Introduction: Microvascular function is maintained by a number of vasodilating factors, with nitric oxide (NO) and endothelial hyperpolarizing factors (EDHF) predominating. Advancing age is an independent risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease, and NO-mediated vasodilation declines, or is unchanged, depending on the vascular bed examined, number of cardiovascular risk factors, or specific endothelial-dependent agonist used. Mechanisms contributing to cutaneous microvascular dysfunction with age have been attributed largely to reductions in NO signaling, but the role of EDHF-mediated dilation, particularly to acetylcholine (ACh), remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the endothelial mechanisms contributing to age-induced cutaneous microvascular function and compare cutaneous microvascular function responses to those from isolated adipose arteriole preparations. We hypothesized that cutaneous microvascular vasodilation to ACh in older adults will be mediated primarily by EDHFs relative to young adults and that isolated adipose arteriole preparations will corroborate these findings. Methods: Four intradermal microdialysis fibers were placed in the skin of the ventral forearm of 9 young (3F/6M; 29±7 yrs) and 3 older adults (3F/0M; 59±11 yrs) for infusion of Ringer’s solution; L-NAME (10 mM), an NO synthase inhibitor; tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA; 50 mM), a non-specific K+ channel inhibitor; and a combination of L-NAME and TEA. Laser Doppler flowmetry and brachial mean arterial pressure were measured during infusion of ACh (10 mM and 100 mM) and in response to local heating to 39°C. Maximal vasodilation was assessed with heating to 43°C and infusion of sodium nitroprusside (28 mM). Adipose resistance arterioles for pressure myography were obtained from a gluteal biopsy or from surgical discard tissue, which were pre-constricted (ET-1), and ACh responses (10−9–10−4 M) were assessed in the presence of the above inhibitors. Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) and isolated arteriole responses are presented as % maximum vasodilation. Results: In response to local heating in young adults, L-NAME reduced vasodilator magnitude (Ringers 69.0±18.1% vs. L-NAME 30.3±12.1%; p< 0.05) while TEA did not have any effect (69±18% vs. 49±28%; p=0.20). Combined L-NAME and TEA reduced vasodilation (69±18% vs. 19±6%; p<0.05). Conversely, vasodilator magnitude to ACh was not different across the Ringers, L-NAME, or TEA sites (p=0.93-0.94), while combined inhibition of NOS and K+ channels with L-NAME and TEA, respectively, reduced vasodilator responsiveness (p<0.05). In isolated resistance arterioles, there were no differences in %max dilation to ACh across inhibitor sites (p=0.19) in young adults. In older adults, neither independent nor combined inhibition of NOS or K+ channels impacted vasodilator responses to local heating, while vasodilator magnitude to ACh was most impacted by combined inhibition with L-NAME and TEA (83±14% vs. 32±15%; p<0.05). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that vasodilator plasticity in response to local heating is divergent with advancing age, relying on non-NO or K+ mechanisms relative to young adults, while NO and K+ mechanisms are suffcient to maintain ACh-mediated vasodilation. These findings further support the concept of diversity in vasodilator mechanisms within the microvasculature. NHLBI K99-HL161491 (WEH), K08-HL150340 (JJM), R01-HL160752 (JKF), R01-HL133029 (AB), and NICHD R01-HD099340 (MJD). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.