dB For Beam Research Articles

Dual-Ridge Gap Waveguide-Based Antenna With Diverse Beam Capabilities

In this paper, a dual-ridge gap waveguide (DRGW) based antenna with beam scanning, sum-difference beam, and flat top beam capabilities has been proposed. The proposed antenna is composed of a gap waveguide (GW) with two flared horn-shaped ridges. A metallic plane with the same horn shape as the ridge is inserted between two ridges and extended beyond the waveguide. Two coaxial probes are located on the top and bottom plates of the GW, respectively, to excite the antenna. By independently adjusting the magnitudes and phases of two signals fed into the antenna, the patterns including the beam scanning from θ=60∘ to θ=120∘ in E plane, the sum and difference beams at the endfire direction, and the flat top beam can be flexibly achieved. Measured results are given to demonstrate that the proposed antenna operates in a band of 16.3 18.4 GHz with the average gain about 11 dBi and the front-to-back ratio (FTBR) better than 20 dB for the beam scanning, the sum beam and the flat top beam, and the null depth better than 25 dB for the difference beam.

Ten switched‐beams with 2 × 2 series‐fed 2.4 GHz array antenna and a simple beam‐switching network

This article presents a 2 × 2 series fed 2.4 GHz patch antenna array having multiple beam switching capabilities by using two simple 3 dB/90° couplers to achieve required amplitude and phase excitations for array elements with reduced complexity, cost and size. The beam switching performance with consistent gain and low side lobe levels (SLL) is achieved by exciting the array elements from orthogonally placed thin quarter-wave (λg/4) feeds. The implemented array is capable to generate ten (10) switched-beams in 2-D space when series fed elements are excited from respective ports through 3 dB quadrature couplers. The dual polarized characteristics of presented array provide intrinsic interport isolation between perpendicularly placed ports through polarization diversity to achieve independent beam switching capabilities for intended directions. The implemented antenna array on 1.575 mm thick low loss (tan δ = 0.003) NH9450 substrate with εr = 4.5 ± 0.10 provides 10 dB return loss impedance bandwidth of more than 50 MHz. The measured beam switching loss is around 0.8 dB for beams switched at θ = ±20°, Ф = 0°, 90°, and 45° with average peak gain of 9.5 dBi and SLL ≤ −10 dB in all cases. The novelty of this work is the capability of generating ten dual polarized switched-beams by using only two 3 dB/90° couplers as beam controllers.

Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 CP810 Sound Processor.

The Nucleus® 5 System Sound Processor (CP810, Cochlear™, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia) contains two omnidirectional microphones. They can be configured as a fixed directional microphone combination (called Zoom) or as an adaptive beamformer (called Beam), which adjusts the directivity continuously to maximally reduce the interfering noise. Initial evaluation studies with the CP810 had compared performance and usability of the new processor in comparison with the Freedom™ Sound Processor (Cochlear™) for speech in quiet and noise for a subset of the processing options. This study compares the two processing options suggested to be used in noisy environments, Zoom and Beam, for various sound field conditions using a standardized speech in noise matrix test (Oldenburg sentences test). Nine German-speaking subjects who previously had been using the Freedom speech processor and subsequently were upgraded to the CP810 device participated in this series of additional evaluation tests. The speech reception threshold (SRT for 50% speech intelligibility in noise) was determined using sentences presented via loudspeaker at 65 dB SPL in front of the listener and noise presented either via the same loudspeaker (S0N0) or at 90 degrees at either the ear with the sound processor (S0NCI+) or the opposite unaided ear (S0NCI-). The fourth noise condition consisted of three uncorrelated noise sources placed at 90, 180 and 270 degrees. The noise level was adjusted through an adaptive procedure to yield a signal to noise ratio where 50% of the words in the sentences were correctly understood.In spatially separated speech and noise conditions both Zoom and Beam could improve the SRT significantly. For single noise sources, either ipsilateral or contralateral to the cochlear implant sound processor, average improvements with Beam of 12.9 and 7.9 dB in SRT were found. The average SRT of –8 dB for Beam in the diffuse noise condition (uncorrelated noise from both sides and back) is truly remarkable and comparable to the performance of normal hearing listeners in the same test environment. The static directivity (Zoom) option in the diffuse noise condition still provides a significant benefit of 5.9 dB in comparison with the standard omnidirectional microphone setting. These results indicate that CI recipients may improve their speech recognition in noisy environments significantly using these directional microphone-processing options.

Combining Directional Microphone and Single-Channel Noise Reduction Algorithms

This study tested a combination of algorithms designed to improve cochlear implant performance in noise. A noise reduction (NR) algorithm, based on signal to noise ratio estimation was evaluated in combination with several directional microphone algorithms available in the Cochlear CP810 sound processor. Fourteen adult unilateral cochlear implant users participated in the study. Evaluation was conducted using word recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise, and subjective feedback via questionnaire after a period of take-home use. Music appreciation was also evaluated in a controlled listening task. The sentence recognition task measured speech reception threshold for 50% morphemes correct. The interfering maskers were speech-weighted noise and competing talkers, which were spatially separated from the target speech. In addition, the locations of the noise maskers changed during the test in an effort to replicate relevant real-world listening conditions. SmartSound directionality settings Standard, Zoom, and Beam (used in the SmartSound programs Everyday, Noise, and Focus, respectively) were all evaluated with and without NR. Microphone directionality demonstrated a consistent benefit in sentence recognition in all noise conditions tested. The group average speech reception threshold benefit over the Standard setting was 3.7 dB for Zoom and 5.3 dB for Beam. Addition of the NR algorithm further improved sentence recognition by 1.3 dB when the noise maskers were speech-weighted noise. There was an overall group preference for the NR algorithm in noisy environments. Group mean word recognition in quiet, preference in quiet conditions, and music appreciation were all unaffected by the NR algorithm. Multimicrophone directionality was effective in improving speech understanding in spatially separated noisy conditions. The single-channel NR algorithm further enhanced speech intelligibility in speech-weighted noise for cochlear implant users while maintaining equivalent performance in quiet situations and when listening to music.

Effects of Radar Beam Shielding on Rainfall Estimation for the Polarimetric C-Band Radar

Abstract Radar reflectivity (Zh), differential reflectivity (Zdr), and specific differential phase (Kdp) measured from the operational, polarimetric weather radar located in Trappes, France, were used to examine the effects of radar beam shielding on rainfall estimation. The objective of this study is to investigate the degree of immunity of Kdp-based rainfall estimates to beam shielding for C-band radar data during four typical rain events encountered in Europe. The rain events include two cold frontal rainbands with average rainfall rates of 7 and 17 mm h−1, respectively, and two summertime convective rain events with average rainfall rates of 11 and 22 mm h−1. The large effects of beam shielding on rainfall accumulation were observed for algorithms using Zh and Zdr with differences of up to ∼2 dB (40%) compared to a Kdp-based algorithm over a power loss range of 0–8 dB. This analysis reveals that Zdr and Kdp are not affected by partial beam shielding. Standard reflectivity corrections based on the degree of beam shielding would have overestimated rainfall rates by up to 1.5 dB for less than 40% beam shielding and up to 3 dB for beam shielding less than 75%. The investigation also examined the sensitivity of beam shielding effects on rainfall rate estimation to (i) axis–ratio parameterization and drop size distribution, (ii) methods used to smooth profiles of differential propagation phase (ϕdp) and estimate Kdp, and (iii) event-to-event variability. Although rainfall estimates were sensitive to drop size distribution and axis–ratio parameterization, differences between Zh- and Kdp-based rainfall rates increased independently from those parameters with amount of shielding. Different approaches to smoothing ϕdp profiles and estimating Kdp were examined and showed little impact on results.