Queen rearing is a common beekeeping practice that plays a crucial role in modern apiculture. To enhance the efficiency of the queen rearing process, plastic queen cell cups have gained widespread popularity amongst queen producers. However, concerns have arisen regarding the potential adverse effects of these petrochemical-based products on queen rearing success and their development. To address this concern, we compared beeswax cups to 10 different commercial plastic queen cups by evaluating their effects on rearing success, queen development, and physical characteristics. Our results showed that plastic queen cell cups are manufactured in a variety of dimensions (inner diameter, depth, and wall thickness). A comparison of queen rearing between beeswax cups and different plastic cups revealed significant differences in larval acceptance, followed by sealing, and queen emergence. Negative correlations were observed between the inner diameter, the depth of queen cups, and the three metrics of queen rearing: acceptance, sealing, and queen emergence rates. While significant variation was observed among larvae weights raised in different queen cups, the differences were less pronounced for the deposited royal jelly weight measured from beeswax queen cups compared to different plastic cups. The weight and morphometric parameters of queens emerging from beeswax cups were similar to those from different plastic types. It indicates the need for standardizing queen cup dimensions without compromising the physical quality of queens.
Read full abstract