Distribution:Tidewater gobies are confined to shallow, brackish portions of coastal streams, marshes, lagoons and estuaries between the Smith River to the north and Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the south California (Swift et al. 1989). Abundance: Where found, they are often one of the most abundant fish species (densities peak in summer). Habitat and ecology: They feed on benthic invertebrates such as ostracods, amphipods, and insect larvae. Potential predators include birds and other fishes. Wading and diving birds often forage in areas where tidewater gobies are abundant. Larger native fishes such as Oncorhynchus mykiss, Cotfus aspeu, Leptocotrus armatus and Gil/ichthys mirabilis may be important predators. Introduced fishes such as Tridentiger trigonocephalus, 7: bifasciatus, Acanthogobiusflavimanus, Morone saxatilis, Micropterous salmoides and other centrarchids may also adversely affect goby populations. Tidewater gobies rarely occur where predatory fishes are abundant. In addition, trematode metacercariae (probably Cryptocotyle lingua) infect some populations. Reproduction: Males excavate 10-20 cm mucus lined burrows in coarse sand and care for one clutch of 300-500 eggs. Embryos hatch in about 10 days. Females, which are more strikingly patterned, aggressively compete with other females for breeding males. Both sexes spawn several times. Spawning occurs almost year-round, with spring and fall peaks (Brown & Swenson 1994). Mortality appears to increase after spawning, and fish typically live only one year. Some may overwinter upstream. Threats: Habitat loss and degradation is associated with land use practices such as conversion of coastal wetlands to marinas, highway and railroad construction. freshwater diversions, grazing, breaching of coastal lagoons, and flood control practices. Drought conditions in recent years have compounded these effects. The number of known populations has declined by half since 1900 (less than 50 populations currently exist) (Swift et al. 1989). Reductions have been most striking in Southern California and San Francisco Bay. The loss of this many populations is impressive in light of the broad physical tolerance of this species. The lack of a marine phase has led to genetically divergent populations with limited capacity for re-colonization following local extinctions (Crabtree 1985). Small populations continue to be found, suggesting that the total number of populations lost might be higher than presently estimated. Conservation action: Gobies were successfully re-introduced into Malibu Lagoon (Swift et al. 1993) and Waddell Creek in 1991 (Brown & Swenson 1994). Its recent listing as a federally endangered species (7 March 1994) should increase protection. Conservation recommendations: Reducing eutrophication, maintaining the quality of freshwater flows, and allowing the natural development of barrier sand berms which close stream mouths and enhance lagoon formation will help protect habitats. In addition, introductions of exotic species to goby habitats should be prevented.
Read full abstract