Event Abstract Back to Event Modeling decision rules to optimize host localization in flying insects Sharri Zamore1* 1 University of Washington, Neurobiology and Behavior, United States When searching for host prey at large distances (>1 m), mosquitoes integrate information across multiple sensory modalities, navigating through complex environments by encoding turbulent, intermittent olfactory and thermosensory cues. As in most airborne localization, mosquitoes use a combination of two flight behaviors: 1) casting in a zigzagging crosswind flight path, and 2) surging in by a fast upwind flight. During casting, information is gathered about the source location, while surging exploits estimations about source location. It is unknown what signal information governs switching between these two behaviors, allowing for successful source localization. Sensory encoding and behavioral output operate as a closed loop system, i.e., change in input may directly affect the output, and vice versa. To explore potential neural phenomena of behavioral changes in natural environments, without opening the loop, we have developed a simple computational search agent, controlled by few parameters. We examined host localization by changing parameter values involved in decision making over multiple flights (n = 800) in a flow field. Our agent model is built using a cascade of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron, and exhibits flight characteristics (speed, angular velocity) matched to mosquito flight. The agent navigates a spatiotemporally varying intensity field, derived from videos of smoke plumes (courtesy of Mark Willis). The first LIF neuron, a sensor neuron, encodes the stimulus intensity along the flight path. The agent employs a casting behavior, governed by a crosswind sinusoidal pattern. The cast amplitude follows a second integrator, which rapidly decreases with the firing rate of the sensor neuron, but relaxes back to a maximum amplitude with insufficient inputs. When the amplitude of the cast approaches zero, the model surges. By changing model variables, such as time constants (LIF decay constant, amplitude decay constant, firing threshold, and amount of amplitude change) we have optimized search times (mean search time = 4.12 ± 5.55 s), while selecting for the highest rates of successful localization (65%). We also found that long timescales of integration (~0.33 s -1) resulted in the fastest and most accurate searches, suggesting that stimulus integration over time periods that are relatively long compared with stimulus intermittency, and a sharp threshold allows for successful localization. Finally, we found that, while the fastest searches did not universally exhibit surges, searches that did involve surges had higher probability of successful localization than those that did not. These data show that an agent can successfully localize a source, at speeds and success rates comparable to mosquitoes, using intermittent cues with a single LIF neuron. Acknowledgements Many thanks to Mark Willis, Mike Famulare, Bryan Toth, Adrienne Fairhall, and Tom Daniel Keywords: agent model, host localization, LIF neuron, mosquito, plume navigation Conference: Tenth International Congress of Neuroethology, College Park. Maryland USA, United States, 5 Aug - 10 Aug, 2012. Presentation Type: Poster (but consider for student poster award) Topic: Computation Citation: Zamore S (2012). Modeling decision rules to optimize host localization in flying insects. Conference Abstract: Tenth International Congress of Neuroethology. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnbeh.2012.27.00391 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 01 May 2012; Published Online: 07 Jul 2012. * Correspondence: Ms. Sharri Zamore, University of Washington, Neurobiology and Behavior, Seattle, United States, sharri@u.washington.edu Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Sharri Zamore Google Sharri Zamore Google Scholar Sharri Zamore PubMed Sharri Zamore Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract