Several studies on the topic of rhizarthrosis have evaluated the clinical effectiveness of the Maia (Lepine group) prosthesis. Our study concerned younger active patients, more rarely represented and evaluated in these studies. Our aim was to evaluate the postoperative return time to professional and manual activites, correlated to clinical and radiographic results, amid an active population of Maia prosthesis bearers. We included a cohort of 28 patients of an average age of 57.8 years old (45–65), operated between 2009 and 2016 by 4 different surgeons with a follow up of 2.53 years (0,5–7). 64 % of patients were professionally active. 83 % had a regular manual activity. A total of 32 prosthesis were implanted (2 bilateral cases). We collected the postoperative return time to work and manual activities, and evaluated clinical and radiographic results through standardized scores (Moineau, Kapandji, PWRE, QuickDASH). 85 % of patients returned to a full time work-schedule within 4 months. Postoperative clinical evaluation revealed an average PWRE score of 16.4 (0–67), an average Moineau score of 16.4 and an average QuickDASH score of 27.7 out of 100 (0–86.4). No patient presented secondary de Quervain tenosynovitis. 92 % of patients were highly satisfied and all patients claimed they would recommend the operation to a relative. The functional gain does not seem trifling gathering that 85 % of patients return to their professional acitivies within 4 months, be it a manual labor or not. Functional recovery is faster than that of pure strength. Our study showed excellent clinical and radiographic results of the Maia prosthesis in professionally active patients in younger age ranges. These results can encourage the implantation of this prosthesis in active young patients. It would be interesting to study the results with a longer follow-up and a larger population.
Read full abstract