Cytoreduction For Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Research Articles

Minimally-Invasive Secondary Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been widely increased in recent years, especially in trying to improve the quality of life of these patients by utilising a minimally-invasive (MI) approach. However, surgery in previously-treated patients may be challenging, and patient selection and surgical planning are crucial. Unfortunately, at the moment, validated criteria to select patients for MI-SCS are not reported, and no predictors of its feasibility are currently available, probably due to the vast heterogeneity of recurrence patterns. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery and, in particular, minimally-invasive procedures, in ROC, analyzing patient selection, outcomes, criticisms, and future perspectives.

Secondary cytoreduction in platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: an individual patient level meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo synthesize the role of secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer from the results of randomized studies.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which compared secondary cytoreductive surgery versus...

Robotic surgery in ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer (OC) represents one of the most lethal cancers in women. The aim of surgical treatment is complete cytoreduction in advanced stages and a surgical staging in early stages. Although the guidelines still suggest laparotomy as the standard approach, in recent years minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become increasingly popular in the treatment of OC, especially in early stages, because the 5-year relative survival exceeds 90% and the patients' quality of life cannot be overshadowed. However, MIS has been demonstrated to have a role even in advanced stages, in the prediction of optimal cytoreduction, identification patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and, more recently, in the interval debulking surgery, as in selected cases of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. The aim of this review is to describe the MIS (especially robotic surgery), with its advantages and pitfalls, in the treatment of OC.

181MO Secondary cytoreduction in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: An individual patient level meta-analysis

The role of secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer has not been clearly defined. We aim to synthesize the efficacy of secondary cytoreduction in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer patients.

Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

The objective of the present review is to thoroughly investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the setting of secondary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer recurrence, comparing this approach to traditional open surgery. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus and Web of Science databases (between 1st January 1989 and 1st January 2020), have been systematically queried to identify all articles reporting either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. We also manually searched the reference lists of the identified studies. Only English language papers were considered. Two independent reviewers screened and identified the reports. A sub-analysis was performed including studies comparing MIS vs. open abdominal secondary cytoreduction. A total of 617 articles were considered. Among them, we included 12 retrospective studies on minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction, enrolling 372 patients (260 of whom were submitted to whether robotics or laparosopy). Three studies compared 69 patients who underwent MIS vs. 112 cases of open abdominal secondary cytoreduction. Other 9 articles described a total of 191 patients who had minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer without a comparative arm. The quality of the evidence was low. The decision regarding the use of MIS was left to surgeon's discretion; in general, the candidates to MIS were selected patients with single-site disease or few localizations of relapse. Compared to open surgery, MIS was associated with significantly lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay and less postoperative complications; the rate of complete cytoreduction to residual tumor =0 was 95.5% in MIS cases vs. 87.5% in laparotomy cases. The risk of complications was generally low. Disease-free and overall survival were comparable between groups. There is no consensus on the criteria to select patients for laparoscopic or robotic secondary cytoreduction. Intra-operative ultrasound has been proposed as a possible tool to better identify the site of recurrence and for confirmation of complete resection of disease. In conclusion, MIS is an option in selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, provided there is no widespread disease. Selection of patients appears of utmost importance to obtain satisfactory survival outcomes.

THE VALUE OF CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR ISOLATED LYMPH NODE RECURRENCE OF OVARIAN CANCER

The purpose of the study was to undertake a systematic literature review regarding the role of cytoreductive surgery in treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, as well as to summarize available data on various current studies and estimate indications for secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer with isolated lymph node involvement.Material and Methods. The search for relevant sources was carried out in PubMed, Gynecol Oncol, Medline, NCCN, Elibrary systems; publications were included from January 2006 up to March 2019. Of the 87 studies found, 26 were used to write a systematic review.Results. Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. The initial treatment for IC-IV stages of OC includes surgical cytoreduction followed by platinum-containing chemotherapy. The best outcomes are observed in patients, in whom complete cytoreduction has been achieved. Despite this fact, most patients develop relapses and the 5-year survival rate is about 30 %. The frequency of lymph node involvement in patients with recurrent OC is not reliably known; isolated lymph node recurrence is reported to occur in 5–32 % of patients. To date, the problem regarding the extent of lymph node dissection in treatment of OC recurrence is still unsolved. In our paper we review the available data concerning the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery for isolated lymph node recurrence of ovarian cancer.Conclusion. Isolated lymph node recurrence of ovarian cancer may indicate a more favorable prognosis and has a less aggressive pattern of OC relapse. The role of secondary cytoreduction in this context is not fully understood, but this category of patients may be one of the most suitable for surgical treatment of ovarian cancer recurrence.

Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

(Abstracted from N Engl J Med 2019;381:1929–1939) The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends secondary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer patients with recurrent disease who have received no treatment for a period of 6 months following a complete response from prior chemotherapy. Retrospective reviews and meta-analyses have shown the most benefit from this operation in those with platinum-sensitive disease and those with little or no postoperative residual disease.

Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

BackgroundSecondary surgical cytoreduction in women with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube (“ovarian”) cancer is widely practiced but has not been evaluated in phase 3 investigation.MethodsWe randomly assigned patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one previous therapy, had an interval during which no platinum-based chemotherapy was used (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, and had investigator-determined resectable disease (to no macroscopic residual disease) to undergo secondary surgical cytoreduction and then receive platinum-based chemotherapy or to receive platinum-based chemotherapy alone. Adjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel–carboplatin or gemcitabine–carboplatin) and use of bevacizumab were at the discretion of the investigator. The primary end point was overall survival.ResultsA total of 485 patients underwent randomization, 240 to secondary cytoreduction before chemotherapy and 245 to chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up was 48.1 months. Complete gross resection was achieved in 67% of the patients assigned to surgery who underwent the procedure. Platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance was administered to 84% of the patients overall and was equally distributed between the two groups. The hazard ratio for death (surgery vs. no surgery) was 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.72; P=0.08), which corresponded to a median overall survival of 50.6 months and 64.7 months, respectively. Adjustment for platinum-free interval and chemotherapy choice did not alter the effect. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death (surgery vs. no surgery) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.01; median progression-free survival, 18.9 months and 16.2 months, respectively). Surgical morbidity at 30 days was 9%; 1 patient (0.4%) died from postoperative complications. Patient-reported quality of life decreased significantly after surgery but did not differ significantly between the two groups after recovery.ConclusionsIn this trial involving patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary surgical cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy did not result in longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; GOG-0213 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00565851.)

Secondary Laparoscopic Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Large, Single-Institution Experience

Study ObjectiveTo analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic secondary cytoreductive surgery in a retrospective series of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. DesignRetrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SettingCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. PatientsBetween October 2010 and October 2016, 58 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were selected for a retrospective analysis of data. InterventionsAll patients underwent a laparoscopic secondary cytoreduction with single or multiple procedures. ResultsThe most frequent pattern of recurrence was peritoneal (48.3%); 6 patients (10.3%) experienced parenchymal disease (spleen, n = 5; liver, n = 1), and 24 patients (41.4%) had lymph node recurrence. Complete debulking was achieved in all patients. The median operative time was 204 minutes (range, 55–448 minutes), median estimated blood loss was 70 mL (range, 20–300 mL), and the median length of hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1–21 days). Four patients (6.8%) experienced intraoperative complications. Early postoperative complications were documented in 6 patients (10.3%), but only 1 G3 complication was noted. The median duration of follow-up since secondary cytoreduction was 24 months (range, 9–71 months). Twenty-one patients (36.2%) experienced a second disease relapse. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28 months, and the 2-year PFS was 58.7%. Five patients died (8.6%); the 2-year overall survival was 90.7%. ConclusionsFor selected patients, laparoscopy is a feasible and safe approach to optimal cytoreduction for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Secondary Complete Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Benefit of Optimal Patient Selection Using Scoring System

Complete tumor cytoreduction seems to be beneficial for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (REOC). The challenge is to identify patients eligible for such surgery. Several scores based on simple clinical parameters have attempted to predict resectability and help in patient selection for surgery in REOC.The aims of this study were to assess the performance of these models in an independent population and to evaluate the impact of complete resection. A total of 194 patients with REOC between January 2000 and December 2010 were included in 2 French centers. Two scores were used: the AGO DESKTOP OVAR trial score and a score from Tian et al.The performance (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) of these scores was evaluated in our population. Survival curves were constructed to evaluate the survival impact of surgery on recurrence. Positive predictive values for complete resection were 80.6% and 74.0% for the DESKTOP trial score and the Tian score, respectively. The false-negative rate was high for both models (65.4% and 71.4%, respectively). We found a significantly higher survival in the patients with complete resection (59.4 vs 17.9 months, P < 0.01) even after adjustment for the confounding variables (hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-6.3; P = 0.04). In REOC, surgery seems to have a positive impact on survival, if complete surgery can be achieved. However, factors predicting complete resection are not yet clearly defined. Recurrence-free interval and initial resection seem to be the most relevant factors. Laparoscopic evaluation could help to clarify the indications for surgery.

Thrombocytosis at secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer predicts suboptimal resection and poor survival

ObjectivesA growing body of evidence supports a role for thrombocytosis in the promotion of epithelial ovarian cancer biology. However, studies have only linked preoperative platelet count at time of initial cytoreductive surgery to clinical outcome. Here, we sought to determine the impact of elevated platelet count at time of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for recurrent disease. MethodsUnder an IRB-approved protocol, we identified 107 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent SCS between January 1997 and June 2012. We reviewed clinical, laboratory, and pathologic records from this retrospective cohort. The data was analyzed using the chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Cox proportional hazards, and Kaplan–Meier tests. We defined thrombocytosis as a platelet count ≥350×109/L and optimal resection at SCS as microscopic residual disease. ResultsThirteen of 107 women (12%) with recurrent ovarian cancer had thrombocytosis prior to SCS. Preoperative thrombocytosis at SCS was associated with failure to undergo optimal resection (p=0.0001). Women with preoperative thrombocytosis at time of SCS demonstrated shorter overall survival (33months) compared to those with normal platelet counts (46months, p=0.004). On multivariate analysis, only preoperative platelet count retained significance as an independent prognostic factor (p=0.025) after controlling for age at SCS (p=0.90), disease free interval from primary treatment (0.06), and initial stage of disease (0.66). ConclusionsElevated platelet count at time of SCS is associated with suboptimal resection and shortened overall survival. These data provide further evidence supporting a plausible role for thrombocytosis in aggressive ovarian tumor biology.

Thrombocytosis at secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer predicts suboptimal resection and poor survival

Thrombocytosis at secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer predicts suboptimal resection and poor survival

Faisabilité, morbidité et survie de la chirurgie avec CHIP dans la prise en charge des récidives du cancer de l’ovaire

ObjectiveThe management of recurrent ovarian cancer is based on intravenous chemotherapy with or without debulking surgery. The hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is sometimes proposed as a complement to complete surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, morbidity and survival of HIPEC associated with complete surgical cytoreduction in the management of patients with a first recurrence of ovarian cancer. Patients and methodsBetween 2005 and 2010, 27 patients underwent surgery for a recurrence of ovarian cancer. Among them, 17 patients (63%) have received HIPEC. ResultsSixteen patients (94%) were completely resected after surgery. No patient died postoperatively. Two patients had intraoperative complications: a bladder injury and a section of the ureter. Eight patients had postoperative complications including 3 grade 3 or higher (two organ failure and one reoperation). Fifteen patients had a recurrence with a median DFS of 11.9months (95% CI [5.4–32.9]) from the HIPEC. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 107.8months. Discussion and conclusionThese results showed that the association of HIPEC with a complete cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer presents acceptable morbidity and survival. The results of the ongoing French multicenter study (CHIPOR) are expected to generalize this support.

Thrombocytosis at secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer predicts suboptimal resection and poor survival

Objective: A growing body of evidence supports a role for thrombocytosis in the promotion of epithelial ovarian cancer biology. However, studies have only linked preoperative platelet counts at time of initial cytoreductive surgery to clinical outcome. We hypothesized that thrombocytosis negatively influences tumor biology throughout the disease course. Here, we sought to determine the impact of elevated platelet counts at time of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for recurrent disease.

Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy

ObjectiveAnalysis of perioperative outcomes and survival of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreduction by robotics, laparoscopy, or laparotomy. MethodsRetrospective analysis of 52 selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreduction by laparoscopy (9), laparotomy (33) or robotics (10) between January 2006 and December 2010. Comparison was made by a total of 21 factors including age, BMI, number of previous surgeries, tumor type and grade, number of procedures, and 15 types of procedures performed at secondary cytoreduction. ResultsFor all patients, the mean operating time was 213.8min, mean blood loss 657.4ml; and mean hospital stay 7.5days. Complete debulking was achieved in 75% of patients. Postoperative complications were noted in 36.5% of patients. Overall and progression-free survival at 3-years were 58.8% and 34.1%, respectively. Laparoscopy and robotics had reduced blood loss and hospital stay, while no differences were observed among the three groups for operating time, complications, complete debulking, and survival. ConclusionSelected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer benefit from a laparoscopic or robotic secondary cytoreduction without compromising survival. Robotics and laparoscopy provide similar perioperative outcomes, and reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy. Laparotomy seems preferable for patients with widespread peritoneal implants, multiple sites of recurrence, and/or extensive adhesions.

Safety and Efficacy of Video Laparoscopic Surgical Debulking of Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancers

Studies on the role of laparoscopy in secondary or tertiary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer are limited. Our objective is to describe our preliminary experience with laparoscopic secondary/tertiary cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancers. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective case series. Women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers deemed appropriate candidates for laparoscopic debulking by the primary surgeon(s) were recruited. The patients underwent exploratory video laparoscopy, biopsy, and laparoscopic secondary/tertiary cytoreduction between June 1999 and October 2009. Variables analyzed include stage, site of disease, extent of cytoreduction, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and survival time. Twenty-three patients were recruited. Only one surgery involved conversion to laparotomy. Seventeen (77.3%) of the patients had stage IIIC disease at the time of their initial diagnosis, and 20 (90.9%) had laparotomy for primary debulking. Median blood loss was 75 mL, median operative time 200 min, and median hospital stay 2 d. No intraoperative complications occurred. One patient (4.5%) had postoperative ileus. Eighteen (81.8%) of the patients with recurrent disease were optimally cytoreduced to 1cm. Overall, 12 patients have no evidence of disease (NED), 6 are alive with disease (AWD), and 4 have died of disease (DOD), over a median follow-up of 14 mo. Median disease-free survival was 71.9 mo. In a well-selected population, laparoscopy is technically feasible and can be utilized to optimally cytoreduce patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancers.

Preoperative Factors Predicting Survival After Secondary Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

We evaluated preoperative data that may predict benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) to assist in selecting therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Inclusion criteria included recurrent epithelial or primary peritoneal carcinoma with an initial disease-free interval more than 6 months after chemotherapy, evidence of disease on imaging studies and indication for surgery being to debulk residual disease. Preoperative CA125 values, computed tomographic findings, and time to progression were evaluated as predictors of survival in addition to postoperative information and perioperative morbidity. Sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. In the 35.5% of patients debulked to no visible disease, median survival was significantly longer than in those with less than 1 cm of visible residual disease (5.95 vs 2.73 years, P=0.004), but debulking to less than 1 cm visible disease was not better than those with less than 1 cm residual disease (2.02 years). Mean preoperative CA125 levels were significantly lower in the patients who could be debulked to no visible residual disease compared to less than 1 cm or more than 1 cm residual disease (69.1 vs 290.7 vs 1978.4, P=0.001). Generation of a receiver operating characteristic curve determined that a CA125 cutoff of 250 U/mL best predicted successful cytoreduction to no visible disease. Only patients cytoreduced to no visible disease achieved a survival advantage, and the only preoperative factor that could predict surgical success regarding prolonging survival was a CA125 less than 250 U/mL. These data can guide physicians and patients in deciding whether or not to undergo secondary cytoreduction for first recurrence of ovarian cancer.

Prospective Validation Study of a Predictive Score for Operability of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A Project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO

The DESKTOP I trial proposed a score for the prediction of complete cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer. Resectability was assumed if 3 factors were present: (1) complete resection at first surgery, (2) good performance status, and (3) absence of ascites. The DESKTOP II trial was planned to verify this hypothesis prospectively in a multicenter setting. Participating centers prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients with platinum-sensitive first or second relapse. The score was applied to all patients, but centers were free to decide on therapy. All further therapies were documented, and the outcome of patients was analyzed. A 75% complete resection rate in 110 prospectively classified patients had to be achieved to confirm a positive predictive value of 2 or higher of 3 with 95% probability. A total of 516 patients were screened within 19 months; of these, 261 patients (51%) were classified as score positive, and 129 patients with a positive score and first relapse were operated on. The rate of complete resection was 76%, thus confirming the validity of this score regarding positive prediction of complete resectability in 2 or more of 3 patients. Complication rates were moderate including second operations in 11% and perioperative mortality in 0.8%. This score is the first prospectively validated instrument to positively predict surgical outcome in recurrent ovarian cancer. It can aid in the selection of patients who might benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery and will be enrolled in the recently started randomized prospective DESKTOP III trial investigating the role of surgery in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Survival after secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer: Which are the prognostic factors?

Significant controversy exists concerning the factors affecting survival after secondary cytoreduction (SCR) in recurrent ovarian cancer. This study aims to identify factors independently associated with survival after SCR. We retrospectively retrieved 39 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. All patients had been initially treated with primary cytoreduction in our institution and received platinum- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy postoperatively. Disease-free interval (DFI) had to be longer than 6 months. A variety of clinicopathological factors were recorded. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to examine the associations of parameters with survival. Median survival was equal to 24 months, the median DFI was 22 months, and complete SCR had been achieved in 19/39 patients (48.7%, 95% CI: 32.4-65.2%). Higher number of recurrence sites, clear-cell histological type, and more advanced FIGO stage were independently associated with shorter survival; longer DFI was associated with longer survival. Noticeably, complete SCR lost its significance at the multivariable model, although it was associated with longer survival at the univariable analysis. Four factors seem capable of independently modifying survival after SCR: number of recurrence sites, DFI, FIGO stage, and clear cell histology. The two latter factors might reflect aggressive clinicopathological features of the tumor with long-term effect.

Role of secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer

The majority of ovarian cancer patients will recur despite aggressive initial debulking surgery followed by platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. At present, there is no standard of care for management of these patients. Secondary cytoreductive surgery may be offered to patients with disease recurrence after a disease-free interval of 6–12 months, during which time they demonstrate a complete response to primary therapy and have no evidence of disease. The key is to be able to accurately predict preoperatively which patients have the greatest likelihood of being completely cytoreduced. Although the existing literature is limited, it does show a consistent survival benefit, specifically in patients undergoing maximal cytoreduction to no gross evidence of disease. This article discusses various selection criteria that have been demonstrated to be predictive of successful surgery, as well as various prognostic factors that influence survival following secondary cytoreductive surgery.