In this paper, the vector winds produced by the JPL and the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) ambiguity removal methods are compared for 14 days of overlap, and the data are checked for any systematic differences. This comparison draws attention to some possible sources of error in each data set and provides a first-order evaluation of the quality of the two ambiguity removal techniques. It was found that the directional differences are generally small and random, so that no significant differences occurred between spatially and temporally averaged wind fields constructed from the two data sets.