Precise river water temperature (WT) forecasts are essential for monitoring water quality. This study addresses the limited use of signal decomposition in hybrid WT prediction models by proposing three methods: namely ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) on AdaBoost, long short-term memory (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU). These models integrate ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) with machine learning techniques for forecasting WT across multiple time horizons (one, three, and five days). The performance of implemented models were tested on two river stations located on the Clackamas River (USGS 14211010) and Willamette River (USGS 14211720). Some error measures comprising root mean square (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), uncertainty coefficient in 95% confidence level (U95%), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were applied in assessing the models’ performances. The performance of the proposed merged methods, including EEMD-AdaBoost, EEMD-LSTM, and EEMD-GRU, were compared with their simple forms. The outcomes illustrated that the hybrid models performed better than the relevant individual methods; however, the river WT forecasts of EEMD-LSTM and EEMD-GRU were found to be much closer to the observed data than those of the EEMD-AdaBoost method. The better accuracy of hybrid models compared to their corresponding simple ones can be explained by considering the potential of EEMD in separating intrinsic patterns and reducing the noises, leading to reliable forecasts of river WT time series. A performance comparison of the simple models also denoted the superiority of LSTM and GRU over the AdaBoost. The superior river WT forecasts at both stations during the testing stage were concluded for one day ahead at EEMD-GRU model (USGS 14211010: RMSE = 0.1929 ℃, MAE = 0.1489 ℃, R2 = 0.9988, U95% = 0.3745, MAPE = 1.3608%; USGS 14211720: RMSE = 0.1918 ℃, MAE = 0.1558 ℃, R2 = 0.9990, U95% = 0.3690, MAPE = 1.1790%).
Read full abstract