Introduction: As check-ups in healthcare facilities are much arduous during the pandemic including blood pressure (BP) control, an alternative is urgently needed to replace the use of disturbing cuff-based office and ambulatory BP monitoring (BPM) devices. With the advancement of telemedicine, real-time checking and reporting of blood pressure may be potentially achieved using photoplethysmography (PPG) technology in cuffless devices. Therefore, this study evaluated the accuracy of these devices compared to the cuff-based BPM devices. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the PRISMA 2020 guideline through multiple databases using Rayyan according to the prearranged inclusion and exclusion criteria, yielding six clinical studies to be included in the final review and analysis. Results: Overall fixed-effect meta-analysis of all studies (total of 319 subjects) presented small differences between cuffless and cuff-based devices, showing promising accuracy according to the current medical instrumentation guideline both in measuring systolic BP (SMD: 0.23 mmHg [95% CI: 0.07–0.39], p = 0.004; I2 = 0%, p = 0.55) and diastolic BP (SMD: 0.27 mmHg [95% CI: 0.11–0.43], p = 0.0007; I2 = 39%, p = 0.14). Discussion: PPG itself is a noninvasive technology, consisting of an infrared-emitting light source and a photodetector to measure the blood-reflected light intensity. Despite its ease in equipment, it measures BP accurately without being influenced by various positions and activities. Moreover, the data can be accessed real-time by both users and healthcare providers. Conclusion: In summary, cuffless PPG BPM devices have the potential in becoming a telemonitoring device for ambulatory patients for its accuracy. Its presence may be the answer to current restriction towards healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, in order to further confirm our findings, more clinical studies with various settings are encouraged to be held.
Read full abstract