Day-case Group Research Articles

Incorporating psychological debriefing techniques within a brief group psychotherapy programme for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.

The Royal Air Force Wroughton Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Rehabilitation Programme is described. It comprised a 12-day structured in-patient 'course' of group psychotherapy and day-case group follow-up sessions over a one-year period. Psychological debriefing was the main therapeutic technique employed. This is a 'before and after' open outcome study. A comprehensive assessment protocol confirmed the presence and severity of PTSD and measured co-morbid psychopathological status, occupational and social function longitudinally. A highly significant global response to treatment is demonstrated in the 34 subjects included in the study, with 85.3% not fulfilling the DSM-III-R criteria for PTSD at one year after treatment. Further controlled studies assessing the value of psychological debriefing techniques in the treatment of established PTSD are required.

Is the first day postoperative review necessary after cataract extraction?

In current ophthalmic practice day-case surgery cataract patients are conventionally discharged and then reviewed the following morning thus limiting the advantages of what 'true' day-case surgery strives to achieve. The aim of this study was to see if there was a difference in outcome between 'true' day-case cataract surgery and non-day-care surgery. A total of 387 consecutive cataract operations were followed, comprising 122 local anaesthetic day-cases, 149 local anaesthetic non-day-cases, 63 general anaesthetic non-day-cases, and 53 general anaesthetic day-cases. Although not randomised the groups were comparable with respect to age, operator grade, sex, presence of diabetes, anaesthetic type, pre and postoperative visual acuities, and time to first planned outpatient visit. There were 10 early postoperative complications in the day-case group (5.71% of total) and 14 in the non-day-case group (6.6% of total), the commonest complications in both groups were raised intraocular pressure, corneal oedema, and wound leaks. One patient in each group had an early complication that necessitated attending the casualty department. The visual outcomes in both groups were comparable. These findings suggest that there were no preventable complications within the constraints of the number of operations studied and that no additional risk is attached to 'true' day-case surgery relative to non-day-case surgery.

Day-Case Surgery: A Viable Alternative for Surgical Treatment of Varicose Veins

One hundred and forty-eight patients (164 limbs) who had varicose vein surgery by the same consultant surgeon 3–10 years previously were reviewed; 61 patients had surgery as an in-patient and 87 as a day-case. The patients were reviewed to assess the efficacy and acceptability of day-case varicose vein surgery. There were no significant differences between the age and sex ratios of the patients. However, twice as many operations in the in-patient group included stripping of the long saphenous vein above the knee (χ2 = 4.2, P = 0.04). Fifteen in-patients had bilateral vein surgery as opposed to only one day-case patient. Fifteen patients suffered complications most of which were minor and were evenly distributed including wound infections (nine), reactionary haemorrhage/haematoma (four), deep vein thrombosis (one) and pulmonary embolus (one). The convalescent period before returning to work was similar in the two groups (U= 953, P= 0.28). The mean duration of stay for the in-patients was 3.9 ± 2.2 days. There was no significant difference in the period off work (day-case: 3.6 ± 2.0 weeks; in-patient: 4 ± 2.9 weeks), or in the length of follow-up (day-case: 6.01 ± 1.24 years; in-patient: 6.79 ± 1.71 years). In the period before review 11 patients in the in-patient group and 13 patients in the day-case group had further surgery or sclerotherapy for recurrent symptomatic varicose veins. At review five patients in the in-patient group and six patients in the day-case group had recurrent sapheno-femoral incompetence (χ2 = 0.1, P = 0.7). A total of 34 patients in both groups had recurrent varicose veins. Only four (4.6%) of the day-case patients expressed a preference for in-patient treatment if they were to have further surgery and 21 (34%) of the in-patient group would prefer day-case surgery. Day-case varicose vein surgery has not been shown to be inferior in terms of complications or recurrence rate. Patient acceptability is good and it is a viable alternative to in-patient treatment in suitable patients in areas with adequate district nurse facilities.