Previous articleNext article No AccessDiscussion and CriticismIn Defense of Murdock: A Reply to DickemannJohn HartungJohn Hartung Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 24, Number 1Feb., 1983 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/202954 Views: 9Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1983 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological ResearchPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Laura Betzig Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence, Evolution and Human Behavior 33, no.44 (Jul 2012): 309–317.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.008Bobbi S. Low Men, women, and sustainability, Population and Environment 18, no.22 (Nov 1996): 111–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208407John Hartung Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 661–670.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045520Irwin S. Bernstein Sociobiological metaphor, the rules of evidence, and matrilineal inheritance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 670–670.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045532Gerald Borgia Do we need cultural inertia to explain matrilineal inheritance?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 670–671.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045544David M. Buss Inheritance strategies, resource allocation, and causal alternatives for individual traits, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 671–672.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045556Peter T. Ellison Lineal inheritance and lineal extinction, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 672–672.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045568Susan M. Essock-Vitale, Richard A. Vitale Assessment of paternity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 672–673.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004557XMark V. Flinn How can evolutionary theory help explain inheritance practices?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.0404 (Feb 2010): 673.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045581Robin Fox Paternity irrelevance and matrilineal descent, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 674–675.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045593Patricia Adair Gowaty Low probability of paternity or… something else?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 675–675.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004560XJeffrey A. Kurland Mother knows best?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 675–676.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045611Chet S. Lancaster Matrilineal inheritance: Sociobiological versus ethnological interpretations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 676–677.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045623Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Resource certainty or paternity uncertainty?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 677–678.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045635William M. Shields Uncertain paternity, matrilineality, and cross-cousin marriage: Hidden connections?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 678–679.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045647Nancy Wilimsen Thornhill, Randy Thornhill Matriliny and sexual selection and conflict, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 679–680.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045659Daniel R. Vining Sociobiological theory and contemporary humans, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 680–681.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045660John Hartung Lineal extinction — A bridge to ecology?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, no.44 (Feb 2010): 681–688.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045672