Cross Pin Research Articles

A Comparison of Nerve Injury in Cross Versus Lateral Pinning Fixation of Displaced Supracondylar Humerus Fracture.

Supracondylar fracture of the humerus (SCFH) is a common pediatric fracture encountered in orthopedic surgery. The most frequently used pinning methods include cross pinning or lateral pinning with two or three pins. However, complications such as ulnar nerve injury can occur, particularly during medial pinning, which necessitates careful isolation of the ulnar nerve and expert surgical intervention. The objective of this study is to compare nerve injury in cross versus lateral pinning fixation of the SCFH. The observational study was conducted at Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, PAK. Patients in group L (n=55) underwent lateral pinning, while those in group C (n=55) received cross pinning. The patients were followed retrospectively postoperatively until radiological union was achieved. The outcomes were assessed using the Flynn criteria, and nerve injury was evaluated in both groups. The study aimed to compare the postoperative results between the two groups based on the specified criteria. The mean age was 7.28±2.03 years in group L and 8.20±2.21 years in group C. The majority of patients in both groups were male. The left side was more commonly involved, and among the 110 patients enrolled, most sustained the injury while playing. The mean follow-up period was 21.3±1.4 months for group L and 23.5±0.2 weeks for group C. Nerve injuries were reported in six (5.45%) patients in group C, while no nerve injuries were reported in group L. For type III SCFH, lateral pinning fixation has demonstrated itself to be an effective alternative, yielding excellent functional outcomes. This method not only minimizes the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury, particularly to the ulnar nerve but also provides sufficient stability for the fracture. The results from this study suggest that lateral pinning is a reliable option for treating unstable supracondylar fractures, with a favorable safety profile and outcomes comparable to, if not better than, those achieved with cross pinning. This makes it a valuable technique, especially in settings where the risk of nerve injury is a significant concern.

Comparison of Cross-Pin Versus Cortical Button Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings Autograft: A Long-Term Clinical Study and Review of the Literature.

Background Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common operative procedure and many options regarding the type of the selected graft and fixation technique have been described to date. Although many studies have addressed the issue of the optimal femoral fixation device during ACLR with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, no clear evidence to indicate one technique over another has been found. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term postoperative outcomes and complication rates between transfemoral Cross-pin (CP) and Endobutton-Cortical Button (CB) fixation techniques in patients undergoing ACLR with an HT autograft. Methods One hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent ACLR by using a quadruple HT autograft that was stabilized with either a CP (CP Group: 52 patients) or a CB (CB Group: 55 patients) fixation technique. The Lachman test (LT), the Pivot-shift test (PST), the side-to-side difference in anterior translation of the tibia, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Lysholm knee scoring systems were evaluated before surgery and during long-term follow up. Thefemoral and tibial tunnel diameter was measured in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographsafter surgery and at the final follow-up. Areview of the literature was also carried out to identify any differences between both techniques. Results Study groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics. The mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 1.3 and 10.6 ± 1.3 years in the CP and CB Groups, respectively (p = 0.47). In the CP Group, improvements after surgery in LT and PST from grade 2 (n=34) or 3 (n=18) to grade 0 (n = 41) or 1 (n = 11) and from grade 2 (n=36) or 3 (n = 16) to grade 0 (n = 44) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. In the CB Group, similar improvements in LT and PST scores from grade 2 (n = 40) or 3 (n = 15) to grade 0 (n = 46) or 1 (n = 9) and from grade 2 (n = 41) or 3 (n = 14) to grade 0 (n = 47) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. However, no differences between the groups (p = 0.53 for LT and p = 0.90 for PST) were noted. The mean Lysholm scores were 89.7 ± 6.8 and 90.2 ± 7.2 in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Side-to-side difference improved from 9.1 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 1.5 mm and from 8.6 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.4 mm in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.89 between groups). According to IKDC grades, 92.1% and 91.4% of knees in the CP and CB groups, respectively were reported to be Grade A (Normal) or B (Nearly Normal) with a p = 0.7. Femoral and tibial tunnel widening was found in the last follow-up in both groups. However, there was no difference in the degree of tunnel widening among the two techniques.With respect to LT, PST, anterior drawer test, and IKDC score, none of the 15 published comparative studies demonstrated any significant differences between the two techniques and only one study detected a difference regarding the Lysholm score in favor of CP fixation. Conclusion In the long term, both CB and CP femoral stabilization techniques were shown to be associated with similar functional outcomes and low complication rates. Further large multicenter random clinical trials are still required to identify the most effective method of femoral fixation for HT autograft during ACLR surgery.

Comparison of antegrade and retrograde cross pin fixation in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar femur fractures: A biomechanical study

PurposeThe aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of Kirschner wires (K-wires) sent with antegrade and retrograde technique in the fixation of pediatric supracondylar femur fractures. Materials and MethodsA transverse fracture model was created two centimeters above the physis in 24 synthetic bone models suitable for the pediatric femur bone structure. The models were randomly divided into two groups as 12 bones each. In the first group (Group 1), 12 bone fracture models were retrogradely fixed with two cross K-wires. In the second group (Group 2), the fracture was fixed antegradely. In Group 2, both wire ends were allowed to protrude three millimeters from the femoral condyles. The stability of the groups was tested biomechanically by exposing them to varus and extension forces. The forces corresponding to 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm displacement and failure loads were calculated in two groups. ResultsAccording to the test results regarding displacements and failure loads, the retrograde group was found to be significantly stronger than the antegrade group against varus loads (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared in terms of extension strength, the results of the two groups were similar and there was no statistical difference between them (p > 0.05). ConclusionRetrograde cross K-wires fixation provides a more stable fixation against varus forces. This is important to prevent varus deformity, which is a clinically less tolerable deformity. However, considering that full-weight mobilization of patients is not allowed after surgery in pediatric supracondylar femur fractures, the surgeon should consider that K-wires can also be sent antegrade to decrease the risk of septic arthritis.

Outcomes of RigidFix Cross Pin Fixation in Femoral and Tibial Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

There is no clear consensus so far on which fixation method is most favorable for the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this paper is to investigate the outcome of RigidFix cross pins fixation in the tibial tunnel and to explore the advantages of RigidFix applied both in the femoral and tibial tunnel with hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. This retrospective study included 53 patients (male/female, 45/8) who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons between January 2013 and December 2017 at our institute. The participants in group A (n = 36) received anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with RigidFix cross pins fixation in both femoral and tibial tunnels, while those in group B (n = 17) with RigidFix cross pins fixation in the femoral tunnel and Interference screw fixation in the tibial tunnel. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form 2000 (IKDC2000) score, Lysholm knee scoring scale, Tegner activity score and the side-to-side difference were compared at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. The graft diameter, number of strands in graft and the average diameter of each strand were also compared between the two groups. The categorical parameters were analyzed by chi-square test and the continuous variables conforming to a normal distribution were analyzed by Student's t-test. At 2 years postoperation, the VAS score (1.61 ± 0.55), side-to-side difference (1.50 ± 0.58) in group A were significantly lower than that in group B, and the IKDC2000 score (88.81 ± 3.88), Tegner activity score (6.14 ± 0.60) in group A were significantly higher than that in group B. At 5 years postoperation, the VAS score (1.64 ± 0.68), side-to-side difference (1.73 ± 0.63) in group A were significantly lower than that in group B, and the IKDC2000 score (89.09 ± 3.85), Tegner activity score (6.58 ± 0.94) in group A were slso significantly higher than that in group B. There was statistical difference in the change of the side-to-side difference between the two groups (group A vs. B, 0.22 ± 0.08 vs. 0.34 ± 0.11, p < 0.001). There were also statistical differences in the graft diameter (group A vs. B, 7.83 ± 0.74 vs. 7.41 ± 0.51, p = 0,038), number of strands in graft (5.67 ± 0.72 vs. 4.00 ± 0.00, p < 0.001) and the average diameter of each strand (1.41 ± 0.22 vs. 1.85 ± 0.13, p < 0.001) between the two groups. RigidFix cross pins fixation in the tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can achieve better 5-year results when compared with the interference screw, and the hamstring tendon can be folded into a thicker graft when RigidFix cross pins were applied in both femoral and tibial tunnels.

FUNCTIONAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOME OF DIFFERENT PINNING CONFIGURATION (CROSS PINNING VERSUS DIVERGENT PINNING) IN FIXATION OF EXTRA-ARTICULAR FRACTURE OF DISTAL ENDRADIUS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Objective: The objective of the study is to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of different pinning configuration (cross pinning versus divergent pinning) in the fixation of extra-articular fracture of distal end radius in elderly patients. Methods: An observational prospective study was conducted at Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Indore, MP, from December 2019 to May 2021. After the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee, informed consent was obtained from the 40 elderly patients of the both sex in the age group of more than 50 years with closed fracture. 20 Patients were subjected to divergent pinning and 20 patients were subjected to cross pinning. Regular follow-up with the X-ray imaging. Results: Statistically no significant difference was found in palmar tilt, radial shortening, and loss of radial deviation. Mayo wrist score compare between the two groups. The result showing the functional outcome of configuration B (cross-pinning) is better than that of configuration A (divergent pinning). The only significant complication is pin migration, pin site infection, and stiffness. Pin tract infections are resolved by oral antibiotics, good pin tract care and wrist stiffness treated with vigorous physiotherapy. Conclusion: Cross pinning had better functional and radiological outcome as compared to the divergent pinning in extra-articular fracture of the distal end of the radius. The percutaneous pinning technique is less time-consuming and allows earlier rehabilitation without jeopardizing the fracture alignment.

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy associated with supracondylar humeral fracture in children: A systemic review on its management

Background Supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs) are among the most common pediatric fractures. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are considered the established gold standard. Biomechanically, cross-pinning is resilient for any axial rotation, but the medial pin increases the risk of iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve. Objective A systematic review was conducted to provide an evidence-based analysis of the literature on the management of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury caused by the medial pin during closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of displaced SCHF in children. Methods MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect databases were searched to identify all articles that reported ulnar nerve injury caused by the medial pin during closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of displaced SCHF in children and suggested the management. Reference lists from the articles retrieved were further scrutinized to identify any additional studies of interest. Results One thousand six hundred and six articles on SCHF treated by closed reduction and cross-pinning were identified initially with 25 studies included in the analysis after screening. Four thousand six hundred and seventy-five children sustained SCHF with a median age of 7 years. Of 3036 children treated by closed reduction and cross pinning, 205 (6.75%) were diagnosed with iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. The management involves observation only, removal of the medial pin, or exploration. The average recovery time in the group treated by removal of wire was statistically shorter than the other two groups. Conclusion The evidence suggests surgical exploration of the ulnar nerve can be delayed for up to 7 months, with most studies favouring observation only. In selected cases, immediate removal of the medial pin should be considered.

Tie-Cross Acrylic External Skeletal Fixator: Technique and 13 cases

This study aims to describe a novel design of an acrylic external skeletal fixator system for stabilizing epiphyseal/metaphyseal fractures with or without articular involvement and evaluate its efficiency in 13 cases. Client-owned five cats and eight dogs with epiphyseal/metaphyseal fractures were included in this study. Cross pins with or without a transcortical pin were included in "J" shaped acrylic ESF, and this novel technique was called the Tie-cross ESF. The functional use of the extremity was evaluated, and the joint range of motion was assessed and compared with the contralateral side. Radiographs were evaluated for bone healing and possible complications. The time of the first use of the extremities changed from the day of surgery to the second day. Fracture healing occurred in 35-69 days, and ESFs were removed. No persistent lameness was observed, and total functional recovery was provided in all cases. Fixation of epiphyseal and metaphyseal fractures can be challenging, especially when it involves the articular surface. Including cross-pins in an acrylic ESF (Tie-cross ESF) is useful and can be considered an alternative technique for the stabilization of these fractures. This technique encourages the patient to use the extremity during the fracture healing and enables joint functions; therefore, additional physical therapy will not be necessary.

Surgical repair of Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal humerus: short and long-term outcomes in a case series of three dogs and one cat

ABSTRACT Case histories Three dogs and one cat sustained forelimb trauma and were presented to a university veterinary clinic (Liège, Belgium) and a private veterinary hospital (Beacouzé, France). All four animals were referred for surgery. Clinical findings Two dogs and the cat were ambulatory on admission but unable to bear weight on the affected limb. One dog was non-ambulatory and lacked voluntary movement and sensation in one forelimb. Salter-Harris type II fractures of the distal humerus were diagnosed by radiography in all cases; avulsion of the brachial plexus and pelvic fractures were also present in the non-ambulatory dog. Treatment and outcome All Salter-Harris type II fractures were stabilised by open reduction and internal fixation with cross pins. One minor complication (seroma) and three major complications (implant migration) developed after surgery. The pins were completely removed in one case and partially removed in two cases to resolve these complications. At the final follow-up examination (12–31 months after surgery), owners reported no lameness in three of the four cases and grade 2/5 left forelimb lameness in one case. Clinical relevance This type of fracture is rarely described in the literature; however, it should be included in the differential diagnoses of traumatic humeral fractures in growing dogs and cats. In this case series, we achieved fair-to-excellent short-term and long-term outcomes after osteosynthesis of Salter-Harris type II fractures by cross pinning.

Surgical strategies in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: our experience.

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common skeletal injury of childhood elbow. Treatment option for Gartland type II-III-IV fractures is based on closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) fixation using Kirshner wires. Seldom open reduction is needed. Literature described different method of CRPP. The aim of the study is to report our experience in the surgical management of supracondylar humeral fractures comparing it with the literature, in order to identify useful information for a correct and better approach to reduce complications and improve clinical outcomes. 148 patients with a mean age of 5.72 ± 2.52 years and with Gartland type II-III-IV humeral supracondylar fractures were treated with CRPP at our Orthopedic Pediatric Unit. They were divided into three groups according to surgical technique. Group A was represented by patients treated with cross pinning (1 medial and 1 lateral pin), Group B represented by 2 lateral pins while Group C represented by 2 lateral and one medial pin. Evaluation criteria are based on Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI); Bauman's and Carrying Angle and Flynn's criteria. Data were recorded at the following times: T0 (before surgical procedure); T1 (one-month post-surgery); T2 (six months post-surgery). The three surgical techniques showed comparable results according to MEPI, Bauman's angle, Carrying's angle and Flynn's criteria from T0 to T1. There is an improvement for all Groups. Group C reported the best MEPI outcome at T2. However, 2 patients in this group did not show excellent results according to Flynn's criteria. There is no single and superior treatment for displaced humeral supracondylar fractures and that each fracture has its own personality.

Is implant choice associated with fixation strength for displaced radial neck fracture: a network meta-analysis of biomechanical studies

The multitude of fixation options for radial neck fractures, such as pins, screws, biodegradable pins and screws, locking plates, and blade plates, has led to a lack of consensus on the optimal implant choice and associated biomechanical properties. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical strength of various fixation constructs in axial, sagittal, and torsional loading directions. We included biomechanical studies comparing different interventions, such as cross/parallel screws, nonlocking plates with or without augmented screws, fixed angle devices (T or anatomic locking plates or blade plates), and cross pins. A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL EBSCO databases was conducted on September 26th, 2022. Data extraction was carried out by one author and verified by another. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Primary outcomes encompassed axial, bending, and torsional stiffness, while the secondary outcome was bending load to failure. Effect sizes were calculated for continuous outcomes, and relative treatment ranking was measured using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Our analysis encompassed eight studies, incorporating 172 specimens. The findings indicated that fixed angle constructs, specifically the anatomic locking plate, demonstrated superior axial stiffness (mean difference [MD]: 23.59 N/mm; 95% CI 8.12–39.06) in comparison to the cross screw. Additionally, the blade plate construct excelled in bending stiffness (MD: 32.37 N/mm; 95% CI − 47.37 to 112.11) relative to the cross screw construct, while the cross-screw construct proved to be the most robust in terms of bending load failure. The parallel screw construct performed optimally in torsional stiffness (MD: 139.39 Nm/degree; 95% CI 0.79–277.98) when compared to the cross screw construct. Lastly, the nonlocking plate, locking T plate, and cross-pin constructs were found to be inferior in most respects to alternative interventions. The NMA indicated that fixed angle devices (blade plate and anatomic locking plate) and screw fixations may exhibit enhanced biomechanical strength in axial and bending directions, whereas cross screws demonstrated reduced torsional stability in comparison to parallel screws. It is imperative for clinicians to consider the application of these findings in constraining forces across various directions during early range of motion exercises, taking into account the distinct biomechanical properties of the respective implants.

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF DISPLACED SUPRACONDYLAR HUMERUS FRACTURE IN CHILDREN MANAGED WITH PERCUTANEOUS PINNING - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Background: The majority of elbow injuries in children are supracondylar fractures of the humerus, accounting for around 60% of all elbow injuries in the rst ten years of life. Associated with complications like compartment syndrome, neurovascular damage, Volksman'sischaemic contracture and malunion. Two lateral pins or a cross pin construction are the most popular options for pinning. As compared to alternative treatment options, closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire xation are the most effective and least invasive. Complications like malunion, loss of reduction and compartment syndrome may arise from treating it conservatively. This research evaluates the functional and radiological results of closed reduction percutaneous K wire treatment for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Based on Materials and Methods: the inclusion and exclusion criteria from the consecutive sampling, 32 patients were chosen for the research. All patients had percutaneous K wirexation using the usual procedure. 20 children (63%) of them were affected in their rs Results: t decade of life, with a clear male predilection than females. Mayo elbow scoring was 2.5, 6.0 and 3.75 at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. PTI and Cubitus Rectus was noted in 8 and 2 respectively in our study population. Clinical outcomes measured by Flynn criteria was poor in 2 cases, satisfactorily excellent in 28 and satisfactorily good in 2 case. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning either by crossed conguration or by latera Conclusion: l pinning is the treatment of choice for paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Regardless of the conguration, the proper pinning method guarantees a successful result. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is a safe, cost-effective, less morbid procedure.

Clinical Evaluation of a Combination of Dynamic Intramedullary and Cross Pins Construct to Stabilize Supracondylar Femoral Fracture in Dogs

Clinical Evaluation of a Combination of Dynamic Intramedullary and Cross Pins Construct to Stabilize Supracondylar Femoral Fracture in Dogs

Cross-pin stabilisation of a distal femoral physeal fracture in a miniature Rex rabbit

This case report details the presentation, treatment and medium-term follow up for a distal femoral physeal fracture in a miniature Rex rabbit. A 5-month-old rabbit presented with right hindlimb lameness after attempting to escape and becoming entangled in a cage. On examination, instability affecting the distal right femur was noted, and radiographs revealed a Salter-Harris type I fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed under general anaesthesia using four 0.7 mm cross pins. Satisfactory clinical and radiographic progress was noted 3 weeks postoperatively. At postoperative follow up 6 weeks later, lameness was mild and by 12 weeks the lameness had resolved. Radiographs taken 12 weeks postoperatively revealed that alignment, apposition and implant placement had been maintained and there was no evidence of implant-associated complications. Clinical union had been achieved. Remote follow up with the owners 7 months postoperatively revealed that the rabbit had returned to normal activity levels and experienced no adverse sequelae following the fracture's repair. The satisfactory medium-term outcomes seen after cross-pin placement indicate that this may be an appropriate repair method for distal femoral Salter-Harris type I fractures in rabbits. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first succesful cross-pin stabilisation of a Salter-Harris type I fracture in a rabbit of this age.

Intramedullary K-wires versus Alternate Techniques for Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Intramedullary K-wire (IMKW) fixation is one of the mainstays for surgically treating metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. However, there remains a lack of literature comparing outcomes of the various available surgical repair techniques in all indicated metacarpals. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical advantages and drawbacks of IMKW compared with alternate fracture repair techniques. A comprehensive systematic literature review was performed to identify studies that compared clinical outcomes of IMKW to alternate metacarpal fixation modalities. Outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH/quickDASH) scores, grip strength, union rate, visual analog scale pain, operative time, and complications. A random-effects model was used to compare IMKW to the pooled effect of other fixation techniques. A total of 10 studies were included in our analysis, comprising 497 metacarpal fractures (220 shafts and 277 necks). IMKW fixation was identified as the control group in all studies. The pooled experimental group included plates, transverse K-wires (TKWs), interfragmentary screws (IFSs), and K-wire cross-pinning (CP). In treating metacarpal shaft fractures, IMKW showed significantly shorter operative time (p = 0.04; mean difference = − 13; 95% confidence interval = −26 to −0.64). No significant differences were observed in treating metacarpal neck fractures for disability, grip strength, healing rate, pain, operative time, or complication rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no difference in clinical outcomes among various surgical techniques for treating metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. Further high evidence studies are required that investigate the efficacy and safety of IFS, CP, TKW, and intramedullary screws versus IMKW for treating closed, unstable metacarpal fractures.

Is Lateral Onset Cross Pin Technique Strong Enough? A Biomechanical Study.

It is aimed to compare biomechanically the 3 different pin techniques and the lateral onset cross-pinning (LXP) technique in supracondylar humeral fractures. Biomechanical testing was performed on 52 synthetic humeriFour pin configurations techniques were tested: crossed pins (XP), 2 lateral pins (2LP), 3 lateral pins (3LP), and LXP technique. Biomechanical testing was performed on Shimadzu Autograph measuring machine. Each pin configuration was tested in a total of 13 humeri: 4 in varus bending, 4 in valgus bending, and 5 in flexion bending. Displacement (mm), and load (N) data were sampled at 10 Hz during each test. Varus values were statistically lower in 2 LP group comparing to XP, 3 LP, LXP groups (p=0.01, p=0.02, p=0.012, consequently). Flexion load values statistically lower in 2 LP group comparing to XP, 3 LP, LXP groups (p=0.03, p=0.001, p=0,031, consequently). There was no difference between the groups in terms of valgus values (p>0.05). LXP technique is biomechanically similar to the traditional XP technique. In situations where orthopedic surgeons choose to use medial pins in addition to lateral pins such as distal humerus fractures with medial-sided defects.

Surgical Treatment of Recent Traumatic Epiphyseal Detachments of the Distal Femur in the Orthopedic and Traumatological Surgery Department of the CHU Bocar Sidy Sall de Kati: About 20 Cases

Introduction: To our knowledge, no scientific study has been conducted at the university hospital of Kati on recent traumatic epiphyseal detachment fractures of the distal femur. However, every day, children present in consultation for knee trauma. Conjugal plate fractures are by definition single to children. Any break in any solution of continuity of this plate is called an epiphyseal fracture or detachment. Objectives: To evaluate the results of surgical treatment of traumatic epiphyseal in detachments of the distal femur recent in children and adolescents. Patients and Method: This was a 13-month prospectively collected longitudinal descriptive study from September 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. We identified and reviewed 20 medical records of recent traumatic epiphyseal detachments of the distal femur. The parameters studied were sociodemographic, lesion, surgical technique and evolutionary. Results: During the study period, the most affected group age was 12 to 17 years (85%) with an average of 14.65 ± 1.61 years (6 and 20 years). The victims were male (95%). The most frequent etiology was road traffic accident (95%), with a mean time to care of 26.42 ± 10.21 hours and Type II was frequently encountered (85%) with 35% of immediate complications. Cross-bracketing was the most commonly used surgical technique (85%). The result was good (65%). Conclusion: This study allowed us to observe a significant hospital incidence of epiphyseal detachment fractures of the distal femur. Cross pinning was the most commonly used surgical technique with fewer complications (35%) and a satisfactory result in 90% of cases.

Femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A network meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effectiveness of cortical button (CB), cross-pin (CP) and compression with interference screws (IS) fixation techniques in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring graft.MethodsStudies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to May 20, 2021. Primary outcomes were KT-1000 assessment, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score A or B, Lachman’s test, pivot-shift test, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, and Cincinnati Knee Score. Secondary outcomes included reconstruction failures and synovitis. League tables, rank probabilities and forest plots were drawn for efficacy comparison.ResultsTwenty-six controlled clinical trials (CCTs) with 1,824 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft were included. No significant differences were found among CB, CP and IS fixation methods regarding the 10 outcomes. For KT-1000 assessment, IKDC score A or B, Lachman’s test, VAS score and pivot-shift test, CP had the greatest probability of becoming the best method, and IS may be the suboptimal method in 4 out of these 5 outcomes except pivot-shift test.ConclusionsCP, CB and IS fixations have comparable clinical performance, while CP fixation is most likely to be the optimum fixation technique for hamstring graft in ACL reconstruction. Future larger-sample studies of high quality comparing these techniques in more clinical outcomes are required.

Management of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsies after cross pinning of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: A systematic review.

Purpose:Up to 4% of patients who undergo cross pinning of a pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture sustain an iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy (IUNP). This study aims to summarize the evidence regarding the management of IUNP in this setting, and to identify if early intervention (early wire removal or exploration) leads to faster and/or more complete recovery of the ulnar nerve.Methods:A formal systematic review was undertaken, with databases searched including Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane central. This was performed in accordance with JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines.Results:In all, 26 articles were included in final evaluation, reporting a total of 179 IUNP. In all, 153 cases (85%) were managed expectantly, reporting full recovery at final follow-up (average 4.5 months) in 140 cases (91%). There were 26 cases of IUNP which were managed with early wire removal and/or exploration, of which 22 had full recovery (85%). There were 17 cases of 179 (9%) which did not have full recovery.Conclusion:The majority of IUNP are managed expectantly, with approximately 90% achieving full recovery at final follow-up. The literature does not support early wire removal and/or exploration, possibly because the damage to the nerve is done at the time of wire placement.

Is High-dose Radiation Therapy Associated With Early Revision Due to Aseptic Loosening in Patients With a Sarcoma of the Lower Extremities Reconstructed With a Cemented Endoprosthesis?

Is High-dose Radiation Therapy Associated With Early Revision Due to Aseptic Loosening in Patients With a Sarcoma of the Lower Extremities Reconstructed With a Cemented Endoprosthesis?

EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES TREATED WITH CRISSCROSS VS LATERAL PINNING

Introduction : Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common elbow fractures seen in children. The peak age is 5 to 6 years .Gartland classified these fractures in to extension and flexion type with former being most common. Extension injuries are further divided in to un displaced (type 1),partially displaced with intact posterior cortex(type 2),completely displaced (type 3).Type 2 and type 3 fractures requires intervention (closed reduction and pinning). In this scenario, our study is designed to know the functional outcome of Criss cross pinning versus lateral pinning in supracondylar humerus fractures Aim : 1. To restore the anatomy of the distal end of the humerus with percutaneous Kirschner's wire fixation. 2. To evaluate the functional and cosmetic outcome of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children treated with cross pinning and lateral pinning. Materials And Methods : A prospective study with 30 cases of Gartland type 2 and type 3 supracondylar fracture humerus, treated by lateral ( n=16 ) and criss cross ( n=14 ) pinning, was conducted between October 2018 to october 2020. The results were expressed as mean and standard deviation and p&lt;0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : In this study, among thirty patients, cross pinning was done in fourteen patients (46.67%), and lateral pinning was done in sixteen patients (53.33%). All patients had satisfactory results according to Flynn's criteria.Conclusion : There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome, i.e. loss of carrying angle, and in functional outcome i.e.; loss of flexion in degrees between crisscross Kirschner wire fixation and lateral Kirschner wire fixation in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.