Declarative Form Research Articles

Electronic health care system (e-Health): implementation mechanism and stages of development

The article analyzes issues related to one of the types of Internet technologies in the field of health care, electronic health care system (e-Health) in Ukraine, components and mechanism of its implementation. Information rights, the right to access the Internet and the use of innovative technologies in medicine have traditionally been referred to as the "fourth generation of human rights", the emergence of which is due to the realities of the XXI century. The medical reform introduced in Ukraine has focused on the patient in the field of health care. The purpose was to bring medical services closer to the patient, simplify the procedure for their provision (use of telemedicine), "material interest" of doctors in providing services (payment for each patient), which should improve the quality and availability of relevant services. The concept and content of the electronic health care system as an integral part of health care reform are analyzed. The purpose of which is to assist in establishing a relationship between doctor and patient regarding the proper quality of available (receiving) medical services. The functional capabilities of e-Health, positive aspects and certain "weaknesses" in the mechanism of its implementation are identified. Some components of the e-Health implementation mechanism are considered, which are: introduction of an electronic form of declarations between patients and family doctors, therapists, pediatricians; translation into electronic form of prescriptions under the program "Available Medicines"; introduction of electronic referrals, which is a part of the program "Free diagnostics"; introduction of electronic hospitals; creation of an electronic patient cabinet.

Peer review declaration

Peer Review Declaration Form GuidanceOn the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) We keep hidden the identity of both the author and reviewer. • Conference submission management system: OpenConf • Number of submissions received: 103 • Number of submissions sent for review: 103 • Number of submissions accepted: 44 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 42.72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 39 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name: Djarot Sulistio WisnubrotoAffiliation: BATAN - National Nuclear Energy Agency of IndonesiaEmail: djarot@batan.go.id

Peer review declaration

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Article evaluation criteria • The relevance of research • The work has not been previously published in either Russian or English version • Availability of references to contemporary topical works • Article formatting in accordance with the requirements of the journal • Consent to the requirement of the journal licensing rules After reviewing, there was an opportunity to submit articles with changes • Conference submission management system: Online registration form, with e-mail correspondence of the conference • Number of submissions received: 55 • Number of submissions sent for review: 55 • Number of submissions accepted:43 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1-2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 5 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Klimentov SergeyAffiliation: National Research Nuclear University MEPhIEmail : SMKlimentov@mephi.ru

Peer review declaration

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. The 5th International Symposium of Sustainable Landscape Development (The 5th ISSLD) was held on 22-23 September 2020 in Bogor, Indonesia.All papers published in this proceeding have been peer-reviewed through a process managed by the Editor by involving reviewers from academics and professionals in the field of landscape architecture.• Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers were uploaded through the organizer’s website http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium. All papers passed a basic check of writing format, including size, margins, font type and size, manuscript structure, compliance with submission instructions, quality of English grammar, and plagiarism checks. Reviewers provided opportunities to Authors for correction of discrepancies in the writing format and English grammar and plagiarism. Papers that still did not meet the minimum 25% of plagiarism checks were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer-review while keeping the identity of reviewers and authors anonymous. One external reviewer and one review editor staff member reviewed each paper using professional and scientific standards. The review process took approximately 30 days. The reviewers decided to accept or reject the paper along with the reasons. Editor sent forms of correction, acceptance, and rejection to the appropriate authors.• Submission management system:The submission was made through the ISSLD website management system at the address http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium developed by the ISSLD Operator. The submission, review, and acceptance systems were carried out through the website. Management of the website also includes:1. Managing access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. Automatic registration for ISSLD3. Papers submission;4. List of ISSLD every year;4. Program book schedule of events, materials for Keynote and Invited Speakers, the title of the presentation, and presenter’s name.5. Communication via email between the program committee, reviewers, and authors;6. Preparation and Publication of conference programs;7. All authors who submit papers are assumed to have accepted the terms of Publication License;8. All requirements for papers, templates, and sample papers can be accessed for Author or aspiring writer.• Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 56 • Number of submissions accepted: 46 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 82,14 • The average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 14 • Any additional info on the review process: All papers have passed the English language check using Grammarly and plagiarism check using Turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name : Akhmad Arifin HadiAffiliation: IPB Universityseminar_arl@apps.ipb.ac.idarifin_hadi@apps.ipb.ac.id

PECULIARITIES OF FORMATION AND REPORT SUBMISSION BY FARMS

The article reveals the role, significance, features of the formation and submission of reports by farms. Attention is drawn to the fact that at the present stage the problems of transformation of the domestic agricultural sector are intensifying. Farming is considered one of the most common forms of entrepreneurial activity in the agricultural sector. In an uncertain, ever-changing environment, the effective functioning of an enterprise often depends on the ability to develop and implement creative management decisions based on analytical information. In order for all farm reporting to be as useful as possible, it should be simpler in structure and order of filling and at the same time – concise. The composition and reporting structure of farms depends on the one hand on the types of accounting, and on the other – on the information needs of users. In addition, the organizational and legal form of the entity and the form of accounting should be considered. If the farm is established in the form of a legal entity, it is subject to the requirements of mandatory accounting. The peculiarities of the organization of farm accounting and reporting are determined. It is noted that in addition to the volume of activity, other factors also influence, among which it is worth noting the specialization, the number of business transactions, the system of taxation of the farm. The specifics of financial and statistical reporting of farms as legal entities and natural persons-entrepreneurs are revealed. A farm as a legal entity compiles the same reports as a regular agricultural enterprise. A farm (natural person-entrepreneur) prepares reports as an ordinary natural person-entrepreneur. Peculiarities of formation and submission of tax reporting are investigated. If the farm is on the general system of taxation, it is obliged to file a declaration of income tax (the form approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated 20.10.2015 № 897 as amended). Taxpayers who are registered during the reporting (tax) year (newly created) pay income tax on the basis of an annual tax return for the period of activity in the reporting (tax) year. If the farm is on a simplified taxation system, it will submit, depending on the selected group, either a declaration of a single taxpayer of the third group (legal entity), or a declaration of a single taxpayer of the fourth group (form of declaration approved by order of the Ministry of Finance from 19.06.2015 № 578 with changes). It is established that farms that own or rent wells and are required to report in accordance with IFRS. Such reporting is subject to publication together with the auditor's report on its website (in full). The impact of qualitative characteristics of reporting and the principles of its formation on the completeness of economic processes and features of economic activity in the reporting system.

A Study on ‘Hara’ Style Endings in the Korean Language Education Textbooks

This paper examined how ‘hara style endings were suggested as target grammatical items in Korean language education textbooks and suggested some basic directions for improvement. ‘Hara style endings are sentence-final endings which are used typically in written texts in which a specific addressee is not assumed. Data sources were from six series of Korean language education textbooks which are published by well-known Korean language education institutes since 2015. The findings of data analysis showed that ‘hara style endings have seldom been suggested as target grammatical items. Only two series of the textbooks suggested declarative forms as target items, and only one series suggested interrogative forms as target items. Neither imperative form nor suggestive form has been suggested as a target item in any textbooks. This paper also suggested some basic directions for improvement. First, every types of ‘hara style endings need to be suggested as target items. Second, they need to be suggested in separation from sentence-final endings of same forms which are used in spoken language. Third, information on text genre in which each ending is used needed to be offered besides information on media. Finally, information on different usages of each interrogative form is need to be offered for distinction.

Tastes, emotions, and social cohesion: Toward a cultural theory of social exchange

AbstractThe Affect Theory of Social Exchange (ATSE) research program has produced cumulative insights on how instrumental exchanges lead to the development of affectual attachments. With its focus on task responsibilities, ATSE leaves space to interrogate how factors not related to task execution are at play in the production of interpersonal bonds. In this paper, we integrate insights from social psychology, cultural sociology and organizational research to develop a theoretical framework suggesting (a) why and how cultural tastes contribute to social cohesion and (b) the conditions under which cultural tastes remain a source of strategic advantage or, worse, symbolic exclusion. Our theory rests on the basic proposition that shared cultural tastes increase the likelihood of experiencing positive emotions, which in turn are key in the development and maintenance of affectual attachments. Variations to this proposition are subsequently introduced, considering culture in declarative and nondeclarative forms.

Culture, Cognition, and Internalization

In this paper, I address the history and systematics of the concept of internalization in cultural theory, noting that while use of the concept declined after its heyday in mid‐20th‐century functionalism, it is as indispensable now as it was then. I build an account of internalization consistent with recent conceptual distinctions offered in the culture and cognition literature. Taking the (relatively easy) case of the internalization of belief first, I problematize a popular conception of how declarative forms of personal culture are internalized via linguistic communication but flag a potentially promising solution. In this alternative story, the same “dialectical” model linking personal and public culture accounts for the internalization of both declarative and nondeclarative culture, allowing us to tell the same general story for the internalization of “knowledge‐that” and “knowledge‐how.” I then discuss conceptual personal culture as a third general type of personal culture (“knowledge‐what”), standing between the purely declarative and nondeclarative. I show how the model of internalization developed in the case of beliefs and skills also applies to it with minor modifications. I close by outlining some implications of the theory developed here for clarifying such problems as theorizing degrees of internalization and the relative fragmentation of culture in persons.

How Do Female and Male Characters Speak in the Japanese Translation of English Crime Novels?

Abstract The repertoire of linguistic expressions that index sociopragmatic meanings differs considerably from language to language. This difference becomes particularly noticeable when one language is translated into another. As an example, this study examines dialogs in the Japanese translations of two English crime novels to see how the translator deals with normatively gendered morphological forms in Japanese for which no corresponding forms exist in English. The analysis shows that although the same imperative, declarative, and interrogative forms are used for female and male characters in the English originals, in the translations, gendered forms are used not simply based on the gender of the characters but on the interaction of gender with other social variables, in particular class and age. The results and their theoretical implications are discussed, employing the notions of indirect indexing, double-voiced discourse, and cultural filter.

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page, you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe): Triple-blind • Conference submission management system: Announcement of the conference on the website of the main organizer, submission of materials by e-mail. Distribution of articles for review by e-mail. • Number of submissions received: 35 • Number of submissions sent for review: 35 • Number of submissions accepted: 8 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 23 • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 20 • Any additional info on review process: Communication by emails • Contact person for queries: Name : Ivelin RahnevAffiliation: Scientific Engineering Union of Textiles, Garment and LeathersEmail : tok.chair@fnts.bg Sliven, September 22nd 2021 Rahnev

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: http://conference.tts.or.th• Number of submissions received: 71• Number of submissions sent for review: 39• Number of submissions accepted: 27• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 38%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 43• Any additional info on review process: -• Contact person for queries: Name : Prof.Dr.Jakrapong KaewkhaoAffiliation: Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat UniversityEmail : mink110@hotmail.com; jakrapong@webmail.npru.ac.th

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Conference submission management system: Emails• Number of submissions received: 60• Number of submissions sent for review: 60• Number of submissions accepted: 41• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68%• Average number of reviews per paper: 1• Total number of reviewers involved: 9• Any additional info on review process:• Contact person for queries:Polina KrupyshevaNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Kashirskoye shosse 31, Moscow115409, RussiaPOKrupysheva@mephi.ru

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) The review process is double-blind • Conference submission management system: The conference used the system https://ocs.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/icgeotecheng/icgte • Number of submissions received: 106 • Number of submissions sent for review: 106 • Number of submissions accepted: 60 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56%• Average number of reviews per paper: 3• Total number of reviewers involved: 143• Any additional info on review process: After acceptance papers sent for English language editing and formatting • Contact Person for queries:Name : Prof. Mahdi O. KarkushAffiliation: University of BaghdadPresident of Iraqi Scientific Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation EngineeringEmail : mahdi_karkush@coeng.uobaghdad.edu.iq

Elements of Conceptual Thinking in Planning the Behavior of Autonomous Intelligent Agents

The expediency of using the tools of visual-effective, visual-figurative and conceptual thinking for planning the purposeful activity of autonomous intelligent agents in problem environments of various degrees of a priori uncertainty has been substantiated. The content is revealed and the role of each form of thinking is shown in the process of automatic planning of the purposeful behavior of autonomous intelligent agents in the changing conditions of functioning. The special role of conceptual thinking in the performance of complex tasks by autonomous agents and the planning of polyphasic behavior associated with it is indicated. Taking into account the complexity of the problems associated with the formalization of mental acts of conceptual thinking, possible ways of its gradual development from the initial level to the transition to higher levels of development are shown, expanding on this basis the class of tasks solved by autonomous intelligent agents. A model of knowledge representation and tools for deriving solutions of the initial level of conceptual thinking have been developed, which allow intelligent agents to break down the tasks they receive into sub-goals of behavior. Then, on this basis, plan polyphase activity by searching for solutions to the associated subtasks, which ensure the determination of the minimum length routes of movement in a prob lematic environment with obstacles and the purposeful manipulation of objects in it. The tools are synthesized allowing to establish the order of elaboration of complex actions included in the structure of the task formulated by autonomous intelligent agents. It is shown that the further development of the proposed methodological foundations for constructing intelligent problem sol vers is associated with the formalization of a higher level of mental acts of conceptual thinking, which make it possible to solve practical problems of different complexity, formulated both in procedural and declarative form of presentation in the form of various target situations of the problem environment, having a large dimension.

Benefits of a 14-year surgical site infections active surveillance programme in a French teaching hospital

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second most common healthcare-associated infection. Active SSI surveillance can help inform preventative measures and assess the impact of these measures. We aimed to describe the evolution in trends over 14 years of prospective active SSI surveillance and implementations of SSI prevention measures in a French Teaching Hospital. We monitored and included in the study all surgical procedures performed from 2003 to 2016 in eight surgical units. The semi-automated surveillance method consisted of weekly collection of SSI declaration forms (pre-filled with patient and procedure administrative data and microbiology laboratory data), filled-in by surgeons and then monitored by the infection control practitioners. A total of 181,746 procedures were included in our analysis and 3270 SSIs recorded (global SSI rate 1.8%). The SSI rate decreased significantly from 3.0% in 2003 to 1.1% in 2016. This decrease was mainly in superficial SSIs and high infectious risk procedures. Higher SSI rates were observed for procedures associated with the usual risk factors. During this 14-year period, several evolutions in surgical practices occurred that might have contributed to this decrease. With an overall decrease in SSI rate throughout the surveillance, our results revealed the benefits of an active and comprehensive hospital SSI surveillance programme for understanding the SSI rate trends, analysing local risk factors and assessing the effectiveness of prevention strategies. These findings also highlighted the importance of the collaboration between surgeons and infection control practitioners.

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System • Number of submissions received: 98 • Number of submissions sent for review: 93 • Number of submissions accepted: 52 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 53% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 30 • Any additional info on review process: Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area. Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not? Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own. Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly. Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised. Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers. Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation. Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication. What criteria were considered when assessing the articles: A.Style and Organization: 1.Is the paper clearly presented and well organized? 2.Is the English satisfactory? 3.Is the title appropriate? 4.Are the figures, tables, and their captions clear? 5.Are the references to related work adequate? B.Scientific Quality 1.Contains significant contributions to the advancement of the subject. 2.Sound, original, and of interest. 3.Does not add to knowledge of the subject. 4.Contains fundamental errors. • Contact person for queries: Fengxin Cen Global Scientific Research Association alan.cen@gsrassn.org

TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI SANDIAGA UNO DALAM TALKSHOW MATA NAJWA

The purpose of this article is to find out the illocutionary speech acts of Sandiaga Uno in the mata najwa talk show in TRANS 7 based on the form and type. The data obtained by the author comes from the utterances spoken by Sandiaga Uno in the Mata Najwa talk show on TRANS 7 which is re-aired on Najwa Shihab's Youtube channel April 15, 2021. The author collects data using listening and note-taking techniques. A speech act is an utterance that contains action as a functional unit in communication that considers aspects of the speech situation. Speech acts are classified into three, namely locutionary speech acts, illocutionary speech acts, and perlocutionary speech acts. In this article, the writer analyzes the illocutionary speech acts. Illocutionary speech acts are speech acts that are usually interpreted with explicit performative sentences. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that the forms of illocutionary speech acts obtained are declarative and imperative forms. While the types of illocutionary speech acts obtained are assertive, directive, and expressive.

Peer review declaration

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via ISS2020 Homepage • Number of submissions received: 41 • Number of submissions sent for review: 41 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 93 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.1 • Total number of reviewers involved: 42 • Any additional info on review process:• Contact person for queries:Name : Hirofumi YamasakiAffiliation: Secretariat of International Symposium on SuperconductivityEmail : h.yamasaki@iss-secretariat.org

Peer review declaration

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form.• Please answer each question.• You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files.• The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via ISS2020 Homepage • Number of submissions received: 41 • Number of submissions sent for review: 41 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 93 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.1 • Total number of reviewers involved: 42 • Any additional info on review process:• Contact person for queries:Name : Hirofumi YamasakiAffiliation: Secretariat of International Symposium on SuperconductivityEmail : h.yamasaki@iss-secretariat.org

An Analysis of Speech Acts in Merry Riana : Mimpi Sejuta Dollar Movie

People rarely know the function of the language used in the film. This study analyzes speech acts in a dialogue film entitled Merry Riana: Dreams of a Million Dollars. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. Data were analyzed from the form of speech acts consisting of direct and indirect speech acts in the form of declarative, imperative, and interrogative. The type of speech act analysis uses Searle's theory of representative, directive, commissive, expressive, and declaration. The result of this research is that direct speech act in interrogative form is 43.63%. Direct speech acts in the declarative form are 95 (43.18%), direct speech acts in the imperative form are 24 (10.90%), indirect speech acts in the imperative form are 2 (0.9%), indirect speech acts in imperative form as much as 2 (0.9%). interrogative form is 2 (0.9%), and indirect speech act in declarative form is 1 (0.45%). Furthermore, 74 utterances are analyzed into five types of speech acts. The most dominant representative used 36 (48.6%). Then followed by directive 21 (28.3%), expressive 14 (18.9%), commissive 3 (4.0%), and declarative 0 (0.0%). This research implies that understanding speech acts plays an important role in communication.