Viewed in traditional Amateur Radio terms, the average cellular telephone handset is not very impressive. It has limited RF power output, a fixed, built in antenna, and you can’t even select the operating frequency. These devices do though leverage billions of dollars in worldwide network investment. Until Amateur Radio starts to think beyond just home stations and at more fixed infrastructure and networking, our emergency communications capabilities, particularly in the digital arena, will be limited. One evening in mid 2002 I checked into the Minnesota Section Phone Net. It was one of those days when we had some traffica periodic military Divisional Reunion, and about five messages were being held for us. It took quite a while for these to be sent and for operators in each of the areas to be rounded up. I think we got all five or maybe four of the five messages handled in the half hour the net normally runs. Later that week, in June 2002, there was an article in the Wall Street Journal talking about how hospitals would have to improvise a response to a “dirty bomb” attack (1). While the article focused on the notion of limited emergency room capacity and shortages of decontamination facilities, the point was that we were not prepared for many types of terrorist incidents or accidents. This was before the massive build-up in Federal and other funding for terrorism response, and the widespread adoption of the Incident Command System. If there had been an incident, say in Minneapolis, it is likely Amateur Radio would have played a role. So the question was, if we had to help with a mass evacuation as an example, would we have the tools to do the job? The short answer is no. We could probably handle the message volumes needed for internal Amateur radio purposes; we would not have much if any spare capacity to provide for served agencies, which is of course a key mission for us. I have stopped showing our 1920 era radiogram form to served agencies, who have not appreciated the historical context here in light of their serious mission objectives. Most agencies are besieged with proposals from vendors and consultants for state of the art digital emergency response technology. As was stated in the Editorial in QST in September 2007, (2) the emergency management community is pushing toward a digital response, and we can either fight that and be left behind, or return, as the FCC rules suggest, to a leadership position. Home Stations There are some things we can do at an individual home station to get more digital ready. Having Internet is a start, as that is pretty universal, and is also the source of most news and software updates. If the Internet is up, being able to relay messages that way and look up information is perfectly fine. Internet linked repeaters can be accessed, and you have a range of available services. Winlink/Airmail is another good tool, which can provide in and out of region mail services. These can use the Internet, or HF. HF is great, as you can reach out of region mail servers, who may not be impacted by local Internet outages as an example. One issue though with Airmailyou are capacity constrained, and have to seek permission to send large volumes of messages. And the system is Internet basedit may be impacted by Internet issues, such as in a Pandemic Flu scenario. In Pandemic Flu, it is anticipated there will be a gradual deterioration of fixed utility infrastructure, depending on the length and severity of the infection outbreak. There is a very low cost Airmail option still available – Pactor 1.