You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction/Andrology: Peyronie's Disease/Surgical Therapy I1 Apr 20101070 USE OF LENGTH EXPANSION INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESES IN MEN WITH ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION SECONDARY TO PEYRONIE'S DISEASE Benjamin Whittam, Todd Doran, Melissa Kaufman, and Douglas Milam Benjamin WhittamBenjamin Whittam More articles by this author , Todd DoranTodd Doran More articles by this author , Melissa KaufmanMelissa Kaufman More articles by this author , and Douglas MilamDouglas Milam More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2229AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) with molding is an effective and durable treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) and moderate penile curvature due to Peyronie's disease (PyD). Current literature and dogma support use of the American Medical Systems (AMS) CX model or the Mentor Alpha 1 IPP because lengthening capacity of other models is thought to prohibit adequate rigidity for molding and straightening, however, these devices may result in the perception of decreased penile length. Herein we report our experience with placement of length expansion IPP models in the Peyronie's population. METHODS Retrospective review of medical records was performed for patients with ED and penile curvature that had undergone AMS Ultrex or LGX IPP implantation from January 2004 to February 2009. Charts were evaluated for demographics, perioperative curvature, voiding symptoms, erectile function, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS Forty-nine patients underwent AMS Ultrex or LGX implantation for ED associated with PyD. Mean patient age at time of surgery was 60 years (range 45 – 79 years). All patients presented with ED and penile curvature with an average penile curve of 52.9 degrees. Postoperatively, of the 40 patients with sufficient follow-up, 22 had no residual curve and the 18 had an average residual curve of 17.7 degrees. Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores increased from a preoperative mean of 6.97 to 18.54 postoperatively (p=0.0001). AUA-SS mean scores remained stable from 9.11 preoperatively to 7.77 at last follow-up (p=0.80). Excluding 2 patients not sexually active, 87% reported satisfaction with their IPP, while the percentage able to have intercourse increased from 30.8% preoperatively to 97.3% postoperatively. 31 patients underwent molding at time of operation, with no reported cases of aneurysmal dilatation. There were no device infections, one hematoma and one revision due to reduced glans support. No devices were explanted secondary to issues with penile length. CONCLUSIONS Even in patients with severe curvature and ED secondary to PyD, implantation of the AMS Ultrex or LGX IPP results in substantial improvements in curvature, erectile function and sexual health. This data expands current clinical strategies for treatment of this complex patient population by demonstrating the AMS Ultrex and LGX devices are viable therapeutic options for PyD, providing substantial resolution of penile deformities without perceived loss of length and accompanied by an acceptable morbidity profile Nashville, TN© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e417 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Benjamin Whittam More articles by this author Todd Doran More articles by this author Melissa Kaufman More articles by this author Douglas Milam More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...