Current Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

NSAID Exposure and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis From Cohort Studies.

Background: Initial observational studies and a systematic review published recently have suggested that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has the trend to be associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), while results remain conflicting. Thus, we performed an updated meta-analysis to reevaluate the evidence on this association.Methods: Data sources from PUBMED, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception through April 2017 were searched by two independent reviewers. Eligible cohort studies were selected according to predefined keywords. We did a meta-analysis of available study data using a random-effects model to calculate overall relative risks (RRs) for associations between NSAID exposure and AD risk.Results: From 121 potentially relevant studies, 16 cohort studies including 236,022 participants, published between 1995 and 2016, were included in this systematic review. Meta-analysis demonstrated that current or former NSAID use was significantly associated with reduced risk of AD (RR, 0.81, 95% CI0.70 to 0.94) compared with those who did not use NSAIDs. This association existed in studies including all NSAID types, but not in aspirin (RR, 0.89, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.13), acetaminophen (RR, 0.87, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.91) or non-aspirin NSAID (RR, 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.23).Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that NSAID exposure might be significantly associated with reduced risk of AD. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to reevaluate this association, especially the associations in individual NSAID type.

Discontinuing a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Design and protocol of a placebo-controlled, noninferiority, randomized withdrawal trial

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of knee pain in older adults. Despite the limited data supporting their use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are among the most commonly prescribed medications for knee OA. The use of NSAIDs for knee pain warrants careful examination because of toxicity associated with this class of medications. MethodsWe describe the design of a placebo-controlled, noninferiority, randomized withdrawal trial to examine discontinuation of an NSAID in patients with painful knee OA. Participants will be veterans enrolled in the VA Healthcare System with knee OA pain despite NSAID use and/or relatively higher risk of NSAID toxicity. After a two-week run-in period where eligible subjects will replace their current NSAID with the study NSAID (meloxicam), those remaining eligible (target N=544) will be randomized to receive four weeks of either placebo or continued meloxicam. The primary outcome is knee pain (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale, range 0—20) at four weeks post-randomization. The primary hypothesis is that placebo will be noninferior to (that is, not much worse than) meloxicam within a noninferiority margin of 1. Secondary outcomes include lower extremity disability, global impression of change, adherence to study medication and use of co-therapies. DiscussionThis study is the first clinical trial to date examining the effects of withdrawing an NSAID for OA knee pain. If successful, this trial will provide evidence against the continued use of NSAIDs in patients with OA knee pain. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01799213. Registered February 22, 2013.

Exploring Differences in the Aspirin-Colorectal Cancer Association by Sex and Race/Ethnicity: The Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Evidence has accumulated that long-term use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) protects against colorectal cancer. We tested whether the inverse associations between NSAIDs and colorectal cancer is similarly observed across sexes and five racial/ethnic groups (Japanese, Latino, African American, Native Hawaiian, and white) in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study. During a mean follow-up of 16.1 years, we identified 4,882 invasive incident colorectal cancer cases among 183,199 eligible participants. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Use of aspirin and other NSAIDs was associated with a lower incidence of colorectal cancer in men (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.86 for current vs. never users of aspirin) but not in women (Pinteraction = 0.005). Among male current users, a reduced risk was observed with ≥6 years of aspirin or total NSAID use. The inverse association with current NSAID use in men was observed in all racial/ethnic groups, except for Native Hawaiians, and was stronger in whites. Our findings suggest that the benefit of NSAIDs for colorectal cancer may be strongest for white men and generalizes to African American, Japanese, and Latino, but not to Native Hawaiian men. The lack of inverse association observed in women and Native Hawaiian men in the MEC should be interpreted with caution. As only very few ethnic/racial groups are likely to be represented in trials of NSAIDs and colorectal cancer, it is important to conduct prospective observational studies in various populations to test the generalizability of their results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(2); 162-9. ©2016 AACR.

Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Symptomatic Treatment of Episodic Headache.

Primary headaches have high epidemiologic impact but their symptomatic treatment often remains problematic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used, but their modality of employment and efficacy/differential efficacy are highly variable. This study investigated current NSAID use for episodic headache at an Italian headache center (January 2000 to February 2013). A retrospective evaluation was performed on 6,443 patient records: migraine (n = 2,330), tension-type headache (TTH; n = 807), and migraine plus TTH (n = 3,306). Among migraine patients, 80% had used NSAIDs in the past year. Preferences were: nimesulide (57%), ketoprofen (25%), and ibuprofen (24%); complete efficacy was significantly higher than incomplete/absent efficacy (P < 0.0001). NSAIDs were replaced with triptans in 53% of patients at first visit; after 1 year there was a spontaneous significant return to NSAIDs (56%; P < 0.0005). Among TTH patients, 90% were NSAID users; preferences were: nimesulide (48%), ketoprofen (47%), and diclofenac (19%), with significantly higher complete vs. incomplete/absent efficacy (nimesulide and ketoprofen, P < 0.02). Replacement with analgesics was performed in 24% of patients; after 1 year, there was a 29% return to NSAIDs. Among migraine plus TTH patients, 89% were NSAID users. Preferences were: nimesulide (44%), ibuprofen (42%), and ketoprofen (38%), with significantly higher complete vs. incomplete/absent efficacy (0.001 < P < 0.0001). Replacement with analgesics was performed in 31% of patients; after 1 year, there was a 37% return to NSAIDs. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in headache was higher than could be hypothesized based on guidelines, with NSAID preferences not entirely coinciding with international recommendations. This outcome suggests the need for greater awareness of all treatment options in headache by both patients and physicians.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with osteoarthritis: a nested case-control study.

Recent studies show that the risk of cardiovascular adverse events for certain traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is similar to that of rofecoxib. While these results are focused on ischemic cardiomyopathy, there is little evidence concerning the risk of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack and hemorrhagic stroke. Additionally, there is no information on nimesulide and ketoprofen, the most frequently prescribed NSAIDs in Italy, along with diclofenac. This study aims to determine whether the use of NSAIDs is associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular events in Italy. We performed a case-control analysis nested in a cohort of patients with osteoarthritis between 2002 and 2011 who were newly treated with NSAIDs. The patients were followed until December 31, 2012. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cerebrovascular events (index date) associated with current (until 30 days before the index date), recent (31-365 days) and past (>365 days) use of NSAIDs. Within a cohort of 29,722 patients, 1566 cases (1546 matched with controls) were identified (incidence rate = 11.0/1000 person-years). The overall rate of cerebrovascular event was not elevated with current NSAIDs overall when compared with past use. Among individual NSAIDs, diclofenac and ketoprofen were the molecules significantly associated with an increased rate of cerebrovascular events (OR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.04-2.24; OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02-2.58, respectively). The most frequent event was hemorrhagic stroke following the use of ketoprofen (OR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.05-4.15). Diclofenac and ketoprofen seemed to increase the risk of cerebrovascular events. These findings might influence the choice of NSAIDs according to patient characteristics.

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Risk. The Role of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in NSAID/Low-Dose Aspirin Users.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and NSAID/low-dose aspirin (ASA) use are associated with peptic ulcer disease. The risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) associated with the interaction of these factors remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of PUB associated with the interaction between H. pylori infection and current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose ASA use. This was a case-control study of consecutive patients hospitalized because of PUB. Controls were matched by age, sex, and month of admission. H. pylori infection status was determined in all cases and controls by serology. Drug use was determined by structured questionnaire. Adjusted relative risk (RR) associated with different factors, and the interaction between NSAID/ASA and H. pylori infection was estimated by logistic regression analysis. The study included 666 cases of PUB and 666 controls; 74.3% cases and 54.8% controls (RR: 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-3.3) tested positive for H. pylori infection; 34.5% of cases had current NSAID use compared with 13.4% of controls (RR: 4.0; 95% CI: 3.0-5.4). Respective proportions for low-dose ASA use were 15.8 and 12%, respectively (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-2.7). The RR of PUB for concomitant NSAID use and H. pylori infection suggested an additive effect (RR: 8.0; 95% CI: 5.0-12.8), whereas no interaction was observed with ASA use (RR: 3.5; 95% CI: 2.0-6.1). NSAID, low-dose ASA use, and H. pylori infection are three independent risk factors for the development of PUB, but there were differences in the interaction effect between low-dose ASA (no interaction) or NSAID (addition) use and H. pylori infection, which may have implications for clinical practice in prevention strategies.

Aurothiomalate inhibits the expression of mPGES-1 in primary human chondrocytes

Objectives: Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) is a terminal enzyme in the production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and its expression is upregulated during inflammation. mPGES-1 is considered as a potential drug target for the treatment of arthritis to reduce adverse effects related to the current non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Our aim was to study the expression of mPGES-1 in primary human chondrocytes and whether the expression is affected by clinically used antirheumatic drugs.Method: Primary human chondrocytes were isolated from cartilage samples obtained from patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery. Expression of mPGES-1 was studied by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western blot analysis. PGE2 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Results: mPGES-1 expression in primary human chondrocytes was enhanced when the cells were exposed to interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and mPGES-1 protein levels continued to increase up to the 96-h follow-up. Aurothiomalate inhibited mPGES-1 expression and PGE2 production in a dose-dependent manner, as did the anti-inflammatory steroid dexamethasone. Other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) studied (sulfasalazine, methotrexate, and hydroxychloroquine) did not alter mPGES-1 expression.Conclusions: The results introduce aurothiomalate as the first, and so far the only, DMARD found to be able to inhibit mPGES-1 expression. The effect is likely involved in the mechanisms of action of this gold-containing DMARD in rheumatic diseases. The results are implicated in the regulatory mechanisms of mPGES-1 expression, which are under intensive research.

Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: clinical implications.

In February 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened an advisory committee meeting to discuss the accumulated data relating to the cardiovascular risk of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the potential implications on the class prescription labeling. The committee recommended, though not unanimously, that (1) the current data does not support the conclusion that naproxen has a lower risk of thrombotic events than other NSAIDs; (2) there is no latency period for the risk of cardiovascular thrombotic events; (3) there are some patient populations at increased risk for events; and (4) equipoise remains in the major ongoing trial designed to address these issues further. The clinical implications of the FDA deliberations as well as the recently published meta-analyses and observational studies are discussed. With the information available today, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there are significant differences between the approved NSAIDs with regard to the potential for cardiovascular events. An approach for balancing the major risks associated with NSAIDs is suggested. Clinicians should continue to use the current FDA NSAID labeling language to guide their decision making for individual patients until such time as the FDA makes changes.

Prostate cancer risk and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.

Background:The association between nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and prostate cancer risk remains controversial. We examined the risk among NSAID users in 78 615 men in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.Methods:We obtained information on NSAID prescription usage from Finnish nationwide prescription database and on over-the-counter use by a questionnaire. Prostate cancer cases were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry.Results:Prostate cancer risk was elevated among current NSAID prescription users irrespective of screening (hazard ratio (HR)=1.45, confidence interval (95% CI)=1.33–1.59 and HR=1.71, 95% CI=1.58–1.86 in the screening and control arm, respectively), but not for previous use of NSAIDs. The risk increase was similar among coxib and acetaminophen current users, and stronger for metastatic prostate cancer (HR=2.41, 95% CI=1.59–3.67 and HR=3.44, 95% CI=2.60–4.55 in the screening and control arm, respectively). Previous use of NSAIDs, aspirin use and over-the-counter NSAID usage were not associated with prostate cancer.Conclusions:Differing association for current and previous use suggests that the risk increase is unlikely to be directly caused by the medication, but may be due to the conditions indicating NSAID prescription usage, such as symptoms of undiagnosed prostate cancer. To reduce inconsistency between the study outcomes, future epidemiological studies on NSAID use and prostate cancer risk should assess the indications for NSAID usage.

Genetic variation in prostaglandin synthesis and related pathways, NSAID use and colorectal cancer risk in the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

Although use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) generally decreases colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, inherited genetic variation in inflammatory pathways may alter their potential as preventive agents. We investigated whether variation in prostaglandin synthesis and related pathways influences CRC risk in the Colon Cancer Family Registry by examining associations between 192 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and two variable nucleotide tandem repeats (VNTRs) within 17 candidate genes and CRC risk. We further assessed interactions between these polymorphisms and NSAID use on CRC risk. Using a case-unaffected-sibling-control design, this study included 1621 primary invasive CRC cases and 2592 sibling controls among Caucasian men and women aged 18-90. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, two intronic SNPs were associated with rectal cancer risk: rs11571364 in ALOX12 [OR(het/hzv) = 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-2.95, P = 0.03] and rs45525634 in PTGER2 (OR(het/hzv) = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.29-0.82, P = 0.03). Additionally, there was an interaction between NSAID use and the intronic SNP rs2920421 in ALOX12 on risk of CRC (P = 0.03); among those with heterozygous genotypes, risk was reduced for current NSAID users compared with never or former users (OR(het) = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45-0.80), though not among those with homozygous wild-type or variant genotypes. The results of this study suggest that genetic variation in ALOX12 and PTGER2 may affect the risk of rectal cancer. In addition, this study suggests plausible interactions between NSAID use and variants in ALOX12 on CRC risk. These results may aid in the development of genetically targeted cancer prevention strategies with NSAIDs.

Role of Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Exacerbations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Purpose: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic immunologic diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract characterized by periods of exacerbation and remission. Data are limited as to causative factors of exacerbations. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain, and have been reported to lead to exacerbations of IBD. We aimed to determine rates of NSAID use in the IBD population, and whether NSAID use increases the risk of exacerbation of IBD. Methods: We identified individuals with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission at baseline evaluation within Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) Partners, an online IBD cohort. We determined current patterns NSAID use, and then assessed disease activity 6 months later. NSAID exposure was evaluated in a dichotomous fashion (any/none and ≥5 times /<5 times monthly). We used bivariate statistics and binomial regression models to assess the independent effects of NSAID use on disease exacerbation. Results: A total of 711 individuals with IBD (519 with CD and 192 with UC) in remission, based on short Crohn's disease activity index (sCDAI <150) or simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI ≤2) reported NSAID use patterns. Disease activity was assessed 6 months later. A total of 308 (43.3%) reported any NSAID use, 146 (20.5%) reported ≥5 uses/month, and 125 (17.6%) met criteria for a flare at 6-month follow up. Those on any NSAIDs flared at similar rates to those not on any NSAIDS (19.5% vs. 16.1%, p=0.25). Results were similar when stratified by CD or UC. Those with ≥5 uses/month were more likely to flare when compared to those with <5 uses/month (24.0% vs. 15.9%, p=0.02), risk ratio (RR) 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.13) overall IBD, RR 1.22 (95% CI 0.64-2.33) for UC, and RR 1.66 (95% CI 1.10-2.50) for CD. After controlling for smoking, IBD medication use, and acetaminophen use, the results for overall IBD remained similar (adjusted RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.03-2.08). Acetaminophen use was also independently associated with flare of disease (adjusted RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08-2.27). Conclusion: NSAID use is common amongst individuals with IBD in remission. Those reporting ≥5 uses/month of NSAIDs had a significantly higher risk of flare when compared to those with <5 uses/month. However, those using acetaminophen also had an increased risk of flare, demonstrating that the requirement for any pain medication while in remission may be a marker of occult disease, or that a mechanism common to both drugs (cyclooxygenase-2 or 3 inhibition) may be associated with flare.

IκBKβ and NFκB1 , NSAID use and risk of colorectal cancer in the Colon Cancer Family Registry

The NFκB-signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation and inflammation. Activation of the pathway is implicated in the etiology of colorectal cancer (CRC). NSAIDs may reduce CRC risk partially through a nuclear factor-kappa B (NFκB)-dependent pathway. In this study, we investigated associations between 34 NFκB1 and 8 IκBKβ tagSNPs and CRC risk and examined interactions with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Using conditional logistic regression, we investigated these associations among 1584 incident CRC cases and 2516 sibling controls from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Three IκBKβ SNPs were associated with a statistically significant lower colorectal or colon cancer risk: rs9694958 (A>G intron 5) (colorectal: OR(hzv) = 0.26(0.07-0.99), P(trend) = 0.048, P(adj) = 0.25), rs10958713 (A>C intron 19) (colon: OR(hzv) = 0.62(0.42-0.92), P(trend) = 0.005, P(adj) = 0.03) and rs5029748 (C>A intron 2) (colon: OR(het) = 0.72(0.56-0.91), P(trend) = 0.01, P(adj) = 0.08). We replicated trends associated with NFκB1 and IκBKβ variants identified in a previous study (rs4648110 (T>A intron 22), rs13117745 (G>A intron 5) and rs3747811 (T>A intron 1)). IκBKβ's rs6474387 (C>T intron 20) and rs11986055 (A>C intron 2) showed substantially lower colon cancer risk among current NSAID users (P(interaction) = 0.01 and P(interaction) = 0.045, respectively), whereas NFκB1's rs230490 (G>A 5' (outside UTR)) and rs997476 (C>A 3' (outside UTR)) showed higher CRC risk among current NSAID users (P(interaction) = 0.01 and P(interaction) = 0.03, respectively). These findings suggest that variants in NFκB1 and IκBKβ are associated with CRC risk and NSAIDs may function partially through an NFκB-dependent pathway. The SNPs identified here should be considered for future functional studies and may be useful in designing a pharmacogenetic approach to preventive NSAID use.

Migraine history, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer.

Endometrial cancer is primarily a hormonally mediated disease. As such, factors that mediate or reflect exposure to estrogens, or that mediate response to such exposure, may plausibly be associated with endometrial cancer risk. History of migraines, another hormonally mediated condition, has recently been associated with a reduced risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer; however, the relationship between migraines and endometrial cancer has not previously been explored. We evaluated the relationship between migraine history and endometrial cancer risk in postmenopausal women, considering also the potential impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, given the relationship of NSAIDs to hormones and to migraine history. We identified 93,384 women participating in the Women's Health Initiative prospective cohort who had an intact uterus at the time of study entry. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, we assessed risk of endometrial cancer during study follow-up according to history of migraines and according to current NSAID use at the time of study entry, adjusting for age, study arm, race, and hormone therapy use. We also evaluated interaction in these associations by body mass index. Having a history of migraines was not associated with endometrial cancer risk [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-1.11], regardless of body mass index (BMI) or NSAID use status. Similarly, current NSAID use was not associated with endometrial cancer risk (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88-1.16), regardless of BMI. Migraine history and NSAID use do not appear to be associated with risk of endometrial cancer.

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and the risk of Clostridium difficile‐associated disease

Several case reports have linked diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), with Clostridium difficile associated disease (CDAD). We assessed whether NSAID use in general, and diclofenac use in particular, is associated with an increased risk of CDAD. We used the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to conduct a population-based case-control study. All cases of CDAD occurring between 1994 and 2005 were identified and were matched to 10 controls each. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio of CDAD associated with current NSAID use, adjusting for covariates. We identified 1360 CDAD cases and 13 072 controls. We found an increased risk of CDAD associated with diclofenac (adjusted odds ratio (RR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 1.67). We did not observe an increased risk of CDAD with use of any other NSAID. No dose-response for diclofenac exposure was found. When we analyzed only patients who were not hospitalized in the year before the index date, we found diclofenac to have a similar effect on CDAD risk (adjusted RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.11, 1.84). Diclofenac use is associated with a modest increase in the risk of CDAD. In patients at risk of CDAD, other NSAIDs could be prescribed.

A Study of Prostaglandin Pathway Genes and Interactions with Current Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use in Colorectal Adenoma

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death and usually arises from colorectal polyps. Screening and removal of polyps reduce mortality from CRC. Colorectal polyps are known to aggregate in families; however the genetic determinants for risk of polyps are unknown. In addition, it has been shown that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use decreases the risk of CRC and the incidence and size of polyps. In this study, we used data from the Tennessee Colorectal Polyp Study and the Tennessee-Indiana Adenoma Recurrence Study to evaluate selected genes from the prostaglandin (PG) metabolism and signaling pathways for association with risk of polyps and for interactions with NSAIDs. Our design consisted of discovery and replication phases for a total of 2,551 Caucasian polyp cases and 3,285 Caucasian controls. We carried out multivariable logistic regression to test for association in both the discovery and replication phase and further examined the results with meta-analysis. We detected association signals in the genes PGE receptor 3 (PTGER3) and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (HPGD), both strong biologic candidates for influence on polyp risk. We did not observe the previously reported effects and effect modification in PG-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), PGE receptor 2 (PTGER2), or PGE receptor 4 (PTGER4), although we did observe a single nucleotide polymorphism in PTGER2 associated with risk of multiple adenomas. We also observed effect modification of the HPGD signal by NSAID exposure.

Coming to Terms with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Gastropathy

Despite well known complications, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain the most commonly prescribed medications in the US for musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis. Although there has been a recent focus on the cardiovascular and renal complications associated with these agents, NSAID gastropathy continues to be a particular concern in many patients, especially those at increased risk for serious adverse events, including the elderly. Complicating the diagnosis of NSAID gastropathy is its silent course, which, up to half of the time, is asymptomatic. Several strategies are currently employed by physicians to mitigate the risk of serious gastrointestinal events. These include either addition of a proton pump inhibitor to current nonselective NSAID therapy or the use of a cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective NSAID. Although these agents are effective at mitigating the overall risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, they fail to address NSAID-related cardiovascular and renal risks. Due to their reduced systemic absorption, topical NSAIDs may present a viable option for patients at increased risk for serious NSAID-related adverse events, including gastropathy.

Harmful Effects of NSAIDs among Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease: Bavry AA, Khaliqu A, Gong Y, et al. Am J Med 2011;124:614–20.

Although selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have been shown to increase the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and aspirin has been shown to be cardioprotective, the effect of chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on adverse cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure has not been well established. This observational study was a post hoc analysis from the International Verapamil Trandolapril Study (INVEST), an international randomized trial comparing the effects of a calcium antagonist (verapamil SR) vs. a beta-blocker (atenolol) on hypertension in stable coronary artery disease, that investigated the association between chronic NSAID use, blood pressure, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, defined as all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke, among patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Patients had scheduled follow-up visits every 6 weeks for the first 6 months, then biannually for a mean of 2.7 years and were asked every visit about current NSAID use. Patients were divided into two groups: chronic NSAID users if they reported use at every visit and non-chronic NSAID users (occasional or never used). The study found 882 self-reported chronic NSAID users and 21,694 non-chronic users (including 14,408 never NSAID users and 7286 intermittent users). The primary outcomes (all-cause mortality, stroke, or MI) occurred at a rate of 4.4 events per 100 patient-years for chronic NSAID users and 3.7 events per 100 patient-years for non-chronic users, with adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–1.82, p=0.003). Propensity-matched chronic NSAID users, when compared to non-chronic NSAID users, still demonstrated higher incidences of the primary outcomes, with an adjusted HR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.18–2.17, p<0.0023). The study found that this 47% increase in the first occurrence of the primary outcomes in the chronic NSAID group was due to an increase in cardiovascular mortality in the chronic users when compared to the non-chronic users, adjusted HR 2.26 (95% CI 1.70–3.01, p<0.0001). The study also found an overall 90% increase in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.53–2.35, p≤0.0001), specifically a 66% increase in total MI (adjusted HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21–2.28, p=0.0017), but no significant difference in total stroke when comparing chronic users to non-chronic users. The study did find slightly but statistically significant lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the chronic NSAID users group. The researchers recognized that without information on specific NSAID types and dosages, the findings represent a class effect, and that placebo-controlled trials of specific agents are needed to determine the exact safety profile of individual agents. They concluded that despite lower mean blood pressures, the net effect from the multivariate modeling and propensity matching was an overall increase in adverse cardiovascular events, and they support the American Geriatric Society Panel's recommendation of acetaminophen as the first-line agent in chronic pain in the elderly until randomized trial data for specific agents are available.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Among Persons With Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States

Because avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is recommended for most individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), we sought to characterize patterns of NSAID use among persons with CKD in the United States. A total of 12,065 adult (aged 20 years or older) participants in the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2004) responded to a questionnaire regarding their use of over-the-counter and prescription NSAIDs. NSAIDs (excluding aspirin and acetaminophen) were defined by self-report. CKD was categorized as no CKD, mild CKD (stages 1 and 2; urinary albumin-creatinine ratio of ≥ 30 mg/g) and moderate to severe CKD (stages 3 and 4; estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Adjusted prevalence was calculated using multivariable logistic regression with appropriate population-based weighting. Current use (nearly every day for 30 days or longer) of any NSAID was reported by 2.5%, 2.5%, and 5.0% of the US population with no, mild, and moderate to severe CKD, respectively; nearly all of the NSAIDs used were available over-the-counter. Among those with moderate to severe CKD who were currently using NSAIDs, 10.2% had a current NSAID prescription and 66.1% had used NSAIDs for 1 year or longer. Among those with CKD, disease awareness was not associated with reduced current NSAID use: (3.8% vs 3.9%, aware vs unaware; P=.979). Physicians and other health care clinicians should be aware of use of NSAIDs among those with CKD in the United States and evaluate NSAID use in their CKD patients.

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly used classes of pharmaceutical in canine practice. Globally, the current oral NSAID market for chronic pain in small animals is...

Noncalcified Coronary Plaque in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

To study noncalcified coronary plaque (NCP) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Sixty-four-slice coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was performed in 39 consecutive patients with SLE. MDCT scans were evaluated semiquantitatively by a radiologist using dedicated software. The presence or absence of NCP in each coronary artery was assessed. Patients with mixed plaque (calcified and noncalcified portions) were included in the NCP group. The patient group was 90% women, 64% Caucasian, 31% African American, 5% other; mean age 50.5 +/- 9.6 years. Fifty-four percent (21/39) had NCP. Seventy-six percent (16/21) of those with NCP also had coronary calcium (range 0.7 to 1264.1 Agatston units). In univariate analysis, NCP was associated with age (p = 0.01), current nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use (p = 0.04), hormone replacement therapy (p = 0.02), current use of immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.02), current low serum C3 level (p = 0.07), current physician's global assessment of activity (PGA; p = 0.05), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.04). NCP was not associated with other risk factors for atherosclerosis, including total serum cholesterol, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and lipoprotein(a). Unlike coronary calcium, which is not associated with SLE activity measures or with active serologies, NCP is more common in patients with SLE with current, 3-, and 6-month activity by PGA. NCP was also associated with the need for current NSAID or immunosuppressive therapy. NCP is an important part of the total atherosclerotic burden in SLE.