Objective To investigate the symptom, esophageal motility characteristics and the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ gastroesophageal junction (EGJ) diagnosed by high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Methods From 6th January to 27th December in 2012, the clinical data of 171 patients with reflux symptoms and received HREM were retrospectively analyzed. According to the Chicago classification V. 3.0, the patients were divided into EGJ type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups. The age, body mass index (BMI), GERD related symptoms, esophageal motility parameters and the incidence of GERD were compared among the three groups. Chi-square test, t test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. Relationship between EGJ types and other variables were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. Results In 171 patients, 136 cases (79.5%) with type Ⅰ EGJ, 22 cases (12.9%) with type Ⅱ EGJ and 13 cases (7.6%) with type Ⅲ EGJ. The age of patients with type Ⅱ EGJ was significantly older than that of patients with type Ⅰ EGJ ((56.5±2.3) years vs (48.6±1.0) years, t=2.992, P=0.003), however the differences were not statisticant when compared with type Ⅲ EGJ patients ((51.2±3.8) years, P>0.05). The BMI of patients with type Ⅲ EGJ was higher than that of type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ EGJ patients ((26.0±1.3) kg/m2 vs (21.9±0.3) kg/m2 and (23.5±0.6) kg/m2), and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.082 and 2.108, both P<0.05). The resting pressure of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) of patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ were lower than that of type Ⅰ EGJ ((10.6±1.5) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and (3.4±0.7) mmHg vs (17.1±0.7) mmHg), and the resting pressure of LES of type Ⅲ EGJ was lower than that of type Ⅱ EGJ ((3.4±0.7) mmHg vs (10.6±1.5) mmHg), and the differences were all statistically significant (t=-3.882, -6.411 and -2.769, all P<0.01). The amplitude of contraction at 11 cm above LES and distal contractile integral (DCI) of patients with type Ⅲ EGJ were both lower than those of patients with type Ⅰ EGJ ((32.2±5.4) mmHg vs (48.5±2.5) mmHg, and (392.0±94.1) mmHg·s·cm vs (805.1±61.4) mmHg·s·cm), and the differences were statistically significant (t=-2.580 and -2.041, both P<0.05). The incidences of GERD in patients with type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ were 68.4%(93/136), 77.3%(17/22) and 10/13, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 =1.021, P=0.600). EGJ types were positively correlated with age and BMI (r=0.214 and 0.290, both P<0.01). However, EGJ types were negatively correlated with the LES resting pressure, contraction amplitudes at 7 cm and 11 cm above the LES, and DCI (r=-0.474, -0.182, -0.333 and -0.191, all P<0.05). Conclusions Aging, overweight and obesity are risk factors of the LES and crural diaphragm separation. EGJ types are not predictable based on symptoms. The esophageal motility seems to decrease in patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ, the incidence of GERD in patients with type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ are all high. Key words: Gastroesophageal reflux; Gastroesophageal junction types; High resolution esophageal manometry
Read full abstract