Kinetics of crystal growth has considerable importance in industry, either for the influence on production time or on the mechanical properties of the resulting goods [1]. Heat transfer from a crystallizing substance to the surroundings is indispensable for the crystallization to proceed [2]. Otherwise, the temperature of the substance would increase and, according to the thermodynamics, the solid–liquid equilibrium be shifted in favour of the liquid phase. The local arrest of crystallization because of superheating at the growth front is a well-known phenomenon for metals, readily identified since it leads to characteristic dendritic morphologies [3]. The recognition of superheating at the growth front of polymer spherulites is not as obvious as for metals. Indeed, because of the slow crystallization rate of polymers relative to metals, such a phenomenon would go unnoticed under conventional isothermal crystallization since neither a variation of the circular shape of spherulites nor an appreciable deceleration of the radial growth rate can be usually produced. However, the mathematical relationship between the radius of polymer spherulites and the radial growth rate calculated under isothermal conditions may be exploited to derive the theoretical change of the dimension of a spherulite growing under nonisothermal conditions in the absence of superheating. Comparing this value to the experimental datum, it is possible to draw information on the occurrence of superheating phenomena. In this work a method is shown to demonstrate the deceleration of polymer spherulites as a consequence of superheating. The method consists in measuring the increase of the radius of spherulites while the external temperature is increased in the range where crystallization occurs. Despite the invariability of the exterior spherulitic structure on the optical scale, the deceleration of the crystal growth during heating may be proved on the basis of the comparison between the theoretically predictable enhancement of spherulite size and the experimental value. Isotactic polypropylene with a small amount (2.4 wt%) of ethylenic units randomly distributed along the chain has been used in the present investigation. The product (E/P), having weight-average molecular weight Mw = 216 000, was kindly supplied by Montell Polyolefins Company (Ferrara, Italy) and used, instead of isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, because of its wider crystallization temperature range [4]. The following experimental procedures were adopted. For optical observations during crystallization, a small amount of E/P was squashed between two glass slides to give tens of micrometers thick film. Specimens were then inserted in a Linkam THMS 600 hot stage programmed by a TMS91 unit. In isothermal crystallization, specimens were kept at 473 K for 600 s in order to destroy any previous trace of crystallinity and then the temperature rapidly decreased (with a scan rate of −0.5 K/s) to the selected crystallization temperature in the range 393–413 K. The hot stage device was maintained at a constant temperature until primary crystallization was completed. In nonisothermal procedures, the temperature was kept at 473 K for 600 s, and then rapidly decreased to 393 K, allowing nucleation to that temperature, and finally increased at 0.0833 K/s during crystallization up to 413 K. A. Zeiss polarizing microscope equipped with a JVS TK-1085E video camera was used for images acquisition. Pictures were taken at appropriate instants of time and the radius of spherulites measured with Image-Pro Plus software in order to estimate the linear growth rate. A graduate grid was used for length calibration. The radial growth rate G of spherulites is achievable by measuring the radius r of spherulites as a function of time t . The slopes of the isothermal lines resulting in r–t plots provided the values of G as function of temperature. Values of G in the explored temperature range are reported in Table I; the equation between G and T may be obtained by means of the least square method. This procedure, applied to E/P crystallization in the range 393–413 K, resulted in the following equation: