Patient selection for DIBH radiotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OC-0935 Patient selection for DIBH radiotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

MO-0794 Initial experience with DIBH radiotherapy for left breast cancer using SGRT and bore-based linac

MO-0794 Initial experience with DIBH radiotherapy for left breast cancer using SGRT and bore-based linac