WE SEEK TO ACCOMPLISH two goals in this paper. First, we provide a clarifying discussion of the welfare implications of the introduction of indexed debt contracts in a financial market, an issue that has been discussed in [ 1, 9, 11] in this journal, as well as in [3, 12, 13]. We show that doubts about the Pareto-superiority of indexed debt contacts that have been raised in some of this literature are methodologically incorrect, and that, not surprisingly, the introduction of indexed debt contracts at an equilibrium of the nonindexed economy does indeed lead to a Pareto-superior allocation. Second, we derive and examine the implications of suffcient general-equilibrium conditions for (aggregate) savings to rise or decline as a result of the introduction of indexed debt. These conditions allow for general utility functions and take into account the fact that, in general, all prices may change as a result of the introduction of a contract that changes the asset economy. As a result, the conclusions derived are, in their rigor, generality and (as it turns out) simplicity, a significant improvement on the results of Levhari and Liviatan [4, 5] on the same issue. As in most of the literature in this area, our analysis is carried out in the framework of a two-period mean-variance model of consumption and portfolio choice, although
Read full abstract