Cultural Research Research Articles

Consequences of the hospital nursing research culture: Perspective of staff nurses

ObjectiveResearch plays a critical role in molding nursing as a profession. Healthcare organizations are challenged to build an organizational culture that cultivates the development of nursing research. Creating a culture of nursing research is constantly branded a vital component in advancing nursing science. Therefore, this study described nurses’ perceptions about their hospital’s nursing research culture. MethodsSemi-structured personal interviews were used to collect data. Seventeen staff nurses were selected to participate in the study by purposive sampling method from December 2022 to April 2023 in the eastern Philippines. The researchers used Braun and Clarke’s thematic approach to analyze the qualitative data. ResultsThe analysis revealed three central themes and seven subthemes: influencing behavior and performance of the employee (help in research information and learning, flexibility and adaptability, collaboration and communication among employees), influencing staff nurses’ research participation (leadership strategies, training and professional development), and affecting hospitals to adapt to change (organizational performance and success, employee engagement and job satisfaction). ConclusionsThe findings support the benefits of a positive nursing research culture in hospitals due to its critical role in shaping nurses’ behavior and performance, participation in nursing research, and hospital adaptation to changes. Collectively, these themes contribute to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted impact that a culture of nursing research can have on various levels of the healthcare system.

Educational model to strengthen research skills in primary level students

Scientific research skills are essential for all professions, yet they are not usually directly linked to school curricula. In this work, we have developed an educational model focused on the development of skills for scientific research to promote the culture of research in primary school children. For this, two work groups were formed: experimental and control. The classic teaching methods in Science and Technology were evaluated and contrasted with an innovative model based on scientific inquiry, observing that both are efficient. However, only the inquiry method offers meaningful and lasting learning, in addition to providing a socio-emotional impact on students.

Attitudes toward research and scholarly activities among medical laboratory science professionals in the United States.

Medical laboratory science (MLS) professionals play a crucial role in health care teams. However, research culture in the profession has not been well developed or studied. It is necessary to characterize attitudes toward research and scholarly activities among MLS professionals and identify ways to promote research in the profession. A cross-sectional survey was administered through American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science channels. Survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics, and linear regression models were constructed to identify characteristics that predicted 2 research attitudes: "valuing the role of research" and "perceived research environment" in the profession. Of the 116 MLS professionals in this study, 53% reported currently participating in research activities. Opinions toward research were generally positive, although many respondents were not currently conducting research. Individuals with education and research practice focuses tended to place greater value on research, and education level was a significant predictor of perceived research environment. Dedicated research time and mentorship were cited as effective ways for employers to promote research in MLS. Overall, respondents had favorable attitudes toward research in MLS, but approximately half of participants noted a lack of incentives to conduct research. This study highlights several initiatives that may be effective for promoting increased research activity among MLS professionals.

“We have to change our mindsets”: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators in research collaboration across integrated care system organisations

The introduction of Integrated Care Systems (ICS) in England aimed to increase joint planning and delivery of health and social care, and other services, to better meet the needs of local communities. There is an associated duty to undertake collaborative research across ICS partners to inform this new integrated approach, which might be challenging given that organisations span health, local authority, voluntary and community sector, and research. This study aimed to explore the appetite for collaborative Research and Innovation (R&I) across ICSs, potential barriers and solutions. This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 24 stakeholders who held senior positions within organisations across two ICS areas (Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent; Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin). Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive and deductive analysis, first mapping to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), then considering key influences on organisational behaviour in terms of Capability, Opportunity and Motivation from the COM-B Behaviour Change Wheel. There were fundamental limitations on organisational opportunities for collaborative R&I: a historical culture of competition (rather than collaboration), a lack of research culture and prioritisation, compounded by a challenging adverse economic environment. However, organisations were motivated to undertake collaborative R&I. They recognised the potential benefits (e.g., skill-sharing, staff development, attracting large studies and funding), the need for collaborative research that mirrors integrated care, and subsequent benefits for care recipients. Related barriers included negative experiences of collaboration, fear of failing and low confidence. Capability varied across organisations in terms of research skills and confidence, which reflected the range of partners (from local authorities to NHS Trusts, primary care, and academic institutions). These findings indicate a need to shift from a culture of competition to collaboration, and to help organisations across ICS to prioritise research, and share resources and skills to mitigate the limiting effects of a constrained economic environment. This could be further explored using a systems change approach, to develop the collaborative research efforts alongside the overarching move towards integrated care.

A research internship scheme for nurses and its wider implications for clinical managers.

There is growing evidence that clinical research activity is linked to better patient outcomes and that staff involvement in research is linked to enhanced morale and retention. Clinical managers have a pivotal role in supporting staff to engage with research, but they are not always given the means to do so and are not always aware of the benefits. In 2021 a research internship scheme was set up as a collaboration between two London NHS trusts and a university, enabling nurses and midwives to undergo training and undertake a range of research activities. Some participants experienced challenges in fitting internship activities around clinical duties despite the fact that the scheme was planned to give them protected time. This article describes the scheme, reports the findings of its evaluation at one of the two trusts, and discusses its implications for clinical managers in terms of how they can be supported to contribute to the development of a research culture.

EXPLORING THE DETERMINANTS EFFECTING PROMOTION OF RESEARCH CULTURE AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL

The study in hand was undertaken to explore the determinants which are effecting promotion of research culture at university level. Although many factors are effecting but the most relevant determinants affect was checked which are environmental and institutional determinants. The population was comprised of 1477 the faculty members of BZ University, Multan & Islamia University Bahawalpur as well as Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan and University of Science and technology, Bannu. The selected sample from the population was comprised of 253 faculty members hailing from the above-mentioned higher education institutions out of 1477 was selected for study. The research design was quantitative in which survey questionnaires were distributed for data collection. T-test and ANOVA were used for analysis of data. The results offered significant information for reaching the conclusion, and making the desired decisions. Also, some recommendations have been extracted from results offered to the policy-makers and future researchers about research issues.

Hindrances of Scientific Research Cultures: A Study of University Faculty Members at Al- Madinah International University (MEDIU)

Hindrances of Scientific Research Cultures: A Study of University Faculty Members at Al- Madinah International University (MEDIU)

Whom to Remember – How to Return? Brigitte Schiffer, the Voices of Siwa and the Entangled History of the Berlin School of Ethnomusicology

For some years now, there has been an intense and controversial debate about the relationship between the culture of memory and research into the consequences of colonialism, on the one hand, and the Holocaust, on the other. Michael Rothberg's concept of multidirectional memory and Nathan Sznaider's contribution to the debate on the vanishing points of memory ("Fluchtpunkte der Erinnerung") provide only a few of several examples. Using the recordings of the German-Jewish composer and ethnomusicologist Brigitte Schiffer, made at the oasis of Siwa in the Sahara in 1932/33, as a case study, the article reflects on the implications of this debate for dealing with the so-called Berlin School of comparative musicology. Beyond that, the article asks how the complexity of competing memory discourses affects current approaches and efforts of decolonizing archives and identifies perspectives and strategies for how to handle such collections today, especially regarding the chances and challenges of so-called recirculation.

Mismatch in perceptions of the quality of supervision and research data management as an area of concern: Results from a university-wide survey of the research integrity culture at a Belgian university

ABSTRACT Researchers of KU Leuven, a large Belgian university, were invited to complete a bespoke questionnaire assessing their attitudes toward research integrity and the local research culture, with specific emphasis on the supervision of junior researchers. A total of 7,353 invitations were sent via e-mail and 1,866 responses were collected (25.3% response rate), of which 1,723 responses are reported upon here. Some of the findings are relevant to the broader research community. Whereas supervisors evaluated their supervision of junior researchers almost unanimously as positive, fewer supervisees evaluated it as such. Data management emerged as an area of concern, both in terms of reviewing raw data and of data storage. More female than male professors emphasized open communication and supported their supervisees’ professional development and personal well-being. At the same time, fewer female professors felt safe to speak up than male professors. Finally, researchers who obtained their master’s degree outside Europe evaluated their supervision and KU Leuven’s research culture more positively than researchers with a master’s degree from KU Leuven. The results of the survey were fed back to the university’s board and several bodies and served as input to update the university’s research policy. Faculties and departments received a detailed report.

Evaluation of a Seed Award scheme to promote the involvement of global health researchers in public and community engagement: approaches, challenges and lessons learned

Background Public and community engagement (PCE) in health research is becoming more common and many research organizations are committed to fostering PCE to strengthen their research culture. However, barriers that may make researchers hesitate to undertake PCE activities may be heightened in Global South research settings. To address these challenges, we set up a PCE Seed Award scheme at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU) across four research sites in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi -Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nepal to enable researchers to incorporate public engagement activities in their research. Methods The Seed Award scheme followed three steps: 1. A call for applications and funding decisions: Researchers were invited to submit grant applications twice per year. Applications were reviewed and funding decisions made by a committee including external reviewers. 2. Supporting and monitoring: Successful awardees were supported to further develop their proposals, strengthen engagement capacity and to plan evaluation. 3. Reporting and evaluation: Awardees were asked to conduct evaluation throughout the activities and to submit an end-of-project report. The scheme itself was evaluated using mixed methods. Results Over a six-year period from 2016-2022, 41 small grants were awarded. The PCE team supporting the scheme delivered 19 training sessions to help strengthen awardees PCE capacity. Conclusions We conclude that the scheme has made a profound impact in encouraging researchers at the OUCRU research units to lead and be involved with PCE activities. During this period, many more researchers, of all grades, were active in engagement projects. The scheme was improved by adding mentoring and training, and one-on-one mentoring helped attract more applicants. In this paper, we describe the process of development and implementation of this award programme, which aims to support and promote researcher-led public engagement and reflect on the challenges and lessons learned.

Políticas institucionales de investigación en educación superior

In Ibero-America, studies on "institutional research policies" in "higher education" constitute a little explored or emerging field; the absence of publications on the subject evokes multi-causal factors such as the lack of maturation of administrative structures oriented to the development of science, technology and innovation -CTeI in the countries, low valuation of knowledge in society, insufficient budgetary and infrastructural capacities in the territories; the instability in the governance of Latin American nations and the volatility in the regulations oriented to research development; makes that for the most part, a divulgative scenario composed of succinct cases with annualized statistical data and without periodicity/transcendence in time is established. This article describes the findings found in the systematic review of the scientific literature on institutional research policies in higher education published from 2014 to 2023. The methodology adopted the guidelines of the PRISMA Statement method and the Cochrane Collaboration manual, to establish a map of motivations, thematizations, and theoretical and methodological contributions; from the deconstruction of records through the MAXQDAÒ qualitative analysis software. The results, discussions, and conclusions are framed in a humanistic perspective of "science and technology studies -ECT" that seek in / from institutional research policies an opportunity to constitute a "research culture" at the various levels of higher education oriented/evaluated from representational, regulatory, identity, productive and usability of knowledge elements.

In search of nuclear stewards Countdown: The Blinding Future of Nuclear Weapons Sarah Scoles Bold Type Books, 2024. 272 pp.

A journalist probes the culture and convictions of researchers at US national labs

Building research capacity in ultrasound departments

AbstractResearch is integral to evidence‐based practice in healthcare benefiting both the professional's knowledge and improving patient care. Despite its importance, building research capacity within ultrasound departments presents significant challenges for sonographers, managers and health services. In this commentary key factors influencing research culture and capacity building are explored, emphasising the role of the individual sonographer, organisations and structural support, in fostering a culture of research in the ultrasound department.

Evaluating the impact of the supporting the advancement of research skills (STARS) programme on research knowledge, engagement and capacity-building in a health and social care organisation in England

ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact a novel education programme - to improve research engagement, awareness, understanding and confidence - had on a diverse health and social care workforce. Barriers and facilitators to engagement were explored together with research capacity-building opportunities and ways to embed a research culture. The programme is entitled ‘Supporting The Advancement of Research Skills’ (STARS programme); the paper reports findings from a health and social care setting in England, UK.MethodsA four-level outcome framework guided the approach to evaluation and was further informed by key principles of research capacity development and relevant theory. Quantitative data were collected from learners before and after engagement; these were analysed descriptively. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with learners and analysed thematically. A purposive sample was achieved to include a diversity in age, gender, health and social care profession, and level of attendance (regular attendees, moderate attendees and non-attenders).ResultsThe evaluation spanned 18 half-day workshops and 11 seminars delivered by expert educators. 165 (2% of total staff at Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (MPFT)) staffs booked one or more education sessions; 128 (77%) including Allied Health Professionals (AHPs), psychologists, nursing and midwifery, and social workers attended one or more session. Key themes of engagement with teaching sessions, relevance and impact of training and promoting a research active environment were identified with relevant sub-themes. Positive impacts of training were described in terms of research confidence, intentions, career planning and application of research skills as a direct result of training. Lack of dedicated time for research engagement, work pressures and time commitments required for the programme were key barriers. Facilitators that facilitated engagement are also described.ConclusionsFindings demonstrate the impact that a free, virtual and high-quality research education programme had at individual and organisational levels. The programme is the product of a successful collaboration between health and social care and academic organisations; this provides a useful framework for others to adapt and adopt. Key barriers to attendance and engagement spoke to system-wide challenges that an education programme could not address in the short-term. Potential solutions are discussed in relation to protecting staff time, achieving management buy-in, recognising research champions, and having a clear communication strategy.

‘I should do what?’ Addressing research misconduct through values alignment

Evidence suggests that the incidence of research misconduct is not in decline despite efforts to improve awareness, education and governance mechanisms. Two responses to this problem are favoured: first, the promotion of an agent-centred ethics approach to enhance researchers’ personal responsibility and accountability, and second, a change in research culture to relieve perceived pressures to engage in misconduct. This article discusses the challenges for both responses and explains how normative coherence through values alignment might assist. We argue that research integrity and research ethics convey mixed messages, which are likely to contribute to a form of normative confusion. For the successful adoption of an agent-centred approach, normative coherence is needed between the two. To facilitate normative coherence, we propose that research ethics and research integrity be underpinned by a shared set of moral values that can be enacted via codes and guidelines and imbue research environments. Furthermore, to facilitate culture change, the same normative coherence is necessary at all levels of an institution. Only via values alignment between institutional aims, management, institutional practices and researchers can an ethical culture become truly embedded in research institutions.

Walking Toward the Demonumentalization of Qualitative Research: A Collaborative Autoethnography Account While Producing an Educational Podcast

This article examines how two teacher educators, as researchers and as research teachers, engaged in a collaborative interpretation of their autoethnographies about questioning an instrumentalist and positivist research culture in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT). The autoethnographies simultaneously emerged from the research activities related to the production of a bilingual podcast named “Conversing about "Investigación Cualitativa.” Specifically, the authors conducted a qualitative study of autoethnographic and collaborative nature while working on their podcast. The data were individual written retrospective accounts, which were shared, discussed, and interpreted in online live meetings. The outcomes of the study were encapsulated in a major theme called Qualitative research: The path traveled from dogma to critical awareness, and three subsidiary themes named Questioning the culture of scientificity from our research experiences; Adopting a critical perspective (but still teaching by the book); and Empowering ourselves as teachers and as research teachers. Overall, this study emphasized a questioning attitude toward building a critical perspective from which examine alternatives to demonumentalize qualitative research without falling into extremes. Thus, it contributes to finding a balance between dogma and skepticism through a dialogue between local and global research agendas.

“We Know It's a Library”: Black Space, Black Women's Labor, and Radical Black Joy

The Junior Scholars Program (JSP) is a tuition-free youth learning program at the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture in Harlem, New York. At JSP, Damaris, a former JSP instructor, was introduced to Kadiatou, the Schomburg Center's former education and outreach programs manager. They write collaboratively to (re)member the dialectical relationship between Black women's labor, Black Space, and Radical Black Joy.

Variability in research culture across busy catheterisation labs in the Asia-Pacific region.

Information related to research culture in the busy catheterisation (cath) labs across the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region is sparse. The aims of this study were to examine the variability in research culture in busy cath labs in the APAC region and to propose a roadmap for hospitals to develop in-house research capabilities in conjunction with industry and academia. Data related to research practices in the APAC region were collected from busy cath labs (at least 250 angioplasty/year) and analysed. Results were shared with research experts to understand the challenges in institutional research and create a roadmap for hospitals to develop research capabilities. A total of 220 respondents from 62 cath labs (88.6%) across 13 APAC countries participated in the survey. A wide variation was noted in research culture across APAC countries. Well-established infrastructure was reported in Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Singapore, and Japan. Large multicentre trials were common in South Korea, while routine follow-ups were common in Japan. Linking medical records across hospitals/states was considered challenging. Research exposure and training were limited in the APAC region. The experts suggested a roadmap, including creating a conducive regulatory environment, forming synergistic goals, training programs for the professionals involved in research, and leveraging best practices, for improving the research culture in APAC. Clinical research in cardiology has grown significantly in the APAC region, with a huge research potential in China and India. Implementing measures to improve research training and involvement of the industry will boost the research culture in the APAC region.

Safety of Dapagliflozinin Reducing Cardiac Events and Deaths among NYHA Class II and III Cardiac Failure Patients.

Background: In last few decades, a global transition in incidence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from hypertension and valvular heart disease to coronary artery disease has taken place. Aim: To assess the safety of Dapagliflozin in reducing the cardiac events and deaths among class II and class III heart failure patients. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Methodology: Cardiac patients (n=480) who belonged from class II and III with mild to moderate reduced ejection fraction were added in this study. This study was held at Cardiology Department at Mayo Hospital. All patients received sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors at a dose of 10mg once daily or matching placebo, in addition to usual therapy for eight weeks. SPSS-v25 analyzed the entered data. Mean ± SD presented age, blood pressure and eGFR level. Chi square test was used to compare the gender, NYHA class, primary composite outcome, and cardiovascular death. Results: Dapagliflozin showed lower rates of the primary composite outcome (15.8% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.038). There was no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular death between both groups (5.8% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.219). Practical Implication: Due to lack of research culture in our setups, common health issue like chronic heart failure remained clandestine. Present study highlighted the role of oral dapagliflozin in reducing worse cardiovascular events and deaths among NHY class II and III heart failure patients. Conclusion: It was concluded that dapagliflozin showed significant reductions in various cardiovascular events and deaths compared to placebo thus highlighting its potential as a beneficial intervention in our population. Keywords: Heart Failure, Reduced Ejection Fraction, NYHA Classification, Urgent Visits and Cardiac deaths.

The Barriers of Conducting Medical Research in Saudi Arabia: A Review

Research is a crucial component of scientific and medical progress, generating new information and advancing healthcare knowledge. In the context of Saudi Arabia, it is essential for healthcare professionals and students to engage in research activities to stay current and improve patient care. This study explores the attitudes, knowledge, and barriers faced by healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia regarding research analysis and writing. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on English-language scientific literature published between August and September 2023, primarily through PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Saudi Digital Library. Reports written in English related to research in Saudi Arabia were considered for analysis. Result: The study identifies several barriers faced by Saudi healthcare workers in research, including issues like time constraints, lack of mentoring, and inadequate knowledge. The attitude and knowledge toward publishing research among medical residents were found to be suboptimal, with some individuals reporting low knowledge and unacceptable attitudes. Challenges such as the research approval process, heavy workloads, and gender disparities in research participation were also highlighted. Conclusion: Overcoming barriers to research and promoting a research culture is crucial for strengthening the scientific value of Saudi Arabia. By addressing the identified obstacles and implementing recommended measures, Saudi Arabia can contribute to the global research community and achieve its Vision 2030 goals, particularly in the healthcare sector.