The Carpinus caroliniana complex consists of a series of geographical races ranging north and south through the deciduous forest zone of eastern temperate North America and the mountains of Mexico and northern Central America. All of these races are morphologically variable and difficult to distinguish on the basis of independent characters. Nevertheless, each possesses a broadly distinctive set of features related to a particular ecological situation. Published records of Pleistocene and post-Pleistocene pollen floras suggest that Carpinus survived Wisconsin glaciations throughout much of its present range in unglaciated eastern North America, both east and west of the Appalachian Mountains, and geological and paleobotanical evidence supports the hypothesis of pre-Pleistocene western introduction of the genus into Mexico. The complex is divided to form two species. The northern C. caroliniana consists of subsp. caroliniana of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains of the southeastern United States and subsp. virginiana of the Appalachian Mountains and northern interior regions to the west. The Latin American C. tropicalis is separated into subsp. tropicalis of the deciduous forest zone of the highlands of southern Mexico and northern Central America and subsp. mexicana of the cool humid zone of mountains in northeastern Mexico and the trans-Mexican volcanic belt. The Carpinus caroliniana complex of eastern North America has been shown by multivariate analyses (Furlow 1987) to consist of four phenetically distinct, though usually variable, geographical races. High intraand inter-population variability in many parts of the complex results in the overlap of character states among races, and it is difficult to find absolute character differences to distinguish them. Although these patterns have been noted in the past, they have not been described precisely, leading to confusion and oversimplification in the taxonomic treatment of the group. The American hornbeam was first described in 1785 as C. betulus var. virginiana by Humphrey Marshall. Three years later, Thomas Walter (1788) named material from South Carolina C. caroliniana, establishing the American taxon, taken as a whole, as a species distinct from the European C. betulus L. From then until 1935, except for Michaux's (1803) description of C. americana (a nomenclatural synonym of C. caroliniana), little taxonomic change was proposed. Winkler's (1904) monograph of the Betulaceae recognizes only the single species in North America. In 1935, Fernald recognized two varieties of C. caroliniana in the eastern United States and adjacent Canada, the southeastern var. caroliniana being distinguished in a number of foliage, bark, and habit characters from the common var. virginiana of the northern deciduous forest region. The Mexican and Central American portion of the complex was recognized as distinct from C. caroliniana by John Donnell Smith (1890) who named Carpinus americana var. tropicalis, and this taxon was later given species status by Lundell (1939). A great deal of taxonomic confusion has centered around the Mexican and Central American populations of Carpinus, perhaps in part as a result of a lack of familiarity with the group by the botanists from temperate regions who have treated it taxonomically, and in part due to an uncritical acceptance of the idea that Latin American amentiferous taxa are necessarily conspecific with their vicariads of the northeastern United States (cf. Graham 1973). Most current Mexican and Central American floras (e.g., Nee 1981) treat their material simply as C. caroliniana, without recognizing infraspecific taxa. However, Standley (1920) and Standley and Steyermark (1952) state that both var. caroliniana and var. tropicalis occur in Mexico, var. caroliniana in central and northern Mexico, and var. tropicalis mostly in southern Mexico and Central America. These workers describe var. tropicalis as differing from var. caroliniana primarily by its dense pubescence, as do the authors of virtually all of the subsequent descriptive literature dealing with the group. In his