In addition to the two regular plural markers -en and -e for strong and weak inflection (Banken, Jahr-e) with their morphonological variants -n and -0 (Ranke-n, Fahrer-0) German has employed plurals with umlaut (Wolf-e, Vater-0) and in -er (Huhn-er) since Early New High German and, more recently, plurals in -s which establish a new plural class in German (Uhus, Mullers, Hochs und Tiefs). This formation of a new plural class, however, severely contradicts the assumptions of Markedness Theory, according to which language change should lead to a decline in markedness, to a reduction of the diversity of forms, but not to the formation of an additional class. The paper will show that development and function of the umlaut plural and the -er plural can be explained as substitutions for the -e plural subjected to apocope in Early New High German and as better realizations of the naturalness principle of uniqueness, whereas the -s plural can be accounted for in terms of transparency requirements which, in some word classes, dominate all other naturalness principles including those of optimal word length and implicational paradigm structure. Since the specific word classes that form an -s plural in German share joint features, I will assume a specific 'transparency domain' for these nouns. On the one hand, the phonologically or semiotically special characteristics of these nouns motivate the emergence of a new plural class, on the other hand, they define relatively clear cut boundaries. The motivation for the different plural forms, their development and even their decline will be explained in the framework of Markedness Theory by competing naturalness principles.
Read full abstract