e23141 Background: Black patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) have increased risk of mortality and higher rates of treatment complications compared to other racial groups, however, drivers of these disparities are poorly understood. Recent advances in novel targeted therapies, such as mogamulizumab and brentuximab vedotin (BV), have demonstrated improved survival compared to standard therapies. We aimed to identify treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome (MF/SS) to better understand potential drivers underlying these racial disparities. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 282 patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of advanced stage MF/SS seen at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University from 2000-2023. Clinical data was collected from the electronic medical record and included demographics, histopathologic findings, therapies received, highest disease stage reached, and survival. Differences in baseline characteristics and treatments were assessed using univariate analysis. The association between race, insurance status, disease stage, and category of treatment was assessed using multivariable analysis of overall survival (OS). Results: The cohort was comprised of an even distribution of patients identifying as Black (50%) and white (47.5%). Median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range, 12-91), and Black patients had an earlier age of diagnosis compared to white (median 52 vs. 65.5 years, p < 0.001). The majority of patients had a pathological diagnosis of MF (79.1%). Large cell transformation was seen in 24.8%. Most common stage was stage 2b (36.2%); other stages included 3a (18.1%), 3b (4.3%), 4a1 (19.1%), 4a2 (13.1%), and 4b (9.2%). Systemic therapies were divided into three groups: standard chemotherapy, biologics (interferon, retinoids, extracorporeal photopheresis, and methotrexate), and novel agents (mogamulizumab, BV, and clinical trials). Median OS was 47.5 months (range, 2-246 months), and was greater in patients who received treatment with novel agents (hazard ratio 0.46, 95%, CI 0.29-0.73, p < 0.001). Black patients were less likely to receive photopheresis and local radiation compared to white patients (36.73% vs. 63.27% and 39.53% vs. 60.47%, p < 0.05, respectively), however, there were no differences in the receipt of novel agents by race. There were no differences in OS between Black and white patients. Conclusions: While we did find some differences in treatment patterns by race, these did not translate to a difference in outcomes. Importantly, in this cohort of patients who received similar rates of novel targeted therapies across racial groups, there were no differences in survival by race. These findings suggest that factors such as access to novel targeted therapies may play a role in the well-documented racial disparities in treatment outcomes.
Read full abstract