De-novo Coronary Artery Disease Research Articles

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A West Australian Single Centre Experience

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A West Australian Single Centre Experience

Comparison Between Drug-Coated Balloon and Stents in Large De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCT Data.

Although a number of studies involving small-vessel de novo coronary disease showed clinical benefits of drug-coated balloons (DCB), the role of DCB in large vessel lesions is still unclear. We searched main electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCB with stents for large vessel de novo coronary artery disease. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), composite cardiovascular death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). This study included 7 RCTs with 770 participants.DCB were associated with a marked risk reduction in MACE [Risk Ratio (RR): 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.04], TLR (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.14; P = 0.10), and late lumen loss [standard mean difference (SMD): -0.57; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.05; P = 0.03] as compared with stents. There is no significant difference in MI (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.54; P = 0.27), CD (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.78; P = 0.19), and minimal lumen diameter (SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.05; P = 0.08) between groups. In subgroup analyses, the risk reduction of MACE persisted in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.89; P = 0.03), and patients receiving DCB vs. bare metal stent (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.73; P = 0.01). In addition, there was no significant difference between the DCB group and the drug eluting stent group for MACE (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.60; P = 0.38). DCB may be an effective therapeutic option in patients with large vessel de novo coronary artery disease.

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease and Tips for Procedural Success

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease and Tips for Procedural Success

Abstract 15381: Clinical Outcomes of Post-Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Dissection in Large De-Novo Coronary Artery Disease

Introduction: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) may be an alternative to stents in the treatment of large native coronary artery disease. However, the complications of acute elastic recoil and coronary dissections confine the practical application of DCB. Little is known about the clinical outcomes of different types of dissection after DCB angioplasty with or without stenting. Aims: This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of post-DCB dissection in large de novo coronary artery disease. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. A consecutive series of patients with large native coronary artery disease (reference diameter ≥ 3.0 mm) who occurred coronary dissections after the treatment of DCB angioplasty were included. These patients were divided into stented groups and non-stented groups depending on whether bail-out stents were employed. Post-angioplasty coronary artery dissections were classified into type A-F. The cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was compared between the two groups. Results: Between March 2017 and October 2022, 676 patients with large de novo coronary artery disease developed post-DCB angioplasty dissection, 554 of which treated with DCB only, 122 of which underwent bail-out stent implantation. These dissections were type A (60.5%), B (30.9%), C (6.5%), D (1.9%) and F (0.1%), respectively. During a mean follow-up of 1 year, MACE occurred in 60 patients (9 in the stented group and 51 in the non-stented group; 7.4% vs. 9.2%; p=0.522). For type B dissection, the rate of MACE was similar in the stented group than that in the non-stented group (11.1% vs. 8.2%; p=0.502). For type C dissection, the rate of MACE was numerically higher in the non-stented group than that in the stented group (9.5% vs. 0%; p=0.222). Conclusions: For post-DCB angioplasty dissection in large de-novo coronary artery disease, type B dissection requires no bail-out stent implantation and type C dissection deserves further investigation.

Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Many clinical trials have demonstrated the value of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for in-stent restenosis. However, their role in de novo lesions is not well documented. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DCB-only strategy compared to other percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for de novo coronary lesions. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to May 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events and late lumen loss. A total of eighteen trials with 3336 participants were included. Compared with drug-eluting stents, the DCB-only strategy was associated with a similar risk of major adverse cardiac events (risk ratio (RR) = 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 1.37, P = 0.631) and a significant decrease in late lumen loss (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.04, P = 0.021). This effect was consistent in subgroup analysis regardless of indication, follow-up time, drug-eluting stent type, and dual antiplatelet therapy duration. However, DCBs were inferior to DESs for minimum lumen diameter and percentage diameter stenosis. The DCB-only strategy showed significantly better outcomes for most endpoints compared to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents. Interventions with a DCB-only strategy are comparable to those of drug-eluting stents and superior to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents for the treatment of selected de novo coronary lesions. Additional evidence is still warranted to confirm the value of DCB before widespread clinical utilization can be recommended.

Drug Coated Balloon in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review.

Drug coated balloons (DCBs) are currently indicated in guidelines as a first choice option in the management of instant restenosis, whereas their use in de novo lesions is still debated. The concerns raised after the contrasting results of the initial trials with DCBs in de novo lesions have been more recently overcome by a larger amount of data confirming their safety and effectiveness as compared to drug-eluting stents (DES), with potentially greater benefits being achieved, especially in particular anatomical settings, as in very small or large vessels and bifurcations, but also in selected subsets of higher-risk patients, where a 'leave nothing behind' strategy could offer a reduction of the inflammatory stimulus and thrombotic risk. The present review aims at providing an overview of current available DCB devices and their indications of use based on the results of data achieved so far.

Impact of Insulin-Treated Compared to Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus on Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: The Randomized BASKET-SMALL 2 Trial.

We evaluated the outcome of PCI of de novo stenosis with drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (NITDM). Patients were randomized in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial to DCB or DES and followed over 3 years for MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]). Outcome in the diabetic subgroup (n = 252) was analyzed with respect to ITDM or NITDM. In NITDM patients (n = 157), rates of MACE (16.7% vs. 21.9%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-1.58, p = 0.37), death, non-fatal MI, and TVR (8.4% vs. 14.5%, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-1.03, p = 0.057) were similar between DCB and DES. In ITDM patients (n = 95), rates of MACE (DCB 23.4% vs. DES 22.7%, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.46-2.74, p = 0.81), death, non-fatal MI, and TVR (10.1% vs. 15.7%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.18-2.27, p = 0.49) were similar between DCB and DES. TVR was significantly lower with DCB versus DES in all diabetic patients (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95, p = 0.038). DCB compared to DES for treatment of de novo coronary lesions in diabetic patients was associated with similar rates of MACE and numerically lower need for TVR both for ITDM and NITDM patients.

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

B-23 | Outcomes Of Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent In Diabetic Patients With De-Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Studies that investigated the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCB) compared to drug-eluting stents (DES) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with de-novo coronary artery disease (CAD) showed conflicting Results. We aimed to compare the outcomes of DCB with DES in diabetic patients with de-novo CAD.

Comparison of Drug-eluting Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in de Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

<i>Background</i>: Drug- eluting balloon (DEB) and drug- eluting stent (DES) are widely used in cardiovascular interventional surgery. But the long-term safety of DEB is unclear. <i>Objective</i>: To compare the efficacy and safety of DEB with DES for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD). <i>Methods</i>: We conducted a meta-analysis of relevant studies identified in the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Random and fixed effects models were used to calculate the relative risks (RR) and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. <i>Results</i>: Nine studies in 1946 patients were included in this analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or in the efficacy endpoint of late lumen loss (LLL) between the DEB and DES groups. For follow-up < 12 months, there was no significant difference between DEB and DES for each MACE component, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and death. However, a lower risk for MI and death was observed for DEB when the follow-up time was ≥ 12 months. <i>Conclusion</i>: DEB is equivalent to DES for the treatment of patients with de novo CAD and appears to represent a safer option for long-term treatment of this patient population.

Drug-coated balloon treatment for nonsmall de-novo coronary artery disease: angiographic and clinical outcomes.

Although drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are established for de-novo lesions in small coronary arteries, the impact of DCB treatment according to the reference vessel diameter (RVD) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions according to RVD. A total of 227 patients were retrospectively enrolled and stratified according to an RVD >2.5 mm [nonsmall vessel disease (NSVD) group, n = 100] and ≤2.5 mm [small vessel disease (SVD) group, n = 127]. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at a 6-month follow-up, and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and target vessel thrombosis). The LLL among the 206 patients (90.8%) returning for scheduled angiography at 6 month was similar (NSVD, 0.03 ± 0.22 mm vs. SVD, 0.06 ± 0.25 mm; P = 0.384). TVF was also comparable in both groups at a median follow-up of 3.4 years (NSVD, 7.0 vs. SVD, 7.9 %; P = 0.596). At baseline, there were numerically more dissections in the SVD group compared to the NSVD group (47.2 vs. 35.0 %; P = 0.064); however, most of these had disappeared in both groups at a 6-month follow-up. In a multivariable analysis, the presence of dissection was not associated with LLL or TVF in either group. The safety and efficacy of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions, in terms of LLL and TVF, was unrelated to RVD.

Sex-Related Outcomes of Successful Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease.

PurposeAlthough drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment is known to be effective for de novo lesions, the influence of sex on angiographic and clinical outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the angiographic and clinical impact of DCB treatment in patients with de novo coronary lesions according to sex.Materials and MethodsA total of 227 patients successfully treated with DCB were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups according to sex. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at 6-month angiography, and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), which included cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel thrombosis.ResultsThe study enrolled 60 women (26.4%) and 167 men (73.6%). Compared to men, women had a smaller vessel size, larger DCB to reference vessel ratio, and more dissections after DCB treatment (55.0% vs. 37.1%, p=0.016). Women also had a significantly higher LLL compared to men (0.12±0.26 mm vs. 0.02±0.22 mm, p=0.012) at the 6-month follow-up angiography. During a median follow-up of 3.4 years (range 12.7–28.9 months), TVF was similar (women 6.7% vs. men 7.8%, p=0.944). In multivariable analysis, women were independently associated with a higher LLL.ConclusionLLL was higher in women, but there was no difference in TVF between women and men. Based on multivariable analysis, the women sex was an independent predictor of higher LLL (Impact of Drug-coated Balloon Treatment in de Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277).

Back to the future: the role of DCB for the treatment of coronary bifurcation.

Coronary bifurcation lesion (CBL) is a common but challenging scenario in percutaneous coronary interventions. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are modern devices with attractive perspective in CBL treatment. In-stent restenosis, small vessel and diffuse de-novo coronary artery disease have been, so far, considered the ideal scenario for DCBs application. Studies assessing DCBs in de-novo CBL demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this strategy. However, the heterogeneity of the study populations and the presence of methodological limitations prevent from drawing definite recommendations. Considering that the best treatment of bifurcations has not yet been defined, the "leaving nothing behind" philosophy will be the topic of future studies.

Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug coated balloon (DCB) is a novel treatment which seeks to acutely dilate a coronary stenosis and deliver an anti-proliferative drug to the vessel wall (reducing the risk of re-stenosis), without implanting a drug eluting stent (DES). In this study, we performed a systematic review of stentless DCB-only angioplasty in de novo coronary artery disease. We identified 41 studies examining the effects of DCB-only PCI in a variety of clinical scenarios including small vessels, bifurcations, calcified lesions, and primary PCI. DCB-only PCI appears to be associated with comparable clinical outcomes to DESs and superior angiographic outcomes to plain-old balloon angioplasty. Although current data are promising, there is still a need for further long-term randomized control trial data comparing a DCB-only approach specifically against a second- or third-generation DES. A 4-week period of dual antiplatelet therapy provides a real advantage for the DCB-only PCI approach, which is not possible with most DESs. Since rates of adverse clinical outcomes are very low for all PCI procedures attention should be turned to the development of robust endpoints with which to compare DCB-only PCI approaches to the standard treatment with a DES.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40119-018-0121-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prospective, large-scale multicenter trial for the use of drug-coated balloons in coronary lesions: The DCB-only All-Comers Registry.

This prospective, observational all-comers registry assessed the safety and efficacy of a Drug Coated Balloon-only strategy (DCB-only) in patients with coronary lesions. Data regarding the performance of a DCB-only approach, especially in patients with previously untreated de-novo coronary artery disease (CAD), are still limited. This study was conducted as an international, multicenter registry primarily enrolling patients with de-novo CAD. However, it was also possible to include patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 9 months. A total of 1,025 patients with a mean age of 64.0 ± 11.2 years were enrolled. The majority of treated lesions were de-novo (66.9%), followed by drug-eluting-stent ISR (DES-ISR; 22.6%) and bare-metal-stent ISR (BMS-ISR; 10.5%). The TLR rate was lower in the de-novo group (2.3%) when compared to BMS- (2.9%) and DES-ISR (5.8%) (P = 0.049). Regarding MACE, there was a trend toward fewer events in the de-novo group (5.6%) than in the BMS- (7.8%) and DES-ISR cohort (9.6%) (P = 0.131). Subgroup analyses revealed that lesion type (95% CI 1.127-6.587); P = 0.026) and additional stent implantation (95% CI 0.054-0.464; P = 0.001) were associated with higher TLR rates. Our results show that DCB-only angioplasty of de-novo coronary lesions is associated with low MACE and TLR rates. Thus, DCBs appear to be an attractive alternative for the interventional, stentless treatment of suitable de-novo coronary lesions.

GW28-e0314 Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Bare-Mental Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) has become an alternative option to drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, the effect of drug-eluting balloon with regular bare-mental stent (BMS) in de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to

Efficacy and Safety of a Biodegradable Polymer Cobalt‐Chromium Sirolimus‐Eluting Stent (EXCEL2) in Treating De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Pooled Analysis of the CREDIT II and CREDIT III Trials. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26887

An error has been identified in the title and throughout the article. The trade name of the stent EXCEL 2 should be EXCROSSAL. The author regrets any confusion caused by the error.

TCTAP A-148 Drug Eluting Stents Versus Drug Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Very Small De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

TCTAP A-148 Drug Eluting Stents Versus Drug Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Very Small De Novo Coronary Artery Disease

CRT-100.60 Outcomes of Bioresorbable Scaffold Use for the Treatment of Bifurcating Lesions: A Global Study Analysis

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is demonstrated to be clinical equivalent to drug eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of de-novo coronary artery disease. One of his properties is the thicker struts being completed degraded by 24-36 months. Data reporting clinical outcomes is scarce. We

TCTAP A-029 Clinical Results of DEB Treatment for De-Novo Coronary Artery Disease in a Registry Study in China

Randomized trials have demonstrated that drug eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty plus bare-metal stenting is non-inferior to drug eluting stenting in dealing with de-novo lesions. The efficacy and safety of the DEB for treatment of de-novo coronary artery disease in a large-scale registry has been