De Novo Coronary Artery Research Articles

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease.

The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is a novel PCB with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, enhancing drug delivery to the target lesion and minimizing restenosis. This study aimed to compare quantitative coronary angiographic outcomes at 6months after treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) with 2 different types of PCBs. This prospective, multicenter, noninferiority trial randomized 204 patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome to treatment with the shellac and vitamin E-based PCB or the reference PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was noninferiority for the 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss. The 6-month in-lesion late lumen loss was 0.06 ± 0.38mm with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 0.09 ± 0.36mm with reference PCB. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.08mm, which was lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.15mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority=0.001). There was comparable late lumen enlargement (44.7% vs 42.7%; P = 0.903) and binary restenosis rates (3.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.442) following treatment with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB and reference PCB, respectively. Both PCBs had similar 12-month rates of target vessel failure (3.0% in shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 4.3% in reference PCB; P = 0.921). The Genoss PCB, formulated with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, demonstrated angiographic outcomes comparable to a clinically proven PCB in the treatment of de novo CAD. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions; NCT05096442).

Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Because of the limitations in new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), treatments advocating for non-stents with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) is now of great interest. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to testify whether a DCB was more effective and safer than a DES in treating de novo coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to obtain high-quality trials comparing DCB with DES for the treatment of de novo CAD. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR), and the secondary endpoints were in-lesion late lumen loss (LLL), all-cause death, myocardial infarction and binary restenosis. Results: We enrolled 1661 patients from seven randomized clinical trials. Compared with the DES group, the MD (mean difference) of in-lesion LLL was significantly lower in the DCB group (MD –0.19, 95% CI –0.23 to –0.16, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). The DCB group showed superiority in small vessel disease (SVD) in in-lesion LLL (MD –0.21, 95% CI –0.34 to –0.08, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The DCB group exhibited a lower in-lesion LLL compared to the DES group, and DCB was not inferior to DES in other endpoints, including in the SVD subgroup. Hence, to our knowledge, DCB is non-inferior to DES for de novo CVD and SVD. DCB in patients with CVD needs further large and long-term clinical trials to demonstrate its long-term efficacy. The PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021268965, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=268965.

Drug-coated balloon for de-novo coronary artery lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter: optical coherence tomography analysis and clinical follow-up

Abstract Objective To investigate the precise changes in the lumen and lesions, and clinical outcomes after DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter through a detailed analysis of OCT. Methods This is a prospective study including 53 consecutive patients with 55 de-novo coronary lesions, who underwent DCB angioplasty-only between January 2021 and April 2022. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT were performed before percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), immediately after PCI, and at 6-9 months follow-up after PCI. Target lesion failure (TLF) was the primary endpoint of the present study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors or risks for late lumen enlargement (LLE). Results A total of 52 patients were successfully treated with DCB. The median follow-up was 7 months, and the incidence of TLF was 7.5%. After the DCB procedure, 43 patients had their scheduled angiographic and OCT examination. QCA demonstrated that the late lumen loss was -0.79 ± 0.28 mm. OCT demonstrated LLE in 79.1% and dissection healing in 65.1% of lesions. After multivariable logistic analysis, type B dissection (odds ratio [OR] 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.41, p = 0.037) was found to be a predictor of LLE, but lipid plaque (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.63, p = 0.015) was a risk of LLE. Conclusions This is the first and largest prospective study to assess the outcomes of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter and the detection of significant vessel enlargement and dissection healing guide by OCT. DCB could be a novel, safe and effective treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter through a detailed analysis of OCT.Representative coronary angiography (CAGRepresentative optical coherence tomogra

TCT-334 Long-Term Prognosis After Acute Coronary Syndrome Due to De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions and Stent Thrombosis in Patients With and Without Hemodialysis

TCT-334 Long-Term Prognosis After Acute Coronary Syndrome Due to De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions and Stent Thrombosis in Patients With and Without Hemodialysis

TCT-443 Lesion Preparation With Scoring Balloon Improves the Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-443 Lesion Preparation With Scoring Balloon Improves the Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-712 Angiographic and Angiography-Derived Functional Assessment After DCB Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: The PICCOLETO VI Study Final Results

TCT-712 Angiographic and Angiography-Derived Functional Assessment After DCB Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: The PICCOLETO VI Study Final Results

TCT-454 Procedural Predictors of Optimal Angiographic Lesion Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-454 Procedural Predictors of Optimal Angiographic Lesion Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-437 Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Denovo Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-437 Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Denovo Coronary Artery Disease

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A West Australian Single Centre Experience

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A West Australian Single Centre Experience

A Comparison of 2 Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Systems in Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

BackgroundIn percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of de novo lesions, drug-coated balloons (DCB) have been shown to be a promising strategy to improve clinical outcomes of patients with small vessel disease. Evidence of this strategy in PCI of de novo coronary lesions in a real-world setting is limited. The objective of this study was to compare the 12-month outcomes of 2 paclitaxel-coated balloon systems for the treatment of all de novo coronary artery lesions. MethodsAll patients who were treated for de novo coronary artery stenosis with either SeQuent Please or In.Pact Falcon DCB at a single center from January 2014 to December 2018 were included. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (3-point major adverse cardiovascular events) at 12 months. ResultsA total of 496 patients with 623 lesions, of which 144 were treated with SeQuent Please and 352 were treated with In.Pact Falcon were included in the study. Baseline patient, lesion and procedural characteristics at baseline were similar between groups. At 12-month follow-up, 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes were similar (4.2% vs 2.3% respectively; P = .272). Deaths due to cardiovascular events were few and similar between groups (2.7% vs 1.1% respectively; P = .20). ConclusionsBoth paclitaxel DCB systems have similar efficacy and safety outcomes, suggesting that both may be an appropriate treatment choice for patients with de novo lesions. However, a larger randomized controlled study is needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison Between Drug-Coated Balloon and Stents in Large De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCT Data.

Although a number of studies involving small-vessel de novo coronary disease showed clinical benefits of drug-coated balloons (DCB), the role of DCB in large vessel lesions is still unclear. We searched main electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCB with stents for large vessel de novo coronary artery disease. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), composite cardiovascular death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). This study included 7 RCTs with 770 participants.DCB were associated with a marked risk reduction in MACE [Risk Ratio (RR): 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.04], TLR (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.14; P = 0.10), and late lumen loss [standard mean difference (SMD): -0.57; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.05; P = 0.03] as compared with stents. There is no significant difference in MI (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.54; P = 0.27), CD (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.78; P = 0.19), and minimal lumen diameter (SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.05; P = 0.08) between groups. In subgroup analyses, the risk reduction of MACE persisted in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.89; P = 0.03), and patients receiving DCB vs. bare metal stent (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.73; P = 0.01). In addition, there was no significant difference between the DCB group and the drug eluting stent group for MACE (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.60; P = 0.38). DCB may be an effective therapeutic option in patients with large vessel de novo coronary artery disease.

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease and Tips for Procedural Success

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease and Tips for Procedural Success

Drug-Coated Balloon for de-novo Coronary Artery Lesions Exceeding 2.5 mm in Diameter: Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis and Clinical Follow-Up.

To investigate the precise changes in the lumen and lesions, and clinical outcomes after DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter through a detailed analysis of OCT. This is a prospective study including 53 consecutive patients with 55 de-novo coronary lesions, who underwent DCB angioplasty-only between January 2021 and April 2022. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT were performed before percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), immediately after PCI, and at 6-9 months follow-up after PCI. Target lesion failure (TLF) was the primary endpoint of the present study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors or risks for late lumen enlargement (LLE). A total of 52 patients were successfully treated with DCB. The median follow-up was 7 months, and the incidence of TLF was 7.5%. After the DCB procedure, 43 patients had their scheduled angiographic and OCT examination. QCA demonstrated that the late lumen loss was -0.79 ± 0.28 mm. OCT demonstrated LLE in 79.1% and dissection healing in 65.1% of lesions. After multivariable logistic analysis, type B dissection (odds ratio [OR] 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.41, p = 0.037) was found to be a predictor of LLE, but lipid plaque (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.63, p = 0.015) was a risk of LLE. This is the first and largest prospective study to assess the outcomes of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter and the detection of significant vessel enlargement and dissection healing guide by OCT. DCB could be a novel, safe and effective treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter through a detailed analysis of OCT.

Abstract 15381: Clinical Outcomes of Post-Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Dissection in Large De-Novo Coronary Artery Disease

Introduction: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) may be an alternative to stents in the treatment of large native coronary artery disease. However, the complications of acute elastic recoil and coronary dissections confine the practical application of DCB. Little is known about the clinical outcomes of different types of dissection after DCB angioplasty with or without stenting. Aims: This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of post-DCB dissection in large de novo coronary artery disease. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. A consecutive series of patients with large native coronary artery disease (reference diameter ≥ 3.0 mm) who occurred coronary dissections after the treatment of DCB angioplasty were included. These patients were divided into stented groups and non-stented groups depending on whether bail-out stents were employed. Post-angioplasty coronary artery dissections were classified into type A-F. The cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was compared between the two groups. Results: Between March 2017 and October 2022, 676 patients with large de novo coronary artery disease developed post-DCB angioplasty dissection, 554 of which treated with DCB only, 122 of which underwent bail-out stent implantation. These dissections were type A (60.5%), B (30.9%), C (6.5%), D (1.9%) and F (0.1%), respectively. During a mean follow-up of 1 year, MACE occurred in 60 patients (9 in the stented group and 51 in the non-stented group; 7.4% vs. 9.2%; p=0.522). For type B dissection, the rate of MACE was similar in the stented group than that in the non-stented group (11.1% vs. 8.2%; p=0.502). For type C dissection, the rate of MACE was numerically higher in the non-stented group than that in the stented group (9.5% vs. 0%; p=0.222). Conclusions: For post-DCB angioplasty dissection in large de-novo coronary artery disease, type B dissection requires no bail-out stent implantation and type C dissection deserves further investigation.

Feasibility and Safety of Drug-Coated Balloon for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Large Vessel Disease: A Large-Scale Multicenter Prospective Study.

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have been evaluated to be safe and practical in treating coronary small vessel disease (SVD). However, evidence about the practicality and safety of DCB in treating coronary lesions with diameters greater than 3.0 mm is limited. 1166 patients who received DCB angioplasty were enrolled and divided into groups of SVD or large vessel disease (LVD) according to the target vessel diameters ( 3.0 mm for SVD; 3.0 mm for LVD). All participants received a 2-year follow-up. The two main outcomes were patient-oriented composite endpoint (patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), all-cause mortality, all myocardial infarctions [MI], or any revascularization), and target lesion failure (target lesion failure (TLF), cardiac death, target vessel MI, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization). In these patients, a total of 30 (2.6%) TLF and 82 (7.0%) POCE were recorded. Patients in the LVD group showed statistically greater rates of lesion success compared to the SVD group (752 [96.0%] vs. 380 [99.2%], p = 0.004) and procedural success (751 [95.9%] vs. 380 [99.2%], p = 0.003). No significant difference was found in the 2-year risk of TLF (hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% CI 0.58-3.44; p = 0.455), POCE (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.76-2.20; p = 0.354), MI (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.24-3.13; p = 0.837), revascularization (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.68-2.21; p = 0.506), and stroke (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.03-15.26; p = 0.784) between the SVD and LVD groups. There was no discernible inferiority of the DCB intervention in the LVD group as compared to the SVD group. The DCB intervention is practical for coronary lesions with diameters higher than 3.0 mm.

Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Many clinical trials have demonstrated the value of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for in-stent restenosis. However, their role in de novo lesions is not well documented. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DCB-only strategy compared to other percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for de novo coronary lesions. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to May 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events and late lumen loss. A total of eighteen trials with 3336 participants were included. Compared with drug-eluting stents, the DCB-only strategy was associated with a similar risk of major adverse cardiac events (risk ratio (RR) = 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 1.37, P = 0.631) and a significant decrease in late lumen loss (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.04, P = 0.021). This effect was consistent in subgroup analysis regardless of indication, follow-up time, drug-eluting stent type, and dual antiplatelet therapy duration. However, DCBs were inferior to DESs for minimum lumen diameter and percentage diameter stenosis. The DCB-only strategy showed significantly better outcomes for most endpoints compared to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents. Interventions with a DCB-only strategy are comparable to those of drug-eluting stents and superior to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents for the treatment of selected de novo coronary lesions. Additional evidence is still warranted to confirm the value of DCB before widespread clinical utilization can be recommended.

Drug Coated Balloon in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review.

Drug coated balloons (DCBs) are currently indicated in guidelines as a first choice option in the management of instant restenosis, whereas their use in de novo lesions is still debated. The concerns raised after the contrasting results of the initial trials with DCBs in de novo lesions have been more recently overcome by a larger amount of data confirming their safety and effectiveness as compared to drug-eluting stents (DES), with potentially greater benefits being achieved, especially in particular anatomical settings, as in very small or large vessels and bifurcations, but also in selected subsets of higher-risk patients, where a 'leave nothing behind' strategy could offer a reduction of the inflammatory stimulus and thrombotic risk. The present review aims at providing an overview of current available DCB devices and their indications of use based on the results of data achieved so far.

Impact of Insulin-Treated Compared to Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus on Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: The Randomized BASKET-SMALL 2 Trial.

We evaluated the outcome of PCI of de novo stenosis with drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (NITDM). Patients were randomized in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial to DCB or DES and followed over 3 years for MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]). Outcome in the diabetic subgroup (n = 252) was analyzed with respect to ITDM or NITDM. In NITDM patients (n = 157), rates of MACE (16.7% vs. 21.9%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-1.58, p = 0.37), death, non-fatal MI, and TVR (8.4% vs. 14.5%, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-1.03, p = 0.057) were similar between DCB and DES. In ITDM patients (n = 95), rates of MACE (DCB 23.4% vs. DES 22.7%, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.46-2.74, p = 0.81), death, non-fatal MI, and TVR (10.1% vs. 15.7%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.18-2.27, p = 0.49) were similar between DCB and DES. TVR was significantly lower with DCB versus DES in all diabetic patients (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95, p = 0.038). DCB compared to DES for treatment of de novo coronary lesions in diabetic patients was associated with similar rates of MACE and numerically lower need for TVR both for ITDM and NITDM patients.

Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Through meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCB), compared with drug-eluting stents (DES) or uncoated devices, in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcomes were late lumen loss (LLL), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on clinical indications, whether DCBs were used with a systematic or bailout stent, and types of DESs. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that DCBs elicit significantly lower incidences of TLR, MACE, and LLL, compared with uncoated devices, and similar incidences, compared with DESs, in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. Subgroup analysis indicated that DCBs used with a bailout stent achieved lower incidences of binary restenosis and myocardial infarction, compared with uncoated devices, and provided less LLL than DESs. DCBs showed similar rates of TLR and MACE, with significantly less LLL, than DESs in treating de novo small-vessel diseases. The clinical efficacy of DCBs was similar to that of second-generation DES. Overall, DCB is favored over bare metal stent alone in treating de novo coronary lesions. DCBs appear to be a promising alternative to DESs in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions.

Impact of the Xinsorb Scaffold-Related Parameters on Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Single De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions Undergoing Clopidogrel Treatment.

This study aimed to assess the relationship between stent parameters and platelet function, as well as the platelet reactivity profiles over time in patients treated with the Xinsorb scaffold. Adenosine diphosphate-induced maximal amplitude was measured as clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity using thrombelastography. High residual platelet reactivity was defined as MAADP > 47 mm. Platelet function testing was induced at baseline, discharge, and 6- and 12-month visits. A total of 40 individuals undergoing Xinsorb scaffold implantation and platelet function testing were included. No adverse events were recorded during follow-up. No correlation was observed among thrombelastography indices, stent diameters, and stent coverage surface area. Significant correlation was found between MAADP and lengths of stents (Spearman rank correlation = 0.324, P =.031). Multiple logistic regression analyses demonstrated that high levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was an independent protective factor for high residual platelet reactivity (odds ratio = 0.049, 95% confidence interval = 0.011-0.296, P =.016). No significant risk factors were identified; MAADP presented to be 20.6 [13.1-36.2] mm, 26.8 [18.2-35.0] mm, and 30.0 [19.6-33.4] mm 48 hours, 6 months, and 12 months after procedure, respectively; 12-month MAADP was significantly higher than the 48-hour MAADP (P =.026). There was no obvious trend for platelet response status over time. Among patients on a clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet treatment regimen following Xinsorb scaffold implantation, stent parameters had no significant effects on platelet reactivity. The high residual platelet reactivity phenotype is relatively stable over time. High residual platelet reactivity is more likely to occur in patients with lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.