Decrease Radiation Exposure Research Articles

Diagnostic Value of Maximal Systolic Acceleration Measurements in the Follow-up of Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair: Illustration of a Concept.

After complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR), long-term surveillance is advocated to monitor for potential (stent-related) complications. Although various imaging modalities are used, computed tomography angiography remains the standard in current clinical practice worldwide. However, radiopaque markers can cause metal artifacts and scattering, hampering assessment of patency of side branches. The maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a relatively new duplex ultrasound (DUS) parameter measured distal to a stenosis, avoiding in-stent assessment and scattering. The aim of this article is to illustrate the potential diagnostic utility of the ACCmax after cEVAR and visceral artery stenting in general. The ACCmax is measured at the maximal slope of the upstroke during the systolic phase in arterial flow. By manually connecting 2 points, a tangent line is created in which the maximal acceleration is automatically calculated and expressed in m/s2. A higher value reflects better arterial perfusion proximal to its measurement point. One measurement of a visceral artery takes about 5 minutes. ACCmax measurements can be a useful addition during DUS follow-up after cEVAR or visceral artery stenting, possibly decreasing radiation exposure, nephrotoxicity, and health care costs. Long-term surveillance after complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR) is necessary to monitor for potential (stent-related) complications. Although CTA is the most common modality for imaging, metal artifacts and scattering can hamper the assessment of stent patency. The maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a duplex ultrasound based parameter that reflects arterial perfusion proximal to its measurement point. Due to its noninvasive nature, it can be a useful addition during follow-up after cEVAR or visceral artery stenting, possibly decreasing radiation exposure, nephrotoxicity and health care costs as well.

Radiating for Two: Quantifying Radiation Exposure to Pregnant Urologists During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Current occupational recommendations limit fetal radiation dose to 1 mSv. With increased gender diversity in urology, understanding radiation exposure during pregnancy is crucial. The purpose of this study was to determine surgeon uterine radiation dose during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and compare effectiveness of several radiation reduction strategies in a cadaver model. Two cadavers were used to simulate the surgeon and patient in a PCNL model. An ion chamber was placed behind the surgeon's anterior uterine wall to measure radiation dose. Three radiation reduction methods were compared: pulsed fluoroscopy (1, 4, 8, 15, 30 pps), low-dose (LD) fluoroscopy, and surgeon shielding (none, 0.35, 0.50, 0.70 mm lead equivalents). The average radiation dose/second was recorded for 20 trials per combination. Assuming 5 minutes of fluoroscopy per PCNL, the number of cases required to exceed the fetal occupational limit was determined. Decreasing pulse frequency from 30 to 1 pps reduced dose by 96% (p<0.001). The LD setting decreased dose by 56% (p<0.001). A 0.35 mm lead apron resulted in a 94% dose reduction (p<0.001), and the 0.50 and 0.70 mm lead aprons further reduced dose by 12% and 47%, respectively. At conventional fluoroscopy settings of automatic exposure control and 30 pps, a surgeon could perform 12 PCNLs using no lead or 189 PCNLs using a 0.35 mm lead apron before reaching the 1 mSv limit. In addition to shielding, employing 1 pps with LD further decreased radiation exposure, allowing over 6000 cases to be performed with <1 mSv uterine radiation exposure. Within the limitations of this cadaver study, these data support that high volume pregnant surgeons employing active radiation reduction techniques such as pulsed, LD fluoroscopy and appropriate shielding can maintain surgical volume with relatively low risk. Fetal dosimeter use with monthly monitoring is still encouraged to confirm safety throughout pregnancy.

Outcomes of Radiation Dose Reduction Protocol in Electrophysiologic and Cardiac Device Procedures

Background: Exposure to radiation has been demonstrated to be associated with adverse short- and long-term health outcomes. Objective: To presented outcomes before and after the implementation of a radiation dose reduction protocol in electrophysiologic (EP) and cardiac device procedures. Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective comparative study, conducted at Chiang Mai University Hospital in Thailand using 2017 and 2019 data, including all patients who underwent EP and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. Exclusion criteria involved patients with incomplete radiation dose records. The authors compared fluoroscopic time, radiation exposure, and complication rates before and after the protocol. Results: Among the 458 cases, with 214 Eps and 244 devices, the mean age was 58 years. For device implantation procedures, there was no significant change in fluoroscopic time as median (P₂₅, P₇₅) before and after protocol implementation were 3.1 (0.4, 5.8) versus 4.4 (1.2,7.6) minutes, respectively (p=0.117). However, there was a decreasing trend in dose area product (DAP) at 242.0 (119.2, 766.0) versus 197.9 (71.5, 494.5) cGy.cm² (p=0.073). The reduction in DAP was more pronounced in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation when comparing 2017 to 2019 were 1,933.6 (1,039.4, 7,683.8) versus 1,074.6 (427.2, 2,890.7) cGy.cm² (p=0.020). In EP procedures, fluoroscopic time significantly decreased from 8.1 (3.0, 14.3) minutes in 2017 to 1.0 (0.0, 3.6) minute in 2019 (p&lt;0.001), accompanied by a significant reduction in exposure dose of 45.0 (10.8, 153.3) versus 1.7 (0.0, 31.6) mGy (p&lt;0.001) and DAP of 1,022.9 (247.2, 2,660.3) versus 38.5 (0.0, 566.9) cGy.cm² (p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in the complication rate between the two periods. Conclusion: The implementation of the radiation dose reduction protocol resulted in a significant decrease in radiation exposure during EP procedures and showed a trend towards reduction in CIED procedures.

Coil Embolization for Cerebral Aneurysm Using Low Pulse Rate Fluoroscopy.

Although coil embolization is commonly perceived as a minimally invasive procedure, the associated radiation exposure cannot be disregarded. To date, no specific study has investigated radiation exposure during coil embolization. This study aimed to investigate the potential of lowering the pulse rate to decrease radiation exposure during coil embolization while maintaining patient safety. Radiation data and clinical features of 70 patients who underwent coil embolization between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Since July 2017, the pulse rate was regulated from 7.5 to 4 frames per second (f/s). Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between pulse rate and radiation exposure. Out of the 70 procedures, 30 were performed at the standard pulse rate (7.5 f/s), and 40 were performed at the lower pulse rate (4 f/s). In the lower-pulse-rate group, the absorbed dose to the patient (AK) was 2580.7 (±217) mGy, whereas in the standard-pulse-rate group, it was 4760 (±411.1). Both the dose-area product (DAP) and AK were substantially reduced in the low pulse rate group (p = 0.000002). There was a significant correlation between DAP and AK and pulse rate (p = 0.004, p = 0.0017, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between pulse rate and perioperative complications. Our findings suggest that using a lower pulse rate (4 f/s) can effectively reduce radiation exposure during coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms while ensuring patient safety.

Evaluating the Status and Promising Potential of Robotic Spinal Surgery Systems.

The increasing frequency of cervical and lumbar spine disorders, driven by aging and evolving lifestyles, has led to a rise in spinal surgeries using pedicle screws. Robotic spinal surgery systems have emerged as a promising innovation, offering enhanced accuracy in screw placement and improved surgical outcomes. We focused on literature of this field from the past 5 years, and a comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Robotic spinal surgery systems have significantly impacted spinal procedures by improving pedicle screw placement accuracy and supporting various techniques. These systems facilitate personalized, minimally invasive, and low-radiation interventions, leading to greater precision, reduced patient risk, and decreased radiation exposure. Despite advantages, challenges such as high costs and a steep learning curve remain. Ongoing advancements are expected to further enhance these systems' role in spinal surgery.

Are We Imaging Gently in Indiana? A System-Wide Population-Based Study of Chest CT Use in the Pediatric Trauma Population.

Over the past decade, there has been a significant effort to decrease radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients. The objective of this study was to determine if trauma centers (TCs) and nontrauma centers (non-TCs) are practicing in line with this effort. We hypothesized that TCs would demonstrate a significant decrease in the use of chest computed tomography (CT) during the study period, whereas non-TC would show no change in chest CT use. We queried a state-wide database from 2010 to 2020 for pediatric trauma encounters at TCs and non-TCs within a single large health system. All transfer encounters were excluded. Chest CTs and chest radiographs (CXRs) were performed, and injury diagnosis codes were extracted for each encounter. Chest CT use and incidence of thoracic injuries were compared between TCs and non-TCs. A total of 13,014 encounters were included, of which 85.8% occurred at TCs and 14.2% occurred at non-TCs. There were significant differences between TC and non-TC encounter demographics. During the study period, the percentage of trauma encounters in which chest CT was obtained increased yearly at both TCs and non-TCs. Among encounters where both modalities were performed in the first 24 hours, chest CT was performed before CXR in 0.4% of TC and 0.1% of non-TC encounters (P = 0.086). Among encounters without thoracic injury, chest CT was performed in 5.2% of cases at non-TCs and 4.5% of cases at TCs (P < 0.001). In the trauma encounters studied, chest CT was performed prior to CXR more frequently at TCs compared to non-TCs. These data may reflect regional trauma triage protocols, availability of chest CT, or differences in education between institutions. Whereas TCs may see more severely injured patients more frequently, education regarding conservative CT imaging principles should be reinforced through multidisciplinary efforts.

The Impact of Navigation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Study of Historical Aspects, Current Techniques and Future Directions.

Background/Objectives: We sought to improve accuracy while minimizing radiation hazards, improving surgical outcomes, and preventing potential complications. Despite the increasing popularity of these systems, a limited number of papers have been published addressing the historical evolution, detailing the areas of use, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages, of this increasingly popular system in lumbar spine surgery. Our objective was to offer readers a concise overview of navigation system history in lumbar spine surgeries, the techniques involved, the advantages and disadvantages, and suggestions for future enhancements to the system. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the development and implementation of navigation systems in lumbar spine surgeries. Our sources include PubMed-indexed peer-reviewed journals, clinical trial data, and case studies involving technologies such as computer-assisted surgery (CAS), image-guided surgery (IGS), and robotic-assisted systems. Results: To develop more practical, effective, and accurate navigation techniques for spine surgery, consistent advancements have been made over the past four decades. This technological progress began in the late 20th century and has since encompassed image-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, advanced navigation combined with robotic assistance, and artificial intelligence. These technological advancements have significantly improved the accuracy of implant placement, reducing the risk of misplacement and related complications. Navigation has also been found to be particularly useful in tumor resection and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), where conventional anatomic landmarks are lacking or, in the case of MIS, not visible. Additionally, these innovations have led to shorter operative times, decreased radiation exposure for patients and surgical teams, and lower rates of reoperation. As navigation technology continues to evolve, future innovations are anticipated to further enhance the capabilities and accessibility of these systems, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. Conclusions: The initial limited utilization of navigation system in spine surgery has further expanded to encompass almost all fields of lumbar spine surgeries. As the cost-effectiveness and number of trained surgeons improve, a wider use of the system will be ensured so that the navigation system will be an indispensable tool in lumbar spine surgery. However, continued research and development, along with training programs for surgeons, are essential to fully realize the potential of these technologies in clinical practice.

A comparative review of the application value of FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in lung cancer.

Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a multimodal imaging technique that combines PET and CT, utilizing FAP inhibitors as radiotracers. Fibroblast activation protein, a serine protease highly expressed in many epithelial tumor-associated fibroblasts, plays a crucial role in tumor stroma formation and remodeling. Through the detection of FAP expression, FAPI PET/CT facilitates the diagnosis and staging of both benign and malignant pulmonary tumors. In contrast to traditional fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT focusing on glucose metabolism, FAPI PET/CT offers benefits such as enhanced specificity, reduced background noise, accelerated imaging speed, and decreased radiation exposure. This review provides an overview of the progress in applying FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary malignancies and discusses current challenges and future prospects.

Is Ocular Safety in Orthopaedics Overlooked? A Systematic Review of Annual Ocular Radiation Exposure and Protective Measures.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy is increasingly common in orthopaedics, although recent guidelines have reduced the maximum recommended exposure to 20 mSv annually. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to comprehensively assess current adherence to exposure guidelines, identify practice settings at increased risk for exposure, and determine the best practices and personal protective equipment for ocular radiation risk mitigation. In this systematic review we asked: (1) Is the annual amount of eye irradiation received by orthopaedic surgeons below the recommended limit of 20 mSv? (2) What is the effectiveness of leaded glasses in reducing the eye's exposure to radiation? (3) Which imaging setups and operative techniques reduce ocular irradiation? PubMed, Medline, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar were queried on September 28, 2023, to identify studies assessing intraoperative ocular radiation exposure among orthopaedic surgeons. Studies that measured radiation in or around the eye (such as the bridge of the nose or eyebrows) during orthopaedic procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were duplicate studies, studies that only estimated eye radiation based on the radiation dose recorded at parts of the body distant from the eyes, nonoriginal research, case reports, and articles without full-text English versions available. A total of 393 unique articles were retrieved, and after title, abstract, and full-text screening, 23 dosimetry studies were included, comprising 12 prospective observational studies, 7 phantom models, 1 cadaver model, 2 observational studies, and 1 randomized control trial. Risk of bias was determined via the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Study quality was generally good to excellent, with noncomparative studies having a mean MINORS score of 14 ± 0 of 16 and comparative studies achieving a mean score of 19 ± 1 of 24, with higher scores representing better study quality. Due to extensive heterogeneity in study design, a meta-analysis was not conducted, with the results rather presented as a narrative summary of key findings. The vast majority of surgeons conducting a variety of orthopaedic and traumatologic procedures were not exposed to a hazardous level of eye irradiation annually, but surgeons who perform a high volume of fluoroscopy-intensive procedures may exceed guidelines. Leaded eyeglasses reduced eye radiation by about 90%, with sport wrap-around glasses offering better shielding than alternatives, although leaded glasses overall were largely underutilized. Positioning mini C-arms in the standard vertical configuration was shown to provide up to a 13-fold decrease in radiation exposure compared with inverted configuration, while standing perpendicular to the fluoroscope further reduced eye irradiation. We found that orthopaedic surgeons who perform a high volume of fluoroscopy-intensive procedures may be at risk of exceeding recommendations on annual radiation exposure, although exposure can be mitigated through various simple strategies. In particular, this analysis found that the use of sport wrap-around leaded glasses, positioning of mini-C arms in the standard vertical configuration, and standing perpendicular to the fluoroscope provide the most effective means of limiting ocular radiation exposure. As ophthalmic radiation exposure presents a potentially important occupational health hazard to orthopaedic surgeons, further investigations of radiation exposure specific to high-volume, fluoroscopy-intensive orthopaedic practices and long-term ophthalmic outcomes will help determine the extent of the potential harm posed by frequent exposure to intraoperative radiation over the span of a career. Level III, therapeutic study.

A Review of 3D Modalities Used for the Diagnosis of Scoliosis.

Spine radiographs in the standing position are the recommended standard for diagnosing idiopathic scoliosis. Though the deformity exists in 3D, its diagnosis is currently carried out with the help of 2D radiographs due to the unavailability of an efficient, low-cost 3D alternative. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not suitable in this case, as they are obtained in the supine position. Research on 3D modelling of scoliotic spine began with multiplanar radiographs and later moved on to biplanar radiographs and finally a single radiograph. Nonetheless, modern advances in diagnostic imaging have the potential to preserve image quality and decrease radiation exposure. They include the DIERS formetric scanner system, the EOS imaging system, and ultrasonography. This review article briefly explains the technology behind each of these methods. They are compared with the standard imaging techniques. The DIERS system and ultrasonography are radiation free but have limitations with respect to the quality of the 3D model obtained. There is a need for 3D imaging technology with less or zero radiation exposure and that can produce a quality 3D model for diseases like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Accurate 3D models are crucial in clinical practice for diagnosis, planning surgery, patient follow-up examinations, biomechanical applications, and computer-assisted surgery.

Impact of 3D TEE guided ASD transcatheter closure on procedure outcome and radiation exposure

Abstract Background Transcatheter ASD device closure of secondum ASD is widely accepted in closure of ASD. Radiation exposure increases the risk of cancer for both patients and staff members, fusion of 3- D TEE and fluoroscopy has helped us decrease radiation exposure during whole procedure. Aim to assess feasibility of 3 D TEE guidance in transcatheter ASD closure and assess its value in reducing radiation exposure as compared to control patients. Methods This study was conducted on 30 patients with secundum ASD referred to cardiology department - Ain Shams University for percutaneous ASD device closure under 3D TEE guidance and 54 control patients who performed percutaneous ASD device closure using conventional method. we calculated total procedure time (min), total DAP (mGy/cm2), (FT) fluoroscopy time (min), total air kerma (mGy), maximum ASD diameter (mm) and we recorded implanted device size and device type for all the patients. Results There was no significant difference between both groups regarding FT, total air kerma, dose area product. Operative time of study group was significantly longer than control group although FT reduced significantly in last case of the study. In the last 10 cases of the study radiation exposure decreases and was significantly lower than control group. Conclusion The Use of 3 D-TEE by well-trained imaging cardiologist on tracking catheter during percutaneous ASD device closure decrease significantly radiation exposure of patients as well as medical personnel.

Immobilization during infant fluoroscopy: Pros and cons

This article explores the practice of immobilization during fluoroscopy procedures for infants, discussing its advantages and disadvantages. The authors examine contrasting policies and thoughts on immobilization across different medical institutions. While some advocate for its routine use to minimize patient motion, enhance imaging quality, and decrease radiation exposure, others question its necessity and raise concerns about patient consent and parental distress. Ethical dilemmas are also discussed regarding patient autonomy and psychological impact on families. The authors advocate for a balanced approach, recognizing the utility of immobilization in certain clinical scenarios while still emphasizing patient-centered care. Ultimately, the article underscores the importance of institutional policies that prioritize both patient safety and ethical principles in pediatric radiology practices.

Robotic-assisted spine surgery-a narrative review.

Emerging technologies have increasingly been adopted in spine surgery in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes. Robotic assistance is an area of significant interest, with proposed benefits including increased accuracy, decreased complication rates, and decreased radiation exposure. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the currently available robotic assistance systems and their associated outcomes and limitations. A review of national databases was performed using key terms "robotic", "spine", and "surgery" for literature from 2014 to 2023. Studies that aimed to describe the utilities of endoscopic surgeries, associated outcomes, limitations, and future directions were included. Studies that were not in English were excluded. This review includes a brief overview of the history of robotic spine surgery as well as its clinical outcomes, limitations, and future directions. Robotic-assisted spine surgery has seen increasing use in the attempt to increase precision and improve outcomes and has been associated with increased accuracy in pedicle screw placement and decreased complication rates. Barriers to its adoption include a significant learning curve, possibly longer operative cases, and significant associated costs. As robotic assistance continues to become increasingly popular in spine surgery, it is critical for surgeons to understand the technology available and the associated outcomes to make informed decisions when considering which system to incorporate into their practice.

Use of the flat panel detector fluoroscope reduces radiation exposure during periacetabular osteotomy

The Periacetabular Osteotomy is a technically demanding procedure that requires precise intraoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy. Fluoroscopic images pose a radiation risk to operating room staff, scrubbed personnel, and the patient. Most commonly, a Standard Fluoroscope with an Image Intensifier is used. Our institution recently implemented the novel Fluoroscope with a Flat Panel Detector. The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dosage and accuracy between the two fluoroscopes. A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent Periacetabular Osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia was completed. The total radiation exposure dose (mGy) was recorded and compared for each case from the standard fluoroscope (n = 27) and the flat panel detector (n = 26) cohorts. Lateral center edge angle was measured and compared intraoperatively and at the six-week postoperative visit. A total of 53 patients (96% female) with a mean age and BMI of 17.84 (± 6.84) years and 22.66 (± 4.49) kg/m2 (standard fluoroscope) and 18.23 (± 4.21) years and 21.99 (± 4.00) kg/m2 (flat panel detector) were included. The standard fluoroscope averaged total radiation exposure to be 410.61(± 193.02) mGy, while the flat panel detector averaged 91.12 (± 49.64) mGy (p < 0.0001). The average difference (bias) between intraoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral center edge angle measurement was 0.36° (limits of agreement: − 3.19 to 2.47°) for the standard fluoroscope and 0.27° (limits of agreement: − 2.05 to 2.59°) for the flat panel detector cohort. Use of fluoroscopy with flat panel detector technology decreased the total radiation dose exposure intraoperatively and produced an equivalent assessment of intraoperative lateral center edge angle. Decreasing radiation exposure to young patients is imperative to reduce the risk of future comorbidities.

Quantification of Aortic Valve Calcification in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Background: The goal of our study is to evaluate a method to quantify aortic valve calcification (AVC) in contrast-enhanced computed tomography for patients with suspected severe aortic stenosis pre-interventionally. Methods: A total of sixty-five patients with aortic stenosis underwent both a native and a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan of the aortic valve (45 in the training cohort and 20 in the validation cohort) using a standardized protocol. Aortic valve calcification was semi-automatically quantified via the Agatston score method for the native scans and was used as a reference. For contrast-enhanced computed tomography, a calcium threshold of the Hounsfield units of the aorta plus four times the standard deviation was used. Results: For the quantification of aortic valve calcification in contrast-enhanced computed tomography, a conversion formula (691 + 1.83 x AVCCECT) was derived via a linear regression model in the training cohort. The validation in the second cohort showed high agreement for this conversion formula with no significant proportional bias (Bland-Altman, p = 0.055) and with an intraclass correlation coefficient in the validation cohort of 0.915 (confidence interval 95% 0.786-0.966) p < 0.001. Conclusions: Calcium scoring in patients with aortic valve stenosis can be performed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography with high validity. Using a conversion factor led to an excellent agreement, thereby obviating an additional native computed tomography scan. This might contribute to a decrease in radiation exposure.

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Glenohumeral Joint in lateral Position: A Case Report

Background: Shoulder pain due to adhesive capsulitis is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition, necessitating innovative treatments. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers an effective approach to alleviate chronic shoulder pain. This case report focuses on Cooled Radiofrequency ablation of articular branches of the glenohumeral joint, performed with hybrid technique using fluoroscopy and ultrasonography, while the patient remains in a lateral position. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old female presented with chronic right shoulder pain and restricted motion diagnosed with right shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Diagnostic blocks of sensory articular nerves provided significant pain relief, leading to Glenohumeral joint sensory articular nerve denervation via Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation. The procedure was performed with the patient in a lateral position, as lying prone was intolerable due to pain. The patient showed substantial pain relief and improved range of motion post-procedure. Discussion: Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has shown promise in treating Adhesive Capsulitis and Glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis. While the traditional approach involves changing the patient's position from prone to supine, this case report introduces a novel lateral position technique. Benefits include improved patient comfort, strict asepsis maintenance, reduced procedure time, and decreased radiation exposure. However, challenges in C-arm positioning were encountered. Additionally, hydrodilatation of the glenohumeral joint was performed, resulting in further pain reduction and range of motion improvement. Conclusion: This case report demonstrates the efficacy and safety of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation for the Glenohumeral joint, utilizing a lateral position approach. The findings support its potential advantages over traditional methods, offering a valuable addition to the management of chronic shoulder pain. Further research and clinical experience will refine its role in addressing this common and debilitating condition.

How Reliable Is the Measurement of the Lateral Center Edge Angle on Scoliosis Radiographs for Detecting Acetabular Dysplasia?

Hip dysplasia reportedly occurs in up to 12% of the general population and may be higher in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). When using lateral center edge angle (LCEA) measurements to help identify hip dysplasia, it is uncertain if this measurement can be performed reliably on scoliosis radiographs due to parallax. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of measuring LCEA on scoliosis radiographs compared with standard pelvis radiographs. This study evaluated 40 hips on 20 patients (mean age 12.5 years ± 3.1; 50% Female) who received PA scoliosis radiographs and AP pelvis radiographs within 1 year of each other. Review was performed by 4 pediatric radiologists (2 general, 2 MSK), 2 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, and 1 research fellow. Radiographic measurement of the LCEA for each hip was first performed on the scoliosis radiograph. After a minimum of 3 days, the LCEA was measured on a pelvis radiograph of the same individual obtained within 1 year of the scoliosis radiograph. Pearson coefficient was used to measure agreement between scoliosis and pelvis radiograph measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver agreement. ICC values <0.5 were classified as poor reliability, 0.5 to 0.75 were classified moderate, 0.75 to 0.90 were classified good, and >0.9 indicated excellent reliability. The mean difference between scoliosis and pelvis radiographs was 54 ± 79 days. There was good-to-excellent interobserver agreement on LCEA measurements made between readers on scoliosis radiographs (ICC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96, P <0.001) and pelvis radiographs (ICC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95, P <0.001), and moderate-to-excellent intraobserver agreement for scoliosis radiographs (ICC range: 0.68 to 0.98; P <0.001) and pelvis radiographs (ICC range: 0.62 to 0.96; P <0.001). There was a strong correlation between LCEA measurements made on scoliosis and pelvis radiographs ( r2 =0.66, P <0.001), and the intermodality agreement between scoliosis and pelvis radiograph LCEA measurements were moderate to good (ICC range: 0.68 to 0.89, P <0.001). Overall, there was good-to-excellent agreement between readers on scoliosis and pelvis radiographs, respectively, and moderate-to-excellent intraobserver agreement between LCEA measurements made on scoliosis radiographs and pelvis radiographs, respectively. LCEA measurements made on scoliosis radiographs strongly correlated to the measurements made on pelvis radiographs, and the intermodality ICC was also considered moderate to good. Dedicated pelvis radiographs may not be necessary during scoliosis workup and follow-up surveillance, thereby decreasing radiation exposure, cost, and improving patient care workflow. Level IV-diagnostic study.

Do Flat Panel Detector C-Arms Decrease Radiation Exposure Compared to Conventional Image Intensifiers?

To compare the radiation dose and image quality between flat panel detector (FPD) and traditional image intensifier (II) C-arms at their lowest radiation settings. In a ureteroscopy simulation using a cadaver model, the radiation exposure was compared between FPD and II at 4 pulses-per-second (pps) using both low dose and automatic exposure control (AEC) settings. Additionally, the lowest dose settings for each machine were compared (4pps with low dose in the FPD and 1pps with low dose in the II). Five trials of 5minutes were conducted for each setting. Four new optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters were used in each trial to record radiation exposure. Ten blinded urologists completed a survey rating image quality for each setting. When comparing the FPD and II at their lowest possible settings, the FPD produced significantly more radiation (P<.05). Using both machines at 4pps in low dose mode resulted in no significant difference between C-arms (P>.05). Conversely, operating the C-arms at 4pps and AEC resulted in significantly higher radiation exposure from the FPD compared to the II (P<.05). There was no significant difference in image quality at each setting. FPDs produce significantly more radiation at the lowest settings compared to IIs. Surgeons should employ IIs when reducing radiation exposure as low as possible is imperative, such as when operating on pediatric and pregnant patients.

(016) Sexual Health Toxicity Following MRI-Guided versus CT-guided Prostate SBRT

Abstract Introduction Sexual health toxicities remain an under-reported but important health outcome for patients undergoing radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. With the increasing adoption of higher daily doses of radiation over shorter timeframes delivered using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the precision of radiation delivery remains an important factor that can reduce patient toxicity. MRI-guided SBRT (MRgRT) allows for improved image quality, treatment gating, and planning target volume margin reduction, offering improved radiation precision, which may translate to reduced treatment-related toxicity as compared to traditional CT-guided SBRT (CTgRT). Objective We sought to evaluate the effect of MRI-guidance on sexual health toxicity in patients following prostate SBRT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of patients enrolled on a phase III single-center randomized trial (MIRAGE: NCT04384770). The trial overall seeks to study the relative benefit of MRI vs CT guided SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) in patients with localized prostate cancer. Right and left neurovascular bundles (NVBs) and internal pudendal arteries (IPAs) were contoured on treatment planning images. Dosimetric parameters for these structures (Dmax, Dmin, Dmean, and V20Gy) were collected. Patient-reported sexual function outcomes (SHIM and EPIC-26 surveys) were also collected prior to treatment and at 1, 3, and 12 months following treatment. A clinically relevant decrement was defined as a ≥24 point decrease in the EPIC-26 sexual domain scores and a ≥9 point decrease on SHIM surveys. Unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests were used to evaluate for statistical significance. Results 152 patients received either MRgRT (n = 77) or CTgRT (n = 75). MRgRT resulted in a significant improvement in the volume receiving 20 Gy or less of radiation (V20Gy) in the left NVB (7.3cc vs 10.9cc, p = 4.4x10-8), right NVB (7.0cc vs 10.7cc, p = 2.8x10-7), and right IPA (0.42cc vs 1.35cc, p = 0.049), and trended towards significance for the left IPA (0.3cc vs 1.1cc, p = 0.066). Only 48 patients were not given hormonal therapy with radiotherapy. No statistically significant differences in clinically relevant decrements in patient-reported SHIM or EPIC scores were seen between MRgRT and CTgRT in these patients. No clear association between acute or chronic (12-months post-RT) sexual health toxicity and radiation exposure to the NVBs or IPAs was identified. Conclusions Patients treated with MRgRT had decreased radiation exposure to the bilateral NVBs and IPAs compared to patients treated with CTgRT. These data highlight the dosimetric benefits of MRgRT with regard to sexually relevant organs at risk. Power to detect associations between dosimetry and patient-reported sexual health outcomes will increase as the data matures and more patients have recovered testosterone after use of hormonal therapy. Future work will assess the impact on MRI-guided vs CT-guided radiation on sexual health outcomes at later time points. Disclosure No.

Radiation Exposure in Interventional Pain Management Physicians: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

BACKGROUND: Millions of interventional pain procedures are performed each year to address chronic pain. The increase in these procedures also raises the concern of health risks associated with ionizing radiation for interventional pain management physicians who perform fluoroscopy-guided operations. Some health concerns include cancers, cataracts, and even pregnancy abnormalities. Little is known regarding the long-term and cumulative effects of small radiation doses. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to identify common body parts that are exposed to ionizing radiation during interventional pain procedures and examine methods to help physicians reduce their radiation exposure. STUDY DESIGN: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist was used to comprehensively identify articles from 2 medical databases. The radiation dose to interventional pain management physicians obtained from relevant peer-reviewed articles were aggregated and used for analysis. METHODS: PubMed was first used to collect the articles for two broad keyword searches of “radiation exposure pain management” and “radiation exposure interventionalist” with years ranging from 1956 – February 2023. EMBASE was also used to collect the articles for the two keyword searches of “radiation exposure pain management” and “radiation exposure interventionalist” with years ranging from 1969 – February 2023. This systematic approach yielded a total of 2,736 articles; 24 were included in our paper. The risk of bias for these articles was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the National Institutes of Health tool. RESULTS: Through our systematic literature search, more than 3,577 patients were treated by 30 interventional pain management physicians. Some areas of exposure to radiation include the physician’s neck, chest, groin, hands, and eyes. One common body region that is exposed to radiation is the chest; our review found that wearing lead aprons can lower the radiation dose by more than 95%. Wearing protective equipment and managing the distance between the operator and fluoroscope can both independently lower the radiation dose by more than 90% as well. Our literature review also found that other body parts that are often overlooked in regard to radiation exposure are the eyes and hands. In our study, the radiation dose to the outside (unprotected) chest ranged from 0.008 ± 27 mrem to 1,345 mrem, the outside neck ranged from 572 mrem to 2,032 mrem, the outside groin ranged from 176 mrem to 1,292 mrem, the hands ranged from 0.006 ± 27.4 mrem to 0.114 ± 269 mrem, and the eyes ranged from 40 mrem to 369 mrem. When protective equipment was worn, the radiation exposure to the inside chest ranged from 0 mrem to 108 mrem, the inside neck ranged from 0 mrem to 68 mrem, and the inside groin ranged from 0 mrem to 15 mrem. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include its small sample size; only the radiation exposure of 30 interventional pain management physicians were examined. Furthermore, this review mainly consisted of observational studies rather than randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Implementing safety precautions, such as wearing protective gear, providing educational programs, and keeping a safe distance, demonstrated a significant decrease in radiation exposure. The experience of interventional pain management physicians also factored into their radiation exposure during procedures. Radiation is a known carcinogen, and more research is needed to better understand its risk to interventional pain management physicians. KEY WORDS: Chronic pain management, radiation exposure, fluoroscopy, anesthesiology, nerve blocks, x-ray, ultrasound