Migraine Days Research Articles

Ketogenic Diet Improves Sleep Quality and Daytime Sleepiness in Chronic Migraine: A Pilot Study

Aims: The aim of this study is to assess the sleep quality and daytime sleepiness improvement in chronic migraineurs after 6 months of a 2:1 KD (ketogenic diet) and LGID (low-glycemic-index diet). Methods: Twenty-six patients underwent 2:1 KD (11 patients) and LGID (15 patients). PSQI (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) and ESS (Epworth sleepiness scale) were administered at the baseline and the 3-month and 6-month follow-up. MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment), HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test 6), migraine frequency (migraine days per month), migraine intensity, BMI (Body Mass Index), FM (Fat Mass), and FFM (Fat-Free Mass) were also assessed. Results: PSQI (F1.544, 38.606 = 7.250; p = 0.004), ESS (F1.988, 49.708 = 9.938; p < 0.001), HIT-6 (F1.432, 35.805 = 12.693; p < 0.001), migraine frequency (F1.522, 38.041 = 23.070; p < 0.001), migraine intensity (F1.949, 48.721 = 18.798; p < 0.001), BMI (F1.274, 31.857 = 38.191; p < 0.001), and FM (F1.245, 31.134 = 45.487; p < 0.001) improved significantly. The MIDAS (F1.005, 25.121 = 3.037; p = 0.093) and the FMM (F1.311, 32.784 = 1.741; p = 0.197) did not improve significantly. The ESS (p = 0.712) and PSQI (p = 0.776) data at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups did not differ significantly, as well as for migraine frequency, migraine intensity, BMI, FM, and HIT-6. A mild correlation emerged between the mean FM and mean ESS reduction during the 6 months (r = 0.497, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Six months of LGID and 2:1 KD can improve sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in patients with chronic migraine. The effectiveness on migraine, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness does not differ significantly between the 3-month and 6-month follow-up periods.

Is the combination of propranolol and flunarizine better than propranolol, flunarizine and amitriptyline alone in prophylaxis of migraine? An observational study at a tertiary care centre of North India

Background: Migraine is a primary headache disorder marked by recurrent attacks of pain and associated symptoms. Propranolol is traditionally considered highly effective for migraine prophylaxis, but other drugs have recently shown promise. Methods: This study was a prospective, observational, randomized, parallel-arm, unicentric trial conducted in the neurology department of a tertiary care hospital in North India. Patients with migraine without aura were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. After obtaining consent, patients were randomized using a random number table. Group 1 received propranolol (80 mg), group 2 received flunarizine (10 mg), group 3 received a combination of propranolol (40 mg) and flunarizine (10 mg), and group 4 received amitriptyline (10 mg) daily. The primary outcome was a change in the frequency of migraine days, while secondary outcomes included changes in moderate-to-severe headache days and disability levels. Results: The combination of propranolol (40 mg) and flunarizine (10 mg) was significantly more effective in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks at the end of 3 months compared to the group receiving amitriptyline (10 mg). However, no significant differences between the groups were observed at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months. For other outcomes, including adverse drug reactions (ADRs), there were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: The combination of propranolol (40 mg) and flunarizine (10 mg) demonstrated superior efficacy over amitriptyline (10 mg) after prolonged treatment, while its effectiveness was comparable to other groups at earlier time points. ADRs were similar across all groups.

Experience of using Russian rizatriptan 10 mg tablets in routine clinical practice: results of a multicenter post-registration observational study “OPYT”

One of the key mediator systems involved in the pathogenesis of migraine is the serotonergic system, which led to the development and introduction of serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) into clinical practice as the most important means of preventing migraine attacks. Serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists have a high selectivity for the 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor subtypes, which ensures their effect on the pathogenesis of migraine attack development.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of a standard dose of Relonova in the relief of four moderate to severe migraine attacks in outpatients in reallife clinical practice, including assessment of the rate of attack relief, the effect of the drug on headache intensity, concomitant symptoms and the general condition of the patient.Material and methods. The study involved 415 patients with migraine (319 women and 96 men; mean age 35.7±7.8 years). A total of 1660 migraine attacks were analyzed. The average number of migraine days per month was 6.72±3.99. Migraine attacks with aura were observed in 125 patients (30.1%). Patients stopped four migraine attacks and filled out self-monitoring diaries. Treatment efficacy was assessed according to the European Headache Federation (EHF) Consensus Algorithm for Determining Effective Treatment of a Migraine Attack.Results. After taking Relonova, pain became mild or disappeared completely in 30 minutes in 52% of patients, in 76% in 1 hour, in 93% in 2 hours, in 99% in 4 hours and in 99% of patients in 24 hours. A recurrence of the headache occurred in 8.8% of the attacks. Additional analgesic treatment after 30 minutes was required in 14% of cases, after which period the frequency did not exceed 2%. Adverse events were observed in 4% of patients and were mild. The overwhelming majority (90%) of study participants were able to successfully terminate three attacks and were responders.Conclusion. Relonova is an effective and safe agent to stop migraine attack and can be recommended for use in daily clinical practice.

Effects of selected dietary supplements on migraine prophylaxis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The existing evidence on the effect of dietary supplements for preventing migraines has generated conflicting results. We assessed alterations in migraine clinical features corresponding to the intake of dietary supplements. Our main outcomes included the frequency (number of attacks), duration (in hours), the severity (intensity) and the monthly migraine days. Using a dose-response meta-analysis, we estimated the dose-dependent impact. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE tool. Finally, twenty-two trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Magnesium supplementation reduced migraine attacks (mean difference (MD) = -2.51), severity (MD = -0.88), and the monthly migraine days (MD = -1.66) compared with the control group. CoQ10 decreased the frequency (MD = -1.73), severity (MD = -1.35), and duration of migraine (MD = -1.72). Riboflavin decreased attack frequency (MD = -1.34). Alpha-lipoic acid decreased attack frequency (MD = -1.24) and severity (MD = -0.38). Probiotics decreased the frequency (MD = -1.16), severity (MD = -1.07) and the monthly migraine days (MD = -3.02). Vitamin D reduced migraine frequency (MD = -1.69) and the monthly migraine days (MD = -2.41). In adults, compared with placebo, these supplements did not significantly affect other outcomes, and omega-3 supplementation did not yield a statistically significant reduction in any of these outcomes. The use of certain dietary supplements has resulted in a significant decrease in migraine prophylaxis. Further clinical trials of high quality appear to be beneficial.

”I am now on ‘speaking terms’ with my migraine monster” – patient experiences in acceptance-based cognitive behavioral therapy delivered via the internet for migraine: a randomized controlled pilot study using a mixed-method approach

ABSTRACT Migraine is a common neurological disorder globally. Migraines, with or without aura, are episodic and recurring with symptom-free periods. Frequent and prolonged attacks can lead to chronic migraine. This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate feasibility of therapist-guided, acceptance-based internet cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) as an adjunct to standard medical care for migraine patients in Swedish primary healthcare settings using a mixed methods approach. Participants (treatment n = 15, control n = 14) underwent qualitative and quantitative assessments to evaluate feasibility, acceptance, and initial treatment effects. Interviews with participants (n = 7) indicate that most participants had struggled with migraines for decades and expressed dissatisfaction with the limited medical care. They found the flexible, digital format particularly helpful, praising its accessibility and structured learning. While they appreciated the comprehensive content, some faced challenges with the psychological language and the program pace. Post-treatment, participants reported emotional and behavioral changes, and better migraine management. Seventy-two percent of the 29 participants completed both baseline and 3-month follow-up measures. On average, participants completed 7.7 modules, with 60% completing all 10 modules. Promising effect size indicated a reduction in migraine days during the three-month follow-up. Both qualitative and quantitative data support the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention in primary care settings.

Efficacy of eptinezumab in non-responders to subcutaneous monoclonal antibodies against CGRP and the CGRP receptor: A retrospective cohort study.

Migraine patients unresponsive to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)(-receptor, -R) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may benefit from switching between CGRP(-R) mAbs. However, some patients do not tolerate or respond to any subcutaneous mAbs. This study evaluates the efficacy of the intravenous CGRP mAb eptinezumab in these therapy-refractory patients. In this retrospective cohort study, patients with migraine who previously failed erenumab and at least one CGRP mAb (fremanezumab and/or galcanezumab) received eptinezumab 100 mg, followed by a second dose of 100 mg or 300 mg after 12 weeks. Monthly headache days, monthly migraine days, acute medication days, and migraine pain intensity were recorded from standardized headache diaries during the four weeks before the first infusion (baseline), and during weeks 9-12 and 21-24 of treatment. Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed at baseline, weeks 12, and 24. From January 2023 to February 2024, 41 patients received eptinezumab 100 mg. Of these, 38 (93%) received a second infusion after 12 weeks, with 29 (71%) increasing the dose to 300 mg. The percentage of patients with a ≥30% reduction rate in monthly migraine days was 23.1% at week 12 and 29.7% at week 24. Monthly migraine days decreased from 16.3 ± 8.0 at baseline to 15.4 ± 8.1 days during weeks 9-12 and 14.4 ± 8.0 days during weeks 21-24 (p = 0.07). During weeks 21-24, 38.5% reported a clinically meaningful reduction in HIT-6 scores and 52.4% in MIDAS scores. No adverse events were reported. Eptinezumab may be an effective and well-tolerated option for some treatment-refractory migraine patients unresponsive to subcutaneous CGRP-(R) mAbs.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation effects on chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic pain is one of the major causes of disability with a tremendous impact on an individual's quality of life and on public health. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a safe therapeutic for this condition. We aimed to evaluate its effects in adults with chronic pain. A comprehensive search was performed, including randomized controlled trials published until October 2023, which assessed the effects of noninvasive tVNS. Cohen's d effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Fifteen studies were included. The results revealed a mean effect size of 0.41 (95% CI 0.17-0.66) in favor of tVNS as compared with control, although a significant heterogeneity was observed (χ2 = 21.7, df = 10, P = 0.02, I 2 = 53.9%). However, when compared with nonactive controls, tVNS shows a larger effect size (0.79, 95% CI 0.25-1.33), although the number of studies was small (n = 3). When analyzed separately, auricular tVNS and cervical tVNS against control, it shows a significant small to moderate effect size, similar to that of the main analysis, respectively, 0.42 (95% CI 0.08-0.76, 8 studies) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.01-0.70, 3 studies). No differences were observed in the number of migraine days for the trials on migraine. This meta-analysis indicates that tVNS shows promise as an effective intervention for managing pain intensity in chronic pain conditions. We discuss the design of future trials to confirm these preliminary results, including sample size and parameters of stimulation.

Assessment of prolonged safety and tolerability of erenumab in migraine patients in a long-term open-label study (APOLLON)

BackgroundEfficacy and safety of human monoclonal antibody erenumab used for migraine prophylaxis have been shown in clinical studies. APOLLON is an open-label, multi-center, single arm study, which permits dose adjustments of erenumab and includes an option for a drug holiday. The findings contribute to the accumulating long-term evidence regarding erenumab’s tolerability and safety profile in individuals experiencing episodic and chronic migraines.MethodsThe study population consisted of adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine, who had successfully completed the HER-MES study (NCT03828539). Patients were treated with erenumab for 128 weeks at a flexible dose of either 70 mg or 140 mg. Treatment discontinuation attempts were allowed as voluntary single treatment interruption (‘drug holiday’) of up to 24 weeks.Results701 patients were enrolled in APOLLON. The exposure associated incidence rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) (N = 601) per 100 subject years was 101.71 (95% CI [92.28; 111.14]) meaning a patient could expect having about one adverse event per each year of treatment. EAIR was higher in females (n = 524, EAIR: 104.40, 95% CI [93.93; 114.86]) than in males (n = 77, EAIR: 86.55, 95% CI [65.39; 107.71]) and increased with initial monthly migraine days (MMD) and prior prophylactic treatment failures. A total of 155 patients discontinued erenumab treatment during open-label treatment phase. Of these, 29 were due to AEs (4.1% of total cohort) and out of these 65.5% (N = 19) were considered treatment-related. Safety parameters were in line with HER-MES data and did not reveal new safety signals. Drug holidays were realized by 108 patients (15.4%), of which 64.8% (N = 70) returned to treatment. The mean number of monthly headache days (MHDs), MMDs, and days with acute headache medication significantly increased during drug holiday. After resumption of erenumab treatment, a rapid reduction of the migraine parameters was observed.ConclusionsAPOLLON provides long-term safety and tolerability data confirming the beneficial safety profile of erenumab over a period of 128 weeks. In addition, reversibility of migraine deterioration during drug holiday was shown and most patients returned to their treatment with similar response rates compared to initial treatment.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04084314 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04084314), First submitted: 2019-09-06.

Persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies in patients with chronic migraine.

To evaluate, in patients with chronic migraine (CM) in real-world conditions, the persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability of erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the persistence and effects of switching. Anti-CGRP mAbs represent a novel therapeutic approach to the management of CM; however, real-world data on persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability, especially after switching, are scarce. This was a retrospective observational cohort study including all patients with CM treated with erenumab, fremanezumab, and/or galcanezumab in a tertiary hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Treatment persistence was measured as the number of days between treatment start and end dates or the end of follow-up and also as a percentage of persistent patients at 3, 6, and 12 months; effectiveness as a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD); and tolerability as the number and type of adverse events. Included were 281 patients (383 treatments) with CM (91.5% [257/281] female) receiving anti-CGRP mAbs. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) treatment persistence was 267 (103-550) days. At 12 months, persistence was greater for the first (66.7%) compared to the second (49.8%) and third (37.2%) anti-CGRP mAb treatments (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-2.74; HR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.69-4.47, respectively). Persistence minimum observed median (IQR) was also greater for the first (291 [112-594] days) compared to both the second (188 [90-403] days; p < 0.001) and third (167 [89-352] days; p < 0.001) anti-CGRP mAb treatments. For the first anti-CGRP mAb treatment, there were no differences in persistence among the different drugs. In terms of effectiveness of the first, second, and third anti-CGRP mAb treatments, a ≥50% reduction in MMD was achieved by 57.6% (117/203), 25.0% (11/44), and 11.8% (2/17) of patients, respectively, at 3 months, and by 55.8% (87/156), 29.6% (8/27), and 12.5% (1/8) of patients, respectively, at 6 months. At 12 months, no significant effectiveness differences were observed among anti-CGRP mAb treatments. As for tolerability, 55 adverse events were reported by 43 (15.3%) patients, mostly mild and leading to treatment discontinuation in only 14 (5.0%) patients. The most common adverse events were constipation, injection site reaction, and pruritus. Erenumab patients (3%, 3/99) experienced a higher rate of discontinuation for constipation. Our findings showed a 12-month higher treatment persistence with the use of a first anti-CGRP mAb treatment when the switch to a second treatment was due to ineffectiveness or severe side events. This persistence was lower after a second or third anti-CGRP. Additionally, in terms of effectiveness, the first anti-CGRP treatment achieved a higher response in terms of ≥50% reduction in MMD; however, some patients may benefit from a switching strategy. Finally, the tolerability profile for anti-CGRP mAbs was favorable. Further studies are needed to identify predictors of response after switching from the first anti-CGRP mAb treatment.

Genetic variants associated with response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy in a chronic migraine Han Chinese population

BackgroundAnti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies have emerged as promising therapeutic options for the treatment of chronic migraine. However, treatment response varies considerably among individuals, suggesting a potential role for genetic factors. This study aimed to identify genetic variants affecting the efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy in chronic migraine among the Han Chinese population in Taiwan to enhance treatment precision and to understand the genetic architecture of migraine.MethodsWe conducted a quantitative trait locus (QTL) association study in patients with chronic migraines from a tertiary medical center in Taiwan using the Taiwan Precision Medicine Array Chip. The patients received fremanezumab or galcanezumab for at least 12 weeks. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on the improvement rate in monthly migraine days. Genetic variants were identified, and their associations with treatment efficacy were examined through quantitative trait loci analysis, linkage disequilibrium studies, and functional annotations using the Gene Ontology database.ResultsSix single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relative variants were significantly associated with anti-CGRP therapy response (p < 1 × 10− 7): rs116870564, rs75244870, rs56216870, rs12938101, rs74655790, and rs149540851. These variants are located in or near genes, including LRRC4C, ATAD2B, and OXR1, which are involved in neuronal development, DNA-dependent ATPase activity, and oxidation-reduction processes, respectively. The rs116870564 variant in LRRC4C showed the strongest association (β = -0.551, p = 6.65 × 10− 9). The functional impact of these variants is attributed to their regulatory effects on gene expression, which are influenced by intron splicing regulation, transcription factors, and changes in chromatin structure.ConclusionThe identification of key genetic markers associated with response to anti-CGRP therapy emphasizes the importance of genetic variability in treatment efficacy. This could lead to more personalized chronic migraine management strategies and tailored therapeutic approaches based on individual genetic profiles. Further research in larger, diverse populations is warranted to validate these findings and refine our understanding of the role of CGRP in chronic migraine pathophysiology.Trial registrationNot applicable.

Filling the data gap on CGRP mAb therapy in low- to middle-income countries in Southeast Asia: insights from a real-world study in Thailand

BackgroundMost real-world data on CGRP mAbs have been published from high-income countries such as the USA, Western countries, Japan, Korea, and Singapore. However, data from low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia is lacking. This is the first real-world study from Thailand to describe the efficacy of CGRP mAbs therapy in migraine patients and to analyze the response trends between episodic migraine and chronic migraine.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, real-world retrospective chart review study with an observation period of 6 months after CGRP mAbs initiation. We aim to compare treatment responses to CGRP mAbs between EM and CM patients.ResultsA total of 47 Thai patients were enrolled (median [IQR] age 37.2 [28.6–50.4] years; 85.1%F, 44.7% EM; 70.2% galcanezumab). There was no difference in baseline characteristics and migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) between EM and CM. The overall ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 70% monthly migraine day reduction rates at 6 months were 89.0%, 71.6%, and 58.5% with higher responders in EM. There was a significant decrease in monthly headache days (MHDs) over time (adjusted β = -0.42, p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in MIDAS score over time after the initiation of CGRP mAbs (adjusted β = -1.12, p = 0.003). However, there were no differences between the two diagnoses. There was no significant decrease in the number of abortive medication pills used over time after the initiation of CGRP mAbs. CM had a significantly steeper trend compared to those with EM.ConclusionThe first real-world study in Thailand demonstrated that CGRP mAbs therapy had efficacy for migraine treatment, as evidenced by a reduction in MHDs, decreased disability, and reduced use of abortive medications. Additionally, the response pattern to CGRP mAbs therapy was similar between EM and CM in terms of MHDs reduction and MIDAS score improvement.

Acute and preventive treatment of menstrual migraine: a meta-analysis

Background and objectivesAbout a quarter of migraine cases among women have menstrual migraine (MM), which is usually more severe, longer lasting, and less responsive to treatment than typical migraine. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of several medication in the acute and preventive treatment of MM; this meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of these treatments.MethodsWe conducted systematic searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. The primary outcomes of acute treatment trials were pain relief at 2 and 24 h after treatment compared with placebo or another treatment. The three endpoints we checked for studying MM prevention were: no recurrence of headaches each month, a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days from baseline, and a decrease in the mean number of headache days per month.ResultsOut of 342 studies, 26 RCTs met the criteria. Triptans, combined with or without other analgesics, were superior to placebo in providing pain relief in the acute treatment and prevention of MM. Among the treatments, sumatriptan and lasmiditan demonstrated superior pain relief at 2 h (OR: 4.62) and 24 h (OR: 4.81). Frovatriptan exhibited effectiveness in preventing headache recurrence, whereas galcanezumab and erenumab displayed significant preventive benefits in reducing headache days per month.ConclusionSumatriptan and lasmiditan are effective first-line treatments for acute MM. For prevention, frovatriptan may be the more effective of triptans. Compared with triptans, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, here including erenumab and galcanezumab, are more effective in reducing headache days, and therefore, in preventing MM.

Symptoms across the phases of the migraine cycle from the patient's perspective: Results of the MiCOAS qualitative study.

To better understand the breadth and frequency of symptoms across the phases of the migraine cycle using data captured from qualitative patient interviews conducted through the Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System (MiCOAS) project. People living with migraine experience a range of symptoms across the pre-headache, headache, post-headache, and interictal phases of the migraine cycle. Although clinical diagnostic criteria and clinical trial endpoints focus largely on cardinal symptoms or monthly migraine days, migraine symptom profiles are far more complex. As a part of the MiCOAS project, semi-structured qualitative interviews were undertaken to better understand the migraine-related symptomology from the patient's viewpoint. This concept elicitation study used iterative purposeful sampling to select 40 people with self-reported medical diagnosis of migraine for interviews that were conducted via audio-only web conferencing. Key topics related to migraine symptoms, including mood/emotion symptoms, were identified using content analysis. Interview transcripts were also coded to reflect the phase of migraine under discussion, so that patient experiences could be compared by phase. Forty participants (50%, n = 20 episodic migraine; 50%, n = 20 chronic migraine), aged from 21 to 70 years old reported a total of 60 unique symptoms, which were categorized into 30 broader symptom categories. Participants reported between 7 and 22 unique symptom categories across all phases. During pre-headache and headache, participants reported a median of 7.5 (interquartile range [IQR] = 5.5) and 8 (IQR = 4.0) different symptom categories compared to 4 (IQR = 3.0) and 1.5 (IQR = 2.5) for the post-headache and interictal periods, respectively. Head pain during the headache phase was the only universally reported symptom (100%, n = 40). Pooling across all phases, the next most reported symptoms were light sensitivity (93%, n = 37), nausea (88%, n = 35), irritability/impatience (83%, n = 24), sound sensitivity (80%, n = 32), and fatigue/exhaustion (80%, n = 32). One or more interictal symptoms were reported by 73% (n = 29) of participants and included mood/emotion symptoms, such as anxiety (30%, n = 12), depression (18%, n = 7), and anger (15%, n = 6), as well as cardinal symptoms, such as light sensitivity (13%, n = 5) and nausea (13%, n = 5). Patients experience a range of symptoms across the phases of the migraine cycle. Results often aligned with clinical expectations, but non-cardinal migraine-related symptoms were reported both inside and outside the headache phase, including between attacks. These discoveries highlight the importance of assessing a range of symptoms and timing when developing patient-reported outcome measures for migraine clinical trials.

Effects of fremanezumab on migraine-associated symptoms and medication use in Japanese and Korean patients with episodic migraine: Exploratory endpoint analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

To describe exploratory endpoints from a previous phase 2b/3 placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan and Korea, specifically investigating the effect of fremanezumab or placebo on migraine-associated symptoms and acute headache medication use in patients with episodic migraine (EM). EM is associated with non-head pain symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or phonophobia, which contribute substantially to the disease burden, healthcare resource utilization, and impaired quality of life. Current EM treatments include a mix of nonspecific/migraine-specific acute headache medications, but medication overuse can induce headaches and progression from EM to chronic migraine (CM). In multiple phase 2b/3 trials, the monoclonal antibody fremanezumab significantly reduced the average number of monthly migraine days experienced by patients with EM/CM compared with placebo. This was a prespecified analysis of exploratory endpoints in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial conducted in Japanese and Korean patients with EM (NCT03303092). Patients were randomized to receive fremanezumab, either monthly or quarterly, or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously at 4-week/28-day ("monthly") intervals to maintain blinding. Exploratory endpoints reported here were the mean change from baseline in the number of days/month with (i) the use of any acute headache medication, (ii) the use of any migraine-specific acute headache medication, (iii) nausea or vomiting, and (iv) photophobia and phonophobia. Overall, 357 Japanese and Korean patients with EM received either monthly (n = 121) or quarterly (n = 119) fremanezumab or placebo (n = 117). Compared with placebo, fremanezumab administered monthly or quarterly was associated with a significant reduction from baseline in the average number of days/month with acute headache medication use over three months (difference vs. placebo -2.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.52, -2.11]; p < 0.001 and -2.79 [95% CI -3.50, -2.08]; p < 0.001, respectively). Similar findings were observed in the monthly average number of days with migraine-specific acute headache medications (difference vs. placebo with monthly and quarterly fremanezumab, -2.63 [95% CI -3.31, -1.95] for both; p < 0.001), the average number of days/month with nausea or vomiting (difference vs. placebo -1.09 [95% CI -1.60, -0.58]; p < 0.001 for monthly fremanezumab and -1.37 [95% CI -1.88, -0.86]; p < 0.001 for quarterly fremanezumab), and the average number of days with photophobia and phonophobia (difference vs. placebo -1.22 [95% CI -1.80, -0.65]; p < 0.001 and -1.64 [95% CI -2.22, -1.06]; p < 0.001, respectively). Monthly and quarterly administered fremanezumab effectively prevented EM in Japanese and Korean patients. Fremanezumab also improved other disease aspects including the need for acute headache medications and the frequency of migraine-associated symptoms.

Clinical factors associated with day-to-day peak pain severity in individuals with chronic migraine: A cohort study using daily prospective diary data.

To describe the association between day-to-day peak pain severity and clinical factors in individuals with chronic migraine (CM). Little is known about how clinical factors relate to day-to-day pain severity in individuals with CM. Adults with CM were enrolled into this observational prospective cohort study that collected daily data about headache, associated symptoms, and lifestyle factors using a digital health platform (N1-Headache™) for 90 days. "Migraine days" were defined as days in which a headache occurred that had features described by the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria. On these days, peak pain severity was recorded on a 4-point scale; on non-headache days peak pain severity was imputed as "0/none". The associations between peak pain severity and 12 clinical factors were modeled and adjusted for sex, age, daily headache, presence of menstrual bleeding, day of the week, and disability. All numerical and Likert scale variables were standardized prior to analysis. Data were available for 392 participants (35,280 tracked days). The sample was predominantly female (90.6%), with a mean (standard deviation) age of 39.9 (12.8) years. In the final multivariable model with random intercept and slopes, higher than typical self-reported levels of standardized stress (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.11), standardized irritability (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08), standardized sadness (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.07), fatigue (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36), eyestrain (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.26-1.52), neck pain (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.76-2.13), skin sensitivity (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.44-1.80), and dehydration (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.42) were associated with higher reported peak pain severity levels, while standardized sleep quality (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) and standardized waking feeling refreshed (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.88) were associated with lower reported peak pain severity levels. The inclusion of a random intercept and random slopes improved upon more parsimonious models and illustrated large differences in individuals' reporting of peak severity according to the levels of the associated clinical factors. Our data showed that the experience of CM, from a pain severity perspective, is complex, related to multiple clinical variables, and highly individualized. These results suggest that future work should aim to study a personalized approach to both medical and behavioral interventions for CM based on which clinical factors relate to the individual's experience of pain severity.

Effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Chronic migraine (CM) significantly impacts both the physical and mental health of patients. Current studies on the safety and effectiveness of different pharmacological prophylaxis interventions for CM are limited. To address this gap, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of various drugs in preventing CM. Two independent researchers systematically searched four databases from their inception to August 1, 2023, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subsequently, they performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A NMA was then performed. Continuous outcomes and binary outcomes were displayed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR), respectively, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank each intervention separately. 24 RCTs involving 8789 patients were included. Compared to placebo, Botulinum toxin A demonstrated the most significant effect in reducing the monthly migraine days for CM patients (MD = 3.88, 95% CI 0.48, 7.28); in terms of improving the response rate by a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days, Topiramate (RR = 50.06, 95% CI 3.18, 787.30) was the most effective; there was no statistically significant difference between all preventive drugs and placebo in improving the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score; in terms of the incidence of adverse events, Eptinezumab (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.8, 1.54) exhibited the highest safety profile. Among all the drugs for the preventive drugs for CM, Botulinum toxin A has the best efficacy and safety profile, closely followed by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

Headache-related disability as a function of migraine aura: A daily diary study.

To examine the unique role of migraine aura in predicting day-to-day levels of headache-related disability. Migraine symptoms and psychological variables contribute to headache-related disability. Migraine aura may be associated with more severe symptom profiles and increased risk of psychiatric comorbidities, but the impact of aura on daily functioning is unknown. The present study sought to evaluate the role of migraine aura in predicting same-day and subsequent-day migraine-related disability while accounting for demographic, headache, and psychological variables. This was an observational prospective cohort study among 554 adults with migraine. For each participant, data on migraine symptoms and psychological variables were collected daily for 90 days using the N-1 Headache™ digital app (N = 11,156 total migraine days). Analyses assessed whether the presence of aura predicted daily ratings of migraine-related disability independently of other headache and psychological variables. Given the number of predictors examined, statistical significance was set at p < 0.01. The mean (standard deviation, range) patient-level Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire score across days of the migraine episode was 1.18 (1.03, 0-3). Aura was significantly associated with higher disability ratings on all days of the migraine episode (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.74; p < 0.001). This relationship remained unchanged after adjusting for patient-level variables (OR 1.40, 99% CI 1.13-1.73; p < 0.001) and day-level psychological variables (OR 1.39, 99% CI 1.12-1.73; p < 0.001) but was fully negated after controlling for day-level headache variables (OR 1.19, 99% CI 0.95-1.49; p = 0.039). Aura on the first day of the episode was associated with increased odds of allodynia (OR 1.87, 99% CI 1.22-2.86; p < 0.001), phonophobia (OR 1.62, 99% CI 1.17-2.25; p < 0.001), photophobia (OR 1.89, 99% CI 1.37-2.59; p < 0.001), and nausea/vomiting (OR 1.54, 99% CI 1.17-2.02; p < 0.001) on all days of the episode, but not episode duration (p = 0.171), peak severity (p = 0.098), or any examined psychological variables (sleep duration [p = 0.733], sleep quality [p = 0.186], stress [p = 0.110], anxiety [p = 0.102], or sadness [p = 0.743]). The presence of aura is predictive of increased headache-related disability during migraine episodes, but this effect is attributable to associated non-pain symptoms of migraine.

Efficacy of Desvenlafaxine in Reducing Migraine Frequency and Severity: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Migraine is characterized by sudden acute episodes of pain, with a global prevalence of 18% among all age groups. It is the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Prophylactic treatment is important in managing migraine; however, its efficacy and safety are debated. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of desvenlafaxine in female patients with migraine. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational case study involving 10 women diagnosed with migraine who were treated with desvenlafaxine. We measured the number of migraine days per month, average headache duration in minutes, headache severity using a visual analog scale, use of acute medications, and frequency of acute medication use per week. Results: Desvenlafaxine significantly reduced the number of migraine days from 14.70 ± 3.68 at baseline to 2.50 ± 2.50 at follow-up (p < 0.05). The average headache duration dropped from 131.25 ± 32.81 min to 52.50 ± 44.64 min. Headache severity scores improved from 6.80 ± 1.49 at baseline to 0.80 ± 0.92 at follow up, the frequency of acute medication use per week reduced from 3.30 ± 1.49 at baseline to 0.80 ± 0.92, and the frequency of acute medication use decreased from 3.30 ± 1.49 times per week to 0.80 ± 0.92. Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine shows potential as an effective prophylactic therapy for migraine. Larger-scale studies are necessary to further explore its benefits.

Enhancing chronic migraine preventive therapy: low-level 810 nm laser acupuncture as an add-on treatment for patients with unsatisfactory pharmacological effect, a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial

BackgroundLaser acupuncture is a proven non-invasive treatment with effects comparable to traditional acupuncture in different types of headaches, but there is still insufficient evidence for chronic migraine (CM) in adults. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of laser acupuncture (LA) as an add-on preventive therapy on CM.MethodsA single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 2022 to November 2023. CM patients with unsatisfactory pharmacological effects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either LA or sham treatment over a course of 8 sessions spanning 4 weeks. The co-primary outcomes were changes in monthly migraine days (MMD) and acute headache medications usage days per month from baseline. Evaluations were taken at baseline (12 weeks before randomization), at 4th week (treatment completed), 8th week and 12th week from baseline.ResultsA total of 60 patients (30 in each group) were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Baseline headache characteristics between trial groups were similar. Compared with the sham group, the LA group had a significant reduction in MMD (5.2 vs. 1.5 days at 8th week, p = 0.015; 7.3 vs. 1.8 days at 12th week, p = 0.001), and acute headache medications usage days per month (3.1 vs. 0.4 days at 4th week, p = 0.007; 3.2 vs. 0.0 days at 8th week, p = 0.005; 3.9 vs. 0.0 days at 12th week, p < 0.001). No serious adverse event was observed in both groups.ConclusionsLaser acupuncture was effective in reducing MMD and acute headache medications usage with promising safety. Specifically, the efficacy of LA exhibited a progressively more pronounced effect within the follow-up period. We suggested that LA is a promising add-on preventive therapy for CM, and trials focused on investigating the mechanism of LA’s effect and its long-term effects on CM prevention are justified.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered at ISRCTN.org Identifier: ISRCTN11208146 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11208146). The registration date: 19, January, 2024.The date of first participant registration: 04, May, 2022.

Natural history of non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease in Austria.

Non-polyglutamine CACNA1A variants underlie an extremely variable phenotypic spectrum encompassing developmental delay, hemiplegic migraine, epilepsy, psychiatric symptoms, episodic and chronic cerebellar signs. We provide our experience with the long-term follow-up of CACNA1A patients and their response to interval therapy. Patients with genetically confirmed non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease were prospectively followed at the Center for Rare Movement Disorders of the Medical University of Innsbruck from 2004 to 2024. We recruited 41 subjects with non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease, of which 38 (93%) familial cases. The mean age at the first examination was 35 ± 22years. Disease onset was in the childhood/adolescence in 31/41 patients (76%). Developmental delay and episodic symptoms were the first disease manifestation in 9/41 (22%) and 32/41 (78%) patients respectively. Chronic neurological signs encompassed a cerebellar syndrome in 35/41 (85%), which showed almost no progression during the observation period, as well as cognitive deficits in 9/20 (45%, MOCA test score < 26), psychiatric and behavioral symptoms in 11/41(27%). Seizures occurred in two patients concomitant to severe hemiplegic migraine. At the last visit, 27/41 patients (66%) required an interval prophylaxis (including acetazolamide, flunarizine, 4-aminopyridine, topiramate), which was efficacious in reducing the frequency and severity of episodic symptoms in all cases. In one patient in his 70ies with progressively therapy resistant hemiplegic migraine, treatment with the anti-CGRP antibody galcanezumab successfully reduced the frequency of migraine days from 4 to 1/month. Non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease show an evolving age-dependent presentation. Interval prophylaxis is effective in reducing the burden of episodic symptoms.