In a recent paper, Whitehead, McCann, and Shimamura [Phys. Rev. A 64, 023401 (2001)] presented classical-trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) calculations of the effects of laser fields on the cross section for antihydrogen formation in collisions of antiprotons with positronium. They also use the same method to calculate the photoionization rate of isolated positronium in a strong field. The purpose of this Comment is to point out (i) the criteria for validity of the quasiclassical approximation are not satisfied for all the conditions used; (ii) some of their numerical results do not agree with the values obtained with a corroborated code; (iii) the ambiguity of a cross section when the target can ionize even before the projectile arrives; and (iv) the essential effect of quantum-mechanical tunneling on the strong-field ionization rate. A recently published method allowing tunneling in a CTMC calculation [J. S. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 64, 043412 (2001)] is used for (iv). It is concluded that the laser effect on formation of antihydrogen may be much greater than that found by Whitehead et al., but the pulse must be better characterized for quantitative predictions.