The Formation of Christianity in Antioch: A Social-Scientific Approach to Separation between and Christianity, by Magnus Zetterholm. Routledge Early Church Monographs. London/New York: Routledge, 2003. Pp. xiv + 272. $92.95 (hardcover). ISBN 0415298962. Historical analysis of relationship between and Christianity in first centuries of Common Era, long a central concern in study of Christian origins, seems to be approaching a crossroads. The general of model that has dominated scholarship since second World War has become object of substantial and serious criticism (see, e.g., Adam H. Becker and Annette Yoshiko Reed, eds., The Ways That Never Parted: and Christians in Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages [TSAJ 95; Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003]). And Paul, traditionally regarded as a (if not the) decisive figure in this respect, has himself been read within Judaism in an increasing number of recent studies (see on this point John G. Gager, Reinventing Paul [New York: Oxford University Press, 2000]). Yet another sign of healthy reconsideration of conventional wisdom on this matter revised version of Magnus Zetterholm's doctoral dissertation (Lund University, 2001), which brings current sociological theory to bear on separation as it occurred in one specific location, Antioch-on-the-Orontes. The book's provocative thesis that parting of ways, at least here, was essentially an inner-Christian affair: result of a conscious effort by Jesus-believing to dissociate themselves from Jesus-believing Jews to whose community they were attached. What more, it was not Paul who laid groundwork for this separation, but James. In first chapter, Zetterholm explains that approach to general problem of separation of and Christianity taken by James D. G. Dunn's The Parting of Ways (London: SCM, 1991) inadequate on three scores: its limited focus on ideological aspects (Zetterholm will deal with these, but within a sociological framework [p. 4]); its notion that Paul meant to replace the Torah with faith in Christ for both and (Zetterholm assumes, with Gager, that Paul envisioned separate paths to salvation for and Gentiles [p. 5]); and, most interestingly, its assumption that the original Jewish and Gentile identities of adherents to Jesus movement are transformed into a common Christian identity (Zetterholm prefers to speak of Jesus-believing Jews and Jesus-believing [p. 6, his emphasis]). Since separation cannot in any case be assumed to have occurred uniformly everywhere, Zetterholm limits his study to one location: Antioch. Given paucity and questionable reliability of sources, Zetterholm finds sociological theories to be indispensable gap-fillers, indeed, providers of in those cases where the alternative, given state of evidence, is to say nothing (pp. 10, 11). He thus proposes a four-part method involving (i) assumption of general theoretical perspective of sociology of knowledge as presented by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckman, The Social Construction of Reality (London: Penguin, 1991); (ii) use of more specific sociological theories and models to illuminate particular problems; (iii) comparative study of other data from antiquity; and, of course, (iv) analysis of primaiy source material from Antioch. A case considered made we find something in texts about local situation in Antioch that makes sense from an underlying social-scientific perspective, and if this text can be analyzed with modern theories in order to extract more information from it, and if we also find expressions of same phenomenon in other ancient texts dealing with other locations (p. 14). In eh. 2, Zetterholm provides a broad treatment of history of, and sociopolitical conditions in, ancient Antioch in order to provide a general context for study. …