Abstract Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended in patients with heart failure (HF), but 1/3 of patients are "non-responders". More recent resynchronization algorithms promote electrical optimization by dynamically adjusting atrioventricular intervals, reducing QRS duration. However, their impact on left ventricular function parameters remains unclear. Objectives The following echocardiographic parameters were evaluated and compared pre-CRT and at 12 months follow-up: left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic volume; ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal myocardial strain (GLS), left atrial (LA) volume; and analytical parameters: NT-ProBNP. Methods Retrospective, comparative study of patients who underwent CRT. All patients underwent echocardiographic study and clinical analysis before CRT implantation and at 12 months follow-up. The following echocardiographic parameters were assessed post-procedure: LVEF (Simpson biplane method); LV volumes and LA volumes indexed to body surface area and GLS (GE Echopac). NT-ProBNP values were collected. Results 50 patients (74 ± 1.3 years, 66% men) were studied, 50% with ischemic heart disease. In the comparative analysis before CRT and at 12-month follow-up, statistically significant differences were observed in LV diastolic and systolic volumes (96.5 ± 4.3 ml/m2 vs. 78. 2 ± 4 ml/m2, p=0.001; 65 ± 3 ml/m2 vs. 48 ± 3 ml/m2, p=0.001), with a significant improvement in LVEF at follow-up (33% ± 1.1 vs. 40% ± 1.4, p=0.001) as well as GLS (-7.8% ± 0.3 vs. -11.5% ± 1, p=0.003). LA volume also showed a significant decrease at follow-up (87 ± 4 ml vs. 71 ±3.8 ml). Reverse remodeling was more evident in patients without a history of ischemic heart disease, with a decrease in LV volumes, improved LVEF and GLS. NT-ProBNP levels also decreased significantly at follow-up (1945 ± 294 pg/mL vs. 783 ± 134 pg/mL, p=0.001). Conclusions CRT implantation is a therapeutic option for patients with HF refractory to medical treatment. Recent resynchronization algorithms show good results in reducing LV volumes as well as improving left ventricular function, and the prognosis of these patients.
Read full abstract