Cumulative Incidence Of Non-relapse Mortality Research Articles

Impact of donor type on the outcomes of acute graft versus host disease to systemic corticosteroid therapy.

Systemic corticosteroid therapy is a well-established first-line treatment for grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Recently, several developments have occurred, including the introduction of transplantation from human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical donors using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY-Haplo), and improvements in prognosis after cord blood transplantation (CBT) in Japan. This study aimed to analyze the association between donor sources and outcomes in patients with aGVHD. Our study included 2732 patients who developed grades II-IV aGVHD, and were treated with systemic corticosteroids. We compared HLA-matched related donors (MRD), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD), PTCY-Haplo, and CBT. We set endpoint as response rate, 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). The adjusted odds ratios for a complete response (CR) were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.31, P = 0.925) for MUD, 2.08 (95% CI: 1.35-3.25, P = 0.001) for PTCY-Haplo, and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.83-1.41, P = 0.550) for CBT compared with MRD. A significant increase in response rates for PTCY were only found in a single-organ involvement. No significant association was observed between the donor source and NRM or OS. In conclusion, PTCY-Haplo is associated with a high response rate in patients with a single-organ aGVHD; however, MUD and CBT were not associated with treatment response.

Clinical impact of airflow obstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Criteria for airflow obstruction (AFO) at one year after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are more stringent than the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) criteria of the National Institutes of Health. This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated the clinical impact of the AFO criteria at any time after transplantation. In 132 patients who underwent allo-HSCT from 2006 to 2016, the 2-year cumulative incidence of AFO was 35.0%, and the median time to diagnosis of AFO was 101 days after transplantation (range 35–716 days). Overall chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) incidence was significantly higher in patients with AFO than in those without AFO (80.4% vs. 47.7%, P < 0.01); notably, 37.0% of patients with AFO developed cGVHD after AFO diagnosis. AFO patients developed BOS with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 49.1% after AFO onset. The 5-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality in the AFO group was higher than that in the non-AFO group (24.7% vs. 7.1%, P < 0.01). These results suggest that closely monitoring PFTs within two years after allo-HSCT, regardless of cGVHD status, is important for early detection of AFO and prevention of progression to BOS. (192words).

Allogeneic stem cell transplant with TBI-based myeloablative conditioning in adolescents and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL treated with pediatric protocols

To investigate the safety of total body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning (TBI-MAC) in adolescent and young adult (AYA) Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with pediatric protocols, treatment outcomes of 106 AYA patients aged 16–39 years old undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) with TBI-MAC in the first remission were compared according to chemotherapy types before transplant. Pediatric and adult protocols were used in 56 and 50 of the patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and the overall survival (OS) rates were not significantly different between the pediatric-protocol and adult-protocol group (NRM: 4 % vs. 14 % at five years post-transplant, respectively, p = 0.26; OS: 81 % vs. 66 %, respectively, p = 0.14). Multivariate analysis for NRM revealed that a performance status >0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.8) and transplant due to chemotherapy toxicities (HR = 3.5) were independent risk factors, but a pediatric protocol was not (HR = 0.48). The CI of NRM and the OS rates were also similar among patients aged over 24 years old. These findings suggested that conventional allo-SCT with TBI-MAC can be performed without increasing NRM in AYA patients with Ph-negative ALL even after pediatric protocols.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis Aged 70 Years or Older: A Study from the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation

Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is ∼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing. The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older. This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival). Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced-intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform, especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3%-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14%-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27%-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular, non-CALR/MPL genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome. This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of older adults over recent years.

A Retrospective Study of Pediatric Patients With Low- or Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the AML-05 Study Conducted by the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group

The AML-05 study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic strategy based on risk stratification for low-, intermediate-, or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pediatric patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was not indicated for low- or intermediate-risk AML patients in first complete remission. The present retrospective study for the AML-05 study aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival and to determine optimal allo-HCT according to multivariate analysis on overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality for and between low- and intermediate-risk AML group patients in the AML-05 study who had undergone allo-HCT after its completion and relapse. The unique patient numbers (UPNs) of the AML-05 study were matched with the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP)-registered numbers, and the tied data on the AML-05 study's UPNs and the TRUMP-registered numbers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 3-yr OS. Among 443 AML patients in the AML-05 study, 79 (32 low-risk AML and 47 intermediate-risk AML) were analyzed. The following statistically favorable prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis on the low- and intermediate-risk AML groups, respectively: UCB (OS—hazard ratio [HR], 0.105; 95% CI, 0.011 to 0.941; P = .004 and EFS—HR, 0.065, 95% CI, 0.007 to 0.577, P = .014) and late relapse (OS—HR, 0.212; 95% CI, 0.072 to 0.626; P = .005 and EFS—HR, 0.236; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.630; P = .004). Three-year OS, 3-yr EFS, and 3-yr CIR were significantly different between the low- and intermediate-risk AML groups. UCB may be a safe and beneficial donor source for low-risk AML patients, while late relapse was a favorable prognostic factor for intermediate-risk AML patients. Intermediate-risk AML patients with late relapse and low-risk AML patients may benefit from allo-HCT after relapse.

Childhood myelodysplastic syndromes: Is cytoreductive therapy useful before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

For most patients with childhood myelodysplastic syndrome (cMDS), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative option. In the case of increased blasts (cMDS-IB), the benefit of pretransplant cytoreductive therapy remains controversial. In this multicenter retrospective study, the outcomes of all French children who underwent allo-HSCT for cMDS reported in the SFGM-TC registrybetween 2000 and 2020 were analyzed (n = 84). The median age at transplantation was 10.2 years. HSCT was performed from matched sibling donors (MSD) in 29% of the cases, matched unrelated donors (MUD) in 44%, haploidentical in 6%, and cord blood in 21%. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 91% of cases. Forty-eight percent of patients presented with cMDS-IB at diagnosis (median BM blasts: 8%). Among them, 50% received pretransplant cytoreductive therapy. Five-year overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse were 67%, 26%, and 12%, respectively. Six-month cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 46%. Considering the whole cohort, age under 12, busulfan/cyclophosphamide/melphalan conditioning or MUD were associated with poorer 5-year OS. In the cMDS-IB subgroup, pretransplant cytoreductive therapy was associated with a better OS in univariate analysis. This seems to be mainly due to a decreased NRMsince no impact on the incidence of relapse was observed. Overall, those data may argue in favor of cytoreduction for cMDS-IB. They need to be confirmed on a larger scale and prospectively.

Donor’s age influences outcome in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide - a single center experience

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (post-Cy) is considered a reasonable therapeutic option for patients who lack matched donor or who urgently need transplant procedure due to high risk disease. We analyzed the results of haplo-SCT performed in years 2018–2023. Eighty one patients (46 males) at median age of 52 years underwent haplo-SCT using peripheral blood as a stem cell source in most cases. Indications included hematological malignancies (acute leukemias in 88% of cases). In 25 cases (31%) transplantation was performed in relapsed/refractory disease. Majority of patients (61%) presented with very high and high disease risk index (DRI). Conditioning regimens were as follows: nonmyeloablative − 46 cases (57%), myeloablative – in 18 (22%) and reduced intensity – 17(20%). 90% of patients engrafted. All patients received unified immunosuppressive treatment (post-Cy/TAC/MMF). Median follow-up time was 12 months The cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 37.5% and 37.6%, respectively. Estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) was 43.1% and donor’s age was the only factor influencing survival. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.5%, whereas relapse incidence (RI) − 35%. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 44% and was mostly due to infections. Haplo-SCT is a feasible treatment option for hematological patients. Younger donor improves post-transplant survival. Strategies to reduce infection-related mortality and relapse rate remain a challenge.

PTCy vs CNI–based GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-matched transplants for Hodgkin lymphoma: a study of the LWP of the EBMT

AbstractStudies comparing the efficacy of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are scarce. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with HL undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from HLA-matched donors who received GVHD prophylaxis with either PTCy- or conventional CNI-based regimens, using data reported in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database between January 2015 and December 2022. Among the cohort, 270 recipients received conventional CNI-based prophylaxis and 176 received PTCy prophylaxis. Notably, PTCy prophylaxis was associated with delayed hematopoietic recovery but also with a lower risk of chronic (25% vs 43%; P < .001) and extensive chronic GVHD (13% vs 28%; P = .003) compared with the CNI-based cohort. The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality and relapse was 11% vs 17% (P = .12) and 17% vs 30% (P = .007) for PTCy- and CNI-based, respectively. Moreover, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were all significantly better in the PTCy group compared with the CNI-based group: 85% vs 72% (P = .005), 72% vs 53% (P < .001), and 59% vs 31% (P < .001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, PTCy was associated with a lower risk of chronic and extensive chronic GVHD, reduced relapse, and better OS, PFS, and GRFS than the CNI-based platform. Our findings suggest that PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis offers more favorable outcomes than conventional CNI-based prophylaxis in adult patients with HL undergoing HSCT from HLA-matched donors.

Reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen with low dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for haploidentical stem cell transplantation in older patients.

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in 55 patients ≥ 55 years of age with hematologic malignancies treated with fludarabine, cytarabine, busulfan, and low-dose cyclophosphamide as the conditioning regimen between January 1, 2019, and November 30, 2023. Neutrophil engraftment was successful in all patients within 28 days, with 54 patients (98.2%) achieving complete donor chimerism. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 0% at 30 days, 7.5% at 100 days, and 19% at 1 year. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 25% (95%CI, 15-38%), whereas that of grade III-IV aGVHD was 9.1% (95% CI, 3.3-19%). The cumulative incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease at 1 year was 3.6% (95%CI, 0.66-11%). The cumulative incidences of relapse, overall survival, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival at 1 year were 9.0%, 71.6%, and 67.1%, respectively. An RIC conditioning regimen, including a combination of lower PTCy/ATG as GVHD prophylaxis, followed by haplo-SCT, might be a promising option for appropriately selected older patients.

Recipient clonal hematopoiesis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for lymphoid malignancies

AbstractAllogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is increasingly being used in older patients with blood cancer. Aging is associated with an increasing incidence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Although the effects of donor CH on alloBMT has been reported, the impact of recipient CH on alloBMT outcomes is unknown. In this retrospective study, alloBMT recipients age 60 and older with lymphoid malignancies were included. Among 97 consecutive patients who received alloBMT between 2017 and 2022, CH was detected in 60 (62%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51-72). CH was found in 45% (95% CI, 28-64) of patients aged 60 to 64, 64% (95% CI, 44-81) of patients aged 65% to 69%, and 73% (95% CI, 59-87) in those above 70. Pretransplant CH was associated with worse survival after alloBMT: 3-year overall survival (OS) was 78% (95% CI, 65-94) for patients without CH vs 47% (95% CI, 35-63) for those with CH, (unadjusted HR, 3.1; [95% CI, 1.4-6.8; P < .001]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was higher in patients with CH; cumulative incidence of NRM at 1-year was 11% (95% CI, 1-22) vs 35% (95% CI, 23-48), (HR, 3.4; [95% CI, 1.4-8.5], P = .009]). Among CH patients, worse OS and NRM was associated with CH burden and number of mutations. Recipient CH had no effect on relapse. In conclusion, older patients with CH experience worse outcomes after alloBMT, almost exclusively attributable to increased NRM. CH is a strong, independent predictor of outcomes. Novel strategies to ameliorate the adverse impacts of patient CH on transplant outcomes are being evaluated.

Long term outcomes of nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation with TSEB TLI and ATG for Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome

Advanced stage (IIB-IVB) Mycosis Fungoides (MF) and Sezary Syndrome (SS) have a poor prognosis with median survival <5 years. We report long-term outcomes of a non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation regimen consisting of total skin electron beam therapy, total lymphoid irradiation and antithymocyte globulin. Our prospective cohort consisted of 41 patients with a higher proportion of MF (34MF, 7SS). Acute GVHD Grade 2 to 4 was seen in 31.7% and chronic GVHD Grade 2 to 4 in 24%. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 9.8% at 1 year and 12.6% at 2 years. At Day +90 post-transplant 66% of patients had a complete response (CR). With a median post-transplant follow up of 5.27 years, the 5-year overall survival rate was 37.7% (MF 36.7%, SS 57.1%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of progressive disease or relapse was 52.7% in all patients but only 20.8% in those with CR at transplant compared to 70.6% in those not in CR at transplant (p = 0.006). Long term survival is possible in advanced MF and SS with non-myeloablative transplantation and outcomes are improved in patients with CR at transplant.

Impact of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) exposure on outcomes after ex vivo T-cell–depleted hematopoietic cell transplantation in pediatric and young adult patients

Background aimsTraditional weight-based dosing of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) used in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection leads to variable exposures. High exposures induce delayed CD4+immune reconstitution (CD4+IR) and greater mortality. We sought to determine the impact of rATG exposure in children and young adults receiving various types of EX-VIVO T-cell–depleted (EX-VIVO-TCD) HCT. MethodsPatients receiving their first EX-VIVO-TCD HCT (CliniMACS CD34+, Isolex or soybean lectin agglutination), with removal of residual T cells by E-rosette depletion (E-) between 2008 and 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. rATG exposure post-HCT was estimated (AU*d/L) using a validated population pharmacokinetic model. Previously defined rATG-exposures, <30, 30–55, ≥55 AU*d/L, were related with outcomes of interest. Cox proportional hazard and cause-specific models were used for analyses. ResultsIn total, 180 patients (median age 11 years; range 0.1–44 years) were included, malignant 124 (69%) and nonmalignant 56 (31%). Median post-HCT rATG exposure was 32 (0–104) AU*d/L. Exposure <30 AU*d/L was associated with a 3-fold greater probability of CD4+IR (P < 0.001); 2- to 4-fold lower risk of death (P = 0.002); and 3- to 4-fold lower risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (P = 0.02). Cumulative incidence of NRM was 8-fold lower in patients who attained CD4+IR compared with those who did not (P < 0.0001). There was no relation between rATG exposure and aGVHD (P = 0.33) or relapse (P = 0.23). Effect of rATG exposure on outcomes was similar in three EX-VIVO-TCD methods. ConclusionsIndividualizing rATG dosing to target a low rATG exposure post-HCT while maintaining total cumulative exposure may better predict CD4+IR, reduce NRM and increase overall survival, independent of the EX-VIVO-TCD method.

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Significant costs and complex manufacturing underscore the importance of evidence-based counseling regarding the outcomes of these treatments. With the aim of examining the efficacy and safety of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL, we performed a systematic literature search of comparative studies evaluating outcomes in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL after treatment with axi-cel or tisa-cel. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and hematotoxicity. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to generate summary statistics. A total of 2372 participants were included in the 8 studies in our analysis. The dropout rate between apheresis and infusion was 13% for axi-cel versus 18% for tisa-cel, and the median time from apheresis to infusion was 32 days versus 45 days. Axi-cel showed higher odds for a complete response (OR, 1.65; P < .001) and was associated with higher odds for PFS at 1 year after infusion (OR, .60; P < .001). OS appeared to be improved with axi-cel (OR, .84; 95% CI, .68 to 1.02; P = .08), whereas the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 11.5% for axi-cel versus 3.7% for tisa-cel (P = .002). The main predictors for survival were lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and response to bridging, and axi-cel maintained superior efficacy even in elderly patients. In terms of safety, axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of any-grade CRS (OR, 3.23; P < .001), but not of grade ≥3 CRS (P = .92). Axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of severe ICANS grade ≥3 (OR, 4.03; P < .001). In terms of hematotoxicity, axi-cel was significantly associated with higher odds of severe neutropenia at 1 month after infusion (OR, 2.06; P = .003). As a result, axi-cel was associated with significantly greater resource utilization, including prolonged hospital stay, more frequent intensive care admission, and use of agents such as tocilizumab for toxicity management. We provide strong evidence of the greater efficacy of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL. The higher toxicity and NRM seen with axi-cel might not counterbalance the overall results, highlighting the need for timely intervention and careful selection of patients, balancing resource utilization and clinical benefit.

Development of an umbilical cord blood transplantation–specific nonrelapse mortality risk assessment score

AbstractHigher rate of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) remains yet to be resolved in umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Considering that UCBT has some unique features compared with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from other graft sources, a UCBT-specific NRM risk assessment system is required. Thus, in this study, we sought to develop a UCBT-specific NRM Risk Assessment (CoBRA) score. Using a nationwide registry database, we retrospectively analyzed 4437 recipients who had received their first single-unit UCBT. Using the backward elimination method, we constructed the CoBRA score in a training cohort (n = 2687), which consisted of recipients age ≥55 years (score 2), hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index ≥3 (score 2), male recipient, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis other than tacrolimus in combination with methotrexate, performance status (PS) 2 to 4, HLA allele mismatch ≥ 2, refined Disease Risk Index high risk, myeloablative conditioning, and CD34+ cell doses < 0.82 × 105/kg (score 1 in each). The recipients were categorized into 3 groups: low (0-4 points), intermediate (5-7 points), and high (8-11 points) groups according to the CoBRA score. In the validation cohort (n = 1750), the cumulative incidence of NRM at 2 years was 14.9%, 25.5%, and 47.1% (P < .001), and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 74.2%, 52.7%, and 26.3% (P < .001) in the low, intermediate, and high groups, respectively. In summary, the CoBRA score could predict the NRM risk as well as OS after UCBT. Further external validation will be needed to confirm the significance of the CoBRA score.

Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in HLA-Matched and Haploidentical Donor Transplantation for Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Comparative Study of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has emerged as a promising approach for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, there is a lack of studies examining the impact of this GVHD prophylaxis when different donor types are used in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This study compared the outcomes of patients with HL undergoing HSCT from HLA-matched donors, including matched sibling donors (MSDs) and matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and haploidentical donors, using PTCy as the GVHD prophylaxis approach in all cohorts. We retrospectively compared outcomes of allo-HSCT from 166 HLA-matched donors (96 sibling and 70 unrelated donors) and 694 haploidentical donors using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis in patients with HL registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database from 2010 to 2020. Compared to HLA-matched HSCT, haploidentical donor HSCT was associated with a significantly lower rate of platelet engraftment (86% versus 94%; P < .001) and a higher rate of grade II-IV acute GVHD (34% versus 24%; P = .01). The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower in the HLA-matched cohort compared to the haploidentical cohort (10% versus 18%; P = .02), resulting in a higher overall survival (OS) rate (82% versus 70%; P = .002). There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts in terms of relapse, progression-free survival, or GVHD-free relapse-free survival. In multivariable analysis, haploidentical HSCT was associated with an increased risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD and NRM and worse OS compared to HLA-matched HSCT. Our findings suggest that in the context of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis, transplantation from HLA-matched donors appears to be a more favorable option compared to haploidentical HSCT.

Comparison of Myeloablative Conditioning with Cyclophosphamide and Total-Body Irradiation (Cy/TBI) Vs. Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Total-Body Irradiation (Flu/Mel/TBI) in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for AML/ALL

Background: Cyclophosphamide combined with total-body irradiation (Cy/TBI) has been widely used worldwide as the standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but there are concerns about the antitumor effects of CY, as well as side effects, including cardiotoxicity and mucosal toxicity. A few studies suggest that the addition of an anticancer agent to a Cy/TBI regimen may reduce recurrence rates, but comparative studies of Cy/TBI regimens versus other TBI regimens are scarce. Furthermore, the recent expansion of post-transplant cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has increased its utility for cyclophosphamide-free conditioning regimens. Our institution has extensive experience with cord blood transplantation for relatively elderly patients with high-risk leukemia and has worked to develop safer and more effective MAC regimens other than Cy/TBI. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of fludarabine and melphalan combined with total-body irradiation (Flu/Mel/TBI) regimen, which is widely used at our institution, compared to Cy/TBI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult acute leukemia patients who underwent allo-HCT between August 1994 to February 2023 at Toranomon Hospital. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the first allo-HCT, and Cy (120mg/kg) /TBI (8-12Gy) or Flu (180mg/m 2) /Mel (80-120mg/m 2) /TBI (8-12Gy) as MAC regimen. We excluded patients who underwent haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse, and the secondary endpoints were the 5-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM), 5-year overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). OS and RFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The cumulative incidence of relapse and NRM were investigated with a competing risk analysis using Gray's test and multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk regression. Results: A total of 198 patients were included in this study, comprising 101 patients treated with Cy/TBI and 97 treated with Flu/Mel/TBI. Patients who received Flu/Mel/TBI were of higher age (Median age: Cy/TBI 36 years vs. Flu/Mel/TBI 53 years, p&amp;lt;0.01), higher ECOG PS score (PS≥1: 51.5% vs. 66.0%, p=0.044), fewer AML (49.5% vs. 22.7%, p&amp;lt;0.01), and more frequent CBT (45.5% vs. 76.3%, p&amp;lt;0.01). Disease status at HCT (CR1: 53.5% vs. 43.3%, p=0.154) and HCT-CI scores (HCT-CI≥1: 35.6% vs. 44.3%, p=0.214) were not different between the two regimen groups. Regarding the primary endpoint, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower in Flu/Mel/TBI group (36.8% vs. 24.9%, p= 0.035). The cumulative incidence of NRM was not significantly different between the two groups (19.1% vs. 25.2%, p=0.345). In the multivariate analysis, conditioning with Flu/Mel/TBI was significantly associated only with a lower risk of relapse (HR: 2.817; 95%CI: 1.183-6.712; p=0.019). Regarding NRM, only disease status not in CR1 was associated with a higher risk (CR1 vs. non-CR1 HR: 2.21; 95%CI: 1.095-4.468; p=0.027). There was no significant difference in 5-year OS (Cy/TBI 48.1% vs. Flu/Mel/TBI 51.4%, p=0.604) and RFS (44.2% vs. 49.9%, p=0.24). Conclusion: Despite older age and worse PS in the Flu/Mel/TBI group, Flu/Mel/TBI had a significantly lower 5-year cumulative relapse rate than Cy/TBI, with no significant difference in NRM. Our results suggest that Flu/Mel/TBI is a reasonable alternative to CY/TBI and may be a superior TBI-containing MAC regimen.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Is an Important Predictor of Survival in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Introduction:The body mass index (BMI) and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) are nutrition-related risk assessment tool and has been used in various clinical settings. The relationship between BMI and the associated risk of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), such as relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM), have been reported (Fuji S et al. BMT. 2014;49:1505). However, the relationship between GNRI and HSCT outcome remains inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the association between GNRI and overall survival (OS), relapse, and NRM of patients who received allogenic HSCT for hematological malignancies. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed aged 16 years or older patients who underwent first allogeneic HSCT from January 2010 to December 2022 at the Jikei university hospital. The primary endpoints of this study was OS at 5 years. Secondary endpoints were NRM, the incidences of relapse, all-grade acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. Nutritional risk was evaluated both BMI and GNRI. Patients were classified into three groups based on pre-transplant BMI (underweight; BMI &amp;lt;18.5, overweight; BMI ≥25, and others as standard), and also classified into three groups based on pre-transplant GNRI (low-risk; GNRI&amp;gt;98, intermediate-risk; 92≤GNR≤98, and high-risk; GNR&amp;lt;92). GNRI was calculated as follows: (1.519 x serum albumin) + (41.7 x current body weight/ ideal body weight). Data on serum albumin level and body weight were collected at the beginning of conditioning regimen. Results:Two hundred and three patients who received allogeneic HSCT for hematological malignancies (acute myeloid leukemia; n=98, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; n=51, myelodysplastic syndrome; n=27, myeloproliferative neoplasms; n=8, chronic myeloid leukemia; n=18, and other leukemias; n=2) were evaluated. The median age was 52 years old (range 16-69). The median follow-up period of survivors was 1394 days (range 51-4420) after allogeneic HSCT. The donor sources consisted of 39 (19.2%) HLA-matched related donor, 50(24.6%) HLA-mismatched related donor, 26(12.8%) HLA-matched unrelated donor and 88(43.4%) HLA-mismatched unrelated donor. One hundred and nine patients (53.7%) received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Based on the BMI, underweight, standard, overweight were included 33 (16.3%), 139 (68.4%), and 31 (15.3%) patients, respectively. While, based on the GNRI, the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk were divided into 105 (51.7%), 46 (22.8%), and 51 (25.2%) patients, respectively . The 5-year OS rates of standard, underweight, and overweight were 52.6%, 39.5%, and 62.1%, respectively (p=0.07). On the other hand, the 5-year OS of low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 62.6%, 50.4%, and 33.2%, respectively (p=0.01). In addition, multivariate analysis showed high-risk group showed significantly lower OS (p=0.03). Five-year cumulative incidences (CI) of relapse in the standard, underweight, and overweight, were 46.4%, 45.4%, and 25.0%, respectively (p=0.11). However, multivariate analysis showed that CI of relapse ratio was significantly lower in overweight group (p=0.02). While, 5-year CI of relapse rates in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 36.5%, 47.2%, and 52.5%, respectively (p=0.03). However, multivariate analysis showed that there were no significant differences in relapse among three risk groups (p=0.06). There were no significant differences in CI of NRM, acute GVHD and chronic GVHD either BMI or GNRI. Subgroup analysis in the patients who underwent HSCT in complete remission revealed that there was no significant difference in OS among the three BMI groups (p=0.11), as well as the three GNRI groups (p=0.06). For the patients in non-remission at the time of allogeneic HSCT, there was no significant difference in OS between the three groups in BMI; however, OS was shorter in the high-risk group in GNRI (p=0.01). Conclusions:In our study, OS of high-risk group defined by GNRI showed significantly poor , especially in non-remission patients. Although overweight defined by BMI did predict low CI of relapse, overweight did not predict OS. These results suggest that nutrition-related risk assessed by GNRI could be prognostic marker for survival in patients who received allogeneic HSCT.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study

Background: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is a standard of care in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, it remains underutilized in elderly pts due to limited efficacy and safety data. We therefore evaluated real world outcomes of CART in such pts. Methods: Seven academic centers participated in this retrospective study. Pts aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL who received a commercial CART product were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment data, CART toxicity, and clinical outcomes were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS; time from infusion to disease progression or death) and overall survival (OS; time from infusion to death from any cause) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and disease relapse/progression were estimated accounting for competing risks. Statistical analyses were performed in JMP v15 and XLSTAT v2022.1.2. Results: 209 pts were identified. Baseline characteristics and treatment pattern are shown in Table. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89), and 25 (12%) were ≥80 years. 131 (63%) were male, 188 (90%) were white, and 27 (13%) had ECOG PS of ≥2. The median HCT-CI was 1 (range 0-6), and 39 (22%) pts had a score of ≥3. 165 (84%) had stage III-IV disease, 131 (70%) had extranodal involvement, 24 (18%) had bulky disease, and 24 (11%) had high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL; double- or triple-hit lymphoma, n=15; HGBL, NOS, n=9). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-8), and 99 (48%) pts had ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 45 (22%) had prior bendamustine, and 44 (21%) had prior stem cell transplant (SCT; auto-SCT, n=41; allo-SCT, n=2; both auto- and allo-SCT, n=1). Bridging therapy was given to 100 (52%) pts; among those, 57 had chemotherapy, 20 had radiotherapy, 6 had both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 10 had lenalidomide-based regimen, and 7 had CD20 antibody and/or corticosteroids. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was most frequently used (63%, n=131), followed by lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) (24%, n=49) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) (13%, n=27). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 75% of pts, and a minority (6%) had grade ≥3. Immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 55%, and 29% had grade ≥3. The management of CRS and ICANS included corticosteroids in 101 (49%) pts, tocilizumab in 116 (56%) pts, and other biologic agents (anakinra, siltuximab, basiliximab) in 8 (4%) pts. Day 30 response was evaluable in 195 pts with an objective response rate (ORR) of 84%, and a complete response rate (CR) of 52%. 82% of the responders continued to have a response at 3 month follow up. The ORR/CR rates were 86%/53% for axi-cel, 64%/44% for tisa-cel, and 89%/52% for liso-cel, respectively. At a median follow up of 19.1 months (95% CI 16.1-23.6) after infusion, the median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-11.5), with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 54% (95% CI 47-61) and 43% (95% CI 35-50), respectively. The median OS was 16.5 months (95% CI 13.2-26.7), and the 6-and 12-month OS rates were 70% (95% CI 64-77) and 61% (95% CI 54-68), respectively. The NRM rate was 17% (95% CI 11-24) at 1 year, primarily due to infections including 5 COVID-19 related deaths. In univariate analysis, ECOG PS ≥2, bulky disease, elevated LDH, and the need for bridging therapy were associated with inferior PFS and OS. No significant difference in PFS and OS was seen based on age at infusion with a median PFS of 6.4 vs 9.6 vs 6.4 vs 6.0 months ( P=0.93) (Figure) and OS of 16.4 vs 19.2 vs 28.5 vs 12.7 months ( P=0.85) in age groups ≥65-69 vs ≥70-74 vs ≥75-79 vs ≥80-89. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS based on type of CART with a median PFS of 6.4 vs 5.6 vs 12.7 months ( P=0.16) and OS of 15.1 vs vs 16.1 vs NR months ( P=0.24) in pts treated with axi-cel vs tisa-cel vs liso-cel. Conclusions: In this large multicenter study of elderly pts with RR LBCL, CART therapy demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profile comparable to that in pivotal registration trials. Survival outcomes appeared similar regardless of patient age, including those aged ≥80 years, and type of CART product used. Similar to younger pts, high tumor burden and poor performance status at CART infusion were associated with inferior survival. This analysis confirms that older pts should not be excluded from receiving CART therapy solely due to chronological age.

Infusion of UM171-Expanded Cord Blood Led to Excellent Survival in Patients with High-Risk Leukemias: Results from Two Independent Phase II Studies

Background: Cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients experience delayed hematopoietic recovery and an increased risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM). UM171 is a small molecule that expands hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). An initial phase I-II clinical trial of a single UM171-expanded CBT was associated with low NRM and excellent long-term outcomes. (S Cohen et al. Lancet Haematology 2020). With the primary goal of generating increased numbers of HSPC to supplement a conventional single cord blood (CB) graft, we tested the same approach exclusively in high and very high-risk patients with acute leukemias/myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, two single independent prospective phase II studies were conducted in Montreal, at the Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital and in Seattle, at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Primary objectives were safety/NRM and progression free survival at 2-years post-transplant. Only patients with high and very-high risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) and MDS were eligible. Patients were required to have adequate organ function and comorbidity index as defined by the transplant center. Patients received a single UM171 7-day expanded and cryopreserved CB after either a myeloablative or mid-intensity conditioning regimen. All patients received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis. Results: A total of 52 patients were enrolled (31 in Montreal and 21 in Seattle) with 2 patients not receiving the UM171 expanded product and therefore removed from the final analysis. Patient's characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age was 44 years (range 19-66) and weight 78 kg (range, 44-145). Twenty-eight patients (54%) were either in a no complete response (CR) status or in ≥CR2, ten (19%) were p53+ and 17 (33%) were second or third transplants. Forty patients (77%) received a 5/8 HLA-matched CB unit and the median of CD34+ cells infused was 4.7 10 6/Kg (0.9-7.5). All patients engrafted (ANC &amp;gt;500 10^ 9/L for 2 consecutive days) at a median of 17 days (range, 9-39 days). The median time to platelet recovery (&amp;gt;20 x 10^ 9/L) was 37 days (range 24-116). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range 0.7 - 39), the probability of 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 67% (95% CI, 54-82) and 63% (95% CI, 50-79). OS for second/third transplants and p53+ patients was 64% (95% CI, 43-96) and 40 (95% CI, 19-86), PFS was 51 % (95% CI, 29-87) and 40 (95% CI, 19-86), respectively. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of NRM was 19% (95% CI, 8-31) while the incidence of relapse was 18% (95% CI, 6-29). The incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD was 69% (95% CI, 56−82%) and 16% (95% CI, 6−27%). The rate of moderate/severe chronic GVHD was 7% (95% CI,1−15%) and translated in an incidence of a chronic-relapse-free-survival of 55% (95% CI, 42−72%). Of note, Kaplan-Meier analysis of all clinical outcomes showed no difference for patients treated in Montreal and Seattle, and results were similar for both centers (Figure 1). Conclusions: The results of 2 independent Phase II clinical studies demonstrated that infusion of a UM171 single CBT led to excellent clinical outcomes in patients with high and very-high risk malignancies including patients with p53+ mutation. We also observed encouraging results for patients undergoing second/third transplants (33% of the entire cohort). Clinical outcomes were similar between the two Transplant Centers. Based on these positive results, a multicenter randomized clinical trial is currently in the planning stage.

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Decitabine-Containing Conditioning Improves Survival in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients with Iron Overload Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background: Iron overload is considered as an unfavorable prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) even in those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although iron chelation therapy has improved the prognosis of these patients to some extent, the effect has not yet been satisfactory. This study aimed to investigate whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and decitabine (G-DAC)-containing conditioning improve the prognosis of iron-overloaded MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Study Design: One hundred and ninety-seven patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on the level of serum ferritin (SF) and conditioning regimen, all patients enrolled were divided into 4 groups: SF﹤1000µg/L with G-DAC conditioning (cohort 1), SF﹤1000µg/L with non-G-DAC conditioning (cohort 2), SF ≥ 1000µg/L with G-DAC conditioning (cohort 3) and SF ≥ 1000µg/L with non-G-DAC conditioning (cohort 4). The clinical features and prognosis between cohorts were analyzed. Results: The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 77.0%, 72.1%, 73.8% and 38.7% ( P = 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.7%, 62.8%, 71.7% and 35.5% ( P = 0.001), and the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17.3%, 25.0%, 15.2% and 53.1% ( P = 0.001), and the incidence of relapse was 8%, 13.6%, 13.1% and 12.5% ( P = 0.592), respectively, in the four groups. To be specific, cohort4 had worse OS and DFS and higher NRM than the other three groups (all P﹤0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that SF ≥ 1000µg/L was a risk factor for OS, DFS and NRM ( P = 0.022, P = 0.025, P = 0.036), while G-DAC-containin g conditioning was a protective factor ( P = 0.009, P = 0.003, P = 0.004). Intriguingly, when cohort 1 to cohort4 were included in the multivariate analysis, only cohort4 was a risk factor for OS, DFS and NRM (all P﹤0.05), but cohort3, namely iron-overloaded patients who received G-DAC-containing conditioning had no difference in prognosis compared with patients with SF﹤1000µg/L. Conclusions: The poor prognosis of patients with iron overload could be overcome by G-DAC-containing conditioning partly.