To compare the outcomes and complication rates in patients with small renal masses treated with percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) vs. Cryoablation. A retrospective study was performed evaluating 163 renal tumors treated with either ablative therapy between 2003 and 2017. Of the evaluated data, a total of 75 were biopsy proven RCC tumors and 27 biopsy proven Oncocytoma tumors. The remaining were treated based on classical imaging characteristics suggestive of RCC. Tumor characteristics were described using the RENAL Nephrometry scoring system based on cross-sectional imaging prior to the procedure. Time to recurrence was measured and determined by the first cross-sectional imaging study date to report residual/recurrent disease. Major complications requiring intervention in the immediate post-ablative setting were also recorded. 86 renal tumors treated with RFA and 77 were treated with Cryoablation. The average tumor size (cm) and nephrometry score for the RFA group was 2.4 and 5.9, respectively. The average tumor size and nephrometry score for the Cryoablation group was 2.0 and 6.2, respectively. There was no significant difference between the tumor characteristics of the two groups. A total of 22 tumors in the RFA group had residual/recurrent disease and a total of 6 tumors in the Cryoablation group had residual/recurrent disease. The average time to recurrence in RFA and Cryoablation group was 440.6 days and 1579.5 days, respectively (p = 0.045) There were no major complications requiring intervention reported in the RFA group, although there were 4 cases (5%) in the Cryoablation group (p = 0.032). When evaluating renal tumors with an average size of 2.2 cm and Renal Nephrometry scores in the range of 6, percutaneous Cryoablation was shown to have a statistically significant lower recurrence/residual disease rate, as well as overall longer time for disease recurrence. Overall, major complication rates requiring interventions are low; although, Cryoablation did show a statistically significant increased rate when compared to RFA.Tabled 1Ablation TypeAverage Size (cm)Average RENAL Nephrometry Score# of RecurrencesAverage Time to Recurrence (days)Major Complications Requiring InterventionRFA2.45.922440.60Cryoablation26.281579.54 Open table in a new tab