Cutaneous Adverse Events Research Articles

Abstract 4052: Neutrophil recruitment and activation promotes cutaneous adverse effects with T cell immunotherapies

Abstract Immune-based therapies that induce tumor regression are often accompanied by immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which can occasionally present with severe and lethal symptoms. Currently, there are no well-defined preventative approaches to uncouple anti-tumor immunity from irAEs. Currently approved immunotherapies include agents that activate T cell responses, such as antibodies blocking immune checkpoints and infusion of tumor-derived, T cell receptor-transgenic or chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. While the beneficial and toxic effects of T cell-based therapies in the clinic are being extensively explored, the precise mechanisms underlying their activity remain the subject of investigation. In this study, we treated preclinical models of established melanomas with tumor-specific adoptive CD4+ T cell transfer in combination with T cell co-stimulation via OX40 agonism or CTLA-4 blockade. We found that, despite adequate T cell stimulation, acute local inflammation plays an important role in tumor elimination and the manifestation of irAEs. While stimulated T cells are necessary for initiating a therapeutic response, activation of endogenous neutrophils constitutes an important and necessary effector mechanism for both tumor destruction and the development of irAEs. Extensive neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were associated with irAEs. Furthermore, melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade with skin rashes equivalent to irAEs found in mice showed increased survival and NETs in biopsies from both rashes and tumors. Our results bring forward a novel paradigm where T cells prime an anti-tumor immune response that is followed by an inflammatory effector mechanism provided by the innate immune system, resulting in both curative and undesirable side effects in mice and patients. Citation Format: Daniel Hirschhorn, Lukas Kraehenbuehl, Sadna Budhu, Valeria Estrada Navarro, Levi Mark B Mangarin, Yacine Marouf, Jacob Ricca, Billel Gasmi, Olivier De Henau, Yanyun Li, Czrina Cortez, Hamadene Linda, Isabell Schulze, Cailian Liu, Katherine Panageas, Mario Lacuoture, Gabrielle A. Rizzuto, Mikala Egeblad, Jedd D. Wolchok, Taha Merghoub Merghoub. Neutrophil recruitment and activation promotes cutaneous adverse effects with T cell immunotherapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4052.

T-Cell Subtypes and Immune Signatures in Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events in Melanoma Patients under Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) improves outcomes in melanoma patients, but associated T-cell activation frequently leads to immune-related cutaneous adverse events (cutAEs). To dynamically identify T-cell subtypes and immune signatures associated with cutAEs, a pilot study was performed in stage III-IV melanoma patients using blood samples for flow cytometry and cytokine analysis. Blood samples were taken from patients before initiation of ICI (naive), at the onset of a cutAE, and after 6 months of ICI treatment. Overall, 30 patients were treated either with anti-PD1 monotherapy or with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy. Flow cytometry analysis of PBMCs showed that ICI induced an overall shift from a Th2 towards a Th1 profile. Twelve patients (40%) developed cutAEs, which were associated with increased Th22 cells and Th17 cells, supported by a tendency to have elevated Th17/Th22-associated cytokines such as IL-17A, IL-22 and IL-23 levels in the plasma. Cytokine signatures specific for urticaria and T-cell-mediated cutAEs were identified in the plasma of patients by a bead-based assay. IL-10 was elevated in non-responders and, interestingly, during cutAEs. In conclusion, we identified distinct immune signatures based on the Th17/Th22 pathway in cutAEs, both in PBMCs and plasma. In addition, our finding of upregulated IL-10 during cutAEs supports the notion of treating these patients early and adequately to avoid implications for the overall outcome.

Xevinapant Combined with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced, Pretreated, Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Phase Ib/II CATRIPCA Trial.

Xevinapant is an orally available inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) inhibitor. Preclinical data suggest that IAP antagonism may synergize with immune checkpoint blockers by modulating the NFκB pathway in immune cells. Adult patients with non-high microsatellite instability advanced/metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) or colorectal cancer were enrolled in this phase Ib/II study and received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks intravenously, and ascending doses of oral xevinapant (100, 150, and 200 mg daily for 14 days on/7 days off). Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design with a 21-day dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Following the determination of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), 14 patients with PDAC and 14 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled in expansion cohorts to assess preliminary efficacy. Forty-one patients (26 males) with a median age of 64 years were enrolled: 13 in the dose escalation and 28 in the two expansion cohorts. No DLT was observed during dose escalation. The RP2D was identified as xevinapant 200 mg/day + pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The most common adverse events (AE) were fatigue (37%), gastrointestinal AE (decreased appetite in 37%, nausea in 24%, stomatitis in 12%, and diarrhea and vomiting in 10% each), and cutaneous AE (pruritus, dry skin, and rash seen in 20%, 15%, and 15% of patients, respectively). The best overall response according to RECIST1.1 was partial response (confirmed) in 1 (3%), stable disease in 4 (10%), and progressive disease in 35 (88%). Xevinapant combined with pembrolizumab was well tolerated with no unexpected AEs. However, antitumor activity was low.

Efficacy and predictors of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with gallbladder cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising efficacy in multiple cancers including biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, the data focusing on the efficacy of ICIs in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still limited. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy of ICIs in GBC and explore the clinicopathologic and molecular markers associated with ICI benefit. We retrospective analyzed 69 GBC patients who had received ICI therapy between January 2016 and December 2020. Tumor samples were obtained for genomic sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.4 months and 8.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that alcohol intake history, carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥100 U/mL, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. CEA level ≥100 U/mL and cutaneous irAEs were independent prognostic factors for OS. The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.9% and 37.7%, respectively. Patients with cutaneous irAEs, high CD8+ T cell infiltrated or immune inflamed GBCs had higher DCR. Patients with high CD8+ T cell infiltrated or immune inflamed GBCs also had a notably improved prognosis. These results suggest that ICIs were effective in patients with GBC. High CEA level, cutaneous irAEs, high CD8+ T cell infiltration, and immune inflamed phenotype could be useful for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in GBC.

Network pharmacology and molecular docking to explore the mechanism of a clinical proved recipe for external use of clearing heat and removing dampness in the treatment of immune-related cutaneous adverse events.

Immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) will undermine the patients' quality of lives, and interrupt the antitumor therapy. A clinical proved recipe for external use of clearing heat and removing dampness (Qing-Re-Li-Shi Formula, hereinafter referred to as "QRLSF") is beneficial to the treatment of ircAEs in clinical practice. Our study will elucidate the mechanism of QRLSF against ircAEs based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. The active components and corresponding targets of QRLSF were collected through traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database. GeneCards, online Mendelian inheritance in man, and pharmacogenomics knowledgebase were used to screen the targets of ircAEs. The intersecting targets between drug and disease were acquired by venn analysis. Cytoscape software was employed to construct "components-targets" network. Search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins database was applied to establish the protein-protein interaction network and then its core targets were identified. Gene ontology and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes analysis was performed to predict the mechanism. The molecular docking verification of key targets and related phytomolecules was accomplished by AutoDock Vina software. Thirty-nine intersecting targets related to QRLSF against ircAEs were recognized. The analysis of network clarified 5 core targets (STAT3, RELA, TNF, TP53, and NFKBIA) and 4 key components (quercetin, apigenin, luteolin, and ursolic acid). The activity of QRLSF against ircAEs could be attributed to the regulation of multiple biological effects via multi-pathways (PI3K-Akt pathway, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, JAK-STAT pathway, chemokine pathway, Th17 cell differentiation, IL-17 pathway, TNF pathway, and Toll-like receptor pathway). The binding activities were estimated as good level by molecular docking. These discoveries disclosed the multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway characteristics of QRLSF against ircAEs, providing a new strategy for such medical problem.

Cutaneous toxicities of mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors in children and young adults with neurofibromatosis-1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder which commonly causes neoplasms leading to disfigurement or dysfunction. Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors (MEKi) are generally well-tolerated treatments which target neural tumor progression in patients with NF1. However, cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) are common and may hinder patients' abilities to remain on treatment, particularly in children. We aim to characterize CAEs secondary to MEKi treatment in pediatric and young adult patients with NF1. We reviewed institutional medical records of patients under 30 years with a diagnosis of "NF1," "NF2," or "other neurofibromatoses" on MEKi therapy between January 1, 2019 and June 1, 2022. We recorded the time-to-onset, type, and distribution of CAEs, non-cutaneous adverse events (AEs), AE management, and tumor response. Our cohort consisted of 40 patients with NF1 (median age, 14 years). Tumor types included low-grade gliomas (51%) and plexiform neurofibromas (38%). MEKi used included selumetinib (69%), trametinib (25%), and mirdametinib (6%). A total of 74 CAEs occurred, with 28 cases of acneiform rash (38%). Other common CAEs were paronychia, seborrheic dermatitis, eczema, xerosis, and oral mucositis. The most common treatments included oral antibiotics and topical corticosteroids. Most patients had clinical (stable or improved) tumor response (71%) while 29% had tumor progression while on a MEKi. There was no significant association between CAE presence and tumor response (p = 0.39). Improvement in characterization of MEKi toxicities and their management is important to develop treatment guidelines for pediatric and young adult patients with NF1 on MEKi therapy.

Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Heparin-Induced Bullous Hemorrhagic Dermatosis

Background. Heparin-induced bullous hemorrhagic dermatosis (HBHD) is a rare cutaneous adverse effect of heparin and has unclear clinical features. We explored the clinical features of HBHD to provide evidence for the safe use of heparin. Methods. We collected HBHD-related case reports for a retrospective analysis by searching the Chinese and English databases from inception to December 31, 2022. Results. Seventy-two patients, including 51 males (70.8%), were included, and they had a median age of 71.5 years (range: 21, 94). Low-molecular-weight heparin was used in 62 patients (86.1%), and unfractionated heparin was used in 10 patients (13.9%). The median time for HBHD to appear was 7 days (range: 0.25, 270). Lesions appeared far from the injection site, and the extremities (57 patients, 79.2%) were the most frequently involved site. The blisters were mainly located in the intraepidermal (34 patients, 47.2%), subcorneal (10 patients, 13.9%), and subepidermal (9 patients, 12.5%) regions. Thirty-seven patients (51.4%) had no obvious dermal inflammatory infiltration, and 20 patients (27.8%) had lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration. Sixty-seven patients (93.1%) recovered from their skin lesions after the discontinuation of heparin or despite continuing heparin and at a median treatment time of 14 days (range: 2, 141). Conclusion. HBHD is a rare self-limiting disease that occurs far from the injection site. Clinicians should be aware of BHD during the administration of heparin. Heparin can be discontinued or continued depending on the patient’s condition.

Management of cutaneous adverse events caused by antineoplastic therapies: a single-center experience.

Cutaneous adverse events can occur in patients treated with antineoplastic treatments, albeit their incidence has not been defined yet. The clinical presentation of CAEs related to anticancer treatments can vary. The purpose of our study is to characterize skin toxicities during oncological treatments, manage such adverse events to improve patients' quality of life, and ensure therapeutic adherence. We conducted a single-center prospective study which provided the enrollment of all patients referred to the Skin Toxicity Outpatient Clinic for the occurrence of cutaneous adverse events secondary to an ongoing antineoplastic treatment, between July 2021 and June 2023. We analyzed clinical features, and we described our therapeutic approach. Based on the type of drug assumed, chemotherapy-induced skin toxicity in 24 (38.7%) of the 62 evaluated patients, target therapies in 18 (29.0%), CDK4/6 cyclin inhibitors in 12 (19.4%), and immunotherapy in 6 (9.7%), while skin adverse events secondary to hormone therapy were seen in two patients. The most common cutaneous adverse event in our experience was rosaceiform rash of the face, followed by eczematous rash, hand-foot syndrome, and folliculitis. The present study is aimed at describing the variability and heterogeneity of clinical manifestations of different pharmacological classes used in oncological patients, as well as the different pathogenesis of skin damage. Chemotherapy very frequently causes skin toxicities that are often underestimated by clinicians. Their adequate recognition and optimal treatment lead to total recovery and allow better adhesion to chemotherapy.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events: incidence rates, risk factors and association with extracutaneous toxicity - a prospective study of 189 patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors at a Spanish tertiary care hospital.

Clinicians are increasingly prescribing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat cancer, but the real-world incidence, characteristics and risk factors of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are unclear. To determine the incidence, features and risk factors of cirAEs and to measure their possible association with extracutaneous toxicity. We conducted a prospective observational study in a Spanish tertiary care hospital, including people who started an ICI between March 2020 and May 2022. We used a survival analysis and a log-rank test to obtain and compare incidence rates, and a multivariate Cox model to detect risk factors for cirAEs. We included 189 patients, 82 (43.4%) of whom presented cutaneous toxicity. The incidence of cirAEs was 75.0 per 100 person-years, with a 50.0% probability of the appearance of a cirAE at 10 months of follow-up. The most frequent cirAE category was inflammatory dermatoses, and the most frequent types were pruritus, eczema and maculopapular eruptions. ICI combination therapy, a family history of psoriasis and rheumatological and pulmonary immune-related adverse events increased the risk of cirAEs. We found a high incidence of cirAEs, and they occurred early in the follow-up period. Dermatologists should be involved in the management of cirAEs, especially in people with risk factors.

Cancer type and histology influence cutaneous immunotherapy toxicities: a multi-institutional cohort study.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are the most common toxicities to occur in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Identifying patients who are at increased risk of developing cirAEs may improve quality of life and outcomes. To investigate the influence of cancer type and histology on the development of cirAEs in the setting of ICI therapy and survival outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included patients recruited between 1 December 2011 and 30 October 2020. They received ICI from 2011 to 2020 with follow-up of outcomes through October 2021. We identified 3668 recipients of ICI therapy who were seen at Massachusetts General Brigham and Dana-Farber. Of these, 669 developed cirAEs. Records that were incomplete or categories of insufficient sample size were excluded from the study cohort. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the impact of cancer organ system and histology on cirAE development, after adjusting for demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ICI type, cancer stage at ICI initiation, and year of ICI initiation. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to examine the impact of cirAE development on mortality. Compared with other nonepithelial cancers (neuroendocrine, leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloma, sarcoma and central nervous system malignancies), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma [cSCC; hazard ratio (HR) 3.57, P < 0.001], melanoma (HR 2.09, P < 0.001), head and neck adenocarcinoma (HR 2.13, P = 0.009), genitourinary transitional cell carcinoma (HR 2.15, P < 0.001) and genitourinary adenocarcinoma (HR 1.53, P = 0.037) were at significantly higher risk of cirAEs in multivariate analyses. The increased risk of cirAEs translated into an adjusted survival benefit for melanoma (HR 0.37, P < 0.001) and cSCC (HR 0.51, P = 0.011). The highest rate of cirAEs and subsequent survival benefits were observed in cutaneous malignancies treated with ICI therapies. This study improves our understanding of patients who are at highest risk of developing cirAEs and would, therefore, benefit from appropriate counselling and closer monitoring by their oncologists and dermatologists throughout their ICI therapy. Limitations include its retrospective nature and cohort from one geography.

Antitubercular drug-induced lichen planus: A case study with a mini literature review.

Drug-induced lichen planus is a cutaneous adverse effect that manifests as a systemic eruption of flat-topped, erythematous, or violaceous papules resembling lichen planus on the trunk and extremities. Although antitubercular therapy has been linked to cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions, the literature on such cases is scarce. Here, we present a case to contribute to this field, reporting on its presentation and management, and reviewing previous case studies. Our patient, a 63-year-old male, presented with black pigmented patches on the skin, having been diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and on antitubercular therapy for the past two months. A diagnosis of ATT-induced lichen planus was made, and all ATT was stopped. The patient was treated with antihistamines, apremilast, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids, and rechallenge of each drug was performed consecutively. No new lesions appeared after rechallenge with isoniazid and rifampicin. However, ethambutol was not reintroduced due to strong suspicion, by exclusion, that it was the offending agent, whereas on rechallenge with isoniazid and rifampicin, the patient's skin lesions gradually improved with eventual resolution of hyperpigmentation. Lichenoid drug eruptions are characterized by type IV hypersensitivity reactions, and rechallenge is required to ensure safer treatment since the risk of disseminated and multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis increases with the cessation of antitubercular therapy.

Timing of cutaneous immune-related adverse events impacts survival in patients with cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A multi-institutional cohort study

Timing of cutaneous immune-related adverse events impacts survival in patients with cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A multi-institutional cohort study

Association of CirAEs and Efficacy in NSCLC Patients Treated with PD-1/PD-L1: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.

To systematically evaluate the relationship between cutaneous immunerelated adverse events (cirAEs) and the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to provide an evidence-based reference for the clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 and safety evaluation. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were screened systematically to collect prospective or retrospective cohort studies on the correlation between cirAEs and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 in the treatment of NSCLC. A total of 3514 participants were included in 13 cohort studies (enclosing an ambidirectional cohort study). Outcomes revealed that compared with those patients with non cirAEs, patients suffering cirAEs were associated with significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) [risk ratio (RR): 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-2.14, P<0.00001], longer progressionfree survival (PFS) [RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.45-0.60, P<0.00001], and longer overall survival (OS) [RR:0.46, 95% CI: 0.38-0.56]. Sensitivity analyses through the exclusion of one study at a time did not significantly influence the outcomes, indicating that the meta-analysis results were relatively robust. Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed consistent results in the study design (prospective or retrospective cohort studies), as well as in the endpoint results (PFS and OS) of Kaplan-Meier curves or Cox proportional hazards regression for evaluable patients. Currently, evidence reveals that cirAEs development may be associated with a good prognosis and can be an early predictor of the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 in the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Ribociclib-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Events in Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: Incidence, Multidisciplinary Management, and Prognostic Implication.

Ribociclib is approved for hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treatment, in combination with endocrine therapy. Hematological, hepatic, and cardiac adverse events (AEs) emerged from pivotal trials, but little is known about cutaneous adverse events (CAEs). We report data from a retrospective cohort study of all patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated with ribociclib at Humanitas Cancer Center between June 2017 and December 2022. We recorded clinical-pathological data, the incidence, and treatment of ribociclib-related CAEs. These were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE v5.0 classification. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. Thirteen of 91 patients (14.3%) experienced treatment-related CAEs (mean time to the occurrence: 3.9 months). The most frequent CAEs were eczematous dermatitis (53.8%) and maculo-papular reaction (15.4%). Itch was reported by all 13 patients. The grade was G3 in 8 cases, G2 in 4, and G1 in 1. An integrated approach based on ribociclib dose modulation and dermatological interventions (oral antihistamine, moisturized cream, topical, and/or systemic steroids) could prevent ribociclib discontinuation in most patients. At a median follow-up of 20 months, the median PFS was 13 months (range, 1-66) with a better PFS curves for patients experiencing CAEs (P = .04). We mapped frequency and types of ribociclib-induced CAEs. An interdisciplinary management of CAEs incorporated into routine care may reduce the rate of drug discontinuation thus potentially contributing to better long-term outcomes.

The impact of COVID-19 vaccine reactions on secondary vaccine hesitancy

BackgroundPrimary and booster vaccinations are critical for mitigating COVID-19 transmission, morbidity, and mortality. Future booster vaccine campaigns rely on an increased understanding of vaccine hesitancy. ObjectiveTo evaluate self-reported allergic and skin vaccine reactions as factors potentially associated with vaccine hesitancy in a nationwide vaccine allergy registry. MethodsResponses to survey questions concerning COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, coded from free text by 2 independent reviewers. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between changed negative perception and respondent demographics, vaccination history, and reaction characteristics. ResultsA total of 993 individuals (median of 46 years [IQR, 36-59], 88% female, 82% White) self-reported reactions to COVID-19 vaccination. Reactions included the following: delayed large local skin reaction (40%), hives/urticaria (32%), immediate large local skin reaction (3%), swelling (3%), anaphylaxis (2%), and other or unspecified (20%). Most respondents were initially unconcerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines (56%). After reactions, 401 of 993 (40%) report negative change in perception of vaccination, with more than half of these respondents (n = 211, 53%) citing their reasoning as a negative experience with adverse effects. Of 102 individuals asked about future vaccination, 79 (77%) indicated that they were unlikely or very unlikely to receive future COVID-19 vaccinations. Increased negative perception after reaction was associated with younger age, later COVID-19 vaccination dose number, and reaction type. ConclusionOur findings reveal that an individual's experience with allergic or cutaneous adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination affects attitudes and decision-making regarding future vaccination, even in initially non-hesitant individuals. Further investigation of secondary vaccine hesitancy is necessary for adapting public health messaging to this important population.

Multi-center retrospective review of vitiligo-like lesions in breast cancer patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors.

Cutaneous adverse effects from cyclin-dependent 4 and 6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) used in metastatic breast cancer are prevalent and well described. Vitiligo-like lesions have been reported and are rare. They can negatively impact patients' quality of life and may be associated with survival benefits. We describe the clinical characteristics of vitiligo-like lesions in an international cohort of patients treated with CDK4/6i to help improve recognition and management. Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with vitiligo-like lesions from CDK4/6i from five academic institutions in the USA and Europe was performed. Ten patients were included in the study. Median age of our patients was 55 (range 37-86). Median progression-free survival was 24months in 5 patients. The median time to rash was 10months. Sun-exposed areas such as the arms and face were the most affected areas. Multiple skin-directed therapies such as topicals, laser, and phototherapy were trialed with minor success. Mild repigmentation was seen in one patient treated with ruxolitinib cream. CDK4/6 treatment was discontinued due to the vitiligo-like lesions in one patient. Clinical characteristics are similar to previously reported findings in case reports and series. We add topical ruxolitinib as a potential treatment option for these patients and include data regarding progression-free survival that should continue to be collected. No definitive conclusions can be made regarding survival benefits from our cohort. Clinicians should refer these patients to dermatologists to aid with management.

Incidence of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Containing Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many cancers, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are among the most frequently encountered toxic effects. Understanding the incidence and prognostic associations of cirAEs is of importance as their uses in different settings, combinations, and tumor types expand. To evaluate the incidence of cirAEs and their association with outcome measures across a variety of ICI regimens and cancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or other ICIs in patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Key findings of our study include variable cirAE incidence among tumors and ICI regimens, positive association with increased cirAE incidence and response rate, as well as significant association between increased vitiligo incidence and overall survival. Across 174 studies, rash, pruritis, and vitiligo were the most reported cirAEs, with incidences of 16.7%, 18.0%, and 6.6%, respectively. Higher incidence of cirAEs was associated with ICI combination regimens and with CTLA-4-containing regimens, particularly with higher doses of ipilimumab, as compared to PD-1/L1 monotherapies. Outcome measures including response rate and progression-free survival were positively correlated with incidence of cirAEs. The response rate and incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash were associated with expected rises in incidence of 0.17% (p = 0.0238), 0.40% (p = 0.0010), and 0.18% (p = 0.0413), respectively. Overall survival was positively correlated with the incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash; this association was significant for vitiligo (p = 0.0483). Our analysis provides benchmark incidence rates for cirAEs and links cirAEs with favorable treatment outcomes at a study level across diverse solid tumors and multiple ICI regimens.

Facial Papulopustular Eruption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with EGFR Inhibitors.

Papulopustular rash (PPR) is the most frequent cutaneous adverse event during treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRis). Although often mild in severity, it can impair patients' quality of life and may also be a reason for discontinuing or changing the dose of the antineoplastic treatment. During COVID-19 pandemics, the use of surgical masks drastically increased and it had an impact on the face skin microenvironment, favoring the worsening of dermatological pathologies. We reported the relapse of PPR in patients treated with EGFR inhibitors who consistently wore face masks (>6 hours/day). All the patients developed the PPR within 6 months of starting mask use. Compared to the PPR occurred previously, after mask use, the skin eruption was more severe and affected mainly those regions of the face which came into contact with the mask. Patients received topical or systemic treatment, obtaining complete response in 65.7% of the cases. The establishment of an early treatment for the PPR allows continuing the oncologic treatment, without any suspension which could result in a decreased oncologic outcome. In conclusion, when using these devices, it is recommended to use special precautions, particularly in oncologic patients, by using a daily prophylactic skincare and replacing masks regularly with regular and frequent breaks.

Effectiveness and tolerability of chlormethine gel for the management of mycosis fungoides: a multicenter real-life evaluation.

Topical chlormethine (CL) is recommended as a first-line treatment for early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) and in 2017, the European Medicines Agency approved the CL gel formulation to treat adult patients. More recently, to increase patient compliance and adherence, clinicians have developed flexible protocols that allow the concomitant use of CL gel with topical corticosteroids in daily practice regimens. Therefore, sharing real-life data on CL gel use and side effects management may help improve the use of this agent. To expand knowledge about the actual use of CL gel in patients with MF, the present study assessed the improvement of MF skin lesions after CL gel treatment and provided information on the management of cutaneous adverse events (AEs) in a real-life setting. This was an Italian retrospective study conducted among six dermatology referral centers. Patients ≥18 years affected by MF and in treatment with CL gel (160 µ/g), alone or in combination according to routine clinical practice, between December 2019 and December 2021 were considered. The study's primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of CL gel in terms of overall response rate (ORR) after 3 months of treatment. A total of 79 patients (61% male) with different stages of MF (84% early stage) were included. CL gel was prescribed mainly in association with topical corticosteroids (66% of patients). ORR after 3 months of treatment was 42%, with no differences between early- and advanced-stage MF. Response rates improved over time up to 97% after 18 months of treatment. Overall, 66 AEs were reported in 67% of patients; most were hyperpigmentation (45%) and irritant contact dermatitis (37%). Six AEs led to treatment discontinuation, and five out of six (83%) patients who reported these events resumed treatment after interruption. No AEs were classified as severe. Our observations support the use of CL gel in patients with early- and advanced-stage MF, making it a valuable treatment option.

Disease activity of patients with chronic urticaria receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

Cutaneous adverse events after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine were identified. The disease activity of urticaria after a COVID-19 vaccine has never been explored in chronic urticaria patients. To evaluate disease activity of chronic urticaria after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in chronic urticaria patients aged 18 or above who visited Siriraj Hospital between July and September 2021, and received the first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccine. The status prior to vaccination, including disease activity, disease control and disease severity was assessed by a urticaria activity score over seven days, urticaria control test, and modified medication score. The disease activity after vaccination was recorded. A total of 130 patients with a mean age of 45.9 ± 14.7 were enrolled in this study. Adenoviral and inactivated vaccines were administered to 85 (65.4%) and 45 patients (34.6%), respectively. Exacerbation was reported in 20 cases (15.4%) after the first dose and 17 cases (13.1%) after the second dose. Nine patients (45%) reported exacerbation after both the first and second dose. The majority of patients only had wheal, while three patients reported wheal with angioedema. No anaphylaxis was reported. Factor predicting exacerbation was concurrent thyroid disease (aRR 2.78, p < 0.01). Approximately 15% of chronic urticaria patients reported exacerbation after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. No serious events were observed. Chronic urticaria patients should be vaccinated against COVID-19 after a discussion of the risk of disease flare-up.