Recently, ‘dark patterns’ of business operators that hinder consumers’ free and autonomous decision-making or decision-making and selection in a state where sufficient information is provided online are attracting attention. And as a basic rule to regulate it, Article 21, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the E- Commerce Act are receiving considerable attention. As already evident from its wording, this provision is to be understood as a provision with a fairly wide scope of application. Therefore, it regulates a large part of online dark patterns. For example, Disguised ads type, Price comparison prevention type, Testimonials type, Activity messages type, Low stock type, High demand message type, etc. can be sufficiently regulated. However, there are many types of dark patterns to which Article 21, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the E-Commerce Act does not apply. For example, e-commerce laws do not apply despite the need for regulation to roach motel type and Sneak into basket type. Therefore, it is necessary to amend the E-Commerce Act so that it can be applied to all types that may interfere with consumers' reasonable deliberation. In conclusion, the korean e-commerce act has a legislative flaws in adequately and sufficiently regulating online dark patterns.