The surgical management of degenerative conditions affecting the hip joint has undergone very radical changes over a number of years, necessitating a reassessment of our approach to this common problem. When considering surgery, it is important to recognize the main types of degenerative joint, which may present subluxation, or concentric or atrophic changes. The type of joint change as well as age, sex and multiplicity of joint problems must be considered in helping one to determine the appropriate operative management. This paper attempts to assess the present value of, and indications for, osteotomy, arthrodesis, and partial replacement arthroplasty in the light of recent developments in surgery of the degenerative hip joint. It is concluded that high femoral osteotomy and total hip replacement arthroplasty are the two most useful procedures available, and that other operations have only limited application in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip joint.SummaryIn conclusion, therefore, it is considered that cup arthroplasty and partial replacement arthroplasty have little place in the treatment of degenerative and rheumatic hip disease. Arthrodesis is indicated in very few patients, but it can be particularly indicated in a fit young man undertaking heavy physical work.The two operative procedures considered to be of value in the treatment of degenerative hip disease are high femoral osteotomy and total hip replacement. When these are used according to a number of well‐defined criteria, a high percentage of satisfactory results can be expected. Both procedures have problems. Osteotomy fails to achieve a high standard of normal function, and non‐union at the osteotomy site is a possibility. Total hip replacement can be complicated by loosening of the prosthesis, by wearing of the prosthetic socket, and rarely, by infection of the prosthetic joint.