Cutting Balloon Angioplasty Research Articles

De Novo Superficial Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: Peripheral Cutting Balloon Angioplasty and Restenosis Rates—Randomized Controlled Trial

To prospectively determine, in a randomized controlled trial, whether cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) yields superior morphologic and clinical outcomes at 6 months compared with the 6-month outcomes after conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with short de novo superficial femoropopliteal artery (SFA) lesions. This study was approved by the ethics committees of the two participating centers, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors randomly assigned 43 patients (26 men, 17 women; median age, 69 years) who had 5 cm or shorter de novo SFA lesions in association with intermittent claudication or chronic limb ischemia to undergo CBA or PTA. The patients were followed up clinically, and restenosis was assessed with duplex ultrasonography (US) at 6 months. chi(2) and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare data between the two treatment groups. The US-determined 6-month restenosis rate was 32% (seven patients) in the PTA group versus 62% (13 patients) in the CBA group (P = .048). Sixteen (73%) PTA group patients versus eight (38%) CBA group patients were asymptomatic at follow-up (P = .059). There was no significant difference in ankle-brachial index (median, 0.83 vs 0.77 for PTA vs CBA group, respectively; P = .56) or pain-free walking distance (median, >1000 m vs 600 m for PTA vs CBA group, respectively; P = .17) between the two groups. CBA did not prove to be superior to conventional PTA for treatment of short de novo SFA lesions and yielded increased restenosis rates at 6 months.

Cutting balloon angioplasty: Is it the key to access?

Cutting balloon angioplasty: Is it the key to access?

Cutting balloon angioplasty for resistant venous stenoses of dialysis access: Immediate and patency results

To evaluate the technical success, safety and patency of cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of resistant dialysis access stenoses. Cutting balloon angioplasty has been proposed to be useful in treating resistant dialysis access stenoses. However, they are based on experience with very limited cases and formal patency data is insufficient. The author retrospectively reviewed 896 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) procedures for the treatment of dysfunctional or thrombotic dialysis access. Thirty-seven of 623 patients with native fistulas and 23 of 273 patients with synthetic grafts had residual stenoses of more than 30% after conventional PTA at an inflation pressure of 24 atm for 60 sec. In these 60 patients, additional cutting balloon PTA was performed. The overall technical success rate was 96.7% and clinical success rate was 98.3%. Only one patient experienced mild local extravasation. The postintervention primary patency rates for native fistula group (N = 37) were 100%, 86.4%, and 67.5% at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month; the postintervention primary patency rates for synthetic graft group (N = 23) were 87.0%, 60.9%, and 34.2% at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month respectively. For resistant venous stenoses of dialysis access, cutting balloon PTA is effective, safe, and seems to provide comparative primary patency as suggested by guidelines.

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Carotid Artery In-stent Stenosis Supported by Three-dimensional Rotational Angiography With Automated Vessel Analysis Software -Technical Note-

In-stent stenosis is a possible long-term complication of carotid artery stenting. A simple and safe technique of cutting balloon angioplasty is described for carotid in-stent stenosis. The stented vessel is imaged by three-dimensional (3D) rotational angiography, the acquired projection images are transferred to a workstation, and the stenotic lesion and implanted stent are reconstructed. The diameter of the implanted stent in the stenotic region is measured by automated analysis software. Cutting balloon angioplasty carries the risk of vessel injury by the cutting balloon microblades, but the implanted stent acts as a barrier to protect the vessel. Therefore, cutting balloon inflation up to the stent diameter is safe and results in maximal vessel dilation. The key to success is precise measurement of the stent diameter and choice of a cutting balloon catheter of the appropriate size. 3D rotational angiography provides high-quality images of the vasculature of a stented vessel and a reference for intervention based on absolute measurements. Cutting balloon angioplasty supported by 3D rotational angiography with automated vessel analysis software should be considered as a treatment strategy for high-grade carotid artery in-stent stenosis.

P3-53 COMPARISON OF CUTTING BALLOON VERSUS HIGH-PRESSURE BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR RESISTANT VENOUS STENOSES OF NATIVE DIALYSIS FISTULAS

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 1,220 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedures performed to treat dysfunctional native hemodialysis fistulas. Seventy patients with stenoses resistant to conventional balloon angioplasty (up to 24 atm) were included in this study: 35 patients underwent cutting balloon angioplasty from September 2003 through February 2005, and 35 patients underwent high-pressure balloon angioplasty from March 2005 through April 2006. Evaluation included technical success, complications, and postintervention patency rates up to 6 months.

Iatrogenic stenosis following suture‐mediated closure device

The use of percutaneous closure devices post arterial punctures has been introduced to reduce time to haemostasis, reduce haemorrhage, improve patient comfort and reduce time to ambulation. Their increased use has been a result of larger access sites for more complicated procedures, periprocedural anticoagulation and concomitant use of anti-platelet therapy. Although complication rates are not increased with their use as compared with mechanical compression, complications may be more severe and are an important consideration in their use. We report two cases of iatrogenic stenoses secondary to suture-mediated closure device. The first managed with open surgical repair and the second with cutting balloon angioplasty.

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty (CBA) Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty (PTA) in the Pre-Dilatation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Our Preliminary Experience

A retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cutting-balloon angioplasty (CBA) for the predilatation of tight fibrocalcified carotid stenosis before carotid artery stenting (CAS). We also compared the intraprocedural results of CBA with those of conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in terms of postdilatation rate. The study population was composed of 32 patients who underwent CAS requiring predilatation before stent implantation. In detail, predilatation was performed by using a conventional balloon (PTA) in 14 patients (group A) and a cutting balloon (CBA) in 18 patients (group B). Intraprocedural and periprocedural mortality, major and minor procedural and neurologic complications, arterial damage, and embolic debris found in the distal filter were recorded. We statistically compared the rate of postdilatation obtained in the two groups. Technical success was obtained in 100% of the cases. No death, major neurologic or periprocedural complications, or arterial damage were recorded in either group. Minor neurologic reactions were recorded in 1 patient from group A (4%) and in 1 patient from group B (3%). Embolic debris was found in the distal filter in 2 patients from group A (8%) and in 3 patients from group B (10%). Postdilatation was necessary in 14 patients from group A (100%) and in 9 patients from group B (50%) (p < 0.05). Although limited to a small number of patients, compared with PTA, CBA seems to be a safe and effective procedure for the predilatation of tight fibrocalcified carotid stenoses before stent placement and may decrease the need for postdilatation in this patient population.

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty in Dialysis Fistulas: Let Us Start to Ask the Right Questions

Bhat and coworkers [1] describe the use of cutting balloons in a larger cohort of dialysis fistulas. They found a high technical success and an acceptable follow-up patency compared to conventional balloon angioplasty. Moreover, the results are in line with a number of other publications stating the effectivity and technical safety of cutting balloon angioplasty in dialysis patients [2–6]. However, the more expensive technique of cutting angioplasty has an alternative: the use of high-pressure balloons, with pressures up to 30 atm [7]. Trerotola and coworkers showed, in their retrospective work, that by use of extreme pressures, a high technical success is achievable [7]. Evidence-based knowledge about the use of cutting balloons in dialysis fistulas is scarce, however. In a prospective trial, Karya and coworkers found no advantage of cutting balloons regarding primary patency except for graft-to-vein stenosis [8]. Vesely et al., on the contrary, did not find a significant benefit of cutting angioplasty over conventional balloon angioplasty in the treatment of graftto-vein anastomoses [9]. The author himself is a convinced user of cutting balloons in particular highly resistant stenoses ([20–25 atm) in dialysis fistulas. However, I must admit that there is not yet striking evidence published regarding when and why to use cutting balloons in dialysis fistulas, although my daily practice and gut feeling tell me that highly resistant lesions do benefit from them and the technique is safe. Cutting balloons, however, are expensive, difficult to manufacture, and not very easy to handle. To ensure that we will keep this interesting and—in the eyes of many—important interventional tool in our hands, we have, finally, to start to ask the right questions. It is not surprising that there is no statistical difference between cutting ballons and conventional balloons in a general cohort of dialysis lesions. Patency in these lesions is influenced by a large number of factors, and probably huge cohorts need to be investigated to find a statistical difference—if that is possible. What we need to focus on is determining whether the subgroup of lesions which are resistant to high pressures, 20 atm—which have to be considered technical failures of conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty—will benefit from cutting balloon angioplasty regarding patency and whether there is also a long-term advantage over extreme pressure balloon angioplasty. These results, which should be gained in a prospective, randomized, and multicenter fashion, are warranted to guarantee the further availability of the fascinating tool of cutting balloon angioplasty in our hands.

Cutting balloon angioplasty of autogenous infrainguinal bypasses: Short-term safety and efficacy

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty in the treatment of infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis. Data from a prospective database, supplemented by chart review, were obtained on all patients who underwent cutting balloon angioplasty of lower extremity vein bypass grafts at a single institution during a 4-year period. Noninvasive duplex ultrasound imaging of grafts, along with measurement of ankle-brachial indices and digital pressures, was performed on all patients before and after treatment with the cutting balloon. Efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty and procedural complications were analyzed. Data from noninvasive vascular testing were compared using the two-tailed paired Student t test. Patency rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in patency rates were compared using the log-rank test. From July 2002 to February 2006, 109 cutting balloon angioplasties were performed on 70 bypasses in 61 patients. There were 12 complications in 109 procedures (11%), only one of which required immediate operative intervention. Initial technical success was 96%. Noninvasive vascular testing indicators significantly improved immediately after intervention: peak systolic graft velocity decreased from 360 +/- 158 cm/s to 143 +/- 67 cm/s (P < .001), ankle-brachial index improved from 0.55 +/- 0.3 to 0.85 +/- 0.2 (P < .001), and digital pressure increased from 31 +/- 30 mm Hg to 62 +/- 32 mm Hg (P < .001). Patency rates at 6 months according to the Kaplan-Meier method were primary patency, 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.60); assisted primary patency, 72% (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.83); and secondary patency, 99% (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00). At 6 months, cumulative limb salvage was 94% (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.00). Cutting balloon angioplasty of infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis is technically feasible but is associated with a relatively high complication rate and a relatively low short-term patency rate.

Primary Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Venous Stenoses in Native Hemodialysis Fistulas: Long-Term Results from Three Centers

To evaluate the technical success and patency rates following primary cutting balloon angioplasty for venous stenoses in native dialysis fistulas. Forty-one patients (26 men, 15 women; age range 26-82 years, average age 59 years) underwent 50 (repeat procedures in 9 patients) primary cutting balloon (PCB) angioplasty procedures in three institutions by three primary operators. The indication was primary stenosis in 21 patients, recurrent lesions in 15, and immature fistulas in 5. A PCB was used alone in 17 cases, but was followed by a larger standard balloon in 33 cases. Follow-up included ultrasound, flow analysis and urea reduction ratio, and ranged from 2 to 30 months (mean 14 months). The technical success rate was 98%. All procedures were relatively painless. Two PCBs burst and 4 leaked, but without causing any morbidity. Nineteen fistulas were still working at last follow-up. Primary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months using Kaplan-Meier analysis were 88%, 73%, and 34%, respectively, and the primary assisted patencies were 90%, 75%, and 50%, respectively. PCB angioplasty has high technical success and low complication rates. The long-term patency rates are favorable for PCB angioplasty and compare favorably with other series.

Angioplasty of Long Venous Stenoses in Hemodialysis Access: At Last an Indication for Cutting Balloon?

To compare the postintervention primary patency rates of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) with those of conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of hemodialysis-related stenoses at least 2 cm long. This retrospective and controlled study included 29 patients with a hemodialysis-related stenosis at least 2 cm long. From August 2002 to August 2003, nine patients (PTA group, six upper-arm and three forearm fistulas) were treated with a conventional balloon (5-8 mm, 4 cm long). From September 2003 to December 2005, 20 patients (CBA group, 12 upper-arm and seven forearm fistulas; one polytetrafluoroethylene hemodialysis graft) were treated with a cutting balloon (5-7 mm, 1 cm long). The median follow-up was 22.1 months for the CBA group and 15.6 months for the PTA group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the primary cumulative patency rates, and the log-rank test was used for comparison. Multivariate Cox models were generated by combining three variables: patient age, stenosis length, and treatment type (CBA or PTA). In the CBA group, the postintervention primary patency was 85% +/- 16 at 6 months, 70% +/- 20 at 1 year, and 32% +/- 26 at 18 months. In the PTA group, the postintervention primary patency was 56% +/- 32 at 6 months and 21% (range, 0%-53%) at 1 year. When comparing PTA versus CBA with the log-rank test, there was a statistically significant difference (P = .009). With the multivariate Cox models, treatment was again a statistically significant (P = .007) determinant of primary patency; patient age and stenosis length were not. The use of a cutting balloon as the first-line treatment for stenoses at least 2 cm long significantly improves the postintervention primary patency rate.

Treatment of reoccurring instent restenosis following reintervention after stent‐supported renal artery angioplasty

Reoccurrence of restenosis following angioplasty of renal instent restenosis is a considerable drawback of stent-supported angioplasty of renal artery stenosis especially in small vessel diameters. We therefore prospectively studied the long-term outcome of different techniques of endovascular treatment of reoccurrence of instent renal artery restenosis after primarily successful reangioplasty focusing on the impact of covered and drug eluting stents, respectively. The study included 31 consecutive patients (33 lesions) presenting with their at least second instent restenosis following renal artery stenting who were included in a prospective follow-up program (mean follow-up 36+/-25 months, range 1-85). Primary endpoint of the study was the reoccurrence rate of instent stenosis after primarily successful treatment of instent restenosis determined by duplex ultrasound. Primary success rate was 100%, no major complication occurred. Seven lesions were treated with balloon angioplasty (21%, group 1), 7 lesions with stent-in-stent placement (21%, group 2), 6 lesions with placement of a covered stent (18%, group 3), 3 lesions with a cutting balloon (9%, group 4), and 10 lesions with placement of a drug eluting stent (31%, group 5). During follow-up, overall 12 lesions (36%) developed reoccurrence of instent restenosis: n=5 in group 1 (reoccurrence rate 71%), n=3 in group 2 (43%), n=1 in group3 (17%), 3 in group 4 (100%), and n=0 in group 5 (0%). Treatment with a cutting balloon was the only significant predictor of restenosis (hazard ratio 32.3 (95% CI, 3.3-315.0); P<0.001). Treatment of at least second renal artery instent restenosis is feasible and safe. Balloon angioplasty and the implantation of a bare metal stent, a covered stent, or a drug eluting stent seemed to offer favorable long-term patency, whereas cutting balloon angioplasty resulted in a very high rate of restenoses and should therefore be discouraged for this indication.

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty in Children with Resistant Renal Artery Stenosis

Children with systemic hypertension resulting from a renovascular stenosis commonly have fibromuscular dysplasia and respond to percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA). There is a subset of children, however, with conditions that appear to be resistant to PTRA (eg, syndromic renal artery stenosis and arteritis). These patients are often treated surgically. The development of the cutting balloon may provide a minimally invasive alternative to surgery in these individuals. Associated adverse events may include recurrent stenosis, arterial occlusion with renal loss, and arterial rupture with extravasation and pseudoaneurysm formation. Some of these adverse events can be successfully treated with percutaneous interventional techniques. The authors present four cases of cutting balloon angioplasty performed at two large metropolitan children's hospitals in children with resistant renal artery stenosis.

Angioplasty for Non-arteriosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: The Efficacy of Cutting Balloon Angioplasty Versus Conventional Angioplasty

We examined the efficacy of conventional balloon angioplasty and cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) for the treatment of non-arteriosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). From 1993 to 2005, 20 patients underwent 27 percutaneous transluminal renalangioplasty (PTRA) for non-arteriosclerotic RAS (men: 8, women: 12, 25.5 +/- 2 years old; 16 fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), 4 Takayasu disease). We evaluated the efficacy of CBA by comparing the rate of initial technical success and surgical conversion. Before the clinical authorization of CBA, three of twelve patients (25 %) underwent surgical bypass due to the failure of PTRA due to the hardness of the lesion. After the approval of cutting balloon, we performed CBA in four cases (2 FMD,2 Takayasu disease) to dilate hard lesions, within which a properly sized balloon could not dilate due to their hardness, or to reduce the risk of local dissection. Initial successes were obtained in all patients (8/8, 100%) and none of the patients underwent surgical conversion. Despite of the good initial result, restenosis was observed in three cases within 6 month (3/4, 75%). Additional interventions were performed in all patients, then, the severity of the restenotic lesion was found not to be exceeded comparing with the initial lesion. The cutting balloon angioplasty may be safe and useful procedure for hard lesions of RAS caused by non-arteriosclerotic disease? especially fibromuscular dysplasia. The cutting balloon may provide the initial success, but the effect on long-term patency is still controversial.

Cutting-balloon angioplasty effectively facilitates the interventional procedure and leads to a low rate of recurrent stenosis in ostial bifurcation coronary lesions: A subgroup analysis of the NICECUT multicenter registry

Background Displacement of plaque is a major concern during coronary intervention of ostial bifurcation lesions. For this reason, angioplasty involves complex stenting procedures, which may trigger development of restenosis in a previously non-diseased parent vessel. Objectives To examine, whether plaque displacement may be prevented by scoring atherosclerotic plaque with a cutting-balloon (CB) stand-alone procedure. Methods Data of patients with Duke E and B type ostial bifurcation lesions (≥ 70% stenosis involving a diagonal and/or marginal branch > 2 mm deriving from a non-diseased parent vessel), who were treated with CB as stand-alone procedure within the prospective NICECUT multicenter trial were analyzed. Primary endpoint was the rate of binary stenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were procedural success and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6-months follow-up. Results 63 out of 65 lesions (56 patients) were successfully amenable to treatment with CB (96.4% procedural success). 76.9% of patients were successfully treated with CB as a stand-alone procedure, while provisional stenting was necessary in 23.1%. At follow-up, binary stenosis was found in 23.2%, among the total population. Total rate of TLR and MACE were 7.7% and 3.6%, respectively, compared to 4.0% and 2.0% in patients for whom CB stand-alone procedure was feasible, while it was 20.0% and 6.7% for stented lesions. Conclusions CB angioplasty as a stand-alone procedure may facilitate interventional treatment of ostial bifurcation lesions and may help to avoid complex stenting procedures. It is associated with a low rate of binary stenosis and TLR.

Transvenous Implantation of a Coronary Sinus Lead for Left Ventricular Pacing After Cutting Balloon Angioplasty

We describe a patient in whom a localized proximal vein stenosis at the only possible target vein precluded placement of a coronary sinus lead for left ventricular (LV) pacing. After multiple attempts to perform venoplasty with both compliant and noncompliant balloons, a cutting balloon relieved the obstruction, and an LV pacing lead was successfully placed in the midportion of this lateral vein.

Primary Patency with Cutting and Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Different Types of Hemodialysis Access Stenosis

To compare primary patency rates of cutting balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (hereafter, cutting PTA) and conventional balloon PTA (hereafter, conventional PTA) in the treatment of different types of hemodialysis access stenosis. The institutional review board approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained for the prospective component of this study and waived for the retrospective component. Patients in whom treatment with cutting PTA alone or conventional PTA alone was clinically successful formed the two study groups. Primary patency for the lesion was defined as uninterrupted patency of the treated site after balloon PTA. A site was no longer considered patent when the patient underwent treatment for hemodialysis access failure due to restenosis of the treated site. Primary patency rates for lesions were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method according to the type of stenosis. We compared the two groups by using the log-rank test to determine statistical significance. In the cutting PTA group, 62 patients with 77 stenoses (32 men, 30 women; mean age, 65.5 years +/- 10.1 [standard deviation]) achieved clinical success. In the conventional PTA group, 52 patients with 68 stenoses (23 men, 29 women; mean age, 61.9 years +/- 10.2) achieved clinical success. In patients with autogenous venous stenosis, no significant difference in the primary patency rate was noted between groups (P = .369). In patients with graft-to-vein anastomotic stenosis, the primary patency rate was significantly higher for cutting PTA than for conventional PTA (P = .39). In patients with intragraft stenosis, no significant difference in the primary patency rate was noted between groups (P = .379). In patients with in-stent restenosis, no significant difference in the primary patency rate was noted between groups (P = .923). Primary patency rates are significantly higher for cutting PTA in the treatment of graft-to-vein anastomotic stenosis; however, no significant differences in primary patency rates exist between these PTAs in the treatment of autogenous venous stenosis, intragraft stenosis, or in-stent restenosis.

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Failing Infra-inguinal Vein Grafts: Comparative Study of Short- and Mid-Term Primary Patency Rates

To evaluate the results of a recent change in practice in our institution using cutting balloon angioplasty instead of standard balloon angioplasty as the primary treatment for failing infra-inguinal vein bypass grafts. In this nonrandomized cohort study with a historical control, failing infra-inguinal vein grafts were identified at duplex surveillance or clinical examination. Patients had confirmatory arteriography and balloon angioplasty at the same attendance. Interventions proximal or distal to the graft itself and prosthetic grafts were not included. Patients were entered into a duplex graft surveillance program. Initial assessment of technical success was duplex or improvement 4-6 weeks after the primary angioplasty. Twenty-seven consecutive patients were treated with standard balloon angioplasty, then 11 consecutive patients were treated with cutting balloon angioplasty. Initial technical success was 74% for the standard balloon versus 82% for the cutting balloon. The primary patency rate at 6 months was 16/26 (62%) for standard balloon angioplasty and 8/10 (80%) for cutting balloon angioplasty (p = 0.44). The primary patency rate at 12 months was 9/25 (36%) for standard balloon angioplasty and 5/10 (50%) for cutting balloon angioplasty (p = 0.47). The use of cutting balloons for primary angioplasty of infra-inguinal vein grafts offers no definite advantage over standard balloon angioplasty in this institution or compared with patency rates after standard balloon angioplasty reported elsewhere. Larger multicenter studies would be required to demonstrate whether there was any real difference between the two techniques.

Recanalization of Infrainguinal Vessels: Silverhawk, Laser, and the Remote Superficial Femoral Artery Endarterectomy

There are multiple endovascular options to achieve percutaneous revascularization of chronic superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenoses and occlusions. Most rely on forceful displacement of plaque via balloon angioplasty, either as a stand-alone therapy or supplemented by cold thermal injury (cryoplasty), microtome assistance (cutting balloon angioplasty), nitinol stent deployment, or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-lined nitinol stent deployment. Excellent technical success rates are routinely described in the literature. The essential problem associated with these techniques is the predictable compromise of the initial result by neointimal hyperplasia leading to poor long-term results. An alternative to forceful displacement techniques is use of directional atherectomy or excimer laser to debulk the atheromatous lesion, with the addition of low-pressure angioplasty or stent deployment as needed. Currently, directional atherectomy is performed using the Silverhawk Plaque Excision System (FoxHollow, Redwood City, CA), while laser atherectomy is frequently performed with the CLIRpath Excimer Laser (Spectranetics Corp., Colorado Springs, CO). While both techniques can be utilized for de novo atherosclerotic lesions, even eccentric lesions or ostial lesions, proponents of these devices have also shown good short-term results in the treatment of restenoses. Remote SFA endarterectomy with the Aspire stent (Vascular Architects, San Jose, CA) is a hybrid surgical and endovascular technique that is useful for debulking plaque from the SFA with adjunctive stenting of the distal SFA. We present a review of various alternative techniques to forceful balloon dilation used in the recanalization of the SFA with potential pitfalls and complications, along with a review of literature associated with each of these techniques.

Dilation of Renal Artery Stenosis after Administration of Losartan

Transluminal angioplasty with a balloon catheter is effective to dilate renal artery stenosis (RAS) caused by fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), but lesions resistant to the angioplasty exist. In this report, we describe the case of a young woman with RAS of FMD that was difficult to dilate even by cutting-balloon angioplasty. To facilitate the formation of a smooth intimal covering at the site of angioplasty, we administered losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, for 4 months after the angioplasty. Although re-stenosis was detected at 5 months after the angioplasty, the normotensive state continued without antihypertensives and the re-stenosis gradually dilated afterwards. The present case suggests the possibility of remodeling the renal artery during the normotensive state by administering losartan after the angioplasty.