STILLE'S conception of phases seems to be widely accepted in Japan as well as in Europe. There are, however, many different opinions about the intensities and durations of the bretonic, sudetic and asturic phases, the main phases of the Variscan (Hercynian) orogeny, which have been proposed by STILLE in 1920. These phases in Germany do not always mean very short and intense earth-movements as analyzed by BUBNOFF (1931). Many phases have been reported in Japan; for example, more than ten phases in the Cretaceous period (MATSUMOTO, 1967). That means that the rate of the occurrence of the phases is one per 5 million years on the average. We need precise age determination to correlate the phases among different continents.The cycles of the events in the orogenic zones are good means to correlate the orogenies among different continents. There are, however, some confusions about the conceptions of the orogenic cycles in Japan. The conceptions of the KRAUS's cycle (1927), KOBAYASHI's cycle (or series) (1941), STILLE'S geotectonic cycle (1924) and BUBNOFF'S great cycle (1959) must be distinguished with each other. In Europe we can easily recognize the Paleo-, Meso-and Neo-europe. Therefore the Caledonian, Variscan and Alpine Ara (STILLE, 1928) can be easily distinguished. However, we cannot separate the strata of the Variscan geosyncline into two similar cyclic series of sedimentation to each other; the Caledonian and Variscan cyclic series of sedimentation. The cycles of the events, for example the cycles of the sedimentary facies, must be studied to correlate a orogenic cycle in a continent to another cycle in another continent. There are too many phases in the world. We cannot correlate the cycles only by the phases. Moreover, the end of an orogenic cycle in an orogenic zone is not usually contemporaneous with the beginning of the “next” cycle in the adjacent orogenic zone. Cycles are usually overlapped in age.Angular unconformities are generally thought to show short and intense earthmovements. Some angular unconformities in Japan, however, do not mean the short and intense earth-movements. They have been probably formed by local, but secular earthmovements with the coordination of the regression and transgression which covered the wide area of East Asia. Besides the angular unconformities, the sedimentary facies-change, deformation of strata, and metamorphism and granite-intrusion are used for the recognition of the phases. However, we need precise and comprehensive study to determine the age and intensities of the phases.According to such data for the sedimentary facies-change, the deformation of strata and the age and the metamorphism and others, KOBAYASHI'S (1941) Akiyoshi and Sakawa series of oronization can be recognized in Japan, although there are some opponets. The oldest strata in the Chichibu geosyncline is those of the Silurian. Submarine volcanism was intense during the Devonian and early Carboniferous period. The Akiyoshi series of earth-movements occurred principally in the northern part of the geosyncline during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic time, and the Sakawa series principally in the southern part during the late Mesozoic time. The Akiyoshi series of earth-movements began at least in the Permian, was intense in the Triassic and continued to the Jurassic period. The duration of the orogenic cycle from the Silurian to the Jurassic (from the beginning of the geosyncline to the end of the series of the earth-movements) is clearly different from that of the Variscan cycle in Europe. Therefore, we cannot correlate two cyles in view of the duration. Were orogenic cycles produced by the particular agencies for the continents, or produced by one agency which formed an orogenic cycle in one continent earlier and migrated to another continent forming another cycle later ? Such questions, however, remain unsolved.