CRP Site Research Articles

Comprehensive Characterization of fucAO Operon Activation in Escherichia coli.

Wildtype Escherichia coli cells cannot grow on L-1,2-propanediol, as the fucAO operon within the fucose (fuc) regulon is thought to be silent in the absence of L-fucose. Little information is available concerning the transcriptional regulation of this operon. Here, we first confirm that fucAO operon expression is highly inducible by fucose and is primarily attributable to the upstream operon promoter, while the fucO promoter within the 3'-end of fucA is weak and uninducible. Using 5'RACE, we identify the actual transcriptional start site (TSS) of the main fucAO operon promoter, refuting the originally proposed TSS. Several lines of evidence are provided showing that the fucAO locus is within a transcriptionally repressed region on the chromosome. Operon activation is dependent on FucR and Crp but not SrsR. Two Crp-cAMP binding sites previously found in the regulatory region are validated, where the upstream site plays a more critical role than the downstream site in operon activation. Furthermore, two FucR binding sites are identified, where the downstream site near the first Crp site is more important than the upstream site. Operon transcription relies on Crp-cAMP to a greater degree than on FucR. Our data strongly suggest that FucR mainly functions to facilitate the binding of Crp to its upstream site, which in turn activates the fucAO promoter by efficiently recruiting RNA polymerase.

Robust and sensitive control of a quorum‐sensing circuit by two interlocked feedback loops

The quorum-sensing (QS) response of Vibrio fischeri involves a rapid switch between low and high induction states of the lux operon over a narrow concentration range of the autoinducer (AI) 3-oxo-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone. In this system, LuxR is an AI-dependent positive regulator of the lux operon, which encodes the AI synthase. This creates a positive feedback loop common in many bacterial species that exhibit QS-controlled gene expression. Applying a combination of modeling and experimental analyses, we provide evidence for a LuxR autoregulatory feedback loop that allows LuxR to increase its concentration in the cell during the switch to full lux activation. Using synthetic lux gene fragments, with or without the AI synthase gene, we show that the buildup of LuxR provides more sensitivity to increasing AI, and promotes the induction process. Elevated LuxR levels buffer against spurious variations in AI levels ensuring a robust response that endows the system with enhanced hysteresis. LuxR autoregulation also allows for two distinct responses within the same cell population.

ArcA works with Fnr as a positive regulator of Vitreoscilla (bacterial) hemoglobin gene expression in Escherichia coli

Low oxygen induction of the bacterial (Vitreoscilla) hemoglobin gene (vgb) by the Arc system was investigated, as the presumptive vgb Crp site was found to have 73% identity to the Escherichia coli consensus ArcA site. The role of ArcA by itself and with Fnr was examined in E. coli using the wild type vgb promoter and promoter mutants affecting the Fnr and Crp (presumptive ArcA) sites and E. coli strains with all combinations of fnr+/fnr-, arcA+/arcA- genotypes. High-level transcription required both ArcA and Fnr systems to be functional; low oxygen induction required at least one of ArcA and Fnr to be intact. Levels of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin protein (VHb) followed the same trends as seen with mRNA, although the relative decreases in the mutants relative to wild type were less than with transcription. Growth of cells was stimulated by VHb, generally to a greater extent as VHb levels increased.

Role of activator site position and a distal UP-element half-site for sigma factor selectivity at a CRP/H-NS-activated sigma(s)-dependent promoter in Escherichia coli.

Transcription initiation by the stress-associated sigma(S)-containing RNA polymerase holoenzyme (E sigma(S)) in Escherichia coli is often subject to complex regulation that involves multiple additional regulators and histone-like proteins. csiD is a stationary phase-inducible sigma(S)-dependent gene in E. coli that requires activation by cAMP-CRP (bound to a site centred at -68.5 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site) and is positively modulated by the abundant nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and Lrp. By shifting the CRP box to positions between -80.5 and -60.5, we could demonstrate that: (i) activation is equally helix phase dependent as at classic class I promoters; (ii) E sigma(S) prefers a CRP box location at -68.5/-70.5, whereas E sigma(70) is nearly inactive with such an arrangement; and (iii) with the CRP site moved to -60.5, transcription can be initiated efficiently by both holoenzymes. The csiD promoter region also contains a distal UP-element half-site located downstream of the CRP box, as demonstrated by mutational studies, in which this element was either eliminated or completed to a full UP-element. The UP-element half-site favours E sigma(S)-mediated expression, whereas with the full UP-element, nearly wild-type levels of csiD transcription were observed in the absence of sigma(S). Finally, we show that the two histone-like proteins, H-NS and Lrp, both act by influencing activation by cAMP-CRP, but do so by different mechanisms. In particular, H-NS directly or indirectly increases positional stringency for the CRP binding site. The implications of these findings with respect to sigma factor selectivity, activation mechanisms used by the two holoenzymes and the architecture of sigma(S)-dependent promoters are discussed.

A novel mechanism controls anaerobic and catabolite regulation of the Escherichia coli tdc operon

The tdc operon is subject to CRP-controlled catabolite repression. Expression of the operon is also induced anaerobically, although this regulation does not rely on direct control by either FNR or ArcA. Recently, the anaerobic expression of the tdc operon was found to be fortuitously induced in the presence of glucose by a heterologous gene isolated from the Gram-positive anaerobe Clostridium butyricum. The gene, termed tcbC, encoded a histone-like protein of 14.5 kDa. Using tdc–lacZ fusions, it was shown that TcbC did not activate tdc expression by functionally replacing any of the operon regulators. In vitro transcription analyses with RNA polymerase and CRP revealed that faithful CRP-dependent transcription initiation occurred only on supercoiled templates. No specific, CRP-dependent transcription initiation was observed on relaxed or linear DNA templates. Surprisingly, purified His-tagged TcbC activated transcription from a relaxed, circular template, but not from supercoiled or linear templates. Examination of the CRP binding site of the tdc promoter revealed that it was located 43.5 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site. Repositioning of the CRP site at −41.5 bp abolished activation by the TcbC protein and allowed CRP-dependent transcription to occur on linear, relaxed and supercoiled templates. TcbC bound DNA non-specifically; however, in topoisomerase I relaxation assays, it was demonstrated that TcbC imposed torsional constraints on negatively supercoiled DNA, which influenced the ability of the enzyme to relax the topoisomers. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that TcbC activates transcription of tdc by altering the local topological status of the tdc promoter and that, in the wild-type tdc promoter, the CRP binding site is misaligned to allow transcription to occur only under optimal conditions. Indeed, in vivo transcription analyses revealed that repositioning of the CRP binding site to −41.5 bp resulted in high-level, CRP-dependent transcription, even under catabolite-repressing conditions, and that transcription was no longer influenced by TcbC. Remarkably, however, anaerobic regulation of the mutant promoter was retained. This indicates that the other tdc regulators, TdcA and TdcR, govern anaerobic transcription activation by CRP.

A novel mechanism controls anaerobic and catabolite regulation of the Escherichia coli tdc operon.

The tdc operon is subject to CRP-controlled catabolite repression. Expression of the operon is also induced anaerobically, although this regulation does not rely on direct control by either FNR or ArcA. Recently, the anaerobic expression of the tdc operon was found to be fortuitously induced in the presence of glucose by a heterologous gene isolated from the Gram-positive anaerobe Clostridium butyricum. The gene, termed tcbC, encoded a histone-like protein of 14.5 kDa. Using tdc-lacZ fusions, it was shown that TcbC did not activate tdc expression by functionally replacing any of the operon regulators. In vitro transcription analyses with RNA polymerase and CRP revealed that faithful CRP-dependent transcription initiation occurred only on supercoiled templates. No specific, CRP-dependent transcription initiation was observed on relaxed or linear DNA templates. Surprisingly, purified His-tagged TcbC activated transcription from a relaxed, circular template, but not from supercoiled or linear templates. Examination of the CRP binding site of the tdc promoter revealed that it was located 43.5 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site. Repositioning of the CRP site at -41.5 bp abolished activation by the TcbC protein and allowed CRP-dependent transcription to occur on linear, relaxed and supercoiled templates. TcbC bound DNA non-specifically; however, in topoisomerase I relaxation assays, it was demonstrated that TcbC imposed torsional constraints on negatively supercoiled DNA, which influenced the ability of the enzyme to relax the topoisomers. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that TcbC activates transcription of tdc by altering the local topological status of the tdc promoter and that, in the wild-type tdc promoter, the CRP binding site is misaligned to allow transcription to occur only under optimal conditions. Indeed, in vivo transcription analyses revealed that repositioning of the CRP binding site to -41.5 bp resulted in high-level, CRP-dependent transcription, even under catabolite-repressing conditions, and that transcription was no longer influenced by TcbC. Remarkably, however, anaerobic regulation of the mutant promoter was retained. This indicates that the other tdc regulators, TdcA and TdcR, govern anaerobic transcription activation by CRP.

Synergistic transcription activation: a dual role for CRP in the activation of an Escherichia coli promoter depending on MalT and CRP.

Activation of the Escherichia coli malEp promoter relies on the formation of a higher order structure involving cooperative binding of MalT to promoter-proximal and promoter-distal sites as well as CRP binding to three sites located in between. MalT is the primary activator and one function of CRP is to facilitate cooperative binding of MalT to its cognate sites by bending the intervening DNA. It is shown here that CRP also participates directly in malEp activation. This function is carried out by the molecule of CRP bound to the CRP site centered at -139.5 (CRP site 3). This molecule of CRP recruits RNA polymerase by promoting the binding of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD) to DNA immediately downstream from CRP site 3, via a contact between alphaCTD and activating region I of CRP. The action of MalT and CRP at malEp hence provides the example of a novel and complex mechanism for transcriptional synergy in prokaryotes whereby one activator both helps the primary activator to form a productive complex with promoter DNA and interacts directly with RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Regulation of expression of the yiaKLMNOPQRS operon for carbohydrate utilization in Escherichia coli: involvement of the main transcriptional factors.

The yiaKLMNOPQRS (yiaK-S) gene cluster of Escherichia coli is believed to be involved in the utilization of a hitherto unknown carbohydrate which generates the intermediate L-xylulose. Transcription of yiaK-S as a single message from the unique promoter found upstream of yiaK is proven in this study. The 5' end has been located at 60 bp upstream from the ATG. Expression of the yiaK-S operon is controlled in the wild-type strain by a repressor encoded by yiaJ. No inducer molecule of the yiaK-S operon has been identified among over 80 carbohydrate or derivative compounds tested, the system being expressed only in a mutant strain lacking the YiaJ repressor. The lacZ transcriptional fusions in the genetic background of the mutant strain revealed that yiaK-S is modulated by the integration host factor and by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (Crp) activator complex. A twofold increase in the induction was observed during anaerobic growth, which was independent of ArcA or Fnr. Gel mobility shift assays showed that the YiaJ repressor binds to a promoter fragment extending from -50 to +121. These studies also showed that the cAMP-Crp complex can bind to two different sites. The lacZ transcriptional fusions of different fragments of the promoter demonstrated that binding of cAMP-Crp to the Crp site 1, centered at -106, is essential for yiaK-S expression. The 5' end of the yiaJ gene was determined, and its promoter region was found to overlap with the divergent yiaK-S promoter. Expression of yiaJ is autogenously regulated and reduced by the binding of Crp-cAMP to the Crp site 1 of the yiaK-S promoter.

Position 127 amino acid substitutions affect the formation of CRP:cAMP:lacP complexes but not CRP:cAMP:RNA polymerase complexes at lacP.

The lacP DNA binding and activation characteristics of CRP having amino acid substitutions at position 127 were investigated. Wild-type (WT) and T127C CRP footprinted lacP DNA in the presence of DNase I in a cAMP-dependent manner. The T127G, T127I, and T127S forms of CRP failed to footprint lacP both in the absence and in the presence of cAMP. Consistent with these data, WT and T127C CRP:cAMP complexes exhibited high affinity for the lacP CRP site whereas T127G, T127I, or T127S CRP:cAMP complexes exhibited low affinity for the lacP CRP site. CRP:cAMP:RNA polymerase (RNAP) complexes formed at lacP in reactions that contained WT, T127C, T127G, T127I, or T127S CRP. These results demonstrate that allosteric changes important for cAMP-mediated CRP activation are differentially affected by amino acid substitution at position 127. Proper cAMP-mediated reorientation of the DNA binding helices required either threonine or cysteine at position 127. However, cAMP-dependent interaction of CRP with RNAP was accomplished regardless of the amino acid at position 127. RNAP:lacP complexes that supported high-level lac RNA synthesis formed rapidly in reactions that contained WT or T127C CRP whereas RNAP:lacP complexes that supported only low-level lac RNA synthesis formed at slower rates in reactions that contained T127I or T127S CRP. The T127G CRP:cAMP:RNAP:lacP complex failed to activate lacP. The results of this study lead us to conclude that threonine 127 plays an important role in transduction of the signal from the CRP cyclic nucleotide binding pocket that promotes proper orientation of the DNA binding helices and only a minor, if any, role in the functional exposure of the CRP RNAP interaction domain.

Regulation of the carnitine pathway in Escherichia coli: investigation of the cai-fix divergent promoter region.

The divergent structural operons caiTABCDE and fixABCX of Escherichia coli are required for anaerobic carnitine metabolism. Transcriptional monocopy lacZ fusion studies showed that both operons are coexpressed during anaerobic growth in the presence of carnitine, respond to common environmental stimuli (like glucose and nitrate), and are modulated positively by the same general regulators, CRP and FNR, and negatively by H-NS. Overproduction of the CaiF specific regulatory protein mediating the carnitine signal restored induction in an fnr mutant, corresponding to its role as the primary target for anaerobiosis. Transcript analysis identified two divergent transcription start points initiating 289 bp apart. DNase I footprinting revealed three sites with various affinities for the binding of the cAMP-CRP complex inside this regulatory region. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments indicated that previously reported perfect CRP motif 1, centered at -41.5 of the cai transcriptional start site, plays a direct role in the sole cai activation. In contrast, mutation in CRP site 2, positioned at -69.5 of the fix promoter, caused only a threefold reduction in fix expression. Thus, the role of the third CRP site, located at -126.5 of fix, might be to reinforce the action of site 2. A critical 50-bp cis-acting sequence overlapping the fix mRNA start site was found, by deletion analysis, to be necessary for cai transcription. This region is thought to be involved in transduction of the signal mediated by the CaiF regulator.

The aldA gene of Escherichia coli is under the control of at least three transcriptional regulators.

Expression studies on the aldA gene encoding aldehyde dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli showed induction by two types of molecule (hydroxyaldehydes and 2-oxoglutarate), carbon catabolite repression and respiration dependence. Promoter deletion analysis showed that the proximal operator, which includes inducer-regulator complex and catabolite repression protein (Crp) recognition sites, was necessary for induction by either type of inducer, and that full induction by aldehydes required the cooperation of distal operator sequences beyond position -119. Interactions of the regulator protein with the -59 to -6 fragment were shown by DNA mobility shift assays. Fusions of different deletions of the aldA promoter to lacZ indicated that a Crp site proximal to the transcriptional start point (tsp) was functional in the cAMP-dependent catabolite repression of this system, whereas a distal control site was likely to operate in a cAMP-independent catabolite repression. DNA mobility shift and footprint analyses showed that only the tsp proximal site was bound by pure Crp with a Kd of 5.4 x 10(-7) M. As shown by an Arc-defective strain, the aldA gene seems to be repressed by the Arc system under anaerobiosis, displaying its physiological full induction and activity in the presence of oxygen.

Design of CytR regulated, cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoters in Escherichia coli: RNA polymerase-promoter interactions modulate the efficiency of CytR repression

In CytR regulated promoters in Escherichia coli, the cAMP-CRP complex acts as a transcriptional activator as well as a co-repressor for the CytR protein. Repression by CytR depends on the formation of nucleoprotein complexes in which CytR binds cooperatively to the DNA with one or two cAMP-CRP complexes. Here, we demonstrate that in order to establish CytR regulation in a cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoter with a single CRP site (CRP site centred around position −40.5) in which the CytR operator is located upstream of the CRP site, high affinity binding sites for both regulators are required. The efficiency of CytR regulation was observed to be modulated by RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter interactions. Specifically, in class II promoters with a single CRP site, the efficiency of CytR regulation was found to correlate inversely with cAMP-CRP independent promoter activity. These observations can be reconciled in a competition model for CytR regulation in which CytR and RNAP compete for cooperative binding with cAMP-CRP to the promoters in vivo. In this model, two mutually exclusive ternary complexes can be formed: a CytR/cAMP-CRP/promoter repression complex and an RNAP/cAMP-CRP/promoter activation complex. Thus, CytR regulation critically depends on formation of a repression complex that binds the promoter with sufficiently high affinity to exclude formation of the competing activation complex. We suggest that the transition from repression to activation involves a switch in the protein-protein interactions made by cAMP-CRP from CytR to RNAP. On the basis of the regulatory features of the promoters analysed here, we speculate about the advantages offered by the structural complexity of natural CytR/cAMP-CRP regulated promoters.

On the Role of the Multiple Regulatory Elements Involved in the Activation of the Escherichia coli malEpPromoter

Activation of malEpand malKp, two divergent promoters from Escherichia coli, depends on the synergistic action of MalT and CRP. The reaction involves a common regulatory region located in between and comprising multiple binding elements for both regulatory proteins. The binding of MalT and CRP to this region is known to result in the formation of a higher-order structure that is responsible for malKpactivation. This paper presents genetic data which together with previous results, provide compelling evidence that this higher-order structure is also responsible for malEpactivation. The role(s) that this structure or elements thereof play in the activation of malEpis analysed by monitoring both the occupancy of the proximal MalT sites (sites 1 and 2) and the activity of different malEpvariants in strains containing increasing amounts of active MalT. A truncated malEppromoter comprising only MalT sites 1 and 2 forms a minimal MalT-dependent promoter whose activity is limited by the occupancy of these sites. One role of the higher-order structure formed by MalT and CRP when bound to the entire regulatory region is to ensure high occupation of MalT sites 1 and 2, but it is not its only function. Some elements of this structure, namely the CRP site 1, located at −76.5, and the distal MalT sites, seem to play a direct role in malEpactivation besides their participation in the assembly of the higher-order structure.

CRP fixes the rotational orientation of covalently closed DNA molecules.

Five minicircles of 284 bp were constructed with a reporter sequence located approximately opposite a CRP binding site. The spacing between the center of the CRP site and this sequence is varied within 1.2 helical turns. The reactivity of the reference sequence to DNAse I was determined on the minicircles and on the corresponding fragments, in both the absence and presence of CRP. A rigorous mathematical analysis of the data shows that in the absence of CRP no preferred rotational orientation of the DNA is observed. In contrast, binding of CRP fixes, in a phase-dependent manner, the rotational orientation of the reporter sequence in the minicircles. This result illustrates the transmission at a distance along the DNA molecule of a structural modification. Such effects modulate the extent of synergy between activators and polymerases during the initiation of transcription.

E. coli RNA polymerase, deleted in the C-terminal part of its alpha-subunit, interacts differently with the cAMP-CRP complex at the lacP1 and at the galP1 promoter.

A deletion of the C-terminal part of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase is known to affect differently promoters activated by CRP depending on the location of the CRP binding site at the promoter. When the CRP binding site is located at -61.5, as at lacP1 (a type I promoter), activation is strongly impaired while it is not significantly affected at galP1 where CRP binds 41.5 bp upstream of the start of the message (type II promoter). We have investigated the differences in the architecture of the corresponding open complexes by comparing the positioning of holoenzymes reconstituted respectively with native or with truncated alpha-subunits (containing the first 235 or 256 residues of a) at two 'up' promoter mutants of the lacP1 and galP1 promoters (respectively lacUV5 and gal9A16C). First, the affinity of wild-type RNA polymerase for both promoters is increased by the presence of CRP and cAMP. By contrast, holoenzymes reconstituted with truncated alpha-subunits, show cooperative binding at the galP1 promoter only. Second, footprinting data confirm these observations and indicate that the truncated holoenzymes are unable to recognize regions of the promoter upstream from position -40. The absence of contacts between the truncated enzymes and CRP at the lacP1 promoter can explain the deficiency in activation. At the galP1 promoter, where the CRP site is closer to the initiation site, protein-protein contacts can still occur with the truncated polymerases, showing that the C-terminal part of the alpha-subunit is not involved in activation.

CAMP-CRP activator complex and the CytR repressor protein bind co-operatively to the cytRP promoter in Escherichia coli and CytR antagonizes the cAMP-CRP-induced DNA bend

Initiation of transcription from the cytRP promoter in Escherichia coli is activated by the cAMP-CRP complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor protein. By combining gel retardation and footprinting assays, we show that cAMP-CRP binds to a single site centered at position −64 and induces a considerable bend in the DNA. CytR binds to a region immediately downstream from, and partially overlapping, the CRP site, and induces a modest bend into the DNA. In combination, cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to cytRP forming a nucleoprotein complex in which the proteins directly interact with each other and bind to the same face of the DNA helix. CytR binding concomitantly antagonizes the cAMP-CRP-induced bend. This study indicates that the minimal DNA region required to obtain CytR regulation consists of a single binding site for each of cAMP-CRP and CytR. The case described here, in which a protein-induced DNA bend is modulated by a second protein, may illustrate a mechanism that applies to other regulatory systems.

A new aspect of transcriptional control of the Escherichia coli crp gene: positive autoregulation.

Transcription of the Escherichia coli crp gene is negatively regulated by CRP-cAMP that binds to a specific site located downstream of the crp promoter. A second binding site for CRP-cAMP (CRP site II) exists upstream of the crp promoter. Using an in vitro transcription assay, we have demonstrated that CRP-cAMP activates transcription of crp in certain conditions. A promoter which carries an altered CRP-binding site II is no longer activated by CRP-cAMP, indicating that CRP site II mediates the activation of crp transcription. The concentrations of cAMP that are required for positive autoregulation are higher than those for negative autoregulation. Evidence for positive and negative autoregulation in vivo is presented by a quantitative S1 nuclease analysis.

The role of two surface exposed loops in tranction activation by theEscherichia ColiCRP and FNR proteins

We have investigated a number of mutations that alter the ability of the E. coli transcription factors CRP and FNR to activate transcription. In CRP, some mutations at position 159 (H159L, H159I and delta 159) prevent transcription activation at a number of naturally-occurring and semi-synthetic CRP-dependent promoters. We suggest that some feature of the surface-exposed turn around residue 159 is recognised by RNA polymerase during transcription activation at these promoters. Mutations at position 52 increase CRP activity and reverse the effects of H159L and delta 159, most likely by creating a new contact with RNA polymerase. However this new contact only gives increased expression when the CRP binding site is located 41 1/2 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site and fails to reverse the effects of H159L and delta 159 at promoters where the CRP site is located further upstream. To explain our results we propose that the two surface-exposed turns around residues 52 and 159 contain elements that are potential RNA polymerase docking sites: in the CRP dimer these two active patches are located on adjacent faces of different subunits. FNR, a related transcription activator, contains amino acid sequences homologous to the CRP sequence around position 52. Mutations in this zone (from residues 81-88 in FNR) reduce expression from an FNR-dependent promoter without stopping FNR binding to its target. This defines a patch on FNR, which is homologous to the CRP surface-exposed loop around position 52, which is involved in transcription activation, most likely by contacting RNA polymerase.

Tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for transcriptional repression of the deoP2 promoter by the CytR repressor in Escherichia coli.

We have studied the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli to define features important for its interaction with the CytR repressor. As is characteristic for CytR-regulated promoters, deoP2 encodes tandem binding sites for the activating complex cAMP-CRP. One of these sites, CRP-1, overlaps the - 35 region, and is sufficient for activation; the second site, CRP-2, centred around-93, is indispensable for repression. Here we demonstrate, by means of in vivo titration, that CytR interaction with deoP2 depends not only on CRP-2, but also on CRP-1 and the length and possibly the sequence separating these two sites. Also, point mutations in either CRP site reduce or abolish CytR titration; however, no co-operativity is observed in the interaction of CytR with the two CRP binding sites. Furthermore, the reduction in CytR titration parallels the reduction in binding of cAMP-CRP to the mutated CRP sites in vitro. These observations are not easily explained by current models for the action of prokaryotic repressors; instead we favour a model in which the interaction of CytR with deoP2 depends on the presence of tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes.

Helical phase dependent action of CRP: effect of the distance between the CRP site and the −35 region on promoter activity

A plasmid carrying a CRP-dependent promoter fused to the lac structural genes was manipulated to construct a set of spacing mutants that have varying lengths between the CRP binding site and the -35 region. The lengths of the spacer were changed over 45 bp by inserting or deleting nucleotides. DNase I footprinting analysis revealed that the spacer length did not affect the binding of cAMP-CRP to the CRP site. The effect of the spacer length on transcription activation by cAMP-CRP was tested in vivo by beta-galactosidase and quantitative S1 assays with crp+ and delta crp cells harboring plasmids. Insertions or deletions of non-integral helical turns, which displace the CRP site onto the opposite face of DNA helix compared to the original promoter, eliminated completely the activation of transcription. In contrast, changing the spacer length by integral helical turns allowed the promoter to respond to CRP, although the degree of activation varied with the length of the spacer. We conclude that stereospecific positioning of CRP and RNA polymerase on the DNA helix is strictly required for CRP action. The data support a model that CRP stimulates transcription by directly contacting RNA polymerase.