Cruciate-retaining Designs Research Articles

Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a highly congruent condylar-stabilized (CS) articulation may be advantageous due to increased stability versus cruciate-retaining (CR) designs, while mitigating the limitations of a posterior-stabilized construct. The aim was to assess ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of a cemented single-radius TKA with a CS insert, performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing TKA at a specialist centre in the UK between November 2010 and December 2012. Data were collected using a bespoke electronic database and cross-referenced with national arthroplasty audit data, with variables including: preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, and mortality status. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected by a specialist research team at ten years post-surgery. There were 536 TKAs, of which 308/536 (57.5%) were in female patients. The mean age was 69.0 years (95% CI 45.0 to 88.0), the mean BMI was 32.2 kg/m2 (95% CI 18.9 to 50.2), and 387/536 (72.2%) survived to ten years. There were four revisions (0.7%): two deep infections (requiring debridement and implant retention), one aseptic loosening, and one haemosiderosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in implant survival according to sex, age, or obesity status. Ten-year PROMs were available for 196/387 (50.6%) surviving patients and were excellent: mean Oxford Knee Score 34.4 (95% CI 32.7 to 36.1); mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 51.2 (95% CI 16.1 to 86.3); mean EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire score 69.9 (95% CI 46.8 to 93.0); 141/196 (71.9%) achieved the 22-point FJS patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS); and 156/196 (79.6%) were "very satisfied or satisfied". This is the only large study reporting ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of TKA using a cemented single-radius design and with a CS tibial bearing construct. The findings of excellent implant survival, safety, and functional outcomes indicate that this combination is a safe and effective option in routine TKA. Further investigation of this single-radius design TKA with CS tibial bearings with well-matched patient study groups will allow further insight into the performance of these implants.

Cementless medial pivot design demonstrates equal or better outcomes compared to cementless cruciate-retaining design following total knee arthroplasty

IntroductionTraditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs fail to reproduce physiologic knee kinematics, which can contribute to patient dissatisfaction. In an attempt to restore more normal knee kinematics, the medial pivot (MP) design may improve knee function and stability as well as patient satisfaction. A limited number of studies have compared postoperative outcomes of exclusively cementless Cruciate-Retaining (CR) TKAs to cementless MP TKAs. We aimed to compare: (1) 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year complications and revisions, (2) preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), (3) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS-JR), and (4) visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-years. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed to identify all patients who had previously undergone a TKA at our institution and compare a cementless CR system to a cementless MP design. Categorical variables, including demographics, comorbidities, and complications utilized Chi-square tests in bivariable analysis. Continuous variables, such as age, were compared using Student's t-tests. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. ResultsCementless CR and cementless MP cohorts showed low profiles of postoperative complications and favorable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The MP cohort had lower VAS pain at 1-year (1.70 vs. 3.76, p < 0.001) and 2-years (1.43 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001) and higher ROM at 3-months (118 vs. 100, p < 0.001), 6-months (113 vs. 103, p < 0.0001), and 1-year (117 vs. 110, p = 0.02), respectively. ConclusionThis study is the first comparison of postoperative outcomes between a cementless CR TKA and cementless MP TKA designs. Implant design and fixation type are vital components influencing patient satisfaction after TKA. Pain scores and range of motion favored the cementless MP cohort in comparison to the cementless CR cohort.

L’efficacité de la conservation du ligament croisé postérieur versus la stabilisation postérieure sur les fonctions du genou et de l’appareil extenseur chez les patients après une arthroplastie totale bilatérale simultanée du genou : une étude de suivi rétrospective de deux ans

IntroductionThe importance of the posterior cruciate ligament in knee functionality is known; however, the effect of preserving the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on extensor mechanism function and knee function is not clear. We aimed to compare extensor mechanism function and knee function between patients operated with the cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs for simultaneous bilateral TKA. HypothesisPatients operated with the cruciate-retaining design would produce better outcomes than those operated with the posterior-stabilized design. Materials and methodsA total of 104 patients were divided into two groups as the cruciate-retaining (n=52) and posterior-stabilized (n=52) groups. The groups were compared for extensor mechanism function (chair-rise test) and knee function (Hospital for Special Surgery [HSS] knee score). The follow-up points were six weeks, three months, six months, one year, and two years. ResultsNo statistically significant effect on chair-rise performance of the group-by-time interaction (χ2 [5,N=104]=5.32, p=0.37) or of group (χ2 [1,N=104]=1.69, p=0.19). In the HSS knee score, the group-by-time interaction was statistically significant (F [5,510]=6.24, p<0.001). A statistically significant difference of 7.4 points in favor of the posterior-stabilized group was found at six weeks (p=0.002). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at the other follow-up points. DiscussionThe cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs have similar outcomes with regard to extensor mechanism function and knee function in the long-term period in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA. In the short-term period, the posterior-stabilized design shows better knee function than the cruciate-retaining design. Level of evidenceIII; a retrospective study.

The effectiveness of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized designs on extensor mechanism function and knee function in patients after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A two-year retrospective follow-up study

IntroductionThe importance of the posterior-cruciate ligament in knee functionality is known; however, the effect of preserving the posterior-cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on extensor mechanism function and knee function is not clear. We aimed to compare extensor mechanism function and knee function between patients operated with the cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs for simultaneous bilateral TKA. HypothesisPatients operated with the cruciate-retaining design would produce better outcomes than those operated with the posterior-stabilized design. Materials and methodsA total of 104 patients were divided into two groups as the cruciate-retaining (n=52) and posterior-stabilized (n=52) groups. The groups were compared for extensor mechanism function (chair-rise test) and knee function (Hospital for Special Surgery [HSS] knee score). The follow-up points were six weeks, three months, six months, one year and two years. ResultsNo statistically significant effect on chair-rise performance of the group-by-time interaction (χ2 [5, n=104]=5.32, p=.37) or of group (χ2 [1, n=104]=1.69, p=.19). In the HSS knee score, the group-by-time interaction was statistically significant (F [5.510]=6.24, p<.001). A statistically significant difference of 7.4 points in favor of the posterior-stabilized group was found at six weeks (p=.002). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at the other follow-up points. DiscussionThe cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs have similar outcomes with regard to extensor mechanism function and knee function in the long-term period in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA. In the short-term period, the posterior-stabilized design shows better knee function than the cruciate-retaining design. Level of evidenceIII; a retrospective study.

Concordance in Radiological Parameters of Different Knee Views After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost-effective treatment for the end-stage of knee osteoarthritis. Despite the improvements in this surgery, a significant percentage of patients still report dissatisfaction after knee arthroplasty.Radiological results have been used to predict clinical outcomes and satisfaction after knee replacement. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of a set of radiographic views to assess alignment on total knee arthroplasty. Methods A concordance study was designed with 105 patients (130 TKA) that underwent conventional total knee arthroplasty cruciate-retaining design recruited for the study and scheduled for their annual radiograph control. Measurements were performed on the following radiograph after total knee replacement: full-length standing anteroposterior and lateral radiograph, anteroposterior standing, lateral and axial knee view, and the knee "seated view". A musculoskeletal radiologist and a knee surgeon were recruited to perform the radiological measurement and then estimate the interobserver agreement. Results There was an excellent correlation between Limb Length (LL), Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), Sagittal mechanical tibial component alignment (smTA), extension lateral and medial joint space (eLJS and eMJS), 90º flexion lateral and medial joint space (fLJS and fMJS) and Sagittal anatomic lateral view tibial component alignment (saLTA); the good correlation between Mechanical lateral femoral component alignment (mLFA), Sagittal anatomic tibial component alignment (saTA), Sagittal anatomic lateral view femoral component alignment 2 (saLFA2), Patella Height (PH); and moderate to poor correlation for the rest of measurements. Conclusion Excellent and good concordance can be achieved for radiographic measurements in different knee views to assess results after TKA. These findings must encourage future studies to address functional and survival outcomes using all knee views and not just one plane.

Biomechanical analysis of different levels of constraint in TKA during daily activities

BackgroundNumerous total knee prosthetic implants are currently available on the orthopedic market, and this variety covers a set of different levels of constraint: among the various models available, a significant role is covered by mobile bearing cruciate-retaining design with an ultra-congruent insert, mobile bearing cruciate-retaining design, fixed-bearing posterior stabilized prosthesis and fixed-bearing constrained condylar knee. A biomechanical comparative study among them could therefore be helpful for the clinical decision-making process. This study aimed to compare the effect of these different levels of constraint in the knee biomechanics of a patient, in three different configurations representing the typical boundary conditions experienced by the knee joint during daily activities.MethodThe investigation was performed via finite element analysis with a knee model based on an already published and validated one. Four different types of prosthesis designs were analyzed: two mobile-bearing models and two fixed-bearing models, each one having a different level of constraint. The different designs were incorporated in to the 3D finite element model of the lower leg and analyzed in three different configurations reproducing the landing and the taking-off phases occurring during the gait cycle and chair-rising. Implant kinetics (in terms of polyethylene contact areas and contact pressure), polyethylene and tibial bone stresses were calculated under three different loading conditions for each design.ResultsThe tibial stress distribution in the different regions of interest of the tibia remains relatively homogeneous regardless of the type of design used. The main relevant difference was observed between the mobile and fixed-bearing models, as the contact areas were significantly different between these models in the different loading conditions. As a consequence, significant changes in the stress distribution were observed at the interface between the prosthetic components, but no significant changes were noted on the tibial bone. Moreover, the different models exhibited a symmetrical medial and lateral distribution of the contact areas, which was not always common among all the currently available prostheses (i.e. medial pivot designs).ConclusionThe changes of the prosthetic implant did not induce a big variation of the stress distribution in the different regions of the tibial bone, while they significantly changed the distribution of stress at the interface between the prosthetic components.

Comparison of the in-vivo kinematics of three different knee prosthesis designs during a step-up movement

BackgroundThere is no consensus on the importance of the kinematics of the prosthetic joint for the clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. A 3-armed randomized controlled trial was done to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics of a posterior cruciate-retaining and two posterior cruciate-sacrificing (Anterior-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized) prosthetic designs from the same total knee arthroplasty system. Since the anterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized designs are posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing designs, we hypothesized they would have similar contact-point kinematics. Further, we hypothesized that the cruciate-retaining design would have contact-point kinematics different from the anterior-stabilized and the posterior-stabilized designs, but comparable to a native knee. MethodsThirty-nine patients with a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty one year postoperatively underwent kinematic analysis of a weight-bearing step-up movement under fluoroscopic recording. Model-based radiostereometric analysis was used to determine anteroposterior contact-point translations and rotations through the movement path to assess knee kinematics. FindingsThe cruciate-retaining and anterior-stabilized groups' medial and lateral contact-points displayed similar paradoxical posterior translations during step-up in the magnitude of 7 and 2 mm, respectively. In contrast, the posterior-stabilized group's contact-points translated anteriorly by 4 and 10 mm throughout the movement and were significantly more posterior than the cruciate-retaining and the anterior-stabilized groups from >100° to 40° of flexion. The femur rotated internally with all designs. InterpretationThe cruciate-retaining and anterior-stabilized designs displayed similar contact-point translation patterns during a step-up movement. Only the posterior-stabilized design showed a pattern comparable to native knees. Conversion from a cruciate-retaining to an anterior-stabilized design because of posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency will not change knee kinematics.

Tibial sagittal and rotational alignment reduce patellofemoral stresses in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Patellofemoral joint complications remain an important issue in total knee arthroplasty. We compared the patellofemoral contact status between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs with varying degrees of tibial sagittal and rotational alignment using a computer simulation to ensure proper alignments in total knee arthroplasty. Knee kinematics, patellofemoral contact force and quadriceps force were computed using a musculoskeletal modeling program (LifeMOD/KneeSIM 2010; LifeModeler, Inc., San Clemente, California) during a weight-bearing deep knee bend. Two different posterior tibial slope (PTS)s (3° and 7°) and five different tibial tray rotational alignments (neutral, internal 5° and 10°, and external 5° and 10°) were simulated. Patellofemoral contact area and stresses were next computed using finite element analysis. The patellofemoral contact force for the posterior-stabilized design was substantially lower than the cruciate-retaining design after post-cam contact because of increasing femoral roll-back. Neutral rotational alignment of the tibial component resulted in smaller differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs for PTSs of 3° or 7°. However, the patellar contact stresses in the cruciate-retaining design were greater than those in posterior-stabilized design at 120° of knee flexion with PTS of 3° combined with internal rotation of the tibial component. Our study provides biomechanical evidence implicating lower PTSs combined with internal malrotation of the tibial component and the resultant increase in patellofemoral stresses as a potential source of anterior knee pain in cruciate-retaining design.

Primary constrained-condylar-knee designs outperform posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining designs in high-grade varus osteoarthritic knees during short-term follow-up: a pilot study.

High-grade varus osteoarthrosis (OA) is characterized by a pronounced intra-articular varus deformity and associated insufficiency of the lateral ligamentous complex. When performing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in such a knee, traditionally the alignment is restored to neutral, and the medial soft tissue structures are released to compensate for the lateral laxity and balance the joint. However, another option would be to leave the medial soft tissues untouched and accept the lateral laxity but to compensate for it using an ML-stabilized constrained-condylar knee (CCK) design. Our aim was to prove our hypothesis that such knees would demonstrate better clinical stability and better functionality as well as subjective outcome scores. We searched our bicenter database of 912 primary TKAs (from 2016 to 2019) for primary TKA patients with a preoperative varus alignment of > 8°. After inclusion, 60 patients were divided into three groups by implant design: CCK (n = 21), posterior-stabilized (PS) (n = 20) and cruciate-retaining (CR) (n = 19). Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Society Score (KSS), UCLA-activity score, ML instability scores and both radiographic and clinical data were compared between groups. ML stability was significantly better in CCK designs (86% grade 0) compared to CR (37% grade 0) (p = 0.004) but not PS (70% grade 0) designs. No grade II instability was present in CCK and PS implants compared to 16% of CR implants. KSS and UCLA-activity score were higher in CCK designs compared to PS (p = 0.027, p = 0.041) and CR designs (p < 0.001, p = 0.007). OKS and FJS were higher in CCK designs compared to CR (p = 0.025, p = 0.008) but not to PS. The use of a CCK design to compensate for the lateral laxity in high-grade varus OA knees allowed to refrain from a medial release. CCK designs displayed improved clinical stability and better functionality as well as subjective outcome scores compared to less-constrained designs.

Highlights of the 2021 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report.

Highlights of the 2021 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report.

Risk factors of early periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a serious complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the risk factors of PFF in the early postoperative setting are not well documented. This study determines the risk factors of early PFF after primary TKA.MethodsThis study recruited 24 patients who had early PFF within postoperative 3 months and 96 control patients. Demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index, diagnosis, operated side, underlying diseases and history of steroid usage intraoperative outcomes), intraoperative outcomes (operative time, surgical approach, type and brand of the prosthesis), and radiographic outcomes (distal femoral width; DFW, prosthesis-distal femoral width ratio; PDFW ratio, anatomical lateral distal femoral angle; LDFA, the change of LDFA, femoral component flexion angle; FCFA and anterior femoral notching; AFN) were recorded and compared between groups. Details of PFF, including fracture pattern, preoperative deformity, and time to PFF were also documented.ResultsIn univariate analysis, the PFF group had significantly older, right side injury, rheumatoid, dyslipidemia, Parkinson patients than the control group (p < 0.05). No cruciate-retaining design was used in PFF group (p = 0.004). Differences between the prosthetic brand used were found in this study (p = 0.049). For radiographic outcomes, PFF group had significantly lower DFW but higher PDFW ratio and postoperative LDFA than the control group (p < 0.05). While the change of LDFA, FCFA and AFN were similar between groups. The fracture patterns were medial condylar (45.8%), lateral condylar (25.0%) and supracondylar fracture (29.2%). The mean overall time to PFF was 37.2 ± 20.6 days (range 8–87 days). Preoperative deformity was significantly different among the three patterns (p < 0.05). When performed multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model, age was only an independent risk factor for early PFF. The cut-off point of age was > = 75 years, with a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 78.1%.ConclusionThis study determined that age was the independent risk factors for early PFF. However, further well-controlled studies with a larger sample size were needed to address this issue.

Conforming Polyethylene Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beyond the Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Debate.

Total knee arthroplasty continues to be one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. However, considerable controversy exists regarding the optimal implant design. Total knee implants with both posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining designs have excellent long-term outcomes with inadequate data demonstrating superiority of either design. Recently, the popularity of total knee designs with more conforming polyethylene liners has increased. These polyethylene inserts prevent paradoxical anterior translation of the femur, without relying on a cam and post mechanism, and promote more physiologic native knee kinematics. This review summarizes the design rationale of several commercially available implants, discusses the kinematic data of several designs, and reviews the available clinical data.

Tibial joint line orientation has no effect on joint awareness after mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Joint line orientation (JLO) plays an important role in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its influence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine JLO impact as measured by the forgotten joint score (FJS-12). The hypothesis was that restoring the joint line(JL) parallel to the floor would influence joint awareness favorably, i.e., allow the patient to forget about the joint in daily living. All computer-navigated primary TKAs using a cemented, cruciate-retaining (CR) design implanted between January 2018 and September 2019 were reviewed in this retrospective single-center analysis. Primary endpoints were: clinical [range of motion (ROM)], and patient-reported (FJS-12) and radiographical outcomes [tibia joint line angle (TJLA), hip knee axis (HKA), mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA) as well as mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA)]. Seventy-six patients (mean age: 70.3 ± 9.7years, mean BMI: 29.7 ± 5.2kg/m2) were included. Postoperative ROM averaged 118.7 ± 9.6°. The mean FJS-12 improved from 16.4 ± 15.3 (preoperatively) to 89.4 ± 16.9 (1-year follow-up; p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes and PROs did not correlate with JLO (p = n.s.). Cluster analysis using six measures revealed that a medially opened TJLA was associated with significantly better postoperative FJS-12. Tibial JLO was found to have no effect on PROs. Considering the JLO in the coronal plane alone probably has questionable clinical relevance. Lower limb alignment should be assessed in all three planes and correlated with the clinical outcome. Level IV.

Lower revision rates for cemented fixation in a long-term survival analysis of three different LCS designs.

In primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), it is still not clear if cemented or uncemented fixation has the best long-term survival. The Low Contact Stress (LCS) mobile-bearing (MB) knee system was introduced in 1977. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term survival of this design with a minimum of 15-year follow-up. A retrospective analysis was performed, with the primary endpoint for survival defined as revision. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between type of fixation and the risk of revision, while correcting for potential confounders (diagnosis, design, age and sex). 1271 cases were included with inflammatory joint disease (IJD) (657 cases) and non-IJD (614 cases). TKAs were performed cemented in 522 cases and uncemented in 749 cases. A bicruciate retaining design was used in 180 cases, a rotating platform design in 174 cases and an anterior posterior glide posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) design in 916 cases. Cumulative incidence of component revision at 15years was 2.7% (95% CI 1.6; 4.5) for cemented and 10% (95% CI 8.1; 12.4) for uncemented TKA, respectively. The 20-year cumulative incidence was 2.9% (95% CI 1.7; 4.7) for cemented and 10.9% (95% CI 8.8; 13.4) for uncemented TKA, respectively. Age, non-IJD and PCR design were associated with a significantly higher risk of revision, regardless of the type of fixation. Long-term survival for patients undergoing cemented or uncemented TKA using the LCS MB system revealed lower revision rates for cemented fixation. Revision risk was higher in younger, non-IJD patients who had the PCR design, regardless of the type of fixation. For the LCS MB TKA design, it is recommended to use cemented fixation.

Evaluating Posterior Cruciate Ligament Integrity in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients Prescribed Biologic Agents: A Radiological Case-Control Study.

IntroductionPatients with inflammatory arthropathies present a significant challenge to the arthroplasty surgeon when they present with symptomatic degenerative changes of their knee joint. Debate is ongoing regarding the selection of implants for this cohort of patients. There is conflicting evidence for the use of posterior-stabilising (PS) over cruciate-retaining (CR) designs in this cohort. Biologics are licensed for use in moderate-to-severe disease that has not responded to conventional treatment. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have assessed the integrity of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in these patients with more advanced disease prescribed biologic agents.AimThe aim of this study is to assess the integrity of the PCL on MRI in patients with inflammatory arthritis who are prescribed biologic agents.MethodsA case-control study was performed, with cases identified through chart review to confirm prescription of biologic agents for inflammatory arthropathies, who also had contemporaneous MRI knee scans performed. Knee MRIs for age- and sex-matched controls with osteoarthritis (OA) and meniscal pathology were identified from the National Joint Registry and the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE), respectively.The MRIs were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists who were blinded to the clinical details. They were asked to assess the MRIs to determine PCL integrity, synovial Inflammation, and any associated pathology.ResultsNo difference was noted in the rate of synovitis, PCL attenuation, or PCL tears between the OA and inflammatory arthropathy groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThe results of this study show no difference in the integrity and continuity of the PCL in those patients for age- and sex-matched controls on MRI. This finding lends support to the use of CR total knee arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory arthropathy on biologic agents.

CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate- and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate- and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

CORR Insights®: Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing.

CORR Insights®: Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing.

Age and Prosthetic Design as Risk Factors for Secondary Patella Resurfacing

BackgroundSelectively resurfacing the patella based on a patient’s risk of secondary patella resurfacing (SPR) may be the optimal strategy for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, exactly which factors increase the risk of SPR is unknown. Utilizing New Zealand Joint Registry data, we investigated the following: (1) What patient and surgical factors are more prevalent among TKA patients who received SPR compared to those who did not? and (2) What is the difference in Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) between those who receive SPR and those who do not? MethodsPrevalence of various patient and surgical factors was compared between 197 non-resurfaced TKAs that proceeded to SPR and 31,399 that did not. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the odds ratio for each factor that differed between groups. Six-month postoperative OKS for each group was utilized for comparison. ResultsPosterior-stabilized designs had an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.66; P = .001) when compared to cruciate-retaining designs. When compared to age less than 55, age >75 and age 65-74 had odds ratios of 0.27 (95% CI 0.16-0.46; P < .001) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.69; P < .001) respectively. Six-month OKS was lower among those who received SPR (37.27 vs 27.26; P < .001). ConclusionYounger age, posterior-stabilized design, and a low 6-month OKS were associated with SPR.

Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bicruciate-retaining TKA has been proposed to improve clinical outcomes by maintaining intrinsic ACL function. However, because the unique design of the bicruciate-retaining tibial component precludes a tibial stem, fixation may be compromised. A radiostereometric analysis permits an evaluation of early migration of tibial components in this setting, but to our knowledge, no such analysis has been performed. We performed a randomized controlled trial using a radiostereometric analysis and asked, at 2 years: (1) Is there a difference in tibial implant migration between the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining TKA designs? In a secondary analysis, we asked: (2) Is there a difference in patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Score [OKS] and Forgotten Joint Score [FJS] between the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining TKA designs? (3) What is the frequency of reoperations and revisions for the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining TKA designs? This parallel-group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01966848) randomized 50 patients with an intact ACL who were eligible to undergo TKA to receive either a bicruciate-retaining or cruciate-retaining TKA. Patients were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial component measured with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at 2 years postoperatively. The MTPM is a translation vector defined as the point in the RSA model that has the greatest combined translation in x-, y- and z-directions. A 1-year postoperative mean MTPM value of 1.6 mm has been suggested as a threshold for unacceptable increased risk of aseptic loosening after both 5 and 10 years. The repeatability of the MTPM was found to be 0.26 mm in our study. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively with the OKS (scale of 0-48, worst-best) and FJS (scale of 0-100, worst-best). Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. At 2 years postoperatively, RSA images were available for 22 patients who underwent bicruciate-retaining and 23 patients who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA, while patient-reported outcome measures were available for 24 patients in each group. The study was powered to detect a 0.2-mm difference in MTPM between groups (SD = 0.2, significance level = 5%, power = 80%). With the numbers available, we found no difference in MTPM between the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) MTPM was 0.52 mm (0.35 to 1.02) and 0.42 mm (0.34 to 0.70) in the bicruciate-retaining and cruciate-retaining groups, respectively (p = 0.63). There was no difference in the magnitude of improvement in the OKS from preoperatively to 2 years postoperative between the groups (median delta [IQR] for bicruciate-retaining 18 [14 to 23] versus cruciate-retaining 18 [15 to 21], difference of medians 0; p = 0.96). Likewise, there was no difference in the magnitude of improvement in the FJS score from preoperatively to 2 years postoperative between the groups (mean ± SD for bicruciate-retaining 46 ± 32 versus cruciate-retaining 48 ± 16, mean difference, 2; p = 0.80). Three patients in the bicruciate-retaining group underwent arthroscopically assisted manipulation at 3 to 4 months postoperatively, and one patient in the bicruciate-retaining group sustained a tibial island fracture during primary surgery and underwent a revision procedure after 6 months. There were no reoperations or revisions in the cruciate-retaining group. With the numbers available, we found no differences between the bicruciate-retaining and the cruciate-retaining implants in terms of stable fixation on RSA or patient-reported outcome measure scores at 2 years, and must therefore recommend against the routine clinical use of the bicruciate-retaining device. The complications we observed with the bicruciate-retaining device suggest it has an associated learning curve and the associated risks of novelty with no demonstrable benefit to the patient; it is also likely to be more expensive in most centers. Continued research on this implant should only be performed in the context of controlled trials. Level II, therapeutic study.

Functional outcome of total knee replacement: a study protocol for a prospective, double-blinded, parallel-group randomized, clinical controlled trial of novel, personalized and conventional implants

BackgroundThe development of total knee replacement (TKR) implant designs aims to improve outcome regarding pain, function, joint stiffness, instability, patellar problems, and ultimately wear of the implant. Recently, two major orthopaedic implant manufacturers launched a new generation of TKR implants which, according to the manufacturers, provide improved functional outcome. However, the benefits of these new TKR designs claimed by the manufacturers in terms of improved functional outcome still lack scientific documentation. The present randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare three fixed bearing, cemented cruciate-retaining (CR) designs; one of the new personalized TKR design with two conventional TKR designs with the main emphasis being on functional outcome.MethodsThe present study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, single-center intervention trial. A total of 240 patients will be recruited to participate in a parallel-group study at Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland. We will compare the short-term functional outcome of TKR performed with a novel personalized TKR design (Persona CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) against TKRs performed with two conventional designs (PFC CR, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA and Nexgen CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA). In total, 80 patients will be randomized in each of the three study arms. The primary outcome in this study is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), which is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Secondary outcome measures include the Forgotten Joint Score, the 15D, the UCLA activity score, and the VAS pain scale. The results will be analyzed after 2-year follow-up.DiscussionThis paper presents a prospective, randomized, single-center trial study protocol. It provides details of patient randomization, PROMs, follow-up, methods of analysis of the material, and publication plan. An important aspect that will be considered in the study will be the economic effects of the novel designs as they are substantially more expensive, and the benefits of the added costs remain unknown. In addition, it is especially important to carry out evaluative studies in independent centers that are not biased by the interests of the manufacturers.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered, November, 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03339557.