_ This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper IPTC 22548, “Integrated Approach for Formation-Water-Salinity Determination,” by Tariq Alshaikhmubarak, SPE, and Laila Mira, SPE, Saudi Aramco, and Sherif Ghadiry, Schlumberger, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Copyright 2022 International Petroleum Technology Conference. Reproduced by permission. _ In the complete paper, two methodologies are tested to achieve measurement of formation-water salinity. First, a novel dry-weight chlorine (DWCL) measurement from an advanced spectroscopy tool is used to estimate the formation salinity at the depth of investigation of the device. The second methodology uses a new downhole induction resistivity cell in the formation-tester tool. The chlorine measurement, along with the flowline-induction-resistivity measurement, helps enhance the quality of saturation evaluation for quick decision making during logging operations and acceleration of evaluation studies instead of waiting on laboratory results. Chlorine Work Flow The ability to quantify chlorine concentration can help derive formation salinity as a continuous curve. Because chlorine has a large capture cross section, it is possible to extract it from capture gamma ray spectra with acceptable uncertainty, but the real challenge is to split the total chlorine signal seen by the tool into formation chlorine signal and borehole contribution. The chlorine signal split is a fundamental step in this work flow, outlined in Fig. 1. Once the chlorine concentration in the formation is obtained—expressed as DWCL—several petrophysical applications are enabled. The first is computation of water volume assuming a known formation-water salinity. The second is computation of the sodium chloride (NaCl) equivalent salinity from an independent volume of water and DWCL. Finally, one can solve for the NaCl equivalent water salinity. Equations to achieve these steps are provided in the complete paper. Interpretation Considerations Capture spectroscopy measurements have a shallow depth of investigation (DOI) in the range of 8–10 in., which means sensitivity to mud-filtrate invasion in the volume of rock probed by the tool. The mud-filtrate invasion is controlled by several factors, including mud overbalance, formation exposure time to mud, formation porosity and permeability, and mudcake-formation process and efficiency. These factors must be considered when using the chlorine work flow to assess the effect of the invading water-based-mud (WBM) filtrate, which normally has a different salinity than the formation water. The main effect of oil-based-mud (OBM) filtrate invasion, assuming that only the oil phase is invading the formation, is a reduction of water volume at the measurement DOI, degrading the statistical precision of the DWCL and increasing the uncertainty in the computed salinity.
Read full abstract