Days Of Prescription Research Articles

Polypharmacy among medicaid-insured children with and without documented obesity.

Polypharmacy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events. As obesity and rates of obesity-associated comorbid chronic conditions continue to rise, an improved understanding of whether children with obesity experience higher risk of polypharmacy is needed. This study aimed to compare chronic medication polypharmacy prevalence among children with and without a diagnosis of obesity. We performed a cross-sectional examination of prescription data for children aged 2-18 years prescribed ≥1 chronic medication using the 2019 Marketscan Medicaid database. Children with documented obesity were identified using medical visit diagnosis codes. Chronic medications included any ≥30-day prescription with ≥2 dispensed refills. Polypharmacy was defined as the prescription of ≥2 chronic medications for ≥1 overlapping days. Chi-squared tests compared polypharmacy prevalence and the distribution of chronic medication classes between children with and without obesity. Logistic regression determined the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of polypharmacy for children with obesity, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical differences. Of 634,671 included children, 12.2% had documented obesity. More than one-half (52.7%) of children with obesity experienced polypharmacy compared with 47.6% of children without obesity (aOR 1.06 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.08]). Chronic medication prescriptions, particularly for psychiatric and asthma medications, were more commonly prescribed among children with obesity than those without obesity. Children with documented obesity have higher polypharmacy prevalence than children without obesity. Clinicians must be aware of this risk and minimize inappropriate polypharmacy whenever possible. Future work should examine the consequences of polypharmacy, including drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events in children with obesity.

Understanding Prescribing Differences Between Urologists and Medical Oncologists in the Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer

The availability of oral therapies for advanced prostate cancer allows urologists to continue to care for their patients who develop castration resistance. We compared the prescribing practices of urologists and medical oncologists in treating this patient population. The Medicare Part D Prescribers data sets were utilized to identify urologists and medical oncologists who prescribed enzalutamide and/or abiraterone from 2013 to 2019. Each physician was assigned to one of 2 groups: enzalutamide prescriber (physicians that wrote more 30-day prescriptions for enzalutamide than abiraterone) or abiraterone prescriber (opposite). We ran a generalized linear regression to determine factors influencing prescribing preference. In 2019, 4,664 physicians met our inclusion criteria: 23.4% (1,090/4,664) urologists and 76.6% (3,574/4,664) medical oncologists. Urologists were more likely to be enzalutamide prescribers (OR 4.91, CI 4.22-5.74, P < .001) and this held in all regions. Urologists with greater than 60 prescriptions of either drug were not shown to be enzalutamide prescribers (OR 1.18, CI 0.83-1.66, P = .349); 37.9% (5,702/15,062) of abiraterone fills by urologists were for generic compared to 62.5% (57,949/92,741) of abiraterone fills by medical oncologists. There are dramatic prescribing differences between urologists and medical oncologists. A greater understanding of these differences is a health care imperative.

A Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Narcotic Prescriptions in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Electively or for Femoral Neck Fracture

AbstractThe opioid epidemic has forced orthopaedic surgeons to reevaluate prescribing patterns and led hospitals to develop postoperative opioid-sparing protocols for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to investigate patient-reported pain and narcotic requirements in patients undergoing THA for fracture (F-THA) or nonfracture diagnoses (THA-E). A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent primary THA at a single academic institution between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients with postoperative opioid prescription and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score data were included. Patients who underwent primary THA with a diagnosis of femoral neck fracture (THA-F) were matched 1:1 with patients without primary fracture diagnoses (THA-E) using nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 90-day readmission rates, 90-day opioid prescription amounts (quantified by morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), and daily postoperative VAS pain scores (averaged over 24-hour periods) were compared. A total of 8,714 patients met inclusion criteria (THA-E: 8,362; THA-F: 352). The THA-F group was older and had a higher proportion of females and a lower mean body mass index than the THA-E group. There were 331 THA-F patients successfully matched to 331 THA-E patients. Operative time (113.6 ± 41.3 vs. 914.9 ± 32.6 minutes, p &lt; 0.001) and LOS (2.90 ± 2.82 vs. 2.32 ± 1.44 days, p &lt; 0.001) were longer in fracture patients. The THA-F demonstrated equivalent pain scores at 0 to 24 and 48 to 72 hours postoperatively but had slightly higher pain scores at 24 to 48 hours postoperatively (4.04 ± 1.67 vs. 3.71 ± 1.65, p = 0.028). Ninety-day opioid prescriptions were higher in the THA-E group (median [interquartile range], 150.0 [93.3–300.0] vs. 100.0 [40.0–200.0] MME, p = 0.034). In multivariate regression, a diagnosis of fracture was not associated with changes in MME administration. Patients undergoing primary THA electively and for femoral neck fractures can expect similar postoperative pain scores, though fracture patients may require less narcotics postoperatively. All patients should continue to be counseled preoperatively on the dangers and side effects of prolonged opioid use.

Clinical outcomes of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus in kidney transplantation recipients: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea

Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is an important metabolic complication after KT that causes graft failure and cardiovascular complications in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. Using the national claim data of South Korea, 7612 KT recipients between 2009 and 2017 were analyzed. PTDM was defined as a consecutive 30-day prescription history of antidiabetic medication after KT. Among these patients, 24.7% were diagnosed with PTDM, and 51.9% were diagnosed within 6 months after KT. Compared to patients without PTDM, those with PTDM were older, more likely to be men, more likely to be diagnosed with hypertension and cardio-cerebrovascular disease, and experienced more rejection episodes requiring high-dose steroid treatment after KT. During the follow-up, 607 DCGFs, 230 DWGFs, 244 MACEs, and 260 all-cause mortality events occurred. Patients with PTDM showed a higher risk of DCGF (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–1.82; P < 0.001) and MACEs (aHR 1.76; 95% CI 1.33–2.31; P < 0.001) than patients without PTDM. The risks for all clinical outcomes were higher in the insulin group than in the non-use insulin group. PTDM in KT recipients resulted in both worse allograft and patient outcomes represented by DCGF and MACE, especially in patients needing insulin treatment.

Prescription stimulant use during long-term opioid therapy and risk for opioid use disorder

BackgroundConcurrent therapeutic prescribing of prescription stimulants with opioid analgesics is increasing in the United States. Stimulant medication use is associated with increased risk for long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), and LTOT is associated with increased risk for opioid use disorder (OUD). AimsTo determine if stimulant prescriptions among those with LTOT (≥90 days) are associated with greater risk for opioid use disorder (OUD). MethodsThis retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2018 used a United States, nationally distributed Optum© analytics Integrated Claims-Clinical dataset. Patients ≥18 years of age, and free of prevalent OUD in the two years prior to index were eligible. All patients had a new ≥90-day opioid prescription. The index date was day 91. We compared risk for new OUD diagnoses in patients with and without a prescription stimulant overlapping LTOT. Entropy balancing and weighting controlled for confounding factors. ResultsPatients (n = 5,712), were 57.7 (SD±14.9) years of age on average, majority female (59.8%) and 73.3% White race. Among patients with LTOT, 2.8% had overlapping stimulant prescriptions. Before controlling for confounding, dual stimulant-opioid prescriptions, compared to opioid only, were associated with OUD risk (HR = 1.75; 95%CI:1.17-2.61). After controlling for confounding, this association was no longer present (HR = 0.89; 95%CI:0.47-1.71). Results did not differ in sensitivity analyses limiting the cohort to those <56 years of age. ConclusionsDual stimulant use among patients with LTOT does not increase risk for OUD. Stimulants prescribed for ADHD and other conditions may not worsen opioid outcomes for some patients with LTOT.

Medication delivery factors and adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer.

Over 50% of breast cancer patients prescribed a 5-year course of daily oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) are nonadherent. We investigated the role of costs and cancer medication delivery mode and other medication delivery factors on adherence. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of commercially insured and Medicare advantage patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer in 2007-2015 who initiated ET. We examined the association between 12-month ET adherence (proportion of days covered by fills ≥ 0.80) and ET copayments, 90-day prescription refill use, mail order pharmacy use, number of pharmacies, and synchronization of medications. We used regression models to estimate nonadherence risk ratios adjusted for demographics (age, income, race, urbanicity), comorbidities, total medications, primary cancer treatments, and generic AI availability. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using alternative specifications for independent variables. Mail order users had higher adherence in both commercial and Medicare-insured cohorts. Commercially insured patients who used mail order were more likely to be adherent if they had low copayments (< $5) and 90-day prescription refills. For commercially insured patients who used local pharmacies, use of one pharmacy and better synchronized refills were also associated with adherence. Among Medicare patients who used mail order pharmacies, only low copayments were associated with adherence, while among Medicare patients using local pharmacies both low copayments and 90-day prescriptions were associated with ET adherence. Out-of-pocket costs, medication delivery mode, and other pharmacy-related medication delivery factors are associated with adherence to breast cancer ET. Future work should investigate whether interventions aimed at streamlining medication delivery could improve adherence for breast cancer patients.

Utilization Management in the Medicare Part D Program and Prescription Drug Utilization.

Medicare Part D has significantly enhanced access to prescription drugs among Medicare beneficiaries. However, the recent rapid rise of utilization management policies in the Medicare Part D program may have adversely affected access to prescription drugs. I study the effects of expected and observed exposure to utilization management in prescription drug utilization using Medicare Part D claims data from 2009 to 2016 and an instrumental variables strategy based on the interaction of lagged health status and the set of plans available to each beneficiary. I find that the expected share of spending subject to utilization management increases the observed share, with the smallest effect for prior authorization. Increases in the expected share of drug spending subject to prior authorization increases Part D spending by $122.27 per percentage point, with almost three-quarters of this increase being paid by the Medicare program, rather than beneficiaries or plans. Comparable increases in step therapy and quantity limit exposure increase spending by $46 and decrease spending by $31, respectively. Interestingly, increased exposure to prior authorization and quantity limits increases the average price per 30-day prescription.

Persistence with macitentan versus other endothelin receptor antagonists in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: experience from a real-world data repository in the USA

Abstract Background Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and fatal disease and as such, it is imperative that patients remain on therapy to delay progression and maintain functional status. Previous research has demonstrated differences in overall survival in the real-world by endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) treatments with a lower risk of death with macitentan than ambrisentan and bosentan. However, real-world data on persistence to ERAs are limited. Purpose To compare persistence to macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan) in patients with PAH. Methods This retrospective, non-interventional, observational study identified patients between 10/21/2013–3/31/2021 (study period) from the Decision Resources Group (DRG) Real World Data Repository. The repository links medical and prescription claims from commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare plans with electronic health records (EHRs) to provide longitudinal patient-level data representative of over 300 million patients in the US. Patients selected must have been dispensed an ERA prescription from 4/14/14–3/31/20 AND 1) either an inpatient diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH), or 2) a right heart catheterization with any PH diagnosis, or 3) were taking a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i). The primary outcome was persistence defined by time from index to drug discontinuation (90-day gap after the end of the last prescription's days of supply). Descriptive analysis comprised means, standard deviations, medians, and interquartile ranges for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Three-sample proportion tests were conducted at baseline to detect differences between the three cohorts and identify potentially confounding variables. Hazard ratios (HR) for pairwise comparisons (macitentan vs ambrisentan; macitentan vs bosentan) were calculated using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional regression model, to adjust for potential confounders (see Table 1) of the probability of receiving a specific ERA. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 4,526 patients were included, of whom 1,205 received macitentan, 2,592 received ambrisentan and 729 received bosentan. Study population characteristics were representative of a general PAH population (Table 1). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that median persistence was shortest for ambrisentan (12.6 months) followed by bosentan (13.6 months) and greatest for macitentan (15.8 months; overall log-rank p-value: 0.061). Compared to macitentan, patients on other ERAs had a greater risk of discontinuation: ambrisentan (10%) and bosentan (18%) (Table 2). Conclusions Persistence to therapy was significantly greater for macitentan-treated patients than in those receiving ambrisentan or bosentan. Further research examining variability in key sub-groups as well as the impact of improved persistence on long-term outcomes is warranted. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Patterns of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Use in a Population Accessing PrEP in Jackson, Mississippi.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) persistence is suboptimal in the United States. In the Deep South, a region with high rates of new HIV diagnosis, patterns of PrEP discontinuation remain unexplored. We evaluated data from a clinic-based PrEP program in Jackson, Mississippi and included patients initiating PrEP between August 2018 and April 2021. We considered patients to have a gap in PrEP coverage if they had at least 30 days without an active PrEP prescription; those who restarted PrEP after 30 days were classified as ‘stopped and restarted’ and those who never obtained a new PrEP prescription were classified as ‘stopped and did not restart’. Patients without a gap in coverage were considered ‘continuously on PrEP’. We estimated median time to first PrEP discontinuation and examined factors associated with time to first PrEP discontinuation. Of 171 patients who received an initial 90-day PrEP prescription; 75% were assigned male at birth and 74% identified as Black. The median time to first discontinuation was 90 days (95% CI 90–114). Twenty-two percent were continuously on PrEP, 28% stopped and restarted (median time off PrEP = 102 days), and 50% stopped and did not restart. Associations with early PrEP stoppage were notable for patients assigned sex female vs male (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.5) and those living over 25 miles from clinic vs. 0–10 miles (aHR 1.89, 95% CI 1.2–3.0). Most patients never refilled an initial PrEP prescription though many patients re-started PrEP. Interventions to improve persistence and facilitate re-starts are needed.

The Safety and Effectiveness of a Polysaccharide Extracted from Rosa Canina in Patients with NAFLD: A Randomized Trial

Objective: Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) is a common pathology of hepatocytes due to the accumulation of fat which is predominantly implicated in obesity. Due to the multifaceted characterization of fatty liver and no effective treatment, this study was aimed to assess the protective effect of a polysaccharide in NAFL patients. Materials and methods: Polysaccharide fraction was isolated from Rosa canina and administered to 33 NAFL patients for 90 days. Demographic information, liver ultrasonography, and the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) enzymes were studied. Data were analyzed with the use of SPSS version 21 (SPSS, Inc.) All data were shown as means ± SDs and p &lt; 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: After 90-day prescription, the weight loss, reduced activity of ALT and AST as well as changing the echogenicity of the liver from grades of 3, 2, and 1 to 2, 1 and normal, respectively, were observed in patients compared to the baseline (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, there were no visible side effects in patients during drug consumption. Conclusions: The data indicated that polysaccharide fraction with no obvious side effects is significantly able to protect the liver from steatosis in patients with NAFL disease. However, further information is required to better conclude on the effectiveness of the isolated polysaccharide as a promising fatty liver drug.

Diagnosing Prescription Opioid Use Disorder in Patients Using Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain.

The diagnostic criteria for opioid use disorder, originally developed for heroin, did not anticipate the surge in prescription opioid use and the resulting complexities in diagnosing prescription opioid use disorder (POUD), including differentiation of pain relief (therapeutic intent) from more common drug use motives, such as to get high or to cope with negative affect. The authors examined the validity of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders, DSM-5 opioid version, an instrument designed to make this differentiation. Patients (N=606) from pain clinics and inpatient substance treatment who ever received a ≥30-day opioid prescription for chronic pain were evaluated for DSM-5 POUD (i.e., withdrawal and tolerance were not considered positive if patients used opioids only as prescribed, per DSM-5 guidelines) and pain-adjusted POUD (behavioral/subjective criteria were not considered positive if pain relief [therapeutic intent] was the sole motive). Bivariate correlated-outcome regression models indicated associations of 10 validators with DSM-5 and pain-adjusted POUD measures, using mean ratios for dimensional measures and odds ratios for binary measures. The prevalences of DSM-5 and pain-adjusted POUD, respectively, were 44.4% and 30.4% at the ≥2-criteria threshold and 29.5% and 25.3% at the ≥4-criteria threshold. Pain adjustment had little effect on prevalence among substance treatment patients but resulted in substantially lower prevalence among pain treatment patients. All validators had significantly stronger associations with pain-adjusted than with DSM-5 dimensional POUD measures (ratios of mean ratios, 1.22-2.31). For most validators, pain-adjusted binary POUD had larger odds ratios than DSM-5 measures. Adapting POUD measures for pain relief (therapeutic intent) improved validity. Studies should investigate the clinical utility of differentiating between therapeutic and nontherapeutic intent in evaluating POUD diagnostic criteria.

Long-Term Recurrence Risk Following Pleurectomy or Pleurodesis for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

IntroductionRecurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is often managed with a wedge resection (or blebectomy) and either pleurectomy or pleurodesis. There is a conflicting data regarding which approach is superior to reduce recurrence. Our objective is to evaluate the long-term recurrence rates following pleurectomy versus mechanical pleurodesis for recurrent PSP. MethodsThe PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database was queried for patients aged 10-25 who were presented with PSP and underwent either pleurectomy or mechanical pleurodesis between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome was recurrence and secondary outcomes included 30-day opioid prescriptions, pain diagnoses, and reimbursement. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used with adjustment for age and sex. ResultsOf 18,955 patients presenting with PSP, 5.1% (n = 968) were managed operatively with either pleurectomy (18.3%, n = 177) or mechanical pleurodesis (81.7%, n = 791). There was no difference in the rate of recurrence between pleurectomy and mechanical pleurodesis (5-year risk of recurrence: 25.8% versus 26.5%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 1.58]). Furthermore, there was no difference in rate of outpatient opioid prescription (49.2% versus 52.8%, P = 0.58) or pain diagnoses (22.0% versus 22.8%, P = 0.46) between pleurectomy and mechanical pleurodesis, respectively. The median reimbursement was higher following pleurectomy as compared to mechanical pleurodesis ($14,040 versus $5,811, P = 0.02). ConclusionsThere is no significant difference in recurrence based on type of procedure performed for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax. However, reimbursement is higher following pleurectomy. Given the similar outcomes but higher cost, we recommend mechanical pleurodesis over pleurectomy for recurrent PSP.

Postoperative opioid prescribing, use and pain trends following general surgery procedures: a retrospective cohort study among veterans comparing non-opioid versus chronic opioid users

IntroductionUnderstanding postoperative opioid use patterns among different populations is key to developing opioid stewardship programs.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study on opioid prescribing, use, and pain after general surgery procedures...

Longitudinal trajectories of prescription opioid misuse in adolescents

BackgroundAdolescent misuse of prescription opioids is hazardous. This study aimed to generate data on prescription opioid misuse trajectories across adolescence and identify risk factors and mechanisms for more dangerous use trajectories. MethodsUsing a prospective longitudinal cohort repeated measures design, baseline (Fall 2013) and seven semiannual assessments were administered through Spring 2017 in 10 public high schools in Los Angeles, CA. Frequency of past 30-day prescription opioid misuse was captured. Trajectory groups were identified using growth mixture modeling and multinomial logistic regression identified associations between baseline risk factors with membership in each trajectory group. ResultsOverall, 3395 students were evaluated (53.4% female, Mean [SD] age at baseline=14.58[0.40]; range=12.83–16.29). Four discrete misuse trajectories were identified among 1062 students: (1) Minimal/Experimental (infrequent time-limited use; range of estimated mean number of days using prescription opioid across waves=0.0–0.6 days]; N = 705[20.8%]); (2) Low Deescalating (range=2.0–0.7 days; N = 189[5.6%]); (3) Moderate Escalating (range=0.7–3.6 days; N = 108[3.2%]); and (4) Frequent Persistent (range=4.7–9.4 days; N = 60[1.8%]). Students reporting tobacco, cannabis, alcohol use, or impulsivity in 9th grade were more likely to demonstrate membership in the Moderate Escalating trajectory class when compared to 2333 (68.7%) students reporting sustained abstinence. Female sex, peer opioid misuse, alcohol use, other substance use, impulsivity, or delinquent behavior reported in 9th grade was associated with membership in the Frequent Persistent trajectory class. ConclusionsPrescription opioid misuse in adolescence appears to follow 4 discrete trajectories, including the potentially problematic Moderate Escalating and Frequent Persistent trajectories. Female sex, peer influences, substance use, and intrapersonal risk factors were associated with membership in these classes.

Meloxicam versus Celecoxib for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Safety, Efficacy and Cost.

Introduction:Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used as part of multimodal analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (e.g., celecoxib) are believed to have fewer gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects than nonselective NSAIDS. Meloxicam is less selective for COX-2 than celecoxib is and partially inhibits COX-1 at higher doses. Nonetheless, some surgeons prefer using nonselective NSAIDs because of their lower expense.Methods:Four thousand nine hundred ninety-four patients who underwent TKA between January 2015 and February 2020 and took either celecoxib (n = 3,174), meloxicam 15 mg/d (n = 1,819), or meloxicam 7.5 mg/d (n = 451) were studied. Mutlimodal postoperative analgesia protocols were otherwise similar. GI bleeding and wound complication incidence were determined, as well as average 30-day prescription costs.Results:GI bleeding incidence was similar in the three cohorts (P = 0.4). The incidence of wound complications did not significantly differ between the groups: 0.06%, 0.07%, and 0.22% in the celecoxib, meloxicam 15 mg/d, and meloxicam 7.5 mg/d groups, respectively (P = 0.06). Subsituting meloxicam for celecoxib results in an average savings of $183 per prescription.Discussion:Meloxicam used at higher doses (15 mg/d) does not markedly increase the risk of GI or wound complications associated with COX-1 inhibition and is less costly for multimodal analgesia after TKA.

Characteristics of adults with a medical cannabis license, reasons for use, and perceptions of benefit following medical cannabis legalization in Oklahoma

Little is known about the risks and benefits associated with medical cannabis legalization. The current study was an online panel survey of adult Oklahomans recruited between September and October 2020 (N = 1898). Respondents with and without a medical cannabis license were compared on sociodemographic, substance use and health characteristics, and sub-analyses focused on the characteristics of licensed and unlicensed past 30-day cannabis users. Among all participants, 19.34% (n = 367) reported that they had a medical cannabis license, and 35.73% (n = 676) reported past 30-day cannabis use. Licensees were more likely to be younger (i.e., 18–35 years of age; p = 0.001), identify as a sexual minority (p < 0.001), and report past 30-day cannabis, cigarette, alcohol, and prescription opiate use (all p’s ≤ 0.003). Licensed participants most commonly reported medically-recommended cannabis use for anxiety (42.51%), depression (33.24%), sleep problems (26.98%), chronic pain (24.25%), and arthritis (12.81%). The likelihood of medically-recommended cannabis use for anxiety, depression, and chronic pain differed by age group (all p’s ≤ 0.028). Licensees were most likely to perceive that cannabis delivered “very much/extreme” relief from anxiety (78.57%), sleep problems (76.30%), nausea/vomiting (70.00%), and depression (67.05%). Compared to licensed past 30-day cannabis users (n = 308), unlicensed users (n = 368) were more likely to be non-White, to have ≤ high school education, to report an annual household income <$30,000, and to report current smoking (all p’s ≤ 0.027). Findings provide initial information about the personal characteristics associated with having a medical cannabis license in Oklahoma, the reasons for medical cannabis use, and the perceived medical benefits.

Medication Costs and Use of Older Americans in Assisted Living Settings: a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study.

Assisted-living (AL) settings are an important residential care option for old and disabled Americans, but there are no national data characterizing medication use in AL. To investigate medication costs and use of older adults living in the AL settings compared to those in the community, independent living, and nursing home settings. 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study; nationally representative cross-sectional study. Respondents ≥ 65 years with Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage (n = 5980, representing 32.34 million older adults). Total Part D medication costs; number of 30-day prescription fills; binary indicators for overall polypharmacy (≥ 5 and ≥ 10 concurrent medications), prescription fills of opioid and psychotropic medications including antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, antidepressants, and central nervous system-active (CNS-active) polypharmacy. Adjusting for demographics, the annual medication costs among AL residents, at $3890, were twice as high as those of their community-dwelling counterparts ($1932; p < .01). All medication outcomes except opioids were higher for older adults in AL compared to community settings. While the adjusted number of 30-day prescription fills among AL residents was slightly lower than that of nursing home residents (89.5 vs. 106.2; p < .05), AL residents experienced equivalent rates of overall polypharmacy ≥ 10 medications (30.2% vs. 23.5%), antipsychotics (30.8% vs. 27.8%), benzodiazepines (30.7% vs. 32.6%), gabapentinoids (21.2% vs. 16.1%), and CNS-active polypharmacy (26.0% vs. 36.9%; p > .05 for all). Patterns of use across settings were consistent when limited to older adults with dementia. Older Americans in AL experience a prescription medication burden similar to those in nursing homes. AL settings have an important opportunity to ensure their medication-related clinical services and supports match the needs of their residents.

Difference in rural and urban Medicare prescription pattern for Parkinson’s disease in Hawai‘i

BackgroundMedical management of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is becoming complex. Increasing evidence suggests that patients have better outcomes when they are managed by neurologists. However, access to neurologists can be limited in rural areas. Analysis of prescription pattern can provide insight into access gap rural patients face. MethodsThis retrospective observational study used National Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Part D Prescriber Public Use Files from 2013 to 2018. Query was made for levodopa, dopamine agonists and other antiparkinsonian medications. The data elements obtained included drug name, number of prescribers, prescriber specialty, number of claims, number of standardized 30-day Part D prescriptions, and number of Medicare beneficiaries in the state of Hawai‘i. Individual prescribing providers were categorized as urban or rural based on their cities of practice. Prescription patterns of urban and rural providers in Hawai‘i as well as difference in provider specialty were compared, using standardized 30-day prescriptions as the primary measure of utilization. ResultsPractice patterns differed between rural and urban areas. In rural Hawai‘i, Rytary, Rotigoitne and selegiline were rarely prescribed. Levodopa percentage was higher in urban Hawai‘i. In urban Hawai‘i, 74.4% of the prescriptions were provided by movement disorders and general neurologists. In rural Hawai'i, 25.1% of the prescriptions were written by neurologists and 74.9% by general practitioners. ConclusionsIn the state of Hawai‘i, there is an urban–rural access gap to neurologists as evidenced by Medicare prescription pattern. Further study is needed to understand the reasons for rural–urban differences in prescription patterns and their impact on outcomes.

Bleeding Outcomes in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies Treated with Distally Absorbed Versus Proximally Absorbed Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Introduction: Randomized trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to low molecular weight heparin demonstrated higher rates of bleeding associated with DOACs, especially in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. DOACs differ in location of absorption with apixaban predominately absorbed in the distal small bowel and proximal colon and edoxaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran absorbed in the proximal GI tract (e.g. stomach and proximal small intestine). No comparative data is available for the DOACs in treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Given the differences in location of absorption, we aimed to assess the association of bleeding in patients with GI malignancy and CAT on apixaban versus those treated with proximally absorbed DOACs (dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban).Methods: Using a nationwide cohort of Veterans, we identified patients with active GI malignancy between 2012 and 2018. Using a previously validated algorithm (91% positive predictive value), we identified patients with newly diagnosed VTE. A VTE was considered to occur in the setting of active cancer if the diagnosis occurred (1) within 3 months before cancer diagnosis, (2) within 6 months after cancer diagnosis, or (3) any time after diagnosis of metastatic cancer. We limited the cohort to patients who received at least a 30-day prescription for anticoagulant therapy with apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or rivaroxaban. Patients with a prescription for any anticoagulant therapy within 6 months before VTE diagnosis were excluded. We retrospectively followed patients to 30-days after the last DOAC prescription or to death, whichever came first. The primary outcome of interest was clinically significant bleeding while on DOAC therapy. We defined clinically significant bleeding as the presence of an ICD-9 or ICD-10 code for bleeding in any position for an inpatient admission with 3 exceptions: microscopic hematuria, bleeding related to major trauma and metromenorrhgia. We assessed the association between DOAC use and bleeding as a time-to-event outcome while adjusting for the competing risk of non-bleeding related death through the methods of Fine and Gray.Results: Between 2012 and 2018, a total of 215 patients with GI malignancies received a DOAC for treatment of CAT. Eighty-six patients received apixaban and the remaining 129 received a proximally absorbed DOAC with the majority receiving rivaroxaban (80%). Baseline demographics by anticoagulant therapy are listed in Table 1. None of the clinical variables assessed were significantly different between patients on apixaban versus a proximally absorbed DOAC, including variables associated with risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding.Of the 215 patients included, 73% were diagnosed with a distal GI malignancy (colon or lower). During the follow-up period, 43 of 215 patients (20%) experienced a clinically significant bleeding event, 22.1% of patients on apixaban and 18.6% of patients on a proximally absorbed DOAC. Of the 43 bleeding events, 30 were bleeding from the GI tract. In patients on apixaban versus a proximally absorbed DOAC, there was no significant difference in the risk of clinically significant bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67 - 2.21). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the risk of bleeding from the GI tract in patients on apixaban versus a proximally absorbed DOAC (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.43 - 1.89).Conclusion: In this study of 215 patients with GI malignancy, we found no significant difference in the risk of bleeding between patients treated with apixaban versus those treated with a proximally absorbed DOAC. The rate of clinically significant bleeding was high (20%) while on DOAC therapy. There is a continued need for future prospective studies evaluating antithrombotic therapy in patients with GI malignancies and CAT. [Display omitted] DisclosuresSanfilippo: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Atellas Pharma Global: Research Funding. Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding.

Adherence and persistence to rivaroxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving 30- or 90-day supply prescription fills

Background It is unclear whether 90-day supply fills with rivaroxaban result in better adherence and persistence compared to 30-day supply fills. We assessed patients’ adherence and persistence to rivaroxaban at 12- and 24-months in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients whose rivaroxaban prescriptions were filled every 30- vs. 90-days. Methods Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental data sets, we identified adult NVAF patients with ≥12-months of continuous insurance coverage who filled a prescription in May 2018 and their immediate subsequent prescription for rivaroxaban for the same days’ supply. We propensity score-matched 30- and 90-day rivaroxaban interval fill patients and compared the percentage with a proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80%, mean PDC, and percentage persistent to rivaroxaban therapy over 12- and 24-months of follow-up. Results Following propensity score matching, 2237 patients were included in the rivaroxaban 30- and 90-day supply fill cohorts. The proportion of patients with a PDC ≥80% was greater in the 90-day vs. 30-day cohort at both 12-months (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54–1.97) and 24-months (OR = 1.78, 95%CI = 1.58–2.00), as were mean PDC values (absolute difference in mean PDC = 9.4%, 95%CI = 8.2–10.7% at 12-months and 11.2%, 95%CI = 9.5–12.9% higher at 24-months, respectively). Persistence to rivaroxaban was not found to significantly differ between the 30- and 90-day supply cohorts at 12- or 24-months (assuming a 30-day permissible gap); however, greater persistence was observed with 90-day fills at both time points when a 14-day gap was utilized (HR = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.10–1.36 at 12-months and HR = 1.12, 95%CI = 1.02–1.22 at 24-months). Conclusions Dispensing 90-day supply fills with rivaroxaban appears to increase the proportion of patients achieving acceptable (PDC ≥80%) adherence as well as mean adherence compared to 30-day supply fills. Ninety-day rivaroxaban fills may also result in improved persistence vs. 30-day fills.