CYP3A4 Induction Research Articles

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic precision dosing approach to manage dasatinib drug-drug interactions.

Dasatinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for treating chronic myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. As a sensitive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate and weak base with strong pH-sensitive solubility, dasatinib is susceptible to enzyme-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with CYP3A4 perpetrators and pH-dependent DDIs with acid-reducing agents. This work aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of dasatinib to describe and predict enzyme-mediated and pH-dependent DDIs, to evaluate the impact of strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers on dasatinib exposure and to support optimized dasatinib dosing. Overall, 63 plasma profiles from perorally administered dasatinib in healthy volunteers and cancer patients were used for model development. The model accurately described and predicted plasma profiles with geometric mean fold errors (GMFEs) for area under the concentration-time curve from the first to the last timepoint of measurement (AUClast) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 1.27 and 1.29, respectively. Regarding the DDI studies used for model development, all (8/8) predicted AUClast and Cmax ratios were within twofold of observed ratios. Application of the PBPK model for dose adaptations within various DDIs revealed dasatinib dose reductions of 50%-80% for strong and 0%-70% for moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and a 2.3-3.1-fold increase of the daily dasatinib dose for CYP3A4 inducers to match the exposure of dasatinib administered alone. The developed model can be further employed to personalize dasatinib therapy, thereby help coping with clinical challenges resulting from DDIs and patient-related factors, such as elevated gastric pH.

Effects of Quinidine or Rifampin Co-administration on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Rilzabrutinib (PRN1008) in Healthy Participants.

This open-label, phase 1 study was conducted with healthy adult participants to evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction between rilzabrutinib and quinidine (an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein [P-gp] and CYP2D6) or rifampin (an inducer of CYP3A and P-gp). Plasma concentrations of rilzabrutinib were measured after a single oral dose of rilzabrutinib 400mg administered on day 1 and again, following a wash-out period, after co-administration of rilzabrutinib and quinidine or rifampin. Specifically, quinidine was given at a dose of 300mg every 8hours for 5 days from day 7 to day 11 (N = 16) while rifampin was given as 600mg once daily for 11 days from day 7 to day 17 (N = 16) with rilzabrutinib given in the morning of day 10 (during quinidine dosing) or day 16 (during rifampin dosing). Quinidine had no significant effect on rilzabrutinib pharmacokinetics. Rifampin decreased rilzabrutinib exposure (the geometric mean of Cmax and AUC0-∞ decreased by 80.5% and 79.5%, respectively). Single oral doses of rilzabrutinib, with or without quinidine or rifampin, appeared to be well tolerated. These findings indicate that rilzabrutinib is a substrate for CYP3A but not a substrate for P-gp.

Enzalutamide: Understanding and Managing Drug Interactions to Improve Patient Safety and Drug Efficacy.

Enzalutamide is an oral androgen receptor signaling inhibitor utilized in the treatment of men with prostate cancer. It is a moderate inducer of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and a strong inducer of CYP3A4. It was also shown to be a mild inhibitor of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein in patients with prostate cancer. Enzalutamide is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. The risk of enzalutamide drug interactions arises primarily when it is coadministered with other drugs that interact with these CYPs, including CYP3A4. In this review, we begin by providing an overview of enzalutamide including its dosing, use in special populations, pharmacokinetics, changes to its prescribing information, and potential for interaction with coadministered drugs. Enzalutamide interactions with drugs from a wide range of medication classes commonly prescribed to patients with prostate cancer are described, including oral androgen deprivation therapy, agents used to treat a range of cardiovascular diseases, antidiabetic drugs, antidepressants, anti-seizure medications, common urology medications, analgesics, proton pump inhibitors, immunosuppressants, and antigout drugs. Enzalutamide interactions with common vitamins and supplements are also briefly discussed. This review provides a resource for healthcare practitioners and patients that will help provide a basis for the understanding and management of enzalutamide drug-drug interactions to inform decision making, improve patient safety, and optimize drug efficacy.

Abstract CT196: First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of a macrocyclic ATR inhibitor (ATRN-119) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background: ATRN-119 is an orally bioavailable, potent, selective macrocyclic small molecule inhibitor of Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3- related (ATR) kinase. As the master regulator of DNA damage response (DDR), ATR orchestrates cellular response to DNA replication stress to preserve DNA replication fork integrity. Cancer cells with markedly increased oncogenic stress or dysfunctional DDR are more reliant on ATR for genome stabilization. Thus, inhibition of ATR can result in cancer cell-selective replication fork collapse and cancer cell death. Methods: This ongoing, first-in-human, multi-site phase 1/2a trial (NCT04905914) is investigating ATRN-119 safety and pharmacokinetic properties (primary objectives), preliminary efficacy in various solid tumors (secondary objective), and biomarker profile (exploratory objective). This study uses an open-label, standard 3+3 dose escalation and dose expansion study design. Key inclusion criteria include: advanced solid tumor, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), tumor with at least 1 DDR mutation by next-generation-sequencing, at least 1 failed standard-of-care therapy, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria are cancer therapy within 4 weeks or at least 5 half-lives, unresolved therapy-related AEs, investigational agent within 5 half-lives or 30 days of study drug, CNS metastases or unstable involvement, and concomitant treatment with strong CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 inhibitors or inducers. Results: This trial is currently enrolling at Dose level 5 (550 mg). Among 12 patients in the first four dose levels, the median age is 62 years (range: 48 to 79), where 67% (n=8) are female, 75% (n=9) are White, and 25% (n=3) are Black. The median number of prior treatments is 3 (range: 1 to 6, and 92% have received platinum-based chemotherapy). The majority of tumors, 75% (n=9), had a TP53 mutation. There have been no reports of dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related serious adverse events (AE), and treatment-related AEs Grade 3 or higher in these cohorts. The three most commonly reported all-cause AEs are fatigue (33%, n=4), nausea (25%, n=3), and diarrhea (25%, n=3). Increasing exposure and maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) were observed by dose level. The half-life of ATRN-119 is ~5 hours. Two of 12 patients achieved stable disease (SD): one patient from Dose level 1 (50 mg) who progressed on Day 112 and one patient from Dose level 3 (200 mg) who remains on treatment as of Day 118 (data cut off date: January 2, 2024). Conclusion: In these early cohorts, once-daily oral ATRN-119 appears to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, exhibits near dose proportionality, and demonstrates disease stabilization warranting further investigation. Further studies to explore a twice-daily schedule are being considered. Citation Format: Fiona Simpkins, Amit Mahipal, Patricia LoRusso, Reva Schneider, Crystal Miller, David Stenehjem, Eric J. Brown, Mike Carleton, Joachim Gullbo, Nadeem Q. Mirza. First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of a macrocyclic ATR inhibitor (ATRN-119) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT196.

Clinical assessment of momelotinib drug-drug interactions via CYP3A metabolism and transporters.

Momelotinib-approved for treatment of myelofibrosis in adults with anemia-and its major active metabolite, M21, were assessed as drug-drug interaction (DDI) victims with a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (multiple-dose ritonavir), an organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/1B3 inhibitor (single-dose rifampin), and a strong CYP3A4 inducer (multiple-dose rifampin). Momelotinib DDI perpetrator potential (multiple-dose) was evaluated with CYP3A4 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrates (midazolam and rosuvastatin, respectively). DDI was assessed from changes in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), time to reach Cmax, and half-life. The increase in momelotinib (23% Cmax, 14% AUC) or M21 (30% Cmax, 24% AUC) exposure with ritonavir coadministration was not clinically relevant. A moderate increase in momelotinib (40% Cmax, 57% AUC) and minimal change in M21 was observed with single-dose rifampin. A moderate decrease in momelotinib (29% Cmax, 46% AUC) and increase in M21 (31% Cmax, 15% AUC) were observed with multiple-dose rifampin compared with single-dose rifampin. Due to potentially counteracting effects of OATP1B1/1B3 inhibition and CYP3A4 induction, multiple-dose rifampin did not significantly change momelotinib pharmacokinetics compared with momelotinib alone (Cmax no change, 15% AUC decrease). Momelotinib did not alter the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (8% Cmax, 16% AUC decreases) or 1'-hydroxymidazolam (14% Cmax, 16% AUC decreases) but increased rosuvastatin Cmax by 220% and AUC by 170%. Safety findings were mild in this short-term study in healthy volunteers. This analysis suggests that momelotinib interactions with OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitors and BCRP substrates may warrant monitoring for adverse reactions or dose adjustments.

Is CYP3A4 induction a good indicator for CYP2CS in cryopreserved human hepatocytes?

Is CYP3A4 induction a good indicator for CYP2CS in cryopreserved human hepatocytes?

Improved PBPK model of carbamazepine as a strong CYP3A inducer

Improved PBPK model of carbamazepine as a strong CYP3A inducer

Management of direct oral anticoagulant drug interactions in hospitalized patients.

Moderate-strong CYP3A4 or Pgp inhibitors and inducers alter direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) pharmacokinetics. Whether the presence of a DOAC drug-drug interaction (DDI) prompts in- hospital changes in management remains unknown. We identified all hospitalized patients at our institution who were admitted with a clinically relevant DOAC DDI from 01/2021 to 06/2021. Clinically relevant DOAC DDIs were defined as those listed in the prescribing information or FDA CYP3A4/Pgp inhibitors clinical indexes. We assessed the prevalence of DOAC DDIs and categorized their management as: drug stopped, drug held, or drug continued. For drugs that were continued we assessed whether the dose of the DOAC or interacting drug was increased, decreased or unchanged during the admission. We ascertained the number of DOAC DDIs that prompted an automated prescribing alert in our electronic health record (EHR). Finally, we conducted a logistic regression model to compare users of DOACs with DDI who had their regimen adjusted versus those without adjustments, focusing on outcomes of rehospitalization and death, adjusting for age and gender. Among 3,725 hospitalizations with a DOAC admission order, 197 (5%) had a clinically relevant DOAC DDI. The DOAC and the interacting drug were continued at discharge for 124 (63%) hospitalizations. The most frequent adjustments were stopping the interacting drug (73%) and stopping the DOAC (15%). Only 7 (4%) of DOAC DDIs prompted an EHR alert. The adjusted odds ratios for rehospitalizations and death, respectively, among patients whose regimens were adjusted compared to those whose were not, were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.48; P = 0.44) and 1.88 (95% CI, 0.91 to 3.89; P = 0.09). Clinically relevant DDIs with DOACs occur infrequently among hospitalized patients and usually are managed without stopping the DOAC. The clinical impact of such DDIs and subsequent adjustments on thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes requires further investigation.

PBTK model-based analysis of CYP3A4 induction and the toxicokinetics of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid retrorsine in man

Cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 induction by drugs and pesticides plays a critical role in the enhancement of pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) toxicity as it leads to increased formation of hepatotoxic dehydro-PA metabolites. Addressing the need for a quantitative analysis of this interaction, we developed a physiologically-based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model. Specifically, the model describes the impact of the well-characterized CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin on the kinetics of retrorsine, which is a prototypic PA and contaminant in herbal teas. Based on consumption data, the kinetics after daily intake of retrorsine were simulated with concomitant rifampicin treatment. Strongest impact on retrorsine kinetics (plasma AUC24\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$_{24}$$\\end{document} and Cmax\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$C_{{\ ext {max}}}$$\\end{document} reduced to 67% and 74% compared to the rifampicin-free reference) was predicted directly after withdrawal of rifampicin. At this time point, the competitive inhibitory effect of rifampicin stopped, while CYP3A4 induction was still near its maximum. Due to the impacted metabolism kinetics, the cumulative formation of intestinal retrorsine CYP3A4 metabolites increased to 254% (from 10 to 25 nmol), while the cumulative formation of hepatic CYP3A4 metabolites was not affected (57 nmol). Return to baseline PA toxicokinetics was predicted 14 days after stop of a 14-day rifampicin treatment. In conclusion, the PBTK model showed to be a promising tool to assess the dynamic interplay of enzyme induction and toxification pathways.

Understanding CYP3A4 and P-gp mediated drug-drug interactions through PBPK modeling - Case example of pralsetinib.

Pralsetinib, a potent and selective inhibitor of oncogenic RET fusion and RET mutant proteins, is a substrate of the drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4 and a substrate of the efflux transporter P-gp based on invitro data. Therefore, its pharmacokinetics (PKs) may be affected by co-administration of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, P-gp inhibitors, and combined CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors. With the frequent overlap between CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates/inhibitors, pralsetinib is a challenging and representative example of the need to more quantitatively characterize transporter-enzyme interplay. A physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model for pralsetinib was developed to understand the victim drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk for pralsetinib. The key parameters driving the magnitude of pralsetinib DDIs, the P-gp intrinsic clearance and the fraction metabolized by CYP3A4, were determined from PBPK simulations that best captured observed DDIs from three clinical studies. Sensitivity analyses and scenario simulations were also conducted to ensure these key parameters were determined with sound mechanistic rationale based on current knowledge, including the worst-case scenarios. The verified pralsetinib PBPK model was then applied to predict the effect of other inhibitors and inducers on the PKs of pralsetinib. This work highlights the challenges in understanding DDIs when enzyme-transporter interplay occurs, and demonstrates an important strategy for differentiating enzyme/transporter contributions to enable PBPK predictions for untested scenarios and to inform labeling.

Effect of Strong CYP3A4 Inhibition, CYP3A4 Induction, and OATP1B1/3 Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of Sotorasib.

Sotorasib is a small molecule that irreversibly inhibits the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) protein with a G12C amino acid substitution mutant protein. The impact of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibition and induction on sotorasib pharmacokinetics (PKs) was evaluated in 2 separate studies in healthy volunteers (N = 14/study). The impact of CYP3A4 inhibition was interrogated utilizing repeat doses of 200mg of itraconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on 360mg of sotorasib PKs. The impact of CYP3A4 induction was interrogated utilizing multiple doses of 600mg of rifampin, a strong CYP3A4 inducer. Additionally, the impact of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/3 inhibition on 960mg of sotorasib PKs was interrogated after a single dose of 600mg of rifampin. CYP3A4 inhibition did not significantly impact sotorasib Cmax but did lead to a 26% increase in sotorasib AUCinf. CYP3A4 induction decreased sotorasib Cmax by 35% and AUCinf by 51%. OATP1B1/3 inhibition decreased sotorasib Cmax and AUCinf by 16% and 23%, respectively. These results support that sotorasib can be given together with strong CYP3A4 and OATP1B1/3 inhibitors but the co-administration of sotorasib and strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 Drug-Drug Interaction of Avacopan in 2 Open-Label Studies in Healthy Participants.

Avacopan, a complement 5a receptor (C5aR) antagonist approved for treating severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, was evaluated in 2 clinical drug-drug interaction studies. The studies assessed the impact of avacopan on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates midazolam and simvastatin and CYP2C9 substrate celecoxib, and the influence of CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole and inducer rifampin on the PKs of avacopan. The results indicated that twice-daily oral administration of 30mg of avacopan increased the area under the curve (AUC) of midazolam by 1.81-fold and celecoxib by 1.15-fold when administered without food, and twice-daily oral administration of 30 or 60mg of avacopan increased the AUC of simvastatin by approximately 2.6-3.5-fold and the AUC of the active metabolite β-hydroxy-simvastatin acid by approximately 1.4-1.7-fold when co-administered with food. Furthermore, the AUC of avacopan increased by approximately 2.19-fold when co-administered with itraconazole and decreased by approximately 13.5-fold when co-administered with rifampin. These findings provide critical insights into the potential drug-drug interactions involving avacopan, which could have significant implications for patient care and treatment planning. (NCT06207682).

Comparative toxicity of beach mesoplastics from South Spain: An in vitro approach

Plastics, particularly mesoplastics, dominate beach debris and act as carriers of hazardous chemicals, either initially present in plastics or absorbed from the surrounding environment. In this study, mesoplastics were collected from five beaches in the southern region of Spain to investigate their potential impact on marine life. In vitro assays employing fish liver cells (PLHC-1) were conducted to evaluate the toxicity of methanolic extracts derived from intact mesoplastics and after simulated photodegradation. LC-MS analysis of the methanolic extracts revealed the presence of organophosphate esters, phthalates, and phthalate alternatives. The extracts from photodegraded plastics generally showed higher cytotoxicity, ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), and genotoxicity (micronuclei formation) than those from intact mesoplastics. All the extracts induced EROD activity in PLHC-1 cells, indicating the presence of significant amounts of CYP1A inducers in beach mesoplastics. Thus, mesoplastics contain chemicals able to induce cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in PLHC-1 cells, and further photodegradation of mesoplastics facilitates the release of additional chemicals, increasing the overall toxicity. This work also highlights the usefulness of cell-based assays to better define the risks of plastic pollution.

Phase 1/2 trial of oral EPI-7386 (masofaniten) in combination with enzalutamide (Enz) compared to Enz alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Phase 1 (P1) results and phase 2 (P2) design.

141 Background: EPI-7386 (masofaniten) is a next-generation aniten that inhibits androgen receptor (AR) activity by binding the N-terminal domain and blocking transcription, irrespective of ligand-binding domain resistance mechanisms. Preclinically, the combination of masofaniten with Enz results in a deeper blockade of the AR pathway and greater antitumor activity than either agent alone. Methods: This is a Phase 1/2 multicenter clinical trial (NCT05075577) enrolling patients (pts) with mCRPC on androgen deprivation therapy and naïve to second-generation antiandrogens (one line of prior chemotherapy in the metastatic hormone-sensitive setting allowed). P1 examines escalating doses of masofaniten + Enz at 120 or 160 mg QD. Primary and secondary endpoints of P1 evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of masofaniten + Enz when co-administered to establish the recommended P2 combination doses (RP2CDs). P2 is designed as a two arm, 2:1 randomized, open-label trial evaluating the antitumor activity of masofaniten in combination with Enz versus Enz alone; approximately 120 pts will be randomized with masofaniten 600 mg BID + Enz 160 mg QD (n=80) vs single agent Enz at 160 mg QD (n = 40). Results: P1 completed enrollment with 18 pts in 4 cohorts with 16 pts evaluable for efficacy as per protocol. The combination regimen was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with Enz monotherapy. One grade 3 rash was observed in cohort 4 evaluating masofaniten 600 mg BID + Enz 160 mg QD. PK results demonstrated Enz exposure was not impacted by concomitant administration of masofaniten, allowing testing of the full dose of Enz (160 mg). By contrast, masofaniten exposure was consistently reduced by concomitant administration of Enz (CYP3A4 inducer that metabolizes masofaniten) but remained within the clinically relevant range with the highest exposures and Cmin observed using masofaniten BID dosing. Although efficacy data are still maturing, to date, response rates were PSA50 88% (14/16 pts), PSA90 69% (11/16 pts) and PSA <0.2 ng/mL 56% (9/16 pts) in evaluable pts, regardless of their previous chemotherapy status. Conclusions: The RP2CD for P2 was established at masofaniten 600 mg BID + Enz 160 mg QD. Updated results, including long term follow-up of the dose escalation patients, and P2 study design, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05075577 .

UNICAB: Cabozantinib in locally advanced or metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma post immunotherapy or in those unsuitable for immunotherapy (ANZUP 1802).

428 Background: Rare variant non-clear cell renal cell cancer (nccRCC) have diverse biology and therapeutic response. Immune checkpoint immunotherapy (ICI) can benefit some people with nccRCC, but many experience progression. We sought to test cabozantinib (C) in people with nccRCC refractory to, or unsuitable for ICI. Methods: Eligible participants (pts) had advanced/metastatic nccRCC with good ECOG PS (<2) and either prior treatment with ICI or were unsuitable for ICI due to a contraindicating autoimmune disorder. Pts with urothelial or collecting duct tumour were excluded. Eligible pts started C at 60mg per day with dose modifications as required. Clinical cycles were 28 days and radiological assessment occurred 8-weekly for 12 months. Pts could then continue C via an access program. Results: 33 pts with nccRCC were recruited from Mar 2019 to Dec 2022. Recruitment was influenced by the COVID19 pandemic. Two pts were found ineligible (brain metastasis, concurrent CYP3A4 inducer). Pts tumour histology included papillary type 1 (10), chromophobe (7), papillary type 2 (4), Xp11 translocation (3) and other histologies (7). 24 pts had received prior ICI, mostly nivolumab alone (17) or anti-PD1-antibodies in combination with other agents (anti-CTLA4, anti-TIGIT). Median duration of therapy was 9 cycles. 17 pts ceased for unacceptable toxicity or disease progression and 12 pts completed the 12 months of treatment, with 2 remaining on trial treatment at time of analysis. A partial response was seen 7/31 (22%) pts overall, including 7/24 pts with prior ICI and 0/7 pts unsuitable for ICI. Median treatment duration was 7.5 cycles (range 2-12) in pts with prior ICI treatment, and 11 cycles (range 2-12) in pts unsuitable for ICI. 90% of pts required dose reduction, most often due to fatigue, hypertension, diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome, with a mean C dose of 46mg/day. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: C is an active treatment for people with nccRCC previously treated with ICI, with similar toxicity to previous reports in other cancers. Pts unsuitable for ICI may have poorer outcomes for C therapy in nccRCC. Further follow-up will determine duration of response and overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03685448 .

SWOG S2200 (PAPMET2): A phase II randomized trial of cabozantinib with or without atezolizumab in patients with advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC).

TPS493 Background: The role of immune therapy is not established in PRCC. The S1500 (PAPMET) clinical trial established single agent cabozantinib as the standard of care for PRCC (PMID 33592176) with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 9.0 months compared to 5.6 months with sunitinib. Trials have shown activity of PD-(L)1 antagonists as monotherapy (PMID 33529058) or in combination with targeted therapy (PMID 34491815). In a single arm study of cabozantinib/nivolumab the median PFS was 12.5 months (PMID 35298296). There are no prior randomized studies of immune therapy in PRCC. Single arm trials often overestimate the true effect size (PMID 31218346), highlighting the unmet clinical need for a randomized clinical trial in PRCC. We hypothesize that the combination will have higher clinical activity than single agent cabozantinib. Methods: This is a prospective randomized phase II clinical trial conducted through the NCTN and led by SWOG. The primary endpoint is a comparison of PFS between cabozantinib and cabozantinib/atezolizumab. Secondary endpoints include comparison of objective response rate, overall survival and safety. Patients are treated with cabozantinib 60mg/day versus cabozantinib 60mg/day + atezolizumab 1200 mg q3 weeks. 200 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1. Key inclusion criteria include a pathologic confirmation of PRCC; presence of metastasis; 0-1 prior systemic lines of therapy for metastatic disease; and measurable disease as defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Prior treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab is allowed if completed greater than 6 months before enrollment. Key exclusion criteria include clinically significant autoimmune disease; ongoing use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, strong CYP3A4 inducers. Planned correlatives include stool microbiome testing and genomic/transcriptomic analysis from blood and baseline tissue assays. Clinical trial information: NCT05411081 .

Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction potential of brigatinib using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach.

Brigatinib is an oral anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Invitro studies indicated that brigatinib is primarily metabolized by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 and inhibits P-gp, BCRP, OCT1, MATE1, and MATE2K. Clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies with the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole or the strong CYP3A inducer rifampin demonstrated that CYP3A-mediated metabolism was the primary contributor to overall brigatinib clearance in humans. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for brigatinib was developed to predict potential DDIs, including the effect of moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers on brigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effect of brigatinib on the PK of transporter substrates. The developed model was able to predict clinical DDIs with itraconazole (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞] ratio [with/without itraconazole]: predicted 1.86; observed 2.01) and rifampin (AUC∞ ratio [with/without rifampin]: predicted 0.16; observed 0.20). Simulations using the developed model predicted that moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g., verapamil and diltiazem) may increase brigatinib AUC∞ by ~40%, whereas moderate CYP3A inducers (e.g., efavirenz) may decrease brigatinib AUC∞ by ~50%. Simulations of potential transporter-mediated DDIs predicted that brigatinib may increase systemic exposures (AUC∞) of P-gp substrates (e.g., digoxin and dabigatran) by 15%-43% and MATE1 substrates (e.g., metformin) by up to 29%; however, negligible effects were predicted on BCRP-mediated efflux and OCT1-mediated uptake. The PBPK analysis results informed dosing recommendations for patients receiving moderate CYP3A inhibitors (40% brigatinib dose reduction) or inducers (up to 100% increase in brigatinib dose) during treatment, as reflected in the brigatinib prescribing information.

Pharmacokinetics of Dacarbazine and Unesbulin and CYP1A2-Mediated Drug Interactions in Patients With Leiomyosarcoma.

Unesbulin is being investigated in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) as a potential therapeutic agent in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS). This paper reports the pharmacokinetics (PK) of unesbulin, DTIC, and its unreactive surrogate metabolite 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC) in 29 patients with advanced LMS. Drug interactions between DTIC (and AIC) and unesbulin were evaluated. DTIC (1000 mg/m2 ) was administered to patients with LMS via 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every 21-day (q21d) cycle. Unesbulin dispersible tablets were administered orally twice weekly (BIW), starting on Day 2 of every cycle, except for Cycle 2 (C2), where unesbulin was dosed either on Day 1 together with DTIC or on Day 2, 1 day after DTIC administration. The PK of DTIC, AIC, and unesbulin in Cycle 1 (C1) and C2 were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. DTIC and AIC were measurable immediately after the start of infusion and reached Cmax immediately or shortly after end of infusion at 1.0 and 1.4 hours (Tmax ), respectively. Coadministration of unesbulin orally at 200 mg or above with DTIC inhibited cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2-mediated DTIC metabolism, resulting in 66.7% reduction of AIC exposures. Such inhibition could be mitigated when unesbulin was dosed the day following DTIC infusion. Repeated unesbulin dosing demonstrated evidence of clinical CYP1A2 induction and increased AIC Cmax by 69.4% and AUCinf by 57.9%. No meaningful difference in unesbulin PK was observed between C2 and C1. The combination therapy of 1000 mg/m2 IV DTIC q21d and 300 mg unesbulin BIW in a staggered regimen is well tolerated in patients with LMS.

Impact of a Moderate CYP3A4 Inducer (Bosentan) on Lurbinectedin Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Two-Way, Crossover, Phase Ib Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

This open-label, two-way, crossover, phase Ib drug-drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety profile of lurbinectedin (LRB) are affected by co-administration of a moderate CYP3A4 inducer (bosentan, BOS) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Eleven patients were randomly assigned to Sequence 1 (LRB + BOS in Cycle 1 [C1] and LRB alone in Cycle 2 [C2]) or Sequence 2 (LRB alone in C1 and LRB + BOS in C2), and finally, eight patients (four per sequence) were considered evaluable for PK assessment. LRB (3.2 mg/m2, 1 h [h], intravenous) was administered alone or combined with multiple BOS administration (125 mg/12 h oral; 5.5 days). Co-administration with BOS decreased the systemic total exposure (area under the curve, AUC) of LRB by 21% for AUC0-t and 20% for AUC0-∞ and increased clearance by 25%. Co-administration with BOS did not significantly modify the unbound plasma LRB PK parameters. BOS increased the conversion of LRB to its metabolite M1, with no changes on its metabolite M4. The LRB safety profile was consistent with the toxicities previously described for this drug. No differences in terms of toxicity were found between LRB with and without BOS. In summary, the magnitude of the observed changes precludes a clinically relevant effect of BOS co-administration on LRB exposure and its safety profile.

Use of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data to Develop the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib for Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer.

Ribociclib is an orally bioavailable, selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. CDK4/6inhibition by ribociclib leads to retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) reactivation, thereby restoring Rb-mediated cell cycle arrest. Ribociclib is approved for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), at the dose of 600mg once daily (QD) during cycles of 21days on/7days off, with optional dose reduction to 400 mgand 200mg. Ribociclib is rapidly absorbed with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration of 2.4h, mean half-life of 32.0h and oral bioavailability of 65.8% at 600mg. It is eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism (~84% of total elimination), mostly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Age, body weight, race, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, food, mild hepatic impairment, mild-to-moderate renal impairment, proton pump inhibitors, and combination partners (non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) have no clinically relevant impact on ribociclib exposure. Ribociclib inhibits CYP3A at 600mg leading to increased exposure of CYP3A substrates. Strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers increase or decrease, respectively, ribociclib exposure. Exposure-safety and exposure-efficacy analyses support the clinical benefit of the 600mg QD starting dose, with potential individualized dose reductions to 400 mgand 200mg for effective management of the adverse events neutropenia and QTcF interval prolongation, while maintaining efficacy, in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Overall, these clinical pharmacology data informed ribociclib dose justification and clinical development, as well as its prescribing information for clinical use in advanced breast cancer patients.