P RENATAL care has been given considerable attention in the Iiterature during the Iast severa years. However, no portion of medicine is more negIected than the care of the expectant mother. Because of oId traditions and superstitions, our immediate ancestors sought the services of the physician probabIy a month before the expected deIivery, just to Iet the doctor know that he might expect a caI1. Examination of the patient, if the physician arrived before the deIivery, was done first and Iast, when the stork was on the way. In this sort of practice there were many compIications that often became tragedies. In modern communities the situation has markedIy improved, and in recent years the mortaIity rate has been greatIy decreased. However, the first eIeven months of ‘933, Kansas Iost 139 mothers in 27,526 deIiveries. This number of deaths is appaIIing when one stops to consider that most of the cases were handled by Iicensed physicians, who are supposed to be we11 trained, and to practice aseptic conservatism. The situation is not IocaI. In 1930, the New York Academy of Medicine organized a committee to study materna1 mortality in New York City. In the three years, 1930, 1931, and 1932, there were 2041 materna1 deaths in New York. Of this number, the committee estimated that 1343 or 65 per cent wouId have been preventable, if the women had been given proper care during pregnancy and Iabor. On the other hand it is quite gratifying to the obstetrician, to read statistics from the Chicago Lying-In HospitaI, reporting 23,136 deIiveries with onIy 57 deaths, and part of these were cases that had been mis-managed before the patient entered the hospita1 for deIivery. PrenataI care is routine in this hospita1. Since medicine has made such definite advances in other fieIds, it is high time that a11 medica societies demand better obstetrics in their own communities. This can be done by every physician, whether ocuIist or pediatrician, urging that their patient seek competent obstetrica care. PrenataI care shouId begin as soon as a positive diagnosis of pregnancy has been made. At the Iirst visit a careful history, and physica examination shouId be made. It is important to know something of the famiIy history. Are there any cases of tubercuIosis, nephritis, syphiIis, or bIeeders in the famiIy? Has the patient’s mother or sister had any abnorma1 pregnancies or Iabors, and why ? In her persona1 history do not overIook the diseases of childhood, that may have Ieft chronic heart or kidney disease. The history of any nervous disorders and the patient’s reaction to physica stress and worry may be of great vaIue to the physician in assisting the patient to adjust herseIf to the pregnancy and prevent an impending psychosis. Do not fail to inquire about chronic infections, for many a case of pyeIitis has been caused by an infected tooth. If a foca1 infection is discovered, insist that it be cIeared up as soon as possibIe. If there has been a former pregnancy, a detaiIed history shouId be elicited for often symptoms that may be passed over IightIy by the patient may have
Read full abstract