Didanosine Therapy Research Articles

Attenuated replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with a didanosine-selected reverse transcriptase mutation.

The Leu-74 to Val (Leu74Val) mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase (RT) develops as a consequence of didanosine (ddI) therapy and is associated with a decreased susceptibility to ddI. In this report, we provide evidence that the ddI-associated Leu74Val mutation confers a replication disadvantage to the virus. In a series of experiments, we have shown that (i) a cloned virus with an engineered Leu74Val mutation in RT was attenuated for replication; (ii) a Val-to-Leu revertant of Leu74Val in the pNL4-3 background replicated with an efficiency similar to that of the wild-type virus; (iii) when two isolates from the same patient were compared, a clinical isolate containing mutations Leu74Val and Thr215Tyr was attenuated for replication compared to one in which the Thr215Tyr mutation alone was present; and (iv) the viruses with the Leu74Val mutation showed an 11% loss of fitness in a single passage compared to the wild-type and a mutant virus containing a Lys70Arg mutation. The loss of fitness for viruses grown in drug-free medium could result in an inability to detect a Leu74Val mutant in clinical isolates obtained post-ddI therapy. The decreased replication ability of the Leu74Val mutant virus selected by ddI therapy provides a strong rationale for the lower viral RNA levels observed with ddI therapy compared to zidovudine therapy in clinical trials.

Didanosine therapy of choice in paediatric HIV infection

Didanosine therapy of choice in paediatric HIV infection

Efficacy of a combined zidovudine plus didanosine therapy in one case of HIV-related thrombocytopenia non-responder to zidovudine alone or to anti-Rho immunoglobulin administration

Efficacy of a combined zidovudine plus didanosine therapy in one case of HIV-related thrombocytopenia non-responder to zidovudine alone or to anti-Rho immunoglobulin administration

AZT-Related Mutation Lys70Arg in Reverse Transcriptase of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Confers Decrease in Susceptibility to ddATP inin VitroRT Inhibition Assay

The genetic basis for didanosine (ddI) resistance in human immunodefeciency virus (HIV-1) has previously been shown to be commonly associated with a Leu to Val change at codon 74 in the HIV-1 RT gene. In this study sequential viral isolates were analyzed from five patients with prior zidovudine (AZT) use who received 6 to 16 months of ddI therapy. Following ddI therapy, viral isolates exhibited an increased AZT susceptibility and decreased ddI susceptibility. Sequence and nested PCR analysis of the HIV-1 RT gene revealed that two viral isolates contained the Leu to Val change at codon 74, and three other isolates with reduced susceptibility to ddI each contained changes at codons 65, 70, and 72. Site-directed mutagenesis was employed to insert specific mutations in RT gene of proviral clone pNL4-3. Analysis of virion-associated reverse transcriptase activity indicated that the Lys70Arg mutation resulted in an enzyme with 2- to 4-fold decreased susceptibility to ddATP. Statistical analysis of the inhibitory concentration for RT activity between pNL4-3 and mutant Lys70Arg viruses obtained in three independent RT inhibition assays was significant (P= 0.05) by studentttest paired analysis. Drug susceptibility assays on the virus with Lys70Arg mutation showed a marginal decrease in susceptibility to ddI (1.5- to 2-fold) and about 4- to 6-fold decrease in susceptibilty to AZT. Mutations Lys65Glu and Arg72Ser resulted in an impaired RT with greatly diminished functional RT activity. The AZT-associated Lys70Arg mutation results in an RT enzyme with decreased susceptibility to ddATP.

Lack of muscle toxicity with didanosine (ddI) Clinical and experimental studies

Currently, 2′,3′-dideoxyinosine (ddI) is used in AIDS therapy. To investigate the possible myotoxicity of ddI in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), we examined the effect of ddI in vitro in tissue cultures of skeletal muscles of rats exposed to ddI at doses equivalent to plasma ddI levels obtained in the treatment of HIV patients. Control cultures were exposed to normal saline and zidovudine (AZT). After 4 weeks no changes were noted in the ddI and normal saline cultures, but AZT cultures showed abnormal accumulation of mitochondria. The creatine kinase values in culture supernatants were all normal. We also reviewed the clinical, nutritional and biological parameters, AZT and ddI dosage, and histochemical findings in muscle specimens of 14 HIV patients receiving ddI therapy. All patients had previously received AZT. The mean cumulative dose of ddI was 91.6 gm. Two patients had myalgia, 9 muscle atrophy, and 13 weakness. All patients were malnourished. Five patients had mitochondrial myopathy related to AZT, 4 had ddI-associated neuropathy and 2 patients had only selective type 2 fiber atrophy. One patient had necrotizing vasculitis, one had scattered necrotic fibers and type 2 fiber atrophy and 2 had a normal muscle biopsy. On the basis of the results, we have been unable to implicate ddI as a cause of skeletal myopathy.

Acquisition of syncytium-inducing HIV-1 strains during therapy with zidovudine alone or combined with alpha interferon or didanosine.

The effect of antiretroviral treatment on HIV-1 phenotype was studied in a group of 83 nucleoside-naive patients. These initially nonsyncytium-inducing HIV-1 positive patients were followed prospectively for their HIV-1 phenotype. Syncytium-inducing variants were detected by cocultivation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with the MT-2 T-cell line. Overall, 16 of 83 (19%) patients underwent a shift to syncytium-inducing phenotype: 11 of 67 during zidovudine treatment, 3 of 10 during zidovudine plus alpha interferon treatment, and 2 of 6 under initial zidovudine plus didanosine therapy. The results of this study demonstrate that neither zidovudine therapy alone nor combined with interferon or didanosine prevents the acquisition of syncytium-inducing strains.

Development of zidovudine resistance mutations in patients receiving prolonged didanosine monotherapy.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates from 2 patients who received didanosine (ddI) monotherapy for > 2 years were analyzed for reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations by sequencing of proviral DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. One patient was otherwise antiretroviral-naive; the other had received zidovudine for 5 months before beginning ddI therapy. Isolates obtained from both patients before initiation of ddI monotherapy were free of HIV-1 RT mutations associated with zidovudine or ddI resistance. However, after prolonged ddI monotherapy, mutations associated with zidovudine resistance (M41L, D67N, K70R, and/or T215Y) were detected in HIV-1 isolates from both patients. There was no evidence that surreptitious use of zidovudine or technical artifact caused these findings. This observation suggests that prolonged ddI monotherapy may decrease the efficacy of subsequent zidovudine therapy in some patients.

Intracellular Activation and Cytotoxicity of Three Different Combinations of 3′-Azido-3′-deoxythymidine and 2′,3′-Dideoxyinosine

We measured the intracellular activation and cytotoxicity of 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (zidovudine, ZDV) and 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) when combined at three different clinically relevant combinations of 1:1, 1:10, and 10:1 (ZDV:ddI). The activation of ddI to ddA-TP was increased in all three combinations with ZDV, compared to ddI alone. A maximum twofold increase in ddA-TP was observed, which could not be further increased by raising the concentration of ZDV in the combination. On the other hand, the concentration of ZDV in the combination could be reduced to one-tenth while retaining increased activation of ddI. We also examined the cytotoxicity of these combinations in CEM cells, phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated and resting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). CEM cells were the least sensitive overall to the drugs. ZDV showed greater cytotoxicity in stimulated PBMCs than resting PBMCs, whereas the reverse was true for ddI. This could be explained by the different activation pathways of these two drugs. The 1:1 and 10:1 ZDV:ddI combinations showed reduced toxicity compared to the separate drugs. These results indicate that ZDV and ddI need not necessarily be combined together at a ratio of ZDV:ddI of 1:1, but that some alteration in the dosages of ZDV or ddI in patients could be possible without loss of the benefits of combined ZDV:ddI therapy.

Zidovudine Compared With Didanosine in Patients With Advanced HIV Type I Infection and Little or No Previous Experience With Zidovudine

<h3>Background:</h3> We conducted a trial to compare treatment with zidovudine or didanosine in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection who had received little or no previous therapy with zidovudine. <h3>Methods:</h3> Six hundred seventeen patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), advanced AIDS-related complex (CD4 cell count, ≤0.30× 10⁹/L [300/μL]), or asymptomatic HIV (CD4 cell count, ≤0.20× 10⁹/L) received zidovudine, 500 mg/d of didanosine, or 750 mg/d of didanosine in a randomized, double-blind allocation, with cross-over to alternative medication after development of an end point or serious toxic effect. To be eligible, patients must have received either no or up to 16 weeks of zidovudine therapy before entry into the study. Primary end points were development of a new AIDS-defining event or death. Secondary clinical end points were new or recurrent AIDS-defining events, or death, and survival. <h3>Results:</h3> In the study as a whole, there were no differences in the relative risks (RRs) of the development of end points between treatment groups. However, there was a strong interaction between the relative efficacies of zidovudine and didanosine and previous experience with zidovudine. Among 380 patients with no previous zidovudine therapy, zidovudine was more effective than 750 mg/d of didanosine (RR, 1.43; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.00), with a similar trend for zidovudine compared with 500 mg/d of didanosine (RR, 1.21; 90% CI, 0.86 to 1.71). However, among 118 patients with more than 8 weeks but no more than 16 weeks of previous zidovudine therapy, 500 mg/d of didanosine was more effective than zidovudine (RR, 0.48; 90% CI, 0.27 to 0.86); there was a similar trend for increased effectiveness of 750 mg/d of didanosine compared with zidovudine (RR, 0.61; 90% CI, 0.36 to 1.03). Among 119 patients who had some but no more than 8 weeks of previous zidovudine therapy, there were no significant differences among the treatment arms. Similar findings were noted in the analysis of the two secondary clinical end points. No significant differences were found in efficacy between the groups receiving 500 and 750 mg/d of didanosine. The major toxic effect associated with zidovudine was hematopoietic (granulocytopenia) and that associated with didanosine was pancreatitis (dosage, 750 mg/d). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> In patients with advanced HIV disease, zidovudine appears to be more effective than didanosine as initial therapy; however, some patients with advanced HIV disease may benefit from a change to didanosine therapy after as little as 8 to 16 weeks of therapy with zidovudine. (Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:961-974)

Zidovudine compared with didanosine in patients with advanced HIV type 1 infection and little or no previous experience with zidovudine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group

We conducted a trial to compare treatment with zidovudine or didanosine in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection who had received little or no previous therapy with zidovudine. Six hundred seventeen patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), advanced AIDS-related complex (CD4 cell count, < or = 0.30 x 10(9)/L [300/microL]), or asymptomatic HIV (CD4 cell count, < or = 0.20 x 10(9)/L) received zidovudine, 500 mg/d of didanosine, or 750 mg/d of didanosine in a randomized, double-blind allocation, with cross-over to alternative medication after development of an end point or serious toxic effect. To be eligible, patients must have received either no or up to 16 weeks of zidovudine therapy before entry into the study. Primary end points were development of a new AIDS-defining event or death. Secondary clinical end points were new or recurrent AIDS-defining events, or death, and survival. In the study as a whole, there were no differences in the relative risks (RRs) of the development of end points between treatment groups. However, there was a strong interaction between the relative efficacies of zidovudine and didanosine and previous experience with zidovudine. Among 380 patients with no previous zidovudine therapy, zidovudine was more effective than 750 mg/d of didanosine (RR, 1.43; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.00), with a similar trend for zidovudine compared with 500 mg/d of didanosine (RR, 1.21; 90% CI, 0.86 to 1.71). However, among 118 patients with more than 8 weeks but no more than 16 weeks of previous zidovudine therapy, 500 mg/d of didanosine was more effective than zidovudine (RR, 0.48; 90% CI, 0.27 to 0.86); there was a similar trend for increased effectiveness of 750 mg/d of didanosine compared with zidovudine (RR, 0.61; 90% CI, 0.36 to 1.03). Among 119 patients who had some but no more than 8 weeks of previous zidovudine therapy, there were no significant differences among the treatment arms. Similar findings were noted in the analysis of the two secondary clinical end points. No significant differences were found in efficacy between the groups receiving 500 and 750 mg/d of didanosine. The major toxic effect associated with zidovudine was hematopoietic (granulocytopenia) and that associated with didanosine was pancreatitis (dosage, 750 mg/d). In patients with advanced HIV disease, zidovudine appears to be more effective than didanosine as initial therapy; however, some patients with advanced HIV disease may benefit from a change to didanosine therapy after as little as 8 to 16 weeks of therapy with zidovudine.

A dose comparison study of didanosine in patients with very advanced HIV infection who are intolerant to or clinically deteriorate on zidovudine

Zidovudine (ZDV) is the only antiretroviral drug which has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with symptomatic HIV disease, but its use is restricted by intolerance in a significant proportion of patients. Additionally, the efficacy of ZDV therapy appears to decrease after prolonged treatment particularly in the advanced stage of HIV disease. Therefore, alternative antiretroviral regimens for patients are needed. In this study, didanosine (ddI; 2',3'-dideoxyinosine), another HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor, was evaluated. A total of 426 patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex (ARC) who were intolerant to or clinically progressing on ZDV therapy and who had CD4+ cell counts < or = 150 x 10(6)/l were randomized to receive either a high (750 mg for bodyweight > or = 60 kg or 500 mg for bodyweight < 60 kg) or a low (200 mg and 134 mg, respectively) dose of ddI daily. The patients were recruited from 31 German and Austrian AIDS clinical primary-care centres. The study was stopped after the second interim analysis due to a statistically significant difference in the incidence of pancreatitis (nine versus 26; relative risk, 2.92; P = 0.003) and neuropathy (28 versus 43; relative risk, 1.55; P = 0.05) in favour of the low dose. There was no difference between the low and high dosage groups in survival rate at 6 (80 versus 80%) and 12 months (61 versus 65%), number of deaths [82 (43.6 per 100 patient-years) versus 84 (44.4 per 100 patient-years)], progression from ARC to AIDS or to AIDS or death, or average number of new/recurrent opportunistic infections (2.8 versus 3.0 per patient). This study cannot conclude on ddI efficacy but it shows that in patients with advanced HIV disease for whom no alternative antiretroviral therapy is available and ddI therapy is considered, daily doses < 750 mg should be administered.

Genotypic Evolution of HIV-1 Isolates from Patients after a Switch of Therapy from Zidovudine to Didanosine

The existence of zidovudine (ZDV)-resistant and didanosine (ddI)-resistant human immunodeficiency-1 (HIV-1) variants mutated in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene has been previously demonstrated. In this study, we tried to follow up the genotypic changes in the RT after the switch of therapy from ZDV to ddI. We studied HIV-1 isolates from 11 patients undergoing ddI therapy. Genotypic data were obtained with differential polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and with direct sequencing after PCR. The prevalence of ZDV resistance-related mutations showed a very slow decrease, particularly when patients had been treated with ZDV for a long time. The appearance of a mutation at codon 74 seemed to be independent of the presence or absence of ZDV resistance-related mutations. The broad genotypic heterogeneity of the isolates and the complexity of the evolution in one patient's isolates plead for large sequencing studies of the RT genome in new therapeutic approaches.

Increased hematopoietic toxicity following administration of interferon-å with combination dideoxynucleoside therapy (zidovudine plus DDI) administered in normal mice

Because of the urgency to develop drugs which will effectively combat HIV infection, many combination therapies which have proved effective against HIV in vitro have undergone, or are undergoing clinical trial. Unfortunately many of drugs are being used without rigorous and exhaustive preclinical evaluation to assess their potential to develop hematopoietic toxicity. We report here the results of two in vivo studies performed to analyze the effect of combined zidovudine (AZT) plus didanosine (ddI) therapy, either with or without interferon-a (IFN-a), on murine hematopoiesis. Normal C57BL/6 female mice were administered AZT (1.0 mg/ml) plus dose-escalation ddI (0.1, 1.0 and 2.5 mg/ml) placed in their drinking water. Control mice received IFN-å (100 units/ml) alone. Mice were serially bled and sacrificed over a six-week period for assessment of hematopoietic toxicity measured by peripheral blood indices and assays of hematopoietic progenitors, i.e., erythroid (BFU-E), myeloid (CFU-GM), and megakaryocyte (CFU-Meg) cultured from bone marrow and spleen. AZT plus dose-escalation ddI decreased the hematocrit and white blood cell count when administered to normal mice compared to untreated controls during the six-week examination period. Marrow derived BFU-E, CFU-GM, and CFU-Meg were all reduced, however an increase was observed from the spleen for all three progenitor cell types. Use of IFN-a, in addition to combination AZT plus ddI further decreased the hematocrit, white blood cells and platelets. Marrow derived CFU-GM and CFU-Meg were increased slightly and only marginally for BFU-E with a similar response observed from the spleen. These results demonstrate that combination AZT plus ddI when used in vivo may produce synergistic hematopoietic toxicity, and that the addition of IFN-a to this treatment regimen increases this toxicity. These data indicate caution when this therapeutic approach is suggested for patients infected with HIV. If used, these patients will require careful monitoring for blood cell toxicity.

A Clinicopathologic Report of the Retinal Lesions Associated With Didanosine

Didanosine, a purine analogue with antiretroviral activity, is used in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus disease. Associated toxic effects of didanosine include pancreatitis, peripheral neuropathy, and retinopathy. The retinal lesions associated with didanosine therapy were studied in a 6-year-old girl with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Gross examination disclosed multiple well-circumscribed depigmented lesions in the midperipheral retina. Microscopic examination of these lesions showed multiple areas of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) loss, some surrounded by areas of hypertrophy or hypopigmentation of the RPE. Partial loss of the choriocapillaris and neurosensory retina were also noted in areas of diseased RPE. Transmission electron microscopy showed numerous membranous lamellar inclusions and cytoplasmic bodies in the RPE cells. These data show that didanosine primarily affects the RPE and that the choriocapillaris and overlying neurosensory retina are also dystrophic in areas of RPE loss.

Increased hematopoietic toxicity following administration of interferon-å with combination dideoxynucleoside therapy (zidovudine plus DDI) administered in normal mice

Because of the urgency to develop drugs which will effectively combat HIV infection, many combination therapies which have proved effective against HIV in vitro have undergone, or are undergoing clinical trial. Unfortunately many of drugs are being used without rigorous and exhaustive preclinical evaluation to assess their potential to develope hematopoeitic toxicity. We report here the results of two in vivo studies performed to analyze the effect of combined zidovudine (AZT) plus didanosine (ddl) therapy, either with or without interferon-å (IFN-å), on murine hematopoiesis. Normal C57BL/6 female mice were administered AZT (1.0 mg/ml) plus dose-escalation ddI (0.1, 1.0 and 2.5 mg/ml) placed in their drinking water. Control mice received IFN-å (100 units/ml) alone. Mice were serially bled and sacrified over a six-week period for assessment of hematopoietic toxicity measured by peripheral blood indices and assays of hematopoietic progenitors, i.e., erythroid (BFU-E), myeloid (CFU-GM), and megakaryocyte (CFU-Meg) cultured from bone marrow and spleen. AZT plus dose-escalation ddI decreased the hematocrit and white blood cell count when administered to normal mice compared to untreated controls during the six-week examination period. Marrow derived BFU-E, CFU-GM, and CFU-Meg were all reduced, however an increase was observed from the spleen for all three progenitor cell types. Use of IFN-å, in addition to combination AZT plus ddI further decreased the hematocrit, white blood cell and platelets. Marrow derived CFU-GM and CFU-Meg were increased slightly and only marginally for BFU-E with a similar response observed from the spleen. These results demonstrate that combination AZT plus ddI when used in vivo may produce synergistic hematopoietic toxicity, and that the addition of IFN-å to this treatment regimen increases this toxicity. These data indicate caution when this therapeutic approach is suggested for patients infected with HIV. If used, these patients wil require careful monitoring for blood cel toxicity.

Didanosine resistance in HIV-infected patients switched from zidovudine to didanosine monotherapy.

To determine the frequency and pattern of development of specific drug resistance mutations for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase in patients switched from zidovudine to didanosine therapy and to examine the relation of the didanosine resistance mutation at codon 74 of the HIV reverse-transcriptase gene to CD4+ T-cell changes and virus burden. Retrospective analysis of all patients enrolled at Stanford University in protocols where patients were switched from zidovudine to didanosine monotherapy. A university hospital. 64 patients infected with HIV who were switched from zidovudine to didanosine monotherapy. Patients had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-related complex, or were asymptomatic (mean [+/- SD] starting CD4+ T-cell count of 129 +/- 88 cells/mm3). Serial serum specimens were tested for the didanosine resistance mutation at codon 74 of the HIV reverse-transcriptase gene and for a zidovudine resistance mutation at codon 215 using selective polymerase chain reactions (PCR). Serum HIV RNA levels were determined by quantitative PCR. CD4+ T-cell counts were determined at serial time points. By 24 weeks of didanosine therapy, the proportion of patients with the didanosine resistance mutation at codon 74 increased from 0% to 56% (36 of 64). In contrast, the proportion of patients with the zidovudine resistance mutation at codon 215 decreased from 84% at the start to 59% after 24 weeks of didanosine therapy (a 25% decrease, 95% lower CI, 15%; P < 0.0001). Patients who developed the codon 74 mutation had a greater decrease in CD4+ T cells after the development of the mutation than did patients without the mutation (P < 0.001). In addition, after 24 weeks of didanosine, patients who developed the codon 74 mutation had a greater serum HIV RNA burden than patients who remained wild type (did not have the mutation) at codon 74 (225,000 compared with 82,400 HIV RNA copies/mL serum; P = 0.01). Among patients infected with HIV who had advanced disease and were switched from zidovudine to didanosine therapy, more than one half developed the didanosine resistance mutation at codon 74 by 24 weeks of didanosine therapy. Patients who developed the codon 74 mutation had a greater decline in CD4+ T cells after the development of the mutation and had a greater serum virus burden than did patients without the codon 74 mutation.

Erratum

There is an error in the January 1994 issue of the journal: Yarchoan R, Lietzau JA, Nguyen BY, et al. A randomized pilot study ofalternating or simultaneous zidovudine and didanosine therapy in patients with symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis 1994; 169:9–17. On page 13 in the paragraph beginning “Other adverse effects,” the last sentence The Journal of Infectious Diseases 1994;170:170:260 should read: “All in all, one or more drugs were withheld according to protocol because of probable drug toxicity in 3 patients receiving the simultaneous regimen (an average of 46 days off each) and in 5 patients receiving the alternating regimen (an average of 21 days off each).”

Quantitation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus by Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction in Response to Didanosine after Long-Term Therapy with Zidovudine

Measurements of human immunodeficiency virus by quantitative RNA and DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cell and plasma infectivity dilution cultures, and immune complex-disassociated p24 antigen-capture ELISA were made repeatedly in 10 subjects receiving long-term zidovudine treatment before and after therapy was changed to didanosine. Comparison of baseline assays showed that quantitative cell cultures, plasma RNA, and proviral DNA were measurable in all subjects and that cell culture results were significantly correlated with measures of nucleic acids. Plasma viremia (as indicated by culture) and p24 antigen were detected in three measurements in 3 of 8 and 6 of 10 subjects, respectively. Significant decreases in plasma RNA and cell dilution cultures from baseline were maintained for up to 6 months after initiation of didanosine therapy. These findings demonstrate a decrease in virus burden with the use of didanosine; however, continued detection of plasma RNA suggests that additional antiviral therapy will be required to suppress viral replication.

Investigation of AZT susceptibility of sequential HIV-1 isolates from patients treated with ddI after long-term therapy with AZT

AZT susceptibility of sequential 12 HIV-1 isolates was investigated by culture method. These isolate were obtained from three patients who had received AZT for at least 12 months and switched to ddI after they appeared to deteriorate clinically. Cultures of isolate from a patient before therapy with AZT or ddI did not show cytopathic effect (CPE) in the presence of 0.1 microM or 1.0 microM AZT. Culture of 2 isolates from two patients treated with AZT more than 6 months before switched to ddI therapy showed CPE in the presence of AZT and HIV-1 p24 antigen was detected by ELISA in the supernatants. Culture of 6 of 7 isolates from three patients treated with ddI after long-term therapy with AZT also showed CPE in the presence of 1.0 microM AZT and HIV-1 p24 antigen was detected. These results demonstrated that AZT-resistant variant was still a dominant population in the isolate from patients after 11 to 13 months of discontinuing AZT therapy.

Zidovudine

Zidovudine remains the mainstay in the treatment of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The drug delays disease progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and to AIDS-related complex (ARC), reduces opportunistic infections, and increases survival in patients with advanced HIV infection. There is evidence to suggest that zidovudine also delays disease progression in patients with mild symptomatic disease. Although one study has shown zidovudine to have no significant beneficial effects on survival or disease progression in patients with asymptomatic HIV infection, several other studies have shown zidovudine to delay disease progression in this patient group. Results from related ongoing studies are awaited with interest. Zidovudine reduces the incidence of AIDS dementia complex (ADC) and appears to prolong survival in these patients, and improves other neurological complications of HIV infection. The drug also appears to enhance the efficacy of interferon-alpha in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma. Although zidovudine is widely used as postexposure prophylaxis following accidental exposure to HIV, its efficacy in preventing seroconversion is unclear. Whether zidovudine prevents vertical transmission also remains to be determined. The overall efficacy of zidovudine in the treatment of children with HIV infection appears similar to that in adults despite more rapid disease progression in younger patients. Zidovudine-resistant isolates can emerge as early as after 2 months' therapy, and primary infection with zidovudine-resistant strains has been documented. Both zidovudine resistance and the syncytium-inducing HIV phenotype appear to be associated with poor clinical outcome. However, zidovudine resistance may revert on drug withdrawal or switching to an alternative therapy. Zidovudine-associated haematotoxicity may be dose-limiting. Nonhaematological adverse events associated with zidovudine therapy are generally mild and usually resolve spontaneously. Dosages of approximately 500 to 600 mg/day appear to be at least as effective as dosages of 1200 to 1500 mg/day and are better tolerated in patients with less advanced disease. However, optimal dosage are unclear. Despite beneficial effects, zidovudine monotherapy is not curative. There is evidence to suggest that the concomitant administration of zidovudine with didanosine or zalcitabine is effective in patients with HIV disease progression despite receiving zidovudine monotherapy, and there is some evidence that concomitant zidovudine plus didanosine therapy is more effective than alternating monotherapy. However, results from studies of combination therapy in asymptomatic patients, and from comparative combination therapy studies are awaited. Cotherapy with agents that augment haematopoiesis allows the continuation of therapeutic zidovudine dosages.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)